Academic year 2023 - 2024

•   "VågaSe": Person-centered Care in the Meeting with People with Memory Disorder VAL23029-3002 13.03.2024-24.04.2024  5 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the principles of person-centred care in the encounter with people with memory disorders
  - can apply communication skills for creating and maintaining meaningful relationships with people with memory disorders.
  - can make use of activities and interventions to promote well-being and activate people with memory disorder
  - have developed awareness of cultural differences and how they can affect care and interaction.
  - can reflect on their own cultural awareness

  Prerequisites

  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Content of the study unit

  - the most common memory disorders
  - basic principles of person-centered care
  - customized communication
  - identification and assessment of mental health needs
  - customized activities and inventions that promote well-being
  - cultural competence and development

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Janina Dahla

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Lista på rekommenderad litteratur publiceras på kursens Moodle-plattform (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Obligatoriskt deltagande i den schemalagda distansundervisningen i Teams, självstudier, praktiska övningar,workshops även studiebesök kan bli aktuellt .Inlämningsuppgifter, diskussionsuppgifter under kursen utgör underlag till examinationen ,elektronisk inlärningsportfolio
  Mera ingående information finns tillgänglig på kursen Moodle sida vid kursstart. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1.Deltagande i undervisningen och reflektionsuppgifter. 2sp (GK/UK)
  Godkänd: Studerande har aktivt deltagit i alla obligatosiska närsstudietillfällen. Godkända övningsuppgifter och referat.
  Underkänd: Studerande har inte deltagit i alla obligatiosriska närstudietillfällen. Underkända övningsuppgifter.
  2. Elektronisk inlärningsportfolio och posterpresentation 3 sp (0-5)
  - inlärningsportfolions struktur, kreativa utformning och läsbarhet
  - innehållsmässig sakkunskap, reflektion och förmåga att sammanfatta teori och anpassa teori till praxis
  - förmåga till kritiskt granskning och sjävutvärdering
  - posterpresentation, presentation och sammanfattning av studerandes inlärningsportfolio
  
  Bedömning enligt skala 0-5. Sammanfattad feedback sätts in på moodle.
  
  
  
  . (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.03.2024 - 24.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2023 - 06.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Janina Dahla

  Additional information

  Kursen inleds den 13.3.24 deltagande i närstudierna sker via teams
  Är du intresserad av kvalitetsarbete och vill jobba med utvecklingsfrågor? Vill du utvecklas i din professionella roll och fördjupa din förståelse för människor med minnessjukdom och närståendes livssituation?Det är inte bara äldre som insjuknar i någon minnessjukdom. Delta då i den här kursen så kan vi tillsammans jobba med frågor som vi kan stöta på i vardagen,som professionella eller närstående.
  Kursen innehåller ingen större tentamen,kräver aktivt deltagande under närvarodagarna.
  Kursansvarig lärare Janina Dahla (janina.dahla@novia.fi)
  Kursens moodlesida uppdateras fram till kursstart.
  Eventuell frånvaro kompenseras skriftligt enligt anvisningar som finns på moodle.
  Handledning: Eventuella frågor besvaras av kursansvarig på moodle i kursens handledningsforum. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande förväntas att under kursens gång ha förmåga att självständigt ta kontakt med arbetslivsrepresentanter. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Den elektroniska inlärningsportfolion lämnas in på Moodle senast den 18.4.24
  24.4.24 Under närstudien håller studerande en kort Posterpresentation - sammanfattning av studerandes inlärningsportfolio (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1. Kursen innehåller 21h schemalagd distansundervisning, samt reflektions uppgifter och praktiska övningar 2 sp 54 h
  Studeranden läser efter varje närstudiedag den angivna obligatoriska litteraturen (med koppling till temat) och skriver kommenterade referat av dem. Referaten inkluderas i portfolion.
  2. Elektronisk inlärningsportfolio och posterpresentation 3 sp 81 h
  Den elektroniska inlärningsportfolion inlämnas i Moodle senast den 19.4.24
  24.4. 24 Posterpresentation innehåller en sammanfattning av studerandes inlärningsportfolio
  Studerande utgår från kursens lärandemål och gör en portfolio kring varje temaområde. Tema kopplas till lärandemålen. Inkludera bilder, länkar och material i portfolion. Tänk på att portfolion skall fungera som en materialbank för dig i arbetslivet.
  Studerande väljer i vilket format portfolion görs. Källor skall anges, portfolion behöver inte för övrigt följa Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

•   "VågaSe": Person-centered Care in the Meeting with People with Memory Disorder VAL23029-3001 26.09.2023-21.11.2023  5 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the principles of person-centred care in the encounter with people with memory disorders
  - can apply communication skills for creating and maintaining meaningful relationships with people with memory disorders.
  - can make use of activities and interventions to promote well-being and activate people with memory disorder
  - have developed awareness of cultural differences and how they can affect care and interaction.
  - can reflect on their own cultural awareness

  Prerequisites

  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Content of the study unit

  - the most common memory disorders
  - basic principles of person-centered care
  - customized communication
  - identification and assessment of mental health needs
  - customized activities and inventions that promote well-being
  - cultural competence and development

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Janina Dahla

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Lista på rekommenderad litteratur publiceras på kursens Moodle-plattform (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Obligatoriskt deltagande i den schemalagda distansundervisningen i Teams, självstudier, praktiska övningar,workshops även studiebesök kan bli aktuellt .Inlämningsuppgifter, diskussionsuppgifter under kursen utgör underlag till examinationen ,elektronisk inlärningsportfolio
  Mera ingående information finns tillgänglig på kursen Moodle sida vid kursstart. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1.Deltagande i undervisningen och reflektionsuppgifter. 2sp (GK/UK)
  Godkänd: Studerande har aktivt deltagit i alla obligatosiska närsstudietillfällen. Godkända övningsuppgifter.
  Underkänd: Studerande har inte deltagit i alla obligatiosriska närstudietillfällen. Underkända övningsuppgifter.
  2. Elektronisk inlärningsportfolio och posterpresentation 3 sp (0-5)
  - inlärningsportfolions struktur, kreativa utformning och läsbarhet
  - innehållsmässig sakkunskap, reflektion och förmåga att sammanfatta teori och anpassa teori till praxis
  - förmåga till kritiskt granskning och sjävutvärdering
  - posterpresentation, presentation och sammanfattning av studerandes inlärningsportfolio
  
  Bedömning enligt skala 0-5. Sammanfattad feedback sätts in på moodle.
  Vid validering bedöms kursen Godkänd/Underkänd
  
  
  . (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2023 - 21.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 26.09.2023

  • 5 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Janina Dahla

  Additional information

  Är du intresserad av kvalitetsarbete och vill jobba med utvecklingsfrågor? Vill du utvecklas i din professionella roll och fördjupa din förståelse för människor med minnessjukdom och närståendes livssituation?Det är inte bara äldre som insjuknar i någon minnessjukdom. Delta då i den här kursen så kan vi tillsammans jobba med frågor som vi kan stöta på i vardagen,som professionella eller närstående.
  Kursen innehåller ingen större tentamen,kräver aktivt deltagande under närvarodagarna.
  Kursansvarig lärare Janina Dahla (janina.dahla@novia.fi)
  Kursens moodlesida uppdateras fram till kursstart.
  Eventuell frånvaro kompenseras skriftligt enligt anvisningar som finns på moodle.
  Handledning: Eventuella frågor besvaras av kursansvarig på moodle i kursens handledningsforum. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande förväntas att under kursens gång ha förmåga att självständigt ta kontakt med arbetslivsrepresentanter. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Den elektroniska inlärningsportfolion inlämnas i Moodle senast den 17.11.23
  21.11. 23 Under närstudien håller studerande en Posterpresentation - sammanfattning av studerandes inlärningsportfolio (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1. Kursen innehåller 17h schemalagd distansundervisning, samt reflektions uppgifter och praktiska övningar 2 sp 54 h
  2. Elektronisk inlärningsportfolio och posterpresentation 3 sp 81 h
  Den elektroniska inlärningsportfolion inlämnas i Moodle senast den 17.11.23
  21.11. 23 Posterpresentation innehåller en sammanfattning av studerandes inlärningsportfolio
  Studerande utgår från kursens lärandemål och gör en portfolio kring varje temaområde. De behandlade temana kopplas till lärandemålen. Inkludera bilder, länkar och material i portfolion. Tänk på att portfolion skall fungera som en materialbank för dig i arbetslivet.
  Studerande väljer i vilket format portfolion görs. Källor skall anges, portfolion behöver inte för övrigt följa Novias skrivanvisningar. Studeranden läser den angivna obligatoriska litteraturen (med koppling till temat) och skriver kommenterade referat av dem. Referaten inkluderas i portfolion. (not translated)

•   Advanced clinical nursing care SHV22AK05-3001 01.01.2024-05.04.2024  5 credits  (SHV22HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to handle patient/client health and disease conditions, through adequate medical history, status assessment and treatment
  - is able to teach and guide patients/clients
  - is able to create and maintain effective relationships with patients/clients and colleagues
  - is able to clarify the professional role of the advanced clinical nurse

  Prerequisites

  SHV18AK01, The professional paradigm of a Nurse practioner
  SHV14AK02, Anatomy and pathophysiology
  SHV14AK03, Clinical assessment and nursing care
  SHV14AK04, Clinical Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced clinical nursing care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alotaibi T, Al Anizi CA. The impact of advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) role on adult patients with cancer: A quantitative systematic review. Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Dec;56:151370. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151370.
  Buckley L, Robertson S, Wilson T, Sharpless J, Bolton S. The Role of the Specialist Nurse in Gynaecological Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Sep 11;20(10):83. doi: 10.1007/s11912-018-0734-6.
  Craswell A, Dwyer T. Reasons for choosing or refusing care from a nurse practitioner: Results from a national population-based survey. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3668-3676. doi: 10.1111/jan.14176.
  Heale R, Rietze L, Hill L, Roles S. Development of Nurse Practitioner Competencies for Advance Care Planning. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018 Apr;20(2):166-171. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000425.
  Jackson A, Carberry M. The advance nurse practitioner in critical care: a workload evaluation. Nurs Crit Care. 2015 Mar;20(2):71-7. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12133.
  Townsend K, Johnson KS, Jones S, Spurlock A. Nurse Practitioner's Confidence and Competence of Advance Directives: The Benefits of an Educational Program. Hosp Top. 2023 May 2:1-7. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2023.2201693. Epub ahead of print.
  You are allowed to find other articles but don’t forget to add the list of articles you have used in the end of your work.

  Learning methods

  Lecture and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 05.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 26.02.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV22HD-V
  • SHV22HD-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  instruction for the task and the aims will be given in the first lecture

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar is obligatory

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  see Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS=27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  The student did not achieve any of the criteria points, in the task requirement ( see in Moodle)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points, conduct frail interview, and weak analysis of the results

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable interview, the analysis and the results presentation gave good knowledge about the topic

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding

•   Advancement of knowledge and operations management SHV22FU01-3002 31.08.2023-31.12.2023  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands and is able to analyse the knowledge development in the social and/or health care area from a scientific theoretical perspective
  - is able to evaluate and critically review development and research results in her/his own field
  - is able to contribute to a research-based development of her/his own business

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Science theory
  Critical evaluation and review

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments.
  The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  VETENSKAPSTEORI:
  Malcolm, P. (2015). Modern teoribildning i socialt arbete. Bokförlaget Natur och Kultur, Stockholm.
  Wiklund Gustin, L., Asp, M., Alvsvåg, H., Arman, M., Berg, L., Bergbom, I., . . . Ruthman, M. (2022). Vårdvetenskapliga begrepp i teori och praktik (Tredje upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Birkler, J. 2012. Vetenskapsteori - en grundbok, Liber.
  Sohlberg, P., & Sohlberg, B. (2019). Kunskapens former: Vetenskapsteori, forskningsmetod och forskningsetik (Fjärde upplagan.). Liber.
  Thurén, T. (2019). Vetenskapsteori för nybörjare (Tredje upplagan.). Liber AB.
  Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Tolkning och reflektion: Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod (Tredje upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  Bjereld, U., Demker, M., & Hinnfors, J. (2018). Varför vetenskap?: Om vikten av problem och teori i forskningsprocessen (Fjärde upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Haaparanta, L. & Niiniluoto, I. 2016. Johdatus tieteelliseen ajatteluun, Gaudeamus.
  
  INSTRUMENTUTVECKLING:
  Streiner, D. L. a., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (Fifth edition.). Oxford University Press.
  Olsson, H., & Sörensen, S. (2021). Forskningsprocessen: Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv (Upplaga 4.). Liber AB.
  
  EVIDENSBASERAD PRAKTIK OCH IMPLEMENTERING:
  Hasson H., Schwarz U.T (2017). Användbar evidens om följsamhet och anpassningar.
  Greenhalgh, T. (2012). Att läsa vetenskapliga artiklar och rapporter grunden för evidensbaserad vård. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Willman, A., Bahtsevani, C., Nilsson, R., & Sandström, B. (2016). Evidensbaserad omvårdnad: En bro mellan forskning och klinisk praktik (Upplaga 4:1.). Studentlitteratur
  Freij, B. 2012. Evidens i praktiken - grundbok i evidensbaserat socialt arbete. Gothia förlag, Stockholm.
  Andersson, A., Hommel, A., & Andersson, Å. (2018). Kvalitetsutveckling inom omvårdnad: Sjuksköterskans professionella ansvar (Upplaga 1:1.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Nilsen, P. (2014). Implementering av evidensbaserad praktik (1. uppl.). Gleerups. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridundervisning:
  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Grupparbete (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Moduler 1-2 bedöms med skalan 0-5. Bedömning baseras på:
  - Analysförmåga
  - Förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data
  - Kritisk reflektion
  - Användning av litteratur
  - Användning av Novias skrivanvisningar.
  För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla deluppgifter (Moduler 1-2) vara godkända. Uppgifter ska lämnas in inom utsatt tid. Försenade inlämningar kan sänka vitsordet.
  
  Modul 1: 50 % av vitsordet
  - Begreppskarta: 20%
  - Instrumentutveckling: 30%
  
  Modul 2: 50 % av vitsordet
  - Granskning av vetenskapliga artiklar: 20%
  - Artikelanalys och implementeringsplan: 30% (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 12.09.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Additional information

  Alla skriftliga inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Modul 1: Vetenskapsteori och instrumentutveckling
  - Begreppskarta (par/-gruppuppgift), deadline 8.10.2023
  - Instrumentutveckling (par-/gruppuppgift), deadline 23.11 och 10.12.2023
  
  Modul 2: Evidensbaserad praktik och implementering
  - Granskning av vetenskapliga artiklar (individuell uppgift), deadline 12.11.2023
  - Artikelanalys och implementeringsplan (individuell uppgift), deadline 10.12.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5sp = 135h
  
  Föreläsningar: 10h
  Självstudier: 70h
  Grupparbete: 51h
  Seminarium: 4h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Modul 1: Vetenskapsteori och instrumentutveckling
  Modul 2: Evidensbaserad praktik och implementering (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Modul 1:
  Begreppskarta:
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen brister
  Instrumentutveckling:
  - Litteraturen refereras inte
  - Reflektioner framförs inte
  - Den tekniska utformningen brister
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen fattas
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar
  - Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  - Texten är fragmentarisk och den besvarar inte frågorna
  
  Modul 2:
  Granskning av 2 vetenskapliga artiklar:
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen brister
  - Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  Artikelanalys och implementeringsplan:
  - Litteraturen refereras inte
  - Reflektioner framförs inte
  - Den tekniska utformningen brister
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen fattas
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar
  - Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  - Texten är fragmentarisk och den besvarar inte frågorna (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Modul 1:
  Begreppskarta:
  - Uppgiften innehåller några krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig
  Instrumentutveckling:
  - Litteraturen refereras
  - Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  - Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen är nöjaktig
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar
  
  Modul 2:
  Granskning av 2 vetenskapliga artiklar:
  - Uppgiften innehåller några krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig
  - Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  Artikelanalys och implementeringsplan:
  - Litteraturen refereras
  - Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  - Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen är nöjaktig
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Modul 1:
  Begreppskarta:
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är god
  Instrumentutveckling:
  - Litteraturen tillämpas
  - Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  - Den tekniska utformningen är god
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen är god
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar
  
  Modul 2:
  Granskning av 2 vetenskapliga artiklar:
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är god
  - Frågorna besvaras
  Artikelanalys och implementeringsplan:
  - Litteraturen tillämpas
  - Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  - Den tekniska utformningen är god
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen är god
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Modul 1:
  Begreppskarta:
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig
  Instrumentutveckling:
  - Litteraturen analyseras och tillämpas
  - Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  - Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen är berömlig
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar
  
  Modul 2:
  Granskning av 2 vetenskapliga artiklar:
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig
  - Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  Artikelanalys och implementeringsplan:
  - Litteraturen analyseras och tillämpas
  - Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  - Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig
  - Helhetsbilden och sammanhangen är berömlig
  - Uppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar (not translated)

•   Anatomy and pathophysiology SHV22AK02-3003 26.10.2023-31.12.2023  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to apply her/his knowledge in anatomy and pathophysiology, and to connect the knowledge to clinical context

  Prerequisites

  The student:
  Has knowledge of the various tissue types and the structure of the musculosceletal system, as well as of the anatomy and physiology of the various organ systems.
  Has knowledge of and understands how blood, skin, circulation, lymph circulation, respiration, digestion and urinary excretion work
  Has knowledge of and understands how the endocrine system regulates metabolism and organ functions
  Has knowledge of and understands the reproduction
  Has knowledge of and understand how the nervous system regulates the physiological processes
  Have knowledge of and understands the structure and function of the sensory organs
  Has basic knowledge of pathophysiology

  Content of the study unit

  Anatomy
  Pathofysiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
  The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Material on Moodle.
  A fundamental book in Human Physiology and Anatomy, for example one of these books:
  1) Aldskogius H. and Rydqvist B. (2018) Den friska människan, Anatomi och fysiologi. Liber, Stockholm
  2) Nicolaysen G. and Holck P. (2014) Anatomi och fysiologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  3) Sand, Sjaastad, Haug and Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  4) Henriksson O. and Rasmusson M. (2018) Fysiologi : med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  5) Tortora, G. and Derrickson B. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 15:de upplagan (2017 eller äldre upplagor), Wiley.
  Book in Patophysiology:
  Braun C. and Anderson C. (2012) Patofysiologi : om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-studies and exercises.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The written assignments and quizzes will be graded and based on these the course will be graded between 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.10.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 25.10.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å

  Seats

  0 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  More information on Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written assignments Autumn 2023, and on line quizzes

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures 16 h
  Self-studies 119 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student has pore knowledge of fundamental Anatomy, Physiology and Patophysiology.
  The student has not handed in all assignments.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has basic knowledge of fundamental Anatomy, Physiology and Patophysiology.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy, Physiology and Patophysiology.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy, Physiology and Patophysiology.

•   Budgeting, strategic management and follow-up SHV22UL03-3001 27.10.2023-31.12.2023  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - is able to explain and apply legislation regarding social and health care
  - understands the economics of social and health care as part of the social economy and the organisation's activities
  - is able to describes and apply the basics of ​​budgeting and budget follow-up
  - is able to explain the relationship between business and budget
  - is able to evaluate and argue competition in public and private social and health care

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Social and health care legislation
  Social and health care economics
  Budgeting
  Competition law

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment: The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Lecture material, scientific articles and other distributed material on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-studies and assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In Moodle.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.10.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 22.10.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jussi Reijonen, Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course covers 5 ECTS credits, totalling 135 hours of student work.
  Lectures 8 h
  Seminars 4 h
  Selfstudies 123 h

  Assessment criteria

  The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
  The methodological literature is not used.
  Reflections are not performed.
  The technical design is lacking.
  Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
  The literature is referenced.
  Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
  The technical design is satisfactory.
  Refers concepts and basic principle.
  Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The questions are answered.
  The methodological literature is applied.
  The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
  The technical design is good.
  Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature.
  Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
  The literature is analyzed and applied.
  The reflection is scientifically analytical.
  The technical design is commendable.
  Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions.
  Makes versatile use of literature.
  Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically.

•   Change Leadership HCS22EB01-3003 01.01.2024-15.04.2024  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to recognize and analyze the development of leadership studies in modern organizations, with an emphasis on healthcare organizations.
  - is able to explain and interpret change actions in workplaces that are both inclusive and empowering for all participants
  - is able to identify and describe forces of organizational change and how these can be actively worked with in order to promote innovation and entrepreneurship

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Change leadership theories
  Strategic leadership
  Evaluation Practice

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the written exam
  The student can explain the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

  Learning methods

  Lectures - 16 hours
  Seminar 9 hours
  Small-group work - 20 hours
  Individual studies - 90 hours

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 15.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 08.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders, Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Additional information

  The course is arranged in collaboration with ARCADA.
  Lectures are given in English, but written assignment(s) can be returned in either English or Swedish.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  Total workload of the course: 135 hours
  Of which autonomous studies: 135 hours
  Of which scheduled studies: 25 hours

•   Clinical pharmacology SHV22AK04-3001 31.08.2023-19.11.2023  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to describe pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles, as well as general mechanisms of action for drugs at the molecular and cellular level
  - is able to account for and draw conclusions from individual variations, interaction mechanisms and side effects of drug substances
  - is able to describe the mechanisms of action at the molecular level, as well as account for effects, use area and side effects for different drug groups
  - is able to relate pharmacological mechanisms of action to the treatment of pathological conditions
  - is able to evaluate the potential benefit and risk of multiple drug use (polypharmacy)
  - is able to identify health problems that are due to drug side effects and interaction
  - is able to apply different pedagogical theories when teaching patients who have got prescribed drugs

  Prerequisites

  Basic pharmacology and drug treatment

  Content of the study unit

  Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics
  Drug interaction and side effects
  The action mechanisms of the drugs
  Polypharmacy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
  The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Nordeng H. och Spigset O. et.al. (2020) Farmakologi och läkemedelsanvändning. Studentlitteratur.
  Alternative literature:
  Ritter J., Flower R., Henderson G., Loke Y.K., MacEwan D. and Rang H. (2018) Rang and Dale´s Pharmacology, 9th edition, Elsevier.
  Scientific articles and other distributed material

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-studies and exercises.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination motsvarande 2 sp, samt individuella skriftliga arbeten och kviss motsvarande 3 sp (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 30.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-V

  Seats

  0 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  More information on Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Two out of five credits are examined by a written, individual exam 06.10.2023.
  Possibility of re-take on general re-take 08.12.2023 och 19.01.2024.
  Three out of five credits are examined by individual written assignments and quizzes on line.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures 16 h
  Self-studies 119 h

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande farmakokinetik och farmakodynamik.
  Studerande har inte lämnat in sina individuella arbeten (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande farmakokinetik och farmakodynamik, samt nöjaktiga kunskaper om olika läkemedelsgruppers farmakokinetik och farmakodynamik
  På engelska (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande farmakokinetik och farmakodynamik, samt goda kunskaper om olika läkemedelsgruppers farmakokinetik och farmakodynamik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande farmakokinetik och farmakodynamik, samt utmärkta kunskaper om olika läkemedelsgruppers farmakokinetik och farmakodynamik (not translated)

•   Developing Quality Management and Safety Culture SHV22RS01-3001 24.08.2023-16.11.2023  5 credits  (SHV22HD-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to critically evaluate and present safety culture in clinical radiography
  - is able to manage it safety culture in clinical radiography
  - is ethical and cost-effective in clinical radiography
  - is able to describe and apply quality management models and theories in clinical radiography
  - is able to describe and apply concepts and principles of safety culture in clinical radiography
  - is s able to use the most general evaluation methods in clinical radiography

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Safety culture in clinical radiography
  Ethics and cost-effectiveness in clinical radiography
  Quality management models in clinical radiography
  Evaluation methods in clinical radiography

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
  The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Online (not translated)

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 16.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 24.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV22HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Human Resource Management SHV22UL04-3001 31.08.2023-31.10.2023  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to describe and apply theory and practice of human resources from an interdisciplinary perspective
  - is able to lead and promote diversity in the workplace and has the ability to value and develop an inclusive organisational culture
  - in able to organise the business towards a continuous competence development
  - is able to work for a sustainable work community development
  - is able to apply an ethical approach at work

  Prerequisites

  SHV20HL01 Operational leadership

  Content of the study unit

  Working tutorial
  Staff management
  Labor law
  Practical staff administration and collective agreement issues
  Human resource-oriented leadership, employee interviews and work motivation.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments.
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments
  The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Introduced in the course moodle page

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual studies and group work.
  Blended learning

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2023 - 31.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.09.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Slotte, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c = 27h
  5c= 135h
  
  Lectures (9h), Online or at Campus
  Individual studies (122h) Individiual studies and group work.
  Seminar (4h). Online or at Campus

  Assessment criteria

  The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
  The methodological literature is not used.
  Reflections are not performed.
  The technical design is lacking.
  Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
  The literature is referenced
  Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
  The technical design is satisfactory.
  Refers concepts and basic principle
  Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The questions are answered.
  The methodological literature is applied.
  The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
  The technical design is good
  Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
  The literature is analyzed and applied.
  The reflection is scientifically analytical.
  The technical design is commendable.
  Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
  Makes versatile use of literature
  Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically

•   Leadership for Future Health Care and Social Services HCS22GL01-3004 31.10.2023-12.12.2023  10 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to create and articulate a personal and authentic leadership approach that culminates in a mission statement about continued learning is a key component
  - is able to create a vision and develop behaviors to successfully lead a diverse group of people through uncertain environments
  - is able to present a variety of interventions to enhance an innovative, sustainable and inclusive work environment by demonstrating cultural sensitivity and advanced communication skills

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Personal leadership
  Value-based leadership
  Communication
  Team leadership
  Power
  Organisational culture

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the written exam
  The student can explain the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the written exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

  Learning methods

  Online lectures and seminars.
  Self studies: Literature, written exam and assignments (essays, reports, productions and portfolio)

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  31.10.2023 - 12.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.10.2023

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Additional information

  The course is conducted in collaboration with Arcada

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  10 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  To be introduced during the introductory lecture.

  Student's schedule and workload

  10 ECTS credits equals a total of approximately 270 hours of work.
  1 ECTS credit = 27 hours work.

•   Master's Thesis SHV22MT01-3001 28.08.2023-31.07.2025  30 credits  (HCS22F-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to carry out work-life-related development work in the area of health care or social services in accordance with scientific requirements and ethical principles
  - is able to collaborate on a development work together with the representatives of the working life
  - is able to apply a resource-enhancing and innovative approach in relation to development of operations
  - is able to act as an expert in her/his own professional field and present and argue the results of their development work in a professional context

  Prerequisites

  HCS22EB04, Research methods

  Content of the study unit

  Thesis idea
  Thesis study plan
  Master´s thesis presentation
  Maturity test

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The introduction is short, bland and does not lead the reader on the subject. The purpose is unclear / not entirely relevant and the question positions do not relate to the purpose / or become incorrect. The motivation for the subject choice is weak. The introduction gives a partially misleading / unclear picture of the subject. The purpose is unclear described and the logical connection of the questions to the purpose is weak. Motivation of the subject choice unclear.
  The theoretical background and the starting point are based on preferably few sources and are very general and / or briefly described. An nonindependent referencing method is used. A certain source criticism can be perceived The theoretical background and the starting point is based on relevant literature but remains very general and / or briefly described. The sources are few and constitute a weak theoretical framework for the work. Source criticism is inadequate
  The method selection description, method discussion and ethical discussion are rudimentary and incomplete. The outcome and method discussion, including a critical examination of the study, is not relevant with regard to the work. The conclusions are undeveloped and trivial. Parts of the method description, the method discussion and / or the ethical discussion are deficient. The result, method discussion / critical review are very superficial. The conclusions are trivial.
  The result discussion is mainly referring, and is incomplete with regard to what is relevant for the purpose of the work. The presentation's logical rigor is weak. The feedback to the purpose is extremely weak in the conclusion, and a summary model / discussion is made The discussion of results is mainly referring to and some aspects that are central to the purpose of the work are treated incompletely or not at all. The presentation is, to some extent, not stringent. The feedback to the purpose is weak in the conclusion.
  The summary of the work is inadequate. There are errors in the list of references and references. The presentation is weak and disjointed, the opposition shows the inability to critically review a text. Partially immature, troubled and indecent working method. The summary of the study / study partially flawed. There are some inaccuracies in the list of references and references. The presentation is relatively unsystematic, the opposition is purely referring. The work process has been characterized by some problems and an nonindependent working method.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  he introduction gives a sufficiently good picture for the reader to understand the theme and purpose of the study. The purpose and issues are logically linked to each other. The motivation for the subject selection is clearly described. The introduction gives a clear background picture of how the work relates to previous research and thus to the purpose. The purpose and issues are logically linked to each other. The motivation of choice of topic is interesting
  There is a fundamental ability to synthesize and the theory forms a relevant background. The literature is relevant with regard to the theme and the theoretical starting point is appropriate. A good source criticism. The study is based on a good theoretical whole based on extensive and relevant literature, as well as a clear and adequate theoretical starting point. A good source of criticism.
  The method description gives a comprehensive picture of the study's implementation, but without in-depth discussion of different method choices. The study has an extent corresponding to a Master´s thesis and is well implemented. The ethical discussion is concise but presents the relevant ethical issues. The critical review is extensive but not reflective. The conclusions are reasonable and relate to the purpose, but do not show any ability to reflect on this. The method description gives a comprehensive picture of the study's implementation and shows awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the choice of method. The scope of the study is sufficient with regard to materials to correspond to thesis at master level. The ethical discussion is extensive and exhaustive in relation to relevant ethical issues. The conclusions are comprehensive and well-founded.
  The results report is systematic but preferably referencing. The feedback to the purpose of the conclusion is clear, but brief and a clear reflection is lacking. The results report is correct, systematic and shows the ability for an independent reasoning. The feedback to the purpose of the conclusion is clear and comprehensive and demonstrates strengths and weaknesses in the implementation.
  Good summary of the survey. Layout, source list and references follow standard. Presentation and exposure follow the instructions The work process has been smooth and largely independent. Very good summary of the survey Source list and references follow standard. The presentation is systematic and the writer shows the ability to develop and clarify his theme. The opposition is critical and constructive and shows a good ability to familiarize themselves with the theme of the opposed work. The work process is mature and largely independent

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The introduction is able to discuss previous research and knowledge on the subject and therefore sets the purpose in a scientifically interesting context. The purpose and the issues are logically linked to each other and it is a clear link to the purpose throughout the work.
  The theoretical background and starting point are well-founded and well-written. A reflected approach to the theme can be seen in the work. The source usage is extensive and relevant, as well as showing a remarkable ability to source criticism.
  The method description gives a comprehensive picture of the study's implementation and shows awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the choice of method, and shows the ability to consider different options. The ethical discussion is extensive and exhaustive in relation to relevant ethical issues. The conclusions are comprehensive and well-founded; The writer is also able to critically evaluate these and show new perspectives and questions for further research.
  The results report is well-structured, innovative and shows the ability for an independent reasoning. The feedback to the purpose of the conclusion is clear and comprehensive. Strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of the study / study are discussed. The work concludes with an interesting conclusion, well-founded synthesis and description of development opportunities.
  Excellent summary of the survey. The source list and references follow the standard. The presentation is systematic and the writer shows the ability to develop and clarify her/his theme. The opposition is critical and constructive, and also shows a good ability to discuss and critically reflect. The work process is smooth, mature and independent. The work has that little extra that gives light power.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 31.07.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 28.08.2022

  • 30 credits

  Group(s)

  • HCS22F-Å
  • HCS22P-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Pia Liljeroth, Susanne Jungerstam, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Methods of Development and Evaluation HCS22EB03-3004 28.08.2023-31.10.2023  5 credits  (HCS22F-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to define structure, service and outcome quality and meaning of quality assurance from the different perspectives
  - is able to identify and apply prevailing quality assessment methods and quality standards within social and health care
  - is able to describe the most central quality management systems within social- and health care
  - is able to integrate quality assurance and quality improvement to her/his professional duties
  - is able to plan and implement evaluation of one’s work field/activity/operation

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Perspective on quality management, quality policy, quality system
  Quality standards within social and health care organization
  Quality assurance, quality improvement and control as well as methods for constant quality improvement
  Central quality management systems in Finland within social and health care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Introduced in the course moodle page

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual studies and group work.
  Online

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 31.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 30.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • HCS22F-Å
  • HCS22P-Å
  • SHV22HD-Å
  • SHV22HD-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c = 27h
  5c= 135h

  Assessment criteria

  The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
  The methodological literature is not used.
  Reflections are not performed.
  The technical design is lacking.
  Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
  The literature is referenced
  Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
  The technical design is satisfactory.
  Refers concepts and basic principle
  Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The questions are answered.
  The methodological literature is applied.
  The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
  The technical design is good
  Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
  The literature is analyzed and applied.
  The reflection is scientifically analytical.
  The technical design is commendable.
  Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
  Makes versatile use of literature
  Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically

•   Research Methods SHV22FU02-3003 01.01.2024-31.12.2024  10 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands and is able to use qualitative and quantitative research and development processes and methods
  - is able to apply a scientific and ethical approach in research and development activities
  - is able to carry out a current work life-related development project

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Qualitative research methods
  Quantitative research methods
  Seminars

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Forskningsmetodik:
  - Ahrne, G., & Svensson, P. (2022). Handbok i kvalitativa metoder (Upplaga 3.). Liber AB.
  - Denscombe, M. (2018). Forskningshandboken - för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  - Bell, J., Waters, S. & Nilsson, B. S. (2016). Introduktion till forskningsmetodik (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  - Fejes, A. & Thornberg, R. (2019). Handbok i kvalitativ analys (Upplaga 3.). Liber AB.
  - Höglund-Nielsen, B. & Granskär, M. (2017). Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård (Upplaga 3:1.). Studentlitteratur.
  - Henricson, M. (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod: Från idé till examination inom omvårdnad (Upplaga 2:1.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  - Jacobsen, D. I., Järvå, H., & Wallin, B. (2012). Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: Introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete (2. [uppdaterade och utök.] uppl.). Studentlitteratur.
  - Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S. (2021). Forskningsprocessen: Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv (Upplaga 4.). Liber AB.
  
  Forskningsetik:
  - Forskningsetiska delegationens dokument. https://www.tenk.fi/sv
  - Kalman, H. & Lövgren, V. (2019). Etiska dilemman: Forskningsdeltagande, samtycke och utsatthet (Andra upplagan.). Gleerups Utbilning AB
  
  Böcker på engelska:
  - Holloway, I. (2017). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (4th ed.). Wiley Blackwell. (e-bok)
  - Merriam, S. B. & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (Second edition.). Jossey-Bass.
  - Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, K. & Kääriäinen, M. (2019). The application of content analysis in nursing science research. Springer International Publishing.
  - Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Fourth edition. International student edition.). SAGE. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursen är uppdelad i tre separata delar:
  1) Kvalitativa metoder (5 sp)
  2) Kvantitativa metoder (3 sp)
  3) Metodseminarium (2 sp)
  
  Kvalitativa metoder, 5 sp, går som onlinekurs på våren 2024, och kvantitativa metoder 3 sp med närstudier på hösten 2024. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  KVALITATIVA METODER
  Modul 1 (test) bedöms enligt skalan GK/UK. För att studerande ska vara godkänd i modul 1 bör testet vara gjort.
  Modulerna 2-5 bedöms enligt skalan 0-5.
  Modul 2 (viktning 20 %)
  - kunskap om grundläggande forskningsetiska begrepp
  - förmåga att mångsidigt belysa frågor om etik, dataskydd och tillförlitlighet/trovärdighet utgående från litteratur i forskningsmetodik
  Modul 3 (viktning 20 %)
  - förmåga att analysera utgående från forskningsmetodologisk litteratur och bedömningskriterier
  - förmåga att bedöma det praktiska nyttovärdet
  - förmåga att sammanfatta relevant data
  - kritisk och konstruktiv reflektion
  Modul 4 och 5 (vikning 30 %)
  - förmåga att planera, strukturera, genomföra och kritiskt utvärdera forskning
  - förmåga att formulera en forskningsfråga
  - förmåga att söka vetenskapliga artiklar och samla in empiriska data
  - förmåga att presentera analysprocessen
  - förmåga att presentera resultat av analysen (skriftlig och visuell presentation)
  - förmåga att kombinera teori, praktik och reflektion
  - förmåga att dokumentera och presentera logiskt och strukturerat
  - Användning av litteratur
  - Användning av Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla deluppgifter (Moduler 1-5) vara godkända. Uppgifter ska lämnas in inom utsatt tid. Försenade inlämningar kan sänka vitsordet.
  
  KVANTITATIVA METODER (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 17.01.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Camilla Strandell-Laine, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Additional information

  Alla skriftliga inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  KVALITATIVA METODER
  Kursen i kvalitativa metoder kan avläggas under perioden 18.1-31.5.2024. Deadlines per modul:
  Modul 1: 4.2.2024
  Modul 2: 3.3.2024
  Modul 3: 31.3.2024
  Modul 4: 5.5.2024
  Modul 5: 31.5.2024
  
  KVANTITATIVA METODER
  Kursen i kvalitativa metoder kan avläggas under perioden XX.XX.-31.12.2024 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  KVALITATIVA METODER (5sp = 135 h)
  Modul 1: Kursinfo 1h (bekanting med kursens upplägg) + test på Moodle = 5 h
  Modul 2: Hemtent på Moodle = 25h
  Modul 3: Granskning av ett examensarbete = 25h
  Modul 4: Individuell uppgift = 40h
  Modul 5: Individuell uppgift = 40h
  
  KVANTITATIVA METODER (3 sp = 81 timmar)
  
  METODSEMINARIER (2 sp = 54 timmar)
  Forskningsplan för examensarbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är indelad i tre delar: kvalitativ, kvantitativ, metodseminarier
  Kvalitativa metoder (5 sp) avläggs under vårterminen 2024 och görs av studerande både från Åbo och från Vasa. Denna del av kursen är helt virtuell och finns på Moodle.
  Kvantitativa metoder (3 sp) avläggs under höstterminen 2024 och görs av studerande både från Åbo och från Vasa. Denna del av kursen förverkligas delvis genom föreläsningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  KVALITATIVA METODER
  Modul 2:
  Redogör inte för de centrala begreppen och de grundläggande principerna.
  Baserar sig inte på litteratur.
  Moduler 3, 4 och 5:
  Texten är fragmentarisk och den besvarar inte frågorna.
  Metodlitteraturen används inte.
  Reflektioner framförs inte.
  Den tekniska utformningen brister.
  
  KVANTITATIVA METODER (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  KVALITATIVA METODER
  Modul 2:
  Refererar begrepp och grundläggande principer.
  Baserar sig på metodlitteratur.
  Moduler 3, 4 och 5:
  Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt.
  Metodlitteraturen refereras.
  Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning.
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig.
  
  KVANTITATIVA METODER (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  KVALITATIVA METODER
  Modul 2:
  Förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna.
  Baserar sig på metodlitteratur och forskningsetiska delegationens anvisningar.
  Moduler 3, 4 och 5:
  Frågorna besvaras.
  Metodlitteraturen tillämpas.
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns.
  Den tekniska utformningen är god.
  
  KVANTITATIVA METODER (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  KVALITATIVA METODER
  Modul 2:
  Har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser.
  Använder sig mångsidigt av metodlitteratur och forskningsetiska delegationens anvisningar.
  Moduler 3, 4 och 5:
  Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt.
  Metodlitteraturen analyseras och tillämpas.
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk.
  Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig.
  
  KVANTITATIVA METODER (not translated)

•   Welfare policy and societal impact SHV22UL02-3003 07.03.2024-31.05.2024  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to describe the content, characteristics and prospects of welfare policy
  - is able to analyse the international and national trends of the international community
  - is able to contribute to further development of the client/patient/user's participation and participation in health and care
  - is able to influence the development of her/his own business area in contact with the environment and with political decision makers

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Social and health policy
  Welfare policy
  Community Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments.
  The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bakgrundsmaterial, litteratur och sakkunnigintervjuer enligt lärares anvisningar (föreläsningar och Moodle). (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar (Teams), diskussioner i grupp, examinationsuppgifter, inkl. intervjuer och litteraturstudier (självstudier) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursens examinationsuppgifter omfattar tre examinationsuppgifter:
  1) litteraturbaserad jämförande analys av den finländska välfärdsstaten och valfri annan europeisk välfärdsstat
  2) intervju med politiker, journalist eller tjänsteman enligt närmare instruktion under föreläsningstillfälle
  3) Massmedial övervakning av vald social- och hälsovårdsfråga enligt instruktion
  
  Slutbedömningen av kursen baseras på totala antalet poäng som erhålles för inlämnade uppgifter. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.03.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.10.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Strandell-Laine, HYH Hälsa och Välfärd

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Intervjuer med tjänsteman inom social- och hälsovårdsområdet, yrkesverksam journalist och/eller med en aktiv politiker. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursens examinationsuppgifter omfattar tre examinationsuppgifter:
  
  1) litteraturbaserad jämförande analys av den finländska välfärdsstaten och valfri annan europeisk välfärdsstat
  2) intervju med politiker, journalist eller tjänsteman enligt närmare instruktion under föreläsningstillfälle
  3) Massmedial övervakning av vald social- och hälsovårdsfråga enligt instruktion
  
  Samtliga examinationsuppgifter inlämnas före kursens avslut.
  
  Efter bedömning kan studerande komplettera och/eller höja vitsord inom 1 månad efter bedömning med avseende på en eller flera av de uppgifter som lämnats in under kursens gång. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursen omfattar 5 sp, motsvarande ca 135h arbete för studerande. Tidsanvändningen inkluderar 9h föreläsningar samt självstudier (litteratur och examinationsuppgifter). (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har inte lämnat in alla examinationsuppgifter.
  Uppgifter förljer inte anvisningar.
  Inlämnade examinationsuppgifter är synnerligen knapphändiga eller inkompletta. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se uppgifter om studieperioden. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se uppgifter om studieperioden. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se uppgifter om studieperioden. (not translated)

Academic year 2024 - 2025

•   Organisational Theory and Strategic Leadership SHV22UL01-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - is able to analyse social and health care organisations and consider social development
  - is able to explain and investigate the main principles of organisational activities and leadership
  - is able to analyse and interpret the organisation from a stakeholder perspective
  - is able to critically examine the relationship between ethics, values ​​and leadership at different levels in the organisation
  - is able to apply and analyse current, interdisciplinary research within the leadership area

  Prerequisites

  SHV20HL03 Change management

  Content of the study unit

  Organisational theories and their development related to social development
  Modern organisational theories in today's social and health care
  Strategic management and strategic thinking in the organisation
  Creative organisations
  LEAN
  Organisational culture
  Ethics and values ​​in organisations
  Current interdisciplinary research in the field

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Material on Moodle.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The basis for the course's examination consists of:
  - A written individual submission, graded according to 0-5
  - A group work, graded 0-5
  
  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 09.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • SHV23HD-V
  • SHV23HD-Å
  • SHV24H-Å
  • SHV24H-V

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Strandell-Laine

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline group assignment xx.xx.2024
  Deadline individual assignment xx.xx.2024.

  Student's schedule and workload

  In total 5 ECTS, 135 hours
  Lectures 6h
  Seminarium 4 h
  Selfstudies 125 h

  Assessment criteria

  The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
  The methodological literature is not used.
  Reflections are not performed.
  The technical design is lacking.
  Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
  The literature is referenced
  Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
  The technical design is satisfactory.
  Refers concepts and basic principle
  Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The questions are answered.
  The methodological literature is applied.
  The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
  The technical design is good
  Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
  The literature is analyzed and applied.
  The reflection is scientifically analytical.
  The technical design is commendable.
  Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
  Makes versatile use of literature
  Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically