Academic year 2022 - 2023

•   Basic geodetic calculations LA19GE02-3003 02.01.2023-28.04.2023  5 credits  (BYL21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  After passing the course the student is expected to:
  - be able to define, identify and describe basic concepts in geodetic calculations
  - be able to understand basic principles for geodetic calculations
  - be able to perform, explain and defend the basic principles of geodetic calculations
  - be able to compare and select a method for non-predetermined geodetic calculation data

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  - calculation of coordinates and release measures with calculator and computer program
  - calculation of non-predetermined intersections in flat coordinate systems with calculator and computer programs
  - smoothing of polygon trains

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student shall be able to perform basic coordinate calculations and setting out calculations.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student shall be able to carry out coordinate calculations from different types of intersections in plane coordinate systems.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shall be able to calculate a traverse

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 28.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 17.01.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYL21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anders Ahlbäck

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying)

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basics of Infrastructure Construction BYV22GR04-3001 02.01.2023-28.04.2023  4 credits  (BYL21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  Must understand the importance of infrastructure as part of building activities
  Must understand basic concepts and design methods
  Master basic street technology, basic infra-construction and water supply

  Prerequisites

  Not needed

  Content of the study unit

  Infrastructure as part of construction activities
  Geometric and structural engineering planning of streets and roads
  Lifecycle thinking and the environmental impact of infrastructure
  Laws, norms and organizations in infrastructure

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Understands how infrastructure is related to other construction activities
  Knows different machines used when working with soil materials
  Understands in general the planning methods for and execution of street and road constructions
  Understands how society's water supply is arranged
  Knows about legislation, organizations and norms in the infra-construction field

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Understands how infrastructure is related to other construction activities and understands the factors that influence the development of traffic routes and other infrastructure
  Is familiar with various earthmoving machines and can calculate cost estimates for different types of earthmoving works
  Can state a simple road or street plan and understand different stages of work on how the street is built and maintained
  Knows about legislation, organizations and norms in the industry

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Is familiar with various forms of infrastructure and knows well the factors that influence the development of traffic routes and other infrastructure
  Is familiar with various earthmoving machines and understands how to construct cost calculations for different types of earthmoving based on drawings and models
  Can state a simple road or street plan and master different work phases how the street is built and maintained
  Knows about legislation, organizations and norms in the industry.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Given during course

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Exercices
  Computer planning
  Excursion

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 28.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 16.01.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYL21D-V
  • BYS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Tom Lipkin

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  None

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Excursion

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring 2023

  Student's schedule and workload

  Infrastructure as part of construction activities
  Geometric and structural engineering planning of streets and roads
  Lifecycle thinking and the environmental impact of infrastructure
  Laws, norms and organizations in infrastructure

  Content scheduling

  Infrastructure as part of construction activities
  Geometric and structural engineering planning of streets and roads
  Lifecycle thinking and the environmental impact of infrastructure
  Laws, norms and organizations in infrastructure

  Assessment criteria

  Student lack basic knowledge in infrastructure

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Understands how infrastructure is related to other construction activities
  Knows different machines used when working with soil materials
  Understands in general the planning methods for and execution of street and road constructions
  Understands how society's water supply is arranged
  Knows about legislation, organizations and norms in the infra-construction field

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Understands how infrastructure is related to other construction activities and understands the factors that influence the development of traffic routes and other infrastructure
  Is familiar with various earthmoving machines and can calculate cost estimates for different types of earthmoving works
  Can state a simple road or street plan and understand different stages of work on how the street is built and maintained
  Knows about legislation, organizations and norms in the industry

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Is familiar with various forms of infrastructure and knows well the factors that influence the development of traffic routes and other infrastructure
  Is familiar with various earthmoving machines and understands how to construct cost calculations for different types of earthmoving based on drawings and models
  Can state a simple road or street plan and master different work phases how the street is built and maintained
  Knows about legislation, organizations and norms in the industry.

•   Finnish TKV18FI01-3020 04.03.2023-30.04.2023  2 credits  (MAP21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  A good general vocabulary
  To master the central grammar
  Understanding general Finnish texts (factual texts, articles, etc.)
  Understanding and being able to write everyday life's letters and messages
  Orally coping with everyday situations

  Prerequisites

  Second stage course in Finnish.
  The starting level is B1, which corresponds to C in long Finnish (A-Finnish) or M in short Finnish (B-Finnish) in the student.

  Content of the study unit

  Repetition of the central grammar
  School and studies
  Working life
  Environment
  Daily situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Study material and compendium on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  - oral and written exercises
  - own work, assignments
  - shorter lectures
  - attendance 80 %

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The assessment is based on
  - class activity
  - assignments
  - exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2023 - 30.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 03.03.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • MAP21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pernilla Fagerström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam during last lesson
  Retake on general re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 credits = 54 h work (c. 24 h in class, c. 30 h own work)

  Assessment criteria

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

•   Finnish TKV18FI01-3019 01.01.2023-04.03.2023  2 credits  (PRE21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  A good general vocabulary
  To master the central grammar
  Understanding general Finnish texts (factual texts, articles, etc.)
  Understanding and being able to write everyday life's letters and messages
  Orally coping with everyday situations

  Prerequisites

  Second stage course in Finnish.
  The starting level is B1, which corresponds to C in long Finnish (A-Finnish) or M in short Finnish (B-Finnish) in the student.

  Content of the study unit

  Repetition of the central grammar
  School and studies
  Working life
  Environment
  Daily situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Study material and compendium on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  - oral and written exercises
  - own work, assignments
  - shorter lectures
  - attendance 80 %

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The assessment is based on
  - class activity
  - assignments
  - exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 04.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • PRE21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pernilla Fagerström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam during last lesson
  Retake on general re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 credits = 54 h work (c. 24 h in class, c. 30 h own work)

  Assessment criteria

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

•   Finnish TKV18FI01-3017 24.10.2022-11.12.2022  2 credits  (ELA21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  A good general vocabulary
  To master the central grammar
  Understanding general Finnish texts (factual texts, articles, etc.)
  Understanding and being able to write everyday life's letters and messages
  Orally coping with everyday situations

  Prerequisites

  Second stage course in Finnish.
  The starting level is B1, which corresponds to C in long Finnish (A-Finnish) or M in short Finnish (B-Finnish) in the student.

  Content of the study unit

  Repetition of the central grammar
  School and studies
  Working life
  Environment
  Daily situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5). In order to complete the course with an approved grade (grade 1), the student should have the knowledge required for level B1.1. Approved grades in this course are required to participate in the Työelämän suomi course.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ronnie Sundsten

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Study material and compendium on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  - language of teaching Finnish
  - oral and written exercises
  - own work, assignments
  - shorter lectures
  - attendance 80 %

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The assessment is based on
  - class activity
  - assignments
  - exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.10.2022 - 11.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 24.10.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • ELA21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • ELA21-V-S (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA21-V-Y (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pernilla Fagerström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam during last lesson
  Retake on general re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 credits = 54 h work (c. 24 h in class, c. 30 h own work)

  Assessment criteria

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the assessment of knowledge in Finnish as a second domestic, Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used. Level B1 indicates satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

•   Finnish - Oral Skills YH10FI01-M-3096 01.08.2022-31.07.2023  (BYS20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.07.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 31.07.2023

  Group(s)

  • BYS20D-V
  • BYL20D-V
  • ELA20D-V
  • PRE20D-V
  • MAP20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors, Pernilla Fagerström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish - Writing Skills YH10FI01-S-3090 01.08.2022-31.07.2023  (BYS20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.07.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 31.07.2023

  Group(s)

  • BYS20D-V
  • BYL20D-V
  • ELA20D-V
  • PRE20D-V
  • MAP20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors, Pernilla Fagerström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish for Working Life TKV18FI02-3016 29.08.2022-30.10.2022  4 credits  (MAP20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  To master the central vocabulary in the own field
  To deal with work-related situations orally and in writing
  To be able to write different types of texts and prepare different types of documents
  Understand and be able to make use of information from texts (articles, official documents etc.) concerning the own industry
  To be able to give a structured presentation in Finnish
  Being able to attend and lead a meeting in Finnish
  Orally and in writing master the central grammar

  Prerequisites

  Suomi

  Content of the study unit

  Working life and own field
  Entrepreneurship
  Business Communications
  Meeting technology and terminology
  Thesis abstract

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Kaj Rintanen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Compendium + other material on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  - Language of teaching Finnish
  - Interactive lessons (attendance 75 %)
  - Shorter lectures
  - Pair and group discussions
  - Written exercises and written assignments
  - Own work
  - Presentation and opposition
  - Oral and written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assessment on the basis of
  - Oral exam, oral presentation and other oral exercises (including kokous)
  - Written exams/tests
  - Written assignments
  - Class activity
  - Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 30.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 30.08.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • MAP20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • MAP20-V-K (Size: 55. Open university: 0.)
  • MAP20-V-B (Size: 55. Open university: 0.)
  • MAP20-V-D (Size: 55. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors, Pernilla Fagerström

  Additional information

  Remember to also sign up for the written and oral parts:
  YH10FI01-M-3096
  YH10FI01-S-3090

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Bilingual students can take the course partially at a distance. Some occasions are mandatory for everyone. More info on the first lesson.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam during the last lesson.
  Retake on general re-examination.

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 credits = 108 h work (c. 42 h in class, c. 66 h own work)

  Assessment criteria

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

•   Finnish for Working Life TKV18FI02-3017 29.08.2022-30.10.2022  4 credits  (PRE20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  To master the central vocabulary in the own field
  To deal with work-related situations orally and in writing
  To be able to write different types of texts and prepare different types of documents
  Understand and be able to make use of information from texts (articles, official documents etc.) concerning the own industry
  To be able to give a structured presentation in Finnish
  Being able to attend and lead a meeting in Finnish
  Orally and in writing master the central grammar

  Prerequisites

  Suomi

  Content of the study unit

  Working life and own field
  Entrepreneurship
  Business Communications
  Meeting technology and terminology
  Thesis abstract

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Roger Nylund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Compendium + other material on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  - Language of teaching Finnish
  - Interactive lessons (attendance 75 %)
  - Shorter lectures
  - Pair and group discussions
  - Written exercises and written assignments
  - Own work
  - Presentation and opposition
  - Oral and written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assessment on the basis of
  - Oral exam, oral presentation and other oral exercises (including kokous)
  - Written exams/tests
  - Written assignments
  - Class activity
  - Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 30.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 30.08.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • PRE20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors

  Additional information

  Remember to also sign up for the written and oral parts:
  YH10FI01-M-3096
  YH10FI01-S-3090

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Bilingual students can take the course partially at a distance. Some occasions are mandatory for everyone. More info on the first lesson.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam during the last lesson.
  Retake on general re-examination.

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 credits = 108 h work (c. 42 h in class, c. 66 h own work)

  Assessment criteria

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

•   Finnish for Working Life TKV18FI02-3018 29.08.2022-04.12.2022  4 credits  (BYS20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  To master the central vocabulary in the own field
  To deal with work-related situations orally and in writing
  To be able to write different types of texts and prepare different types of documents
  Understand and be able to make use of information from texts (articles, official documents etc.) concerning the own industry
  To be able to give a structured presentation in Finnish
  Being able to attend and lead a meeting in Finnish
  Orally and in writing master the central grammar

  Prerequisites

  Suomi

  Content of the study unit

  Working life and own field
  Entrepreneurship
  Business Communications
  Meeting technology and terminology
  Thesis abstract

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Leif Östman

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Compendium + other material on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  - Language of teaching Finnish
  - Interactive lessons (attendance 75 %)
  - Shorter lectures
  - Pair and group discussions
  - Written exercises and written assignments
  - Own work
  - Presentation and opposition
  - Oral and written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assessment on the basis of
  - Oral exam, oral presentation and other oral exercises (including kokous)
  - Written exams/tests
  - Written assignments
  - Class activity
  - Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 04.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 29.08.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYS20D-V
  • BYL20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors

  Additional information

  Remember to also sign up for the written and oral parts:
  YH10FI01-M-3096
  YH10FI01-S-3090

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Bilingual students can take the course partially at a distance. Some occasions are mandatory for everyone. More info on the first lesson.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam during the last lesson.
  Retake on general re-examination.

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 credits = 108 h work (c. 42 h in class, c. 66 h own work)

  Assessment criteria

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

•   Finnish for Working Life TKV18FI02-3019 03.10.2022-18.12.2022  4 credits  (ELA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  To master the central vocabulary in the own field
  To deal with work-related situations orally and in writing
  To be able to write different types of texts and prepare different types of documents
  Understand and be able to make use of information from texts (articles, official documents etc.) concerning the own industry
  To be able to give a structured presentation in Finnish
  Being able to attend and lead a meeting in Finnish
  Orally and in writing master the central grammar

  Prerequisites

  Suomi

  Content of the study unit

  Working life and own field
  Entrepreneurship
  Business Communications
  Meeting technology and terminology
  Thesis abstract

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ronnie Sundsten

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Compendium + other material on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  - Language of teaching Finnish
  - Interactive lessons (attendance 75 %)
  - Shorter lectures
  - Pair and group discussions
  - Written exercises and written assignments
  - Own work
  - Presentation and opposition
  - Oral and written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assessment on the basis of
  - Oral exam, oral presentation and other oral exercises (including kokous)
  - Written exams/tests
  - Written assignments
  - Class activity
  - Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 02.10.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • ELA20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • ELA20-V-A (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA20-V-E (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA20-V-K (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA20-V-I (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors, Pernilla Fagerström

  Additional information

  Remember to also sign up for the written and oral parts:
  YH10FI01-M-3096
  YH10FI01-S-3090

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Bilingual students can take the course partially at a distance. Some occasions are mandatory for everyone. More info on the first lesson.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam during the last lesson.
  Retake on general re-examination.

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 credits = 108 h work (c. 42 h in class, c. 66 h own work)

  Assessment criteria

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The assessment of the knowledge in Finnish is based on the European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR). Level B1 refers to satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 refers to good knowledge (grades 4–5). The same assessment criteria are used at all universities in Finland. Level A2 or lower is failed.
  Oral and written proficiency is assessed with different grades.

•   Geodetic coordinate systems LA19GE03-3003 02.01.2023-07.04.2023  5 credits  (BYL21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  After passing the course the student is expected to:
  - be able to define, identify and describe basic concepts related to geodetic coordinate systems
  - be able to understand basic principles for the construction of geodetic coordinate systems
  - be able to explain and defend the basic principles of coordinate transformation
  - be able to choose a method for coordinate transformation, both in relation to theory and practice

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  - terminology relating to coordinate systems
  - different types of geodetic coordinate systems and map projections
  - the coordinate systems used in our country
  - transformation of coordinates between geodetic coordinate systems

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student shall be familiar with the core terminology in geodesy as well as the most common coordinate systems.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student shall be able to describe the mathematic relations between the coordinate systems.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shall be able to carry out coordinate transformations between the coordinate systems in Finland.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2023 - 07.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 17.01.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYL21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anders Ahlbäck

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying)

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Geodetic software LA19GE04-3003 13.02.2023-28.04.2023  5 credits  (BYL21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  fter passing the course the student is expected to:
  - be able to define, identify and use functions in a geodetic computer program
  - be able to understand basic principles of geodetic computer programs
  - be able to explain and defend the basic principles of geodetic computer programs
  - be able to compare and critically evaluate computational functions in geodetic computer programs, both in relation to theory and practice

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  - practical use of geodetic computer programs
  - calculation of coordinates
  - settlement of terrain models
  - calculation of volumes using different methods
  - editing of pointclouds

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Can perform coordinate calculations with geodetic computer program

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Can build digital terrain models with geodetic software

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Can perform volume calculations and edit pointclouds with geodetic computer program

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.02.2023 - 28.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 17.01.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYL21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sem Timmerbacka

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying)

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Hydromechanics and Thermal Physics TKV18HV01-3017 05.09.2022-18.12.2022  4 credits  (BYL21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  To teach basic concepts and important relationships for understanding heat and the thermal properties of matter. The course also includes laboratory work, analyzing measurements and writing reports on the results.

  Prerequisites

  Mechanics (recommended)

  Content of the study unit

  Pressure, Archimedes' principle and buoyancy
  Fluid flow, linear and quadratic drag
  Heat and temperature
  Heat capacity and calorimetry
  Phase transitions
  Humidity
  Heating value and combustion
  Heating processes with continuous flows
  The ideal gas law
  Heat transfer mechanisms
  Heat conduction through layers
  Analysing and reporting measurements from laboratory work (measurement uncertainty, regression analysis)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  - Can carry out measurements according to instructions and correctly record measurements.
  - Can assess the uncertainty of a measured value.
  - Can calculate with propagation of errors.
  - Can write a report containing all the essential structural elements and present results in an understandable way.
  - Can calculate hydrostatic pressure.
  - Can use the continuity condition.
  - Can determine the nature of the flow (laminar/turbulent) in a pipe.
  - Understands central quantities and concepts in heat theory.
  - Can make simple calculations with heat expansion, gas laws, heat capacity and heat transport.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  - Can plan measurements to obtain representative values.
  - Can systematically note measurements.
  - Can calculate uncertainties with regression analysis.
  - Can assess the relative impact of measurement uncertainties on the uncertainty of the end result.
  - Can write a report with correct formalism regarding units, notation, rounding, table structure and graphical presentation.
  - Can calculate forces on bodies in a fluid, both at rest and in relative motion.
  - Can do calorimetric calculations.
  - Can apply the ideal gas law to closed systems.
  - Can calculate heat transfer through flat walls.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  - Can perform measurements efficiently and systematically.
  - Can plan the measurements and make corrections to determine the final results with good accuracy.
  - Can perform an uncertainty analysis by linearizing physical relationships.
  - Can write a report that is balanced, economical and virtually free from formal errors.
  - Can present the data and analysis process in a systematic and easy to read manner.
  - Can calculate the motion for a body falling though a fluid.
  - Can perform calorimetric calculations with phase transitions.
  - Can apply the ideal gas law to open systems.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Leif Östman

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kompendium och annat material delas på kurssidan (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar och övningar
  Laborationer med rapportering
  Inlämningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsordet baserar sig på labbrapporter, inlämningsuppgifter och tentamen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYL21D-V
  • BYS21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Group A (Size: 30. Open university: 0.)
  • Group B (Size: 30. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anders Skjäl

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen mot slutet av kursen
  Två omtagningsmöjligheter på specificerade allmänna omtagningstillfällen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  108 h
  Närundervisning 38 h
  Laboratoriearbete 12 h
  Rapportering 16 h
  Inlämningsuppgifter 22 h
  Självstudier 20 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Uppnår inte kriterierna för vitsordet 1. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  - Kan genomföra mätningar enligt anvisningar och korrekt notera uppmätta resultat.
  - Kan bedöma osäkerheten hos ett uppmätt värde.
  - Kan beräkna osäkerhetsprogression.
  - Kan skriva en rapport som innehåller alla väsentliga strukturella element och presentera resultat på ett förståeligt sätt.
  - Kan räkna hydrostatiskt tryck.
  - Kan använda kontinuitetsvillkoret.
  - Kan för rörströmning avgöra strömningens karaktär.
  - Förstår innebörden av centrala storheter och begrepp i värmeläran.
  - Kan göra enkla beräkningar med värmeutvidgning, gaslagar, värmekapacitet och värmetransport. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  - Kan planera mätningar för att erhålla representativa och väl spridda värden.
  - Kan systematiskt notera uppmätta resultat.
  - Kan beräkna osäkerhet genom regressionsanalys.
  - Kan bedöma den relativa inverkan av mätosäkerheten hos olika uppmätta variabler på slutresultatets osäkerhet.
  - Kan skriva en rapport med huvudsakligen korrekt formalism gällande enheter, beteckningar, avrundning, tabellstruktur och grafisk presentation
  - Kan beräkna krafter på kroppar i en fluid både i vila och i relativ rörelse.
  - Kan göra kalorimetriska beräkningar.
  - Kan tillämpa idealgaslagen på slutna system.
  - Kan räkna värmegenomgång genom plan vägg. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  - Kan effektivt och systematiskt utföra mätningar.
  - Kan planera dessa och vidta korrigerande åtgärder så att slutresultat med god noggrannhet erhålls.
  - Kan göra en osäkerhetsanalys genom att linearisera fysikaliska samband.
  - Kan skriva en rapport som är balanserad, ekonomisk och så gott som fri från formella fel.
  - Kan presentera data och analysprocessen på ett systematiskt och lättläst sätt.
  - Kan räkna fallrörelse för kropp i fluid.
  - Kan göra kalorimetriska beräkningar med fasövergångar.
  - Kan tillämpa idealgaslagen på öppna system. (not translated)

•   Master planning LA19PL02-3003 06.03.2023-28.04.2023  5 credits  (BYL21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - knows about central themes in master planning and different types of master plans
  - understands how a master plan is structured, and what its legal effects are
  - can create planning documents for a general plan
  - can assess difficulties and benefits with general planning

  Prerequisites

  Detailed planning
  CAD

  Content of the study unit

  Instructions and legislation on master plans of different types
  Software for GIS-based analyzes and documents

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Has the most basic insights into legislation and instructions on master planning, and understands the principles of dimensioning in master plans and can produce a simple master plan including calculations and can present a simple plan description

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Has basic insights into legislation and instructions on master planning, and understands the principles of dimensioning in master plans and can produce a master plan including calculations and can present a simple plan description

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Understands legislation and instructions on master planning, understands the principles of dimensioning in master plans and can produce a flawless general plan including flawless calculations and can present a clear and descriptive plan description

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.03.2023 - 28.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 21.03.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYL21D-V
  • BYL20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Barbara Påfs, Leif Östman

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying)

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Swedish for Engineers TKV22SV01-3005 31.07.2023-29.10.2023  3 credits  (MAP23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistic way.
  - is aware of different ways of looking for information and can use it as well as can report according to standard arrangements.
  - can use the reference system and know the work process for scientific writing.

  Prerequisites

  none

  Content of the study unit

  - Summary's or other longer writing assignments
  - Trade Essay
  - Official letters (meeting documents, business letters)
  - Presentation technique and lectures
  - Language care as needed
  - Rules for written reports and scientific work
  - Application according to specific education may occur.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partly stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment. Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources
  to a task but the sources are superficial and elementary. Reporting: Ability to compile a report in which the rules for standard layout are to some extent stated. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable. Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude. Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style. Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task. Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is understandable and functional. Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given. Written presentation: Excellent writing ability that shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless writing language. Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources for a task. Reporting: Excellent ability to set up
  a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free. Reference system: Excellent ability to use
  one or more reference systems and know in which subject areas it is used.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.07.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  29.07.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • MAP23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Swedish for Engineers TKV22SV01-3003 01.01.2023-12.02.2023  3 credits  (ÖH22ELA-LED-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistic way.
  - is aware of different ways of looking for information and can use it as well as can report according to standard arrangements.
  - can use the reference system and know the work process for scientific writing.

  Prerequisites

  none

  Content of the study unit

  - Summary's or other longer writing assignments
  - Trade Essay
  - Official letters (meeting documents, business letters)
  - Presentation technique and lectures
  - Language care as needed
  - Rules for written reports and scientific work
  - Application according to specific education may occur.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partly stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment. Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources
  to a task but the sources are superficial and elementary. Reporting: Ability to compile a report in which the rules for standard layout are to some extent stated. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable. Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude. Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style. Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task. Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is understandable and functional. Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given. Written presentation: Excellent writing ability that shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless writing language. Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources for a task. Reporting: Excellent ability to set up
  a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free. Reference system: Excellent ability to use
  one or more reference systems and know in which subject areas it is used.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Study material at Moodle. Svenska skrivregler (2017) Myndigheternas skrivregler (2014)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussions, writing exercises, reports and oral presentations. Some tasks are done in pairs.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is evaluated on the basis of assignments, oral and written. For an approved performance, all assignments must be approved, as well as written interviews. The student has shown that he / she has mastered the given writing rules, can compile linguistically correct documents and is able to orally present a given topic to the public.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 12.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH22ELA-LED-V
  • ELA22D-V

  Small group(s)

  • ELA22-S (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA22-Y (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Other occasions for the rehearsal on re-examination occasions.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours work for 3 credits, of which 30 hours in class and 51 hours work on their own time.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  does not meet the requirements for the grade 1.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partially stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment.
  Written presentation: Responsible written ability demonstrating uncertainty regarding rewrite rules and expressing ice cream.
  Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources of a task but the sources erratic and elementary.
  Reporting: Ability to prepare a report in which the rules for the standard layout appear to some extent. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable.
  Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude.
  Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style.
  Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task.
  Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is
  understandable and functioning.
  Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given.
  Written presentation: Excellent writing ability which shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless written language.
  Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources of a task.
  Reporting: Excellent ability to produce a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free.
  Reference system: Excellent ability to use one or more reference systems and to know in which subject areas it is used.

•   Swedish for Engineers TKV22SV01-3001 29.08.2022-16.10.2022  3 credits  (MAP22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistic way.
  - is aware of different ways of looking for information and can use it as well as can report according to standard arrangements.
  - can use the reference system and know the work process for scientific writing.

  Prerequisites

  none

  Content of the study unit

  - Summary's or other longer writing assignments
  - Trade Essay
  - Official letters (meeting documents, business letters)
  - Presentation technique and lectures
  - Language care as needed
  - Rules for written reports and scientific work
  - Application according to specific education may occur.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partly stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment. Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources
  to a task but the sources are superficial and elementary. Reporting: Ability to compile a report in which the rules for standard layout are to some extent stated. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable. Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude. Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style. Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task. Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is understandable and functional. Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given. Written presentation: Excellent writing ability that shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless writing language. Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources for a task. Reporting: Excellent ability to set up
  a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free. Reference system: Excellent ability to use
  one or more reference systems and know in which subject areas it is used.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Kaj Rintanen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Study material at Moodle. Svenska skrivregler (2017) Myndigheternas skrivregler (2014)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussions, writing exercises, reports and oral presentations. Some tasks are done in pairs.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is evaluated on the basis of assignments, oral and written. For an approved performance, all assignments must be approved, as well as written interviews. The student has shown that he / she has mastered the given writing rules, can compile linguistically correct documents and is able to orally present a given topic to the public.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 16.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • MAP22D-V
  • ÖH22MAP-LED-V
  • ÖH22ULA-LED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Other occasions for the rehearsal on re-examination occasions.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours work for 3 credits, of which 30 hours in class and 51 hours work on their own time.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  does not meet the requirements for the grade 1.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partially stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment.
  Written presentation: Responsible written ability demonstrating uncertainty regarding rewrite rules and expressing ice cream.
  Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources of a task but the sources erratic and elementary.
  Reporting: Ability to prepare a report in which the rules for the standard layout appear to some extent. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable.
  Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude.
  Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style.
  Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task.
  Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is
  understandable and functioning.
  Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given.
  Written presentation: Excellent writing ability which shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless written language.
  Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources of a task.
  Reporting: Excellent ability to produce a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free.
  Reference system: Excellent ability to use one or more reference systems and to know in which subject areas it is used.

•   Swedish for Engineers TKV22SV01-3002 24.10.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (BYS22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistic way.
  - is aware of different ways of looking for information and can use it as well as can report according to standard arrangements.
  - can use the reference system and know the work process for scientific writing.

  Prerequisites

  none

  Content of the study unit

  - Summary's or other longer writing assignments
  - Trade Essay
  - Official letters (meeting documents, business letters)
  - Presentation technique and lectures
  - Language care as needed
  - Rules for written reports and scientific work
  - Application according to specific education may occur.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partly stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment. Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources
  to a task but the sources are superficial and elementary. Reporting: Ability to compile a report in which the rules for standard layout are to some extent stated. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable. Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude. Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style. Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task. Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is understandable and functional. Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given. Written presentation: Excellent writing ability that shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless writing language. Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources for a task. Reporting: Excellent ability to set up
  a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free. Reference system: Excellent ability to use
  one or more reference systems and know in which subject areas it is used.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Leif Östman

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Study material at Moodle. Svenska skrivregler (2017) Myndigheternas skrivregler (2014)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussions, writing exercises, reports and oral presentations. Some tasks are done in pairs.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is evaluated on the basis of assignments, oral and written. For an approved performance, all assignments must be approved, as well as written interviews. The student has shown that he / she has mastered the given writing rules, can compile linguistically correct documents and is able to orally present a given topic to the public.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 30.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYS22D-V
  • BYL22D-V
  • ÖH22ULA-LED-V
  • ÖH22BYS-LED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Other occasions for the rehearsal on re-examination occasions.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours work for 3 credits, of which 30 hours in class and 51 hours work on their own time.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  does not meet the requirements for the grade 1.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partially stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment.
  Written presentation: Responsible written ability demonstrating uncertainty regarding rewrite rules and expressing ice cream.
  Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources of a task but the sources erratic and elementary.
  Reporting: Ability to prepare a report in which the rules for the standard layout appear to some extent. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable.
  Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude.
  Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style.
  Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task.
  Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is
  understandable and functioning.
  Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given.
  Written presentation: Excellent writing ability which shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless written language.
  Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources of a task.
  Reporting: Excellent ability to produce a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free.
  Reference system: Excellent ability to use one or more reference systems and to know in which subject areas it is used.

•   Swedish for Engineers TKV22SV01-3004 01.01.2023-05.03.2023  3 credits  (PRE22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistic way.
  - is aware of different ways of looking for information and can use it as well as can report according to standard arrangements.
  - can use the reference system and know the work process for scientific writing.

  Prerequisites

  none

  Content of the study unit

  - Summary's or other longer writing assignments
  - Trade Essay
  - Official letters (meeting documents, business letters)
  - Presentation technique and lectures
  - Language care as needed
  - Rules for written reports and scientific work
  - Application according to specific education may occur.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partly stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment. Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources
  to a task but the sources are superficial and elementary. Reporting: Ability to compile a report in which the rules for standard layout are to some extent stated. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable. Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude. Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style. Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task. Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is understandable and functional. Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given. Written presentation: Excellent writing ability that shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless writing language. Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources for a task. Reporting: Excellent ability to set up
  a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free. Reference system: Excellent ability to use
  one or more reference systems and know in which subject areas it is used.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Study material at Moodle. Svenska skrivregler (2017) Myndigheternas skrivregler (2014)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussions, writing exercises, reports and oral presentations. Some tasks are done in pairs.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is evaluated on the basis of assignments, oral and written. For an approved performance, all assignments must be approved, as well as written interviews. The student has shown that he / she has mastered the given writing rules, can compile linguistically correct documents and is able to orally present a given topic to the public.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2023 - 05.03.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.12.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • PRE22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Other occasions for the rehearsal on re-examination occasions.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours work for 3 credits, of which 30 hours in class and 51 hours work on their own time.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  does not meet the requirements for the grade 1.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Oral presentation: Responsible presentation ability characterized by partially stylistically inappropriate language, unstructured content and lack of commitment.
  Written presentation: Responsible written ability demonstrating uncertainty regarding rewrite rules and expressing ice cream.
  Information retrieval: Ability to search for sources of a task but the sources erratic and elementary.
  Reporting: Ability to prepare a report in which the rules for the standard layout appear to some extent. The language is poor and there are errors, but the report text is understandable.
  Reference system: Attempts to use a reference system and succeed to some extent.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Oral presentation: Good presentation ability characterized by structured content, suitable language and positive attitude.
  Written presentation: Good written ability which shows that the writer has mastered writing rules and has a sense of style.
  Information retrieval: Good ability to gather reliable sources for a task.
  Reporting: Good ability to prepare a clear report in accordance with the rules for standard layout. The language is
  understandable and functioning.
  Reference system: Good ability to use a reference system in a functional way.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Oral presentation: Excellent presentation ability characterized by well thought out and well structured content, clear and versatile language and positive attitude to the topic and situation. A knowledgeable impression is given.
  Written presentation: Excellent writing ability which shows that the writer uses a versatile, clean and flawless written language.
  Information retrieval: Excellent ability to critically search for reliable and credible sources of a task.
  Reporting: Excellent ability to produce a well-structured and visually appealing report. The report text is well written, adapted to the subject and error free.
  Reference system: Excellent ability to use one or more reference systems and to know in which subject areas it is used.

•   Technical Reporting TKV18TR01-3015 02.03.2023-30.04.2023  3 credits  (PRE20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student can report and document within the area of ​​competence. She is familiar with writing and layout rules and knows the style level that is appropriate in a formal text. The student can plan an assignment and make associated documentation using critically selected sources of various kinds. The documentation is rooted in practical and theoretical knowledge in the field. They master one or more reference systems.

  Prerequisites

  Swedish for Engineers

  Content of the study unit

  Information retrieval, the work process for more extensive reporting such as degree projects, reference systems, evaluation of reports, rules for written reports and scientific work.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Exercise assignments and lecture material on Moodle.
  Literature:
  Backman, J., 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Nyberg, R. & Tidström A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, writing assignments in groups, literature studies, oral presentations.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved/Rejected

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.03.2023 - 30.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • PRE20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Guest lecturer from Tritonia.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Then on re-examination occasions or other agreement.

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours of work for the student during the course divided into 30 hours of work in class and 51 hours of work on their own.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  For approved performance, the following is required:
  Reporting: Ability to report and document within the area of ​​expertise. She has mastered writing and layout rules that distinguish documentation at degree level and know the style level that is appropriate in a formal reporting text in the field of technology.
  Scientific writing: Have the readiness to plan and complete a comprehensive development and project assignment and know the work process for scientific writing. Have preparedness to present grounded reasoning and grounded conclusions. Know and can use writing manuals. Can use one or more
  reference.
  Reading and reviewing: Ability to critically read and review reports in the area of ​​competence and prepare for oral opposition.
  Information retrieval: Ability to critically and systematically search sources and access them in content for written and oral assignments in the area of ​​competence

•   Technical Reporting TKV18TR01-3017 20.02.2023-28.04.2023  3 credits  (BYL20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student can report and document within the area of ​​competence. She is familiar with writing and layout rules and knows the style level that is appropriate in a formal text. The student can plan an assignment and make associated documentation using critically selected sources of various kinds. The documentation is rooted in practical and theoretical knowledge in the field. They master one or more reference systems.

  Prerequisites

  Swedish for Engineers

  Content of the study unit

  Information retrieval, the work process for more extensive reporting such as degree projects, reference systems, evaluation of reports, rules for written reports and scientific work.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Exercise assignments and lecture material on Moodle.
  Literature:
  Backman, J., 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Nyberg, R. & Tidström A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, writing assignments in groups, literature studies, oral presentations.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved/Rejected

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.02.2023 - 28.04.2023

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2022 - 16.01.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • BYL20D-V
  • BYS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd, Leif Östman

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Guest lecturer from Tritonia.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Then on re-examination occasions or other agreement.

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours of work for the student during the course divided into 30 hours of work in class and 51 hours of work on their own.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  For approved performance, the following is required:
  Reporting: Ability to report and document within the area of ​​expertise. She has mastered writing and layout rules that distinguish documentation at degree level and know the style level that is appropriate in a formal reporting text in the field of technology.
  Scientific writing: Have the readiness to plan and complete a comprehensive development and project assignment and know the work process for scientific writing. Have preparedness to present grounded reasoning and grounded conclusions. Know and can use writing manuals. Can use one or more
  reference.
  Reading and reviewing: Ability to critically read and review reports in the area of ​​competence and prepare for oral opposition.
  Information retrieval: Ability to critically and systematically search sources and access them in content for written and oral assignments in the area of ​​competence

•   Technical Reporting TKV18TR01-3012 24.10.2022-18.12.2022  3 credits  (MAP20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student can report and document within the area of ​​competence. She is familiar with writing and layout rules and knows the style level that is appropriate in a formal text. The student can plan an assignment and make associated documentation using critically selected sources of various kinds. The documentation is rooted in practical and theoretical knowledge in the field. They master one or more reference systems.

  Prerequisites

  Swedish for Engineers

  Content of the study unit

  Information retrieval, the work process for more extensive reporting such as degree projects, reference systems, evaluation of reports, rules for written reports and scientific work.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Kaj Rintanen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Exercise assignments and lecture material on Moodle.
  Literature:
  Backman, J., 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Nyberg, R. & Tidström A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, writing assignments in groups, literature studies, oral presentations.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved/Rejected

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.10.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 24.10.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • MAP20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • MAP20-V-K (Size: 55. Open university: 0.)
  • MAP20-V-B (Size: 55. Open university: 0.)
  • MAP20-V-D (Size: 55. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Guest lecturer from Tritonia.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Then on re-examination occasions or other agreement.

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours of work for the student during the course divided into 30 hours of work in class and 51 hours of work on their own.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  For approved performance, the following is required:
  Reporting: Ability to report and document within the area of ​​expertise. She has mastered writing and layout rules that distinguish documentation at degree level and know the style level that is appropriate in a formal reporting text in the field of technology.
  Scientific writing: Have the readiness to plan and complete a comprehensive development and project assignment and know the work process for scientific writing. Have preparedness to present grounded reasoning and grounded conclusions. Know and can use writing manuals. Can use one or more
  reference.
  Reading and reviewing: Ability to critically read and review reports in the area of ​​competence and prepare for oral opposition.
  Information retrieval: Ability to critically and systematically search sources and access them in content for written and oral assignments in the area of ​​competence

•   Technical Reporting TKV18TR01-3013 29.08.2022-30.10.2022  3 credits  (ELA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student can report and document within the area of ​​competence. She is familiar with writing and layout rules and knows the style level that is appropriate in a formal text. The student can plan an assignment and make associated documentation using critically selected sources of various kinds. The documentation is rooted in practical and theoretical knowledge in the field. They master one or more reference systems.

  Prerequisites

  Swedish for Engineers

  Content of the study unit

  Information retrieval, the work process for more extensive reporting such as degree projects, reference systems, evaluation of reports, rules for written reports and scientific work.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ronnie Sundsten

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Exercise assignments and lecture material on Moodle.
  Literature:
  Backman, J., 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Nyberg, R. & Tidström A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, writing assignments in groups, literature studies, oral presentations.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved/Rejected

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 30.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2022 - 11.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ELA20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • ELA20-V-A (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA20-V-E (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA20-V-K (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • ELA20-V-I (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Guest lecturer from Tritonia.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Rehearsal interrogation at the last lesson. Then on re-examination occasions or other agreement.

  Student's schedule and workload

  81 hours of work for the student during the course divided into 30 hours of work in class and 51 hours of work on their own.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  For approved performance, the following is required:
  Reporting: Ability to report and document within the area of ​​expertise. She has mastered writing and layout rules that distinguish documentation at degree level and know the style level that is appropriate in a formal reporting text in the field of technology.
  Scientific writing: Have the readiness to plan and complete a comprehensive development and project assignment and know the work process for scientific writing. Have preparedness to present grounded reasoning and grounded conclusions. Know and can use writing manuals. Can use one or more
  reference.
  Reading and reviewing: Ability to critically read and review reports in the area of ​​competence and prepare for oral opposition.
  Information retrieval: Ability to critically and systematically search sources and access them in content for written and oral assignments in the area of ​​competence

Academic year 2023 - 2024

•   Finnish for Working Life TKV18FI02-3022 01.08.2023-04.11.2023  4 credits  (MAP21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  To master the central vocabulary in the own field
  To deal with work-related situations orally and in writing
  To be able to write different types of texts and prepare different types of documents
  Understand and be able to make use of information from texts (articles, official documents etc.) concerning the own industry
  To be able to give a structured presentation in Finnish
  Being able to attend and lead a meeting in Finnish
  Orally and in writing master the central grammar

  Prerequisites

  Suomi

  Content of the study unit

  Working life and own field
  Entrepreneurship
  Business Communications
  Meeting technology and terminology
  Thesis abstract

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2023 - 04.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  23.09.2023 - 22.10.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • MAP21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish for Working Life TKV18FI02-3021 01.08.2023-09.11.2023  4 credits  (PRE21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  To master the central vocabulary in the own field
  To deal with work-related situations orally and in writing
  To be able to write different types of texts and prepare different types of documents
  Understand and be able to make use of information from texts (articles, official documents etc.) concerning the own industry
  To be able to give a structured presentation in Finnish
  Being able to attend and lead a meeting in Finnish
  Orally and in writing master the central grammar

  Prerequisites

  Suomi

  Content of the study unit

  Working life and own field
  Entrepreneurship
  Business Communications
  Meeting technology and terminology
  Thesis abstract

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must demonstrate knowledge of Finnish that is required by the law (424/2003) by public employees and should show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.
  
  The Common European Reference Framework for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used to assess knowledge of Finnish. Levels B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1-3) and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4-5).
  
  Oral and written ability is assessed with different grades.
  
  All universities in Finland follow the same assessment criteria.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2023 - 09.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • PRE21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Vikfors

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 33

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Technical Reporting TKV18TR01-3016 23.10.2023-31.12.2023  3 credits  (MAP21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student can report and document within the area of ​​competence. She is familiar with writing and layout rules and knows the style level that is appropriate in a formal text. The student can plan an assignment and make associated documentation using critically selected sources of various kinds. The documentation is rooted in practical and theoretical knowledge in the field. They master one or more reference systems.

  Prerequisites

  Swedish for Engineers

  Content of the study unit

  Information retrieval, the work process for more extensive reporting such as degree projects, reference systems, evaluation of reports, rules for written reports and scientific work.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.10.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  23.09.2023 - 22.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • MAP21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Technology and Seafaring

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Engineer (Land Surveying), Degree Programme in Civil and Construction Engineering, Degree Programme in Mechanical and Production Engineering, Degree Programme in Electrical Engineering and Automation, Degree Programme in Industrial Management

  Assessment scale

  H-5