Academic year 2020 - 2021

•   A Theoretical Framework for Nursing Research NU15RM02-3003 08.02.2021-14.03.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of the fundamental philosophical theories underpinning nursing research
  - obtain knowledge of nursing theories that influence nursing research and nursing care
  - become familiar with the tradition and development of Caring Science - its history and future
  - be able to integrate basic knowledge of ontology, epistemology and the ethos of Caring Science into different modules of clinical caring and nursing

  Prerequisites

  The Nature and Ethics of Nursing
  Integral Aspects of Nursing Research

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of the fundamental philosophical theories underpinning nursing research
  - obtain knowledge of nursing theories that influence nursing research and nursing care
  - become familiar with the tradition and development of Caring Science - its history and future
  - be able to integrate basic knowledge of ontology, epistemology and the ethos of Caring Science into different modules of clinical caring and nursing

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alligood, M.R. ed. 2018. Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (2014 version is available as e-book)
  
  Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book) chapters 1-3,7-9,12,13, 25 ,28, 30, 34, 38.
  
  Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
  eller
  Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2018. Essentials of nursing research. appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.) . Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Methods and basis for evaluation:
  Nursing theory 1 cr
  Written exam 2cr
  
  Criteria for the theory evaluation:
  Motivation of choice 1 point
  Background of theorist 2 p
  Where did the theorist find inspiration 1 p
  How was the theory created/generated 1 p
  Description of the theory 10 p
  Concepts/phenomena 4 p
  Relations within the theory 1 p
  Assumptions, hypothesis, premises 1 p
  Level of theory 1 p
  How is the theory used 2 p
  Criteria for evaluation of the theory 2 p
  Conclusions what did you learn from the theory, how could you use this theory in practice and in your thesis 2 p
  PP layout 1 p
  Other material: pictures, books, instruments etc 2 p
  Presentation, prepared 2 p
  Comments 2 p
  References 2 p
  max 10 slides 1 p
  Handed in on time 1 p
  Followed instructions 1 p
  Total points 40
  
  Written exam 50%= grade 1

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The theory chosen in the assignment can be used in the thesis.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to general instructions on validation in Novia
  Written assignment (PP)+ written online exam

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Time table for examination:
  Online exam 19th of March
  Possibility to two retakes on 16th of April and 7th of May

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  6x2h= 12 lectures, individual presentation,
  seminars 4h per student in two groups (8h all together)
  2h online exam
  63 h own work, reading, doing assignment, preparing for seminar and online exam
  
  1 cr=27h, 3cr= 81h work for students

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Acute and Intensive Nursing Care NU15IC04-3003 09.11.2020-23.05.2021  3 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - prepare to implement the nursing process in acute and intensive nursing care
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients in pain
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients in chock
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients with multiple health problems
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients with trauma or multiple injuries
  - become prepared to care for patients with altered electrolyte- and fluid balance
  - become prepared to support the patient and his/her family in acute and intensive nursing care situations

  Prerequisites

  Specialized Nursing Skills 2
  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - prepare to implement the nursing process in acute and intensive nursing care
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients in pain
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients in chock
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients with multiple health problems
  - obtain knowledge of nursing care for patients with trauma or multiple injuries
  - become prepared to care for patients with altered electrolyte- and fluid balance
  - become prepared to support the patient and his/her family in acute and intensive nursing care situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Price, A., Smith, S. & Challiner, A. 2016. Ward-based Critical Care. A Guide for Health Professionals. 2nd Edition.
  Holbery, N & Newcombe, P. 2016. Emergency Nursing at a Glance.
  WHO, Emergency & Trauma Care Training Course. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s16382e.pdf

  Learning methods

  Lectures

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grade 0 - 5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  09.11.2020 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Cooperation with Vaasa Central hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h

•   Acute and Intensive Nursing Skills NU15CT05-3002 23.11.2020-30.05.2021  3 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to outline and apply the theory of intensive and emergency care to nursing and consider the specific caring needs of the patient who is critically ill or suffers from trauma
  - demonstrate skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in acute and intensive nursing care settings
  - become familiar with common problems in critical and acute care, and be able to implement that knowledge in simulated situations
  - become familiar with the technology of intensive and acute care settings and prepared to perform first aid in hospital settings
  - be able to perform resuscitation in various settings

  Prerequisites

  Specialized Nursing Skills 2
  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to outline and apply the theory of intensive and emergency care to nursing and consider the specific caring needs of the patient who is critically ill or suffers from trauma
  - demonstrate skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in acute and intensive nursing care settings
  - become familiar with common problems in critical and acute care, and be able to implement that knowledge in simulated situations
  - become familiar with the technology of intensive and acute care settings and prepared to perform first aid in hospital settings
  - be able to perform resuscitation in various settings

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Price, A., Smith, S. & Challiner, A. 2016. Ward-based Critical Care. A Guide for Health Professionals. 2nd Edition.
  Holbery, N & Newcombe, P. 2016. Emergency Nursing at a Glance.
  WHO, Emergency & Trauma Care Training Course. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s16382e.pdf

  Learning methods

  Practice in class, simulation exercise

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Pass /fail

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  23.11.2020 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 29.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical examination, pass/fail

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Cooperation with Vaasa Central hospital, Elvytysviikko

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Practical examination spring 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h

•   Anatomy and Physiology 1 NU15BM01-3002 31.08.2020-18.10.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the structure and function of the locomotor system, as well as the anatomic position and the description of orientation
  - become familiar with cell biology, as well as different types of tissues, and understand their function
  - understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes
  - understand the structure and function of the sense organs
  - understand how the endocrine system regulates body metabolism and organ functions
  - understand the reproductive system
  - be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Basic anatomical terminology; body positions, directional terms, planes through the human body, terms in Latin and Greek.
  Basic cell biology. Different cells and tissues, organs and organ systems. The integumentary system.
  Structure and function of the nervous system.
  Structure and function of the sense organs.
  The endocrine system and regulation of organ functions and metabolism.
  The reproductive system; structure and function.
  The locomotor system; muscles, bones, joints and cartilages.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course books:
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
  Additional recommended books:
  Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Lecture material and exercises on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 18.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Sirén, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination is scheduled in Peppi (week 40)
  Re-examination x.x.2020 and x.x.2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Anatomy and Physiology 1 NU15BM01-3003 31.08.2020-18.10.2020  3 credits  (ÖH20NULED-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the structure and function of the locomotor system, as well as the anatomic position and the description of orientation
  - become familiar with cell biology, as well as different types of tissues, and understand their function
  - understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes
  - understand the structure and function of the sense organs
  - understand how the endocrine system regulates body metabolism and organ functions
  - understand the reproductive system
  - be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Basic anatomical terminology; body positions, directional terms, planes through the human body, terms in Latin and Greek.
  Basic cell biology. Different cells and tissues, organs and organ systems. The integumentary system.
  Structure and function of the nervous system.
  Structure and function of the sense organs.
  The endocrine system and regulation of organ functions and metabolism.
  The reproductive system; structure and function.
  The locomotor system; muscles, bones, joints and cartilages.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course books:
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
  Additional recommended books:
  Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Lecture material and exercises on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.
  Online

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 18.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Sirén, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination is scheduled in Peppi (week 40)
  Re-examination x.x.2020 and x.x.2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Anatomy and Physiology 2 NU15BM02-3002 05.10.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
  - understand how the lymphatic system works
  - understand the body's fluid- and acid-base balance
  - be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The blood and cardiovascular system
  The lymphatic system
  The respiratory system
  The digestive system
  The urinary system and the fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance in the body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course books:
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
  Additional recommended books:
  Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Lecture material and exercises on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Sirén, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination will be scheduled in Peppi
  Re-examination x.x.2021 and x.x.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Anatomy and Physiology 2 NU15BM02-3003 05.10.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (ÖH20NULED-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
  - understand how the lymphatic system works
  - understand the body's fluid- and acid-base balance
  - be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The blood and cardiovascular system
  The lymphatic system
  The respiratory system
  The digestive system
  The urinary system and the fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance in the body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course books:
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
  Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
  Additional recommended books:
  Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
  Lecture material and exercises on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Sirén, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination will be scheduled in Peppi
  Re-examination x.x.2021 and x.x.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Basic Mathematics for Nurses NU20PRE01-3003 01.03.2021-27.07.2021  5 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will after completing the course be able to:
  - know the basic mathematics used in the nursing field
  - know how to do unit transformations
  - know the basics of drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  - know the basic mathematics used in the nursing field
  - know how to do unit transformations
  - know the basics of drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  Further information

  The course can be taken in three parts

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  20% Face-to-face, 80% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Study material will be presented on Moodle
  
  You can take part of instruction materials (videos, reading material, examples) and you can practice on interactive exercises.
  The course has self correcting tests where you can test your progress in learning.

  Learning methods

  Online lessons
  Online exercises
  Online quizzes

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Online examination

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.03.2021 - 27.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  30.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  • 5 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Sandström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The online examinations will be during 1.4.2021 - 15.6.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  Basic calculations (1 cr)
  
  In this section we train on basic calculations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. You will learn how to do calculations with fractions and how to shorten and extend fractions. The techniques are implemented on drug dosing calculations.
  
  Unit conversion (1 cr)
  
  In this section you will learn how to do unit conversion that are typical in drug calculations. You will learn the most common unit prefixes that are used in drug calculations.
  
  Persentage (2 cr)
  
  In this section we do percentage calculations that are typical for drug calculations, and implement it especially on dilution calculations.
  
  Infusion ( 1cr)
  
  In this section we do infusion calculations.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  100% correct in online examinations

•   Basic Nursing Skills 1 NU20CT01-3002 25.01.2021-21.02.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - assess vital signs
  - employ aseptic technique
  - understand and manage nursing care when a patient is isolated due to illness reasons
  - support the patient’s hygiene
  - demonstrate knowledge and perform skills in basic care, and in promoting physiological health (activity, exercise, sleep)
  - assist a client with nutritional matters
  - obtain knowledge about, and provide, oxygen therapy
  - know the importance of ergonomic working methods and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - demonstrate knowledge about skin integrity and different types of wounds, as well as perform skills in wound care
  - service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - assess vital signs
  - employ aseptic technique
  - understand and manage nursing care when a patient is isolated due to illness reasons
  - support the patient’s hygiene
  - demonstrate knowledge and perform skills in basic care, and in promoting physiological health (activity, exercise, sleep)
  - assist a client with nutritional matters
  - obtain knowledge about, and provide, oxygen therapy
  - service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  - know the importance of ergonomic working methods and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - demonstrate knowledge about skin integrity and different types of wounds, as well as perform skills in wound care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
  
  Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Medicine Management Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
  
  Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
  
  Moodle: Teachers notes
  
  Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA

  Learning methods

  Practical training i class, demonstration

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 21.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical test

•   Basic Nursing Skills 1 NU20CT01-3003 01.03.2021-04.04.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - assess vital signs
  - employ aseptic technique
  - understand and manage nursing care when a patient is isolated due to illness reasons
  - support the patient’s hygiene
  - demonstrate knowledge and perform skills in basic care, and in promoting physiological health (activity, exercise, sleep)
  - assist a client with nutritional matters
  - obtain knowledge about, and provide, oxygen therapy
  - know the importance of ergonomic working methods and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - demonstrate knowledge about skin integrity and different types of wounds, as well as perform skills in wound care
  - service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - assess vital signs
  - employ aseptic technique
  - understand and manage nursing care when a patient is isolated due to illness reasons
  - support the patient’s hygiene
  - demonstrate knowledge and perform skills in basic care, and in promoting physiological health (activity, exercise, sleep)
  - assist a client with nutritional matters
  - obtain knowledge about, and provide, oxygen therapy
  - service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  - know the importance of ergonomic working methods and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - demonstrate knowledge about skin integrity and different types of wounds, as well as perform skills in wound care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.03.2021 - 04.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 28.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic Nursing Skills 1 NU20CT01-3001 28.09.2020-01.11.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - assess vital signs
  - employ aseptic technique
  - understand and manage nursing care when a patient is isolated due to illness reasons
  - support the patient’s hygiene
  - demonstrate knowledge and perform skills in basic care, and in promoting physiological health (activity, exercise, sleep)
  - assist a client with nutritional matters
  - obtain knowledge about, and provide, oxygen therapy
  - know the importance of ergonomic working methods and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - demonstrate knowledge about skin integrity and different types of wounds, as well as perform skills in wound care
  - service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - assess vital signs
  - employ aseptic technique
  - understand and manage nursing care when a patient is isolated due to illness reasons
  - support the patient’s hygiene
  - demonstrate knowledge and perform skills in basic care, and in promoting physiological health (activity, exercise, sleep)
  - assist a client with nutritional matters
  - obtain knowledge about, and provide, oxygen therapy
  - service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  - know the importance of ergonomic working methods and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - demonstrate knowledge about skin integrity and different types of wounds, as well as perform skills in wound care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
  
  Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Medicine Management Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
  
  Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
  
  Moodle: Teachers notes
  
  Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 01.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V
  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic Nursing Skills 2 NU20CT02-3001 01.03.2021-04.04.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrates skill in, diagnostic testing, common blood tests and specimen collection and injections (S.C. and I.M)
  - obtain knowledge of the nurse’s role when supporting the patient in the x-ray-situation
  - obtain knowledge about elimination, and demonstrate skills in helping a client with urinary and fecal problems (ss. catheterization and ostomy care)
  - obtain knowledge about altered nutrition and demonstrate skills in enteral nutrition
  - has knowledge about electronical documentation and services

  Prerequisites

  Basic Nursing Skills 1

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrates skill in, diagnostic testing, common blood tests and specimen collection and injections (S.C. and I.M)
  - obtain knowledge of the nurse’s role when supporting the patient in the x-ray-situation
  - obtain knowledge about elimination, and demonstrate skills in helping a client with urinary and fecal problems (ss. catheterization and ostomy care)
  - obtain knowledge about altered nutrition and demonstrate skills in enteral nutrition
  - has knowledge about electronical documentation and services

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.03.2021 - 04.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 28.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic Nursing Skills 2 NU20CT02-3003 05.04.2021-25.04.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrates skill in, diagnostic testing, common blood tests and specimen collection and injections (S.C. and I.M)
  - obtain knowledge of the nurse’s role when supporting the patient in the x-ray-situation
  - obtain knowledge about elimination, and demonstrate skills in helping a client with urinary and fecal problems (ss. catheterization and ostomy care)
  - obtain knowledge about altered nutrition and demonstrate skills in enteral nutrition
  - has knowledge about electronical documentation and services

  Prerequisites

  Basic Nursing Skills 1

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrates skill in, diagnostic testing, common blood tests and specimen collection and injections (S.C. and I.M)
  - obtain knowledge of the nurse’s role when supporting the patient in the x-ray-situation
  - obtain knowledge about elimination, and demonstrate skills in helping a client with urinary and fecal problems (ss. catheterization and ostomy care)
  - obtain knowledge about altered nutrition and demonstrate skills in enteral nutrition
  - has knowledge about electronical documentation and services

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Berman, A. & Snyder, S. 2012. (9nd ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
  Hess, C. 2013. Clinical guide to Skin & Wound Care. 7th Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins.

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice in class + independent training
  Demonstration
  Making of movies

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  05.04.2021 - 25.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 04.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Åsa Lågland, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practice in class: pass or fail
  Movies: pass or fail
  Moodle test: pass or fail

•   Cultural Competence and Advanced Nursing Care NU15CT13-3002 17.08.2020-31.12.2020  9 credits  (NU17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - independently participate in a multiprofessional and multicultural nursing team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - communicate with patients and colleagues in the language used at the workplace and follow the general rules and routines in the working environment
  - implement evidence-based nursing care and employ the nursing process in advanced nursing care situations
  - master clinical nursing methodsand implement nursing activities
  - demonstrate cultural competence in nursing care
  - perform safe drug adminstration

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 3
  Paediatrics, Maternity and Adult Nursing Care
  Mental - Home and Rehabilitative Nursing Care
  Acute and Intensive Nursing Care
  Acute and Intensive Nursing Skills

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
  Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
  Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015

  Learning methods

  Supervised Clinical practice
  Practice seminars

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Clinical Practice 40h / week in six weeks.
  Mandatory attendance 100%
  mandatory attendace at practice seminars
  Approved practice assignments

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  17.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or tto find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
  
  Read instructions in Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internships
  Participation in internship seminar
  Approved practice assignments
  See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars week 47
  Approved internship from clincal supervisro and teacher

  Student's schedule and workload

  40 h/week during clinical training

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.
  
  The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
  Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
  Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
  evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
  Can be responsible for safe drug handling
  Can use HaiPro
  Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
  patients and relatives
  Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
  Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
  cultural affiliation
  Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
  Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
  nursing context
  Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
  Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
  Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
  Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
  professional secrecy
  https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.pdf

•   Cultural Diversity in Health and Illness NU15CC02-3002 03.05.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to recognize and consider the challenges of working in a multicultural and multiprofessional team
  - become familiar with concepts related to culture, health and nursing
  - obtain knowledge of the most common nursing theories related to cultural competence in nursing care
  - be able to recognize phenomena like racism and xenophobia, and understand how they can affect good nursing care
  - become aware of cultural safety, cultural blindness and cultural imposition and be able to apply that knowledge to the nursing process
  - obtain knowledge about epidemiology andrelate it to different geographical areas and health risks specific for different areas

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to recognize and consider the challenges of working in a multicultural and multiprofessional team
  - become familiar with concepts related to culture, health and nursing
  - obtain knowledge of the most common nursing theories related to cultural competence in nursing care
  - be able to recognize phenomena like racism and xenophobia, and understand how they can affect good nursing care
  - become aware of cultural safety, cultural blindness and cultural imposition and be able to apply that knowledge to the nursing process
  - obtain knowledge about epidemiology andrelate it to different geographical areas and health risks specific for different areas

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Literature to be found online on databases
  See Moodle course.

  Learning methods

  Lectures online,
  Group work online
  Self studies
  Seminars online

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  See below, please

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  03.05.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 02.05.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Three smaller assignments:
  Poster on tropical diseases
  Assignemnt on structural racism
  Assignment on different topics in groups with Greek students

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Discussion and groupwork with Greek students online

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  2 retakes are possible if needed on general exam days in August and September.
  27.8.2021 12-16
  17.9.2021 12-16
  Registration is needed well in advace

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr= 27h work
  3cr = 81h
  
  18h lectures
  8h seminars
  2x 2h + 1h external lecturer
  50h students individual and group work

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  0 = no participation or submission

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1 = participation and submission in time, limited knowledge of the topic
  2 = participating in discussion and assignment with satisfactory knowledge of the topic

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  3= show good knowledge of the topic
  4= show interest and maturity in the topics

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  5= show an excellent insight in the topic

•   Drug Therapy 1 NU15PH01-3002 16.11.2020-31.01.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply Finnish laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care, and will become aware of international regulations and trends related to the field
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe actions of drugs on the body
  - be able to identify different medication groups and become familiar with indications, interactions and the most common side-effects
  - will be able to observe and evaluate the effects of medication
  - is familiar with medication used in elderly care
  - recognize the steps used in safe administration of oral medication
  - know prescription regulations
  - master calculations needed in medical treatment, and will be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply Finnish laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care, and will become aware of international regulations and trends related to the field
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe actions of drugs on the body
  - be able to identify different medication groups and become familiar with indications, interactions and the most common side-effects
  - will be able to observe and evaluate the effects of medication
  - is familiar with medication used in elderly care
  - recognize the steps used in safe administration of oral medication
  - know prescription regulations
  - master calculations needed in medical treatment, and will be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Downie, G. 2008. Pharmacology and Medicines Management for Nurses. (4th Ed) London Churchill Livingstone
  Berman, A.& Snyder, S. 2016. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. (9th ed) Boston: Pearson. Chapter 35 Medications.
  Lapham, R. & Agar, H. 2009. Drug calculations for Nurses. A step-by-step Approach.
  Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito. Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa.
  Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. 2009. Safe Pharmacotherapy. National Guide for Pharmacotherapy in Social and Health Care.
  http://www.stm.Fi/en/social_andhealth_services/pharmacotherapy
  Lecture notes and handouts

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Drug calculation practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written examination , theory, grade 0-5
  Drug calculation; pass or fail
  Drug calculation; 100% correct for approved exam

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  16.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 22.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written and virtual examinations

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Virtual test
  Written examination in Drug calculation / moodle webex connection if restrictions COVID-19 continue

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cp. = 81 hours

•   Drug Therapy 2 NU15PH02-3004 01.03.2021-31.05.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -master advanced drug therapy in nursing care and recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  -know the active pharmaceutical ingredients
  -know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  -be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  -master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  -understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  -master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Basic Nursing Skills 1
  Basic Nursing Skills 2
  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  -master advanced drug therapy in nursing care and recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  -know the active pharmaceutical ingredients
  -know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  -be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  -master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  -understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  -master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Flipped learning, virtual pedagogics
  Workshops online, assignnets and tests online

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  test grades 0-5
  assignment passed/failed
  calculation test 100% correct answers according to national instructions for drug calculation

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.03.2021 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam i drug calculation online /webex after 4 workshops
  online test and assignets according to deadlines i moodle

•   Drug Therapy 3 NU15PH03-3003 08.02.2021-21.03.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  -know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication
  -be able to identify interactions between different drugs in different ages
  -know drug therapy among all patient groups
  -know various types of pain medication
  -know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1
  Drug therapy 2

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  -know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  -know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication
  -be able to identify interactions between different drugs in different ages
  -know drug therapy among all patient groups
  -know various types of pain medication
  -know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student must manage drug calculations 100% correctly
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  E-book; Gersch, C., Heimgartner, N., Rebar, C. & Willis, L. 2016. Pharmacology Made incredibly Easy.
  Downie, G. 2008. Pharmacology and Medicines Managements for Nurses. (4 th Ed). London: Churchill Livingstone
  Articles and material according to teachers advice

  Learning methods

  lectures and seminars online according to teachers information

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test 0-5 ( 60% correct for approved)
  Assigment: Pass/complete/ not pass

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 21.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Virtual examination, grade 0 - 5 ( 75% for passing)
  Seminars
  written assigments

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Virtual examination examination March 19th 2021
  Re-take 1: 26,th March
  Re-take 2 : 6th April

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 h

•   Elderly Care Management NU15CT12-3002 17.08.2020-31.05.2021  6 credits  (NU17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - communicate with patients and colleagues in Swedish or Finnish, the main supervision will be carried out in Swedish or Finnish
  - follow the general rules and routines in a working environment
  - independently assess the patient’s caring needs, plan for interventions, as well as take part in the implementation of the plan and the evaluation of the given nursing care
  - make decisions concerning the patient’s individual nursing care, under supervision and with increasing independence
  - implement the nursing process for patients with multiple diseases
  - document and give verbal reports of given nursing care, under supervision and with increasing independence
  - understand the administration of a ward, perform necessary procedures when receiving and discharging a patient

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 3
  Paediatrics, Maternity and Adult Nursing Care
  Mental - Home and Rehabilitative Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
  Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
  Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015

  Learning methods

  Supervised Clinical practice
  Practice seminars

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Clinical Practice 40h / week in six weeks.
  Mandatory attendance 100%
  mandatory attendace at practice seminars
  Approved practice assignments
  
  See separate framework for evaluation

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  17.08.2020 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or tto find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
  
  Read instructions in Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internships
  Participation in internship seminar
  Approved practice assignments
  See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars week 47
  Approved internship from clincal supervisro and teacher

  Student's schedule and workload

  40 h/week during clinical training

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.
  
  The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
  Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
  Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
  evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
  Can be responsible for safe drug handling
  Can use HaiPro
  Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
  patients and relatives
  Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
  Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
  cultural affiliation
  Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
  Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
  nursing context
  Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
  Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
  Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
  Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
  professional secrecy
  https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.pdf

•   Finnish for Beginners NU15IA03-3003 11.01.2021-14.03.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at meeting specific needs
  - introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, and possessions
  - interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  During the course we’ll focus on:
  - Oral and written exercises
  - Finnish everyday vocabulary
  - Reading and listening comprehensions
  - Grammar/language structures
  - Exams

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish for Beginners NU15IA03-3004 11.01.2021-14.03.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at meeting specific needs
  - introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, and possessions
  - interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  During the course we’ll focus on:
  - Oral and written exercises
  - Finnish everyday vocabulary
  - Reading and listening comprehensions
  - Grammar/language structures
  - Exams

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Study materials are provided by the teacher.
  Recommended book: Suomen mestari 1.

  Learning methods

  Online lectures, oral and written exercises and assignments, individual work and work in pairs.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The grade is based on work in class, homework and exams.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Nygård

  Additional information

  More information about the course will be provided in Moodle and during the first lesson.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  - assignments and exams
  - homework
  - active participation during lessons
  - attendance at least 80 %

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and exams during the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 credits = 81 h
  32 h online lessons
  49 h individual studies

  Assessment criteria

  - failed exam or assignments
  - too much absence from lessons
  - the student has unsatisfactory knowledge in the basics of Finnish.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has satisfactory knowledge in the basics of Finnish both orally and in writing.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student knows the basics of Finnish well both orally and in writing.
  The student is often able to apply skills learned during the course in simple every day situations.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student knows the basics of Finnish very well both orally and in writing.
  The student knows how to apply skills learned during the course in simple every day situations.

•   First Aid and Crisis Management NU15IC03-3002 31.08.2020-11.10.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of different types of crises, as well as patient care in various emergency and crisis situations
  - obtain knowledge of the organization and administration of crises in the community and in the workplace
  - obtain knowledge of first aid, and be prepared to act in accordance with the requirements of the acute situation
  - obtain knowledge of acute psychiatric illness and be prepared to act in accordance with laws and regulations, as well as the requirements of the acute situation
  - become prepared to support the patient, as well as his/her family, in acute- and trauma situations
  - prepare to supervise and guide patients and personnel in crisis situations
  - become familiar with occupational safety and civil defence

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  2 cu First Aid
  1 cu Crisis Management

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kelly, A & Lawlor, A. 2009. (or later). First Aid Manual. The step-by-step guide for everyone. Irish Red Cross.
  Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
  Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.
  http//www.siviilikriisihallinta.org/from_conflicts_to development.pdf
  Korhonen, S. & Sumuvouri.J. (eds). 2006. From conflicts to Development. An introduction to EU Civilian management. Civil Society Prevention Network. Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy. Jyväskylä.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, practical training, assignments
  seminars

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved practical test
  Approved resuscitation test (90 % correct)
  Approved assignment
  100 % attendance

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Practical test during lectures

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h

•   Gerontology and Geriatrics NU15AF08-3003 08.02.2021-11.04.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the process of natural ageing (physical, mental and social changes)
  - become prepared to assess caring needs that are specific for the elderly patient
  - obtain basic knowledge of health promotion, the prevention of diseases and disabilities in older adults, and use this knowledge for patient guidance.
  - obtain knowledge of specific diseases linked to older adults and their aetiology
  - obtain knowledge of specific issues regarding pharmacology and nutrition in elderly care, and prepare for the practice of safe drug administration
  - become prepared to care for the elderly patient in all nursing contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the process of natural ageing (physical, mental and social changes)
  - become prepared to assess caring needs that are specific for the elderly patient
  - obtain basic knowledge of health promotion, the prevention of diseases and disabilities in older adults, and use this knowledge for patient guidance.
  - obtain knowledge of specific diseases linked to older adults and their aetiology
  - obtain knowledge of specific issues regarding pharmacology and nutrition in elderly care, and prepare for the practice of safe drug administration
  - become prepared to care for the elderly patient in all nursing contexts

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Power points on Moodle
  National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
  Tabloski, P. 2014. Gerontological nursing
  Craig, L. 2019, The role of the registered nurse in supporting frailty in care homes. British Journal of Nursing 7/11. 2019
  Ferraro, K., Janet M. Wilmoth, J. 2013 Gerontology : Perspectives and Issues, Fourth Edition
  Sugar, J.A 2019. Introduction to aging. A positive interdisciplinary approach

  Learning methods

  Lectures online
  Groupwork

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 11.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Additional information

  Assignments submitted after deadline is not accepted - normal exam on scheduled retake
  Assignment is automatically sent to urkund for plagiarism control
  Written exam is graded passes/failed
  Online exam is graded 1-5

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written assignment and group report submitted 12.3
  Online exam 18.3
  Retake

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h =81 h

•   Health Care and Social Welfare NU15HS01-3003 05.10.2020-06.12.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain basic knowledge of health care and social welfare structures, both nationally and internationally
  - become familiar with health care and social welfare services organized by the public, private and third sector in Finland
  - become familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - be able to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing care in order to guide the patient in matters concerning rights to health care and social services

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain basic knowledge of health care and social welfare structures, both nationally and internationally
  - become familiar with health care and social welfare services organized by the public, private and third sector in Finland
  - become familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - be able to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing care in order to guide the patient in matters concerning rights to health care and social services

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Berman, A,. Snyder S.( 2012). Kozier &Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Unit 1 chapter 4.
  Kela, the social institution of Finland. Available at: http://www.kela.fi/documents/10180/578772/Kela_Yleisesite_EN_WEB.pdf/60019393-183a-40ff-9325-e4cdabb54790
  Säkkinen, S. (2010). Fact about social welfare and health care in Finland 2010. Available at: http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79913/facts2010.pdf?sequence=1
  The ministry of social affairs and health care, Finland: http://stm.fi/en/publications
  National Institute of Health and Welfare, Finland https://www.thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en
  Information and literature at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, Group assignment, poster exhibition

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Evaluation of poster and oral presentation at the seminar 0-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 06.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 06.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Irén Vikström, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  poster exhibition and oral presentation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and poster exhibition
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

•   Health Care and Social Welfare - Open Path NU20OPEN03-3001 01.08.2020-31.07.2021  3 credits  (ÖH20NULED-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain basic knowledge of health care and social welfare structures, both nationally and internationally
  - become familiar with health care and social welfare services organized by the public, private and third sector in Finland
  - become familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - be able to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing care in order to guide the patient in matters concerning rights to health care and social services
  - must show motivation, group discussion skills and adequacy in English language, to be suitable for the nursing profession

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain basic knowledge of health care and social welfare structures, both nationally and internationally
  - become familiar with health care and social welfare services organized by the public, private and third sector in Finland
  - become familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - be able to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing care in order to guide the patient in matters concerning rights to health care and social services

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  Further information

  The course is for open path students 30 cu
  The course is mandatory to pass before application for the degree programme in nursing at Novia UAS through open path application

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Irén Vikström, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Health Promotion and Illness Prevention NU15HS02-3003 01.02.2021-14.03.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - develop a holistic view of the human being
  - become familiar with health promotion throughout the life span
  - know the fundamental concepts of epidemiology, health and illness, and differentiates health promotion from health protection or illness prevention
  - recognise factors hazardous to health, and will be able to apply an individual approach to health promotion and prevention
  - be able to identify theoretical frameworks used in individual health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with different aspects of measuring health: subjective and objective measurements
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - understand the concept of health and lifestyle and be able to apply that to disorders linked to lifestyle
  - recognise the connection between illness and social factors

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - develop a holistic view of the human being
  - become familiar with health promotion throughout the life span
  - know the fundamental concepts of epidemiology, health and illness, and differentiates health promotion from health protection or illness prevention
  - recognize factors hazardous to health, and will be able to apply an individual approach to health promotion and prevention
  - be able to identify theoretical frameworks used in individual health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with different aspects of measuring health: subjective and objective measurements
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - understand the concept of health and lifestyle and be able to apply that todisorders linked to lifestyle
  - recognize the connection between illness and social factorsThe student will:
  - develop a holistic view of the human being
  - become familiar with health promotion throughout the life span
  - know the fundamental concepts of epidemiology, health and illness, and differentiates health promotion from health protection or illness prevention
  - recognise factors hazardous to health, and will be able to apply an individual approach to health promotion and prevention
  - be able to identify theoretical frameworks used in individual health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with different aspects of measuring health: subjective and objective measurements
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - understand the concept of health and lifestyle and be able to apply that to disorders linked to lifestyle
  - recognise the connection between illness and social factors

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bergmann, K .E & Bergmann, R. 2003. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in the Family . E-Book.
  Edelman C.L, Kudzma E.C & Mandle C.L.2014.Health Promotion Throghout the Life Span. Eight edition Mosby.Missouri.
  Pender, Nola.J, Murdaugh, C & Parsons A.2011. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson cop. 2011.
  MacMahon, B.1970. Epidemiology. Principles and Methods. First edition. Boston.
  Optional Literature in Epidemiology.
  Alligood, M.R 2018. Nursing Theorists and their work, Ninth Edition. U.S.A Elsevier.
  www.stm.fi
  www.thl.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, group work, self studies / Web based studies - Online

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Validation according to Novia´s general instructions
  Written assignment (group work)

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.02.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars w.10

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr , 3 cr =81 h
  4,4,4,6 = 18 hours lectures
  63 hours individual work to do self studies, to read relevant literature and to cooperate with other students in group work and written assignment.

•   Home and Community Nursing Care NU15HS05-3002 28.09.2020-15.11.2020  3 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with the organization of home care in Finland, and be able to define home care in different settings
  - be able to identify the essential aspects of the home visit
  - become aware of patient- and staff safety during home visits
  - be able to take care of the patient in a home environment while considering professionalism, confidentiality and courtesy
  - be able to apply evidence-based nursing care, and the nursing process, in home- and community nursing care

  Prerequisites

  Health Care and Social Welfare
  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with the organization of home care in Finland, and be able to define home care in different settings
  - be able to identify the essential aspects of the home visit
  - become aware of patient- and staff safety during home visits
  - be able to take care of the patient in a home environment while considering professionalism, confidentiality and courtesy
  - be able to apply evidence-based nursing care, and the nursing process, in home- and community nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Berman A. & Snyder S. (2016). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing, Global Edition. Pearsons. Unit 2. Chapter 7-8.
  LeMone P. et al. (2015) Medical-Surgical Nursing: clinical reasoning in patient care. Pearsons. Boston. Unit 1. Chapter 3.
  Health Care Comes Home: The Human Factors (2011): National Academies Press.
  Mulley G., Bowman C. & Boyd M. (2014). The Care Home Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
  Sines d. et al (Ed.) (2013). Community and Public Health Nursing John Wileys & Sons, Incorporated.
  Tuner K.J. (2012) Advances in Home Care Technologies: Results of the MATCH Project. IOS Press.
  Articles.

  Learning methods

  Group work, self-directed studies, presentations, seminar and discussions.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination:
  Grade scale 0-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia´s general instructions

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr
  3 cr = 81 h

•   Integral Aspects of Nursing Research NU15RM01-3002 21.09.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain the necessary IT-skills for information seeking and communication
  - obtain the necessary skills for academic writing and the presentation of written assignments
  - develop the ability to read, understand and produce academic texts in English

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain the necessary IT-skills for information seeking and communication
  - obtain the necessary skills for academic writing and the presentation of written assignments
  - develop the ability to read, understand and produce academic texts in English

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -Novia UAS's writing instructions
  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 09.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -oral presentation (video recorded)
  -written analysis based on the oral presentation
  -written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written assignments
  The student has followed instructions but his/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student shows limited knowledge of the subject, he/she knows only the most essential matters.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment. His/her knowledge of other students' work/assignments is inadequate. The student demonstrates good subject knowledge in his/her written assignment but the implementation is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows great knowledge of the subject. He/she has read the other participants' written assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical accuracy, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).

•   Integral Aspects of Nursing Research - Open Path NU20OPEN02-3001 01.08.2020-31.07.2021  3 credits  (ÖH20NULED-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain the necessary IT-skills for information seeking and communication
  - obtain the necessary skills for academic writing and the presentation of written assignments
  - develop the ability to read, understand and produce academic texts in English
  - must show competence in reading and writing academic text

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain the necessary IT-skills for information seeking and communication
  - obtain the necessary skills for academic writing and the presentation of written assignments
  - develop the ability to read, understand and produce academic texts in English
  - must show competence in reading and writing academic text

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  På svenska
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  Further information

  The course is for open path students 30 cu
  The course is mandatory to pass before application for the degree programme in nursing at Novia UAS through open path application

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Irén Vikström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Intermediary Thesis Seminar NU15TH02-3002 07.12.2020-31.05.2021  6 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will, under supervision, but with increasing independence:
  - collect data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
  - describe methods of data analysis
  - present the methodological part of the thesis at an intermediary seminar

  Prerequisites

  Thesis Plan and Seminar

  Content of the study unit

  The student will, under supervision, but with increasing independence:
  - collect data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
  - describe methods of data analysis
  - present the methodological part of the thesis at an intermediary seminar

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle courses:
  Examensarbete/Thesis English part
  Theory, qualitative methods and thesis writing

  Learning methods

  Increasingly independent work, with the help of a supervisor
  - collect and describe background information for the study
  - collect data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
  - describe methods of data analysis
  - present the methodological part of the thesis at an intermediary seminar
  Lecture and seminars

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Pass/Fail
  See practical guide to thesis writing
  The manuscript for Intermediary seminar shall include following chapters:
  Introduction
  Background of the study
  Theoretical framework
  Aim, purpose
  Method
  Ethical issues
  Sampling/material
  Data collection
  Data analysis

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  07.12.2020 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 13.12.2020

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Seats

  20 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved manuscript for intermediary seminar, attendance at intermediary seminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation at intermediary seminar in December

  Student's schedule and workload

  6cr= 6x27h= 162h
  2h get together lecture, information + 8h seminar in December, 152h is independent work with the help of the supervisor.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  See practical guide for thesis writing for grades 0-5 for final thesis.

•   International Nursing NU15CC03-3002 24.05.2021-31.12.2021  3 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge about trends in global health
  - be able to identify socioeconomic, biological and behavioural factors that influence health
  - be able to explain the social determinants of health
  - be able to describe some of the major global challenges impacting health
  - be able to distinguish health inequality from health inequity
  - be able to explain the influence of inequality on health outcomes
  - obtain knowledge about tropical diseases and their aetiology
  - become aware of the modes of transmission, prevention, treatment and care related to extremely contagious diseases
  - recognize the organizations working for global issues in health care
  - understand the challenges of working in difficult areas

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge about trends in global health
  - be able to identify socioeconomic, biological and behavioural factors that influence health
  - be able to explain the social determinants of health
  - be able to describe some of the major global challenges impacting health
  - be able to distinguish health inequality from health inequity
  - be able to explain the influence of inequality on health outcomes
  - obtain knowledge about tropical diseases and their aetiology
  - become aware of the modes of transmission, prevention, treatment and care related to extremely contagious diseases
  - recognize the organizations working for global issues in health care
  - understand the challenges of working in difficult areas

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Depending on choice of theme/topic
  See literature on writing and publishing in Moodle course

  Learning methods

  Themes/Topics to write about
  1. The Social and/or Cultural Determinants of Health
  2. The Equality of Health - a Global Challenge
  3. Micro- and Macro-perspective in Health Care
  4. To work as Nurse in Disaster/Vulnerable Areas
  5. The Challenges of working in a Multicultural Team
  6. Intercultural nursing care
  7. To study nursing in a foreign culture
  8. Braindrain of health care personnell from developing countries
  9. Structural racism in health care
  10. Equality and equity among patients with a different cultural background

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  See below

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  24.05.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 23.05.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The assignment is individual.
  Supervision is given from teacher on demand 2 times + final evaluation. Please start early!
  Evaluation can be booked before 7th of June or after 9th of August.
  Deadline of all texts is 1st of November 2021.
  The seminar will be on 25th of November.
  To be able to publish you need to have a grade 3 or above.
  Use references correctly.
  Do not write about your thesis topic or the same topics as you have written in CC02!
  You will take part in the peer review process of two other students
  Do spelling and grammar checkup in Word before you send to peer review and your supervisor

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Alternative 1. Write a short article (min 2000 words abstract with max 150 words excluded) about one of the topics above
  Content: Introduction, Headings 1 - 3 and Conclusion
  
  Alternative 2. Create a blog and update it on a regular base (minimum 4 times and minimum 500 words each time) during May- October 2021 where you write about one of the topics above
  
  Alternative 3. Write a short debate article for a daily newspaper (following the guidelines for debate article) about one of the topics above
  
  Use instructions for written assignments when writing an article (you can also use Vancouver or Harvard system). The aim is to publish your article in Novialia or a non-scientific nursing journal.
  When publishing you need to have a second author, your supervisor. It will be Anita Wikberg. The second writer (AW) gives supervision, corrects manuscript and influences this way on the manuscript).
  When writing a blog, the forum and manuscripts must be approved by the supervisor (AW) before publication. Use the given instructions for the forum where you publish your blog. The blog is published at Novia blogs. The supervisor's name will be mentioned in the blog.
  When writing a short debate article, the manuscript must be approved by the supervisor and include the supervisors name before publishing.
  The final manuscript must be sent to your supervisor through Urkund for all three alternatives

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  October

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1cr =27h
  3cr = 3x27h= 81h
  2h introduction, 2h supervision, 2h peer review, 4-8h presentation
  67-71h is independent work.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  Grade one is not reached

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Grade 1
  The aim with the article is unclear and the literature is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient. The article is incohesive and reflects a flawed understanding of the scientific working procedure, as well as the inability to structure an article in a purposeful and accessible manner. However, the article has achieved the minor criteria for academic writing concerning text and references but cannot be published without major revisions
  The aim for the blog is unclear and the literature is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient and the text mainly reflects the authors opinion rather than factual knowledge. The text has reached the minor criteria for approval but cannot be published without major revisions.
  The aim with the debate article is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient. The text mainly reflects the authors own opinion rather than factual knowledge. The text has reached the minor criteria for approval but cannot be published without major revisions
  
  Grade 2
  The aim for the article remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge. The relevance of the study is described, but in a superficial way. Some of the sources are not relevant to the study. The ability for source criticism is weak. The study lacks systematicity and a logical structure. The article is somewhat incohesive and inconsistent and cannot be published unless major revisions are done.
  The aim for the blog remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to factual knowledge. The relevance for publishing the text is described but in a superficial way. Some of the topics described are not relevant. The ability for source criticism is weak. The blog text does not rise attention and the text is somewhat incohesive and inconsistent and cannot be published unless major revisions.
  The aim for the debate article remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to factual knowledge. It cannot be published unless major revisions.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Grade 3
  The motivation for writing the article is independently described but remain general. The framework for the article is well-constructed and motivated. Central concepts are clearly introduced, but their mutual relationship remains unclear. The chosen literature and research is relevant but is used in an uncritical manner. The article can be published with minor revisions.
  The blog is well motivated, independently described, but remain general. The blog text reflects actual and factual knowledge. The chosen literature is relevant. The text can be published with minor revisions.
  The debate article is interesting, well-motivated but lack a clear and stringent aim that catches the readers interest. The text is not fluent. The text can be published with minor revisions
  Grade 4
  The aim with the article is clearly described, it is actual and interesting. The literature used is relevant and the student ‘s ability for source criticism is good. The article is written in an academic style. With minor editing the article is ready for publication
  The aim with the blog is clearly described, the text reflects factual and actual knowledge described in an interesting way. Relevant literature is used in a good way. The text is ready for publishing with minor revision.
  The aim with the debate article is clear, it is independently described and rises interest. The factual and actual knowledge is reflected in the text and it is ready for publication with minor revisions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Grade 5
  The article is interesting, actual and well-motivated and the text is fluent. The references are actual and reflect the topic. The source criticism is good. The article sows the student’s ability to synthetizing text forming a new understanding. The article is ready for publication.
  The aim with the blog is clearly described, the text rises the interest and is fluently written. It reflects actual and factual knowledge. The debate article is ready for publication

•   Introduction to Studies at Novia UAS NU15IA01-3002 31.08.2020-19.12.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain good insights into nursing as a profession
  - become familiar with teaching methods, rules and norms at Novia UAS, and prepare to participate in various teaching arrangements and settings
  - obtain fundamental knowledge of Peppi, Moodle and other platforms used at Novia UAS
  - adopt critical thinking and incorporate the idea of lifelong learning
  - be able to search for adequate literature
  - become familiar with sustainable development from an economical, ecological and social perspective

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Information about studying at Novia UAS
  - Peppi
  - Moodle
  - Health Care
  - Study technique
  - Library services
  Curriculum
  - Degree Regulations
  - DP in Nursing
  - Nursing as profession
  Student Union
  
  Sustainable development at Novia UAS, National and international perspectives

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  intra.novia.fi
  Degree regualtions in Novia UAS
  Peppi

  Learning methods

  Lecture, group assignments, seminars, presentations, study visits

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation at seminar and approved assignment in the part assignment The own profession.
  Attendance at study visits
  
  Lectures on sustainable development and attendance at online study visit to Stormossen are compulsory.
  If the student is not present at lectures in sustainable development or online study visit to Stormosssen, other assignments will have to be done instead. These will be found on the Moodle page for the course after the lectures.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 19.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V
  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Irén Vikström, Margareta Antus, Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Compulsory attendance, participation in lectures and group processes, approved assignments

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Interviews with nurses in different contexts
  online study visit to Stormossen

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar in the part "The own profession" week XX
  Compulsory attendance in the course and during the seminar with XX w. XX
  Compulsory presence at lectures on sustainable development and online study visit to Stormossen.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Accepted
  The student has actively participated in the nearby studies and has achieved the criterion level in the subject
  Fail
  The student has not participated in the nearby studies and has not achieved, nor has he attempted to achieve the criterion level in the subject

•   Leading, Managing and Delegating in Nursing Care NU15IC05-3002 28.09.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the meaning of internal entrepreneurship
  - obtain knowledge of occupational safety; its legislation, organization and function
  - become familiar with different forms of organization, as well as theories of organization and leadership in nursing
  - understand the individual’s impact on organization and management in nursing
  - obtain knowledge about conflict management and become prepared to act in conflict situations
  - prepare to coordinate the patient’s nursing care

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Leading and managing in nursing care
  Occupational health
  Conflict management

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bondas, T. E., (2003), “Caritative Leadership: Ministering to the Patients,” Nurse ADM Q, 27(3), pp. 249 – 253.
  Bish, M., Kenny, A., Nay, R. (2012). A Scoping Review Identifying Contemporary Issues in Rural Nursing Leadership. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 44 (4), pp. 411-417
  Glasberg, AL., Eriksson, S., Norberg, A. (2008). Factors associated with ‘stress of conscience’ in healthcare. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 22 (2), pp. 249-258
  Horvat, A., & Filipovic, J. (2018). Service quality and maturity of health care organizations through the lens of Complexity Leadership Theory. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(1), 301–307.
  Lawrence, R. L. (2017). Understanding Collaborative Leadership in Theory and Practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 2017(156), 89–96.
  Mannix, J., Wilken, L., Daly, J. (2015). ‘Good ethics and moral standing': a qualitative study of aesthetic leadership in clinical nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 24(11/12)pp 1603-1610
  Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2002). Putting research into practice. Reflections on Nursing Leadership, 28(2), 22-25
  Reinhardt, A. C., (2004), “Discourse on the Transformational Leader: a Metanarrative of Finding the Right Person for the Job,” Adv. Nurs Sci, 27(1)pp. 21 – 31.
  Storch, J., Makaroff, KS., Pauly, B., Newton, L. (2013). Take me to my leader: The importance of ethical leadership among formal nurse leaders. Nursing Ethics. 20 (2), pp. 150-157.
  Tannenbaum, R. & Schmidt, W. How to choose a leadership Pattern. Harvard Business Review, May-June 1973, No. 73311 (originally published in March-April 1958 issue).
  Melnyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2005). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
  Tranmer, J.E., Kisilevsky, B.S., & Muir, D.W. (1995). A nursing research utilization strategy for staff nurses in the acute care setting. Journal of Nursing Administration, 25(4), 21-29

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group work, case studies and self study

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Case study for the part of occupational safety 1 cr. evaluated 0-5 ( 30% of the course)
  Home test for the part of leading, managing and delegating in nursing care 2 cr. evaluated 0-5 ( 70% of the course).

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 29.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  03.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Case study and home exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Case study and home exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  3 cr = 81 h

•   Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1 NU18CT07-3003 11.01.2021-16.02.2021  6 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - be able to communicate with patients and colleagues mainly in Swedish or Finnish, even though the main supervision is in English
  - be able to follow general rules and routines in the working environment
  - develop respect for the patient’s integrity and autonomy
  - understand and gradually adopt aseptic working methods
  - understand and gradually adopt safe working methods
  - be able to verbally report nursing activities and the patient’s condition
  - understand the underlying principles of medical and surgical nursing care at different wards
  - obtain evidence-based knowledge about common diseases and develop an understanding of the pharmacological treatment of the patient
  - be able to perform safe drug administration under supervision

  Prerequisites

  Swedish for Beginners/Finnish for Beginners
  Gerontology and Geriatrics
  Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
  Rehabilitation and Habilitation
  The Nature and Ethics in Nursing
  Basic Nursing Skills 1
  Basic Nursing Skills 2
  The Nursing Process
  Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 16.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1 NU20CT07-3001 03.05.2021-31.12.2021  6 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - be able to communicate with patients and colleagues mainly in Swedish or Finnish, even though the main supervision is in English
  - be able to follow general rules and routines in the working environment
  - develop respect for the patient’s integrity and autonomy
  - understand and gradually adopt aseptic working methods
  - understand and gradually adopt safe working methods
  - be able to verbally report nursing activities and the patient’s condition
  - understand the underlying principles of medical and surgical nursing care at different wards
  - obtain evidence-based knowledge about common diseases and develop an understanding of the pharmacological treatment of the patient
  - be able to perform safe drug administration under supervision
  - has achieved the basic clinical competence of the nurse according to national standard

  Prerequisites

  Swedish for Beginners/Finnish for Beginners
  Gerontology and Geriatrics
  Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
  Rehabilitation and Habilitation
  The Nature and Ethics in Nursing
  Basic Nursing Skills 1
  Basic Nursing Skills 2
  The Nursing Process
  Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  03.05.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 20.09.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Marica Hinders, Åsa Lågland, Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Prerequisites for the practice are passed courses
  Basic Nursing Skills 1 & 2
  Drug therapy 1
  Either Swedish for Beginners or Finnish for Beginners

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2 NU18CT08-3001 17.08.2020-04.10.2020  9 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - demonstrate respect for the patient’s integrity and autonomy
  - demonstrate the ability to support the patient in the rehabilitation process
  - understand the importance of aseptic working methods
  - employ safe working methods
  - be able to assess the patient’s caring needs, plan for interventions, implement nursing activities and demonstrate clinical nursing skills related to medical and surgical nursing, under supervision and with increasing independence
  - be able to produce a written documentation of nursing care and the patient’s condition, under supervision and with increasing independence
  - be able to verbally report nursing activities and the patient’s condition
  -implement the underlying principles of medical and surgical nursing care at different wards
  - obtain evidence-based knowledge about common diseases, and an understanding of the pharmacological treatment of the patient
  - be able to perform safe drug administration under supervision

  Prerequisites

  Specialized Nursing skills 1 & 2
  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1
  Drug Therapy 1,2 & 3
  At least 3 of these:
  Responses to Altered Haematological, Cardiovascular and Vascular Function
  Responses to Altered Integumentary, Neurologic and Eye- and Ear Function
  Responses to Altered Endocrine and Sexual-Reproductive Function
  Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal Function and Urinary Elimination
  Responses to Altered Muskuloskeletal and Respiratory Function

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Jobiili, www.jobiili.fi
  Vasa Central sjukhus, www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi
  Terveysportti
  Moodle - Practice documents from Curricula 2015

  Learning methods

  Supervised Clinical practice
  Practice seminars

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Pass /fail

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  17.08.2020 - 04.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Sirkku Säätelä, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Approved language interview at Vaasa Central Hospital before starting of practice

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved practice
  Approved written practice assignments
  Mini Love test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance at practice seminars
  Approved evaluation from clinical supervisors and supervising teacher

  Student's schedule and workload

  40 h/ weeks during clinical training

•   Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 3 NU18CT09-3001 11.01.2021-09.05.2021  6 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - demonstrate the ability to support the patient and the family in the rehabilitation process
  - be able to employ safe working methods
  - under supervision and with increasing independence be able to assess the patient’s caring needs, plan for i interventions, gradually independently implement nursing activities and demonstrate clinical nursing skills related to medical and surgical nursing
  - be able to document and report nursing activities and the patient’s condition in Finnish or Swedish
  - be able to implement the underlying principles of medical and surgical nursing care at different wards
  - obtain evidence-based knowledge of common diseases and show an understanding for the pharmacological treatment of the patient
  - under supervision and with increasing independence be able to perform safe oral- and intravenous drug administration, follow up the effects and act in accordance with the situation

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 09.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Mental - Home and Rehabilitative Nursing Care NU18CT11-3001 11.01.2021-09.05.2021  9 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to participate in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient by using the patient’s mother tongue on at least a basic level
  - be able to follow general rules and routines in the working environment
  - be able to apply evidence-based knowledge to mental health nursing, primary health care and home nursing care
  - be able to identify mental disorders and addictive behaviour
  - be able to implement the nursing process in mental health, primary health care and home nursing care
  - develop respect for the patient’s integrity and autonomy when caring for the patient in a home environment
  - be able to employ aseptic working methods in a home environment
  - be able to inform, advice and guide the patient in issues related to mental health and addictive behaviour, and will be able to provide psychiatric first aid
  - be able to support the patient’s family in their care for the patient
  - be able to perform safe drug administration

  Prerequisites

  Responses to Altered Mental Health
  Responses to Addictive Behavior
  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 09.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Nordic Health and Welfare VAL21018-3002 21.05.2021-30.09.2021  3 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - Have basic knowledge of and can recognize characteristics of the Nordic Welfare Model
  - Can identify different inter-professional perspectives on Health and Welfare in the Nordic context
  - Can discuss and reflect in English in a digital environment.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  - The Nordic Welfare Model
  - Social Services and Social Work
  - Health Care and Midwifery
  - Trends and challenges

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Satisfactory, very satisfactory 1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good, very good 3-4
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent 5
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Aspalter, C. 2019. Welfare regime analysis: 30 years in the making. International Social Work, 62:1, 76–88.
  
  Kangas, O. & Kvist, J. 2018. Nordic Welfare states. Chapter 12. In: Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State.
  
  Kettunen, P. 2010. The Nordic Welfare State in Finland, Scandinavian Journal of History, 26:3, 225-247.
  
  Nordic Council of Ministers.2020. State of the Nordic region. https://www.norden.org/en/nordicregion2020
  
  Pedersen, W. & Kuhnle S. 2017. The Nordic welfare state model.In: Knutsen, O.P. (ed.). The Nordic Models in Politica lScience: Challenged, Challenged but still Viable? Bergen: Fagbokforlaget
  
  Save the children. 2015. State of the World's Mothers 2015: The Urban Disadvantage. Fairfield; Save the Children.
  https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/node/9052/pdf/sowm_2015.pdf
  
  
  + See list of more literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Methods of teaching:
  The course is online, the course platform is Moodle.
  You will take part in online lectures (recorded), occasional group tasks, practice on interactive exercises and read or watch study materials such as videos, presentations, articles and other literature.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1 (1 cr) The Nordic Welfare Model, Social Services and Social Work:
  Individual written assignment where you compare the role of the state, municipalities, private companies, NGOs and civil society regarding welfare services between one Nordic country and another outside the Nordic region. The assignment ends with a short discussion in forum on different welfare models strengths and challenges. For more information, see Moodle.
  
  Part 2 (1cr) Health Care and Midwifery: Assignment in Moodle
  
  Part 3 (1 cr) Trends and challenges: Assignment in Moodle.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  21.05.2021 - 30.09.2021

  Enrollment date range

  13.04.2021 - 16.05.2021

  • 3 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Annika Wentjärvi, Johanna Wikgren-Roelofs, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Information for students:
  
  Deadline for all assignments is 20th of August 2021
  Contact person: Johanna Wikgren-Roelofs, johanna.wikgren-roelofs@novia.fi
  
  In Moodle there is a forum for questions and answers about the course, the forum will be read every Monday 21.5-28.6 and 9.8-20.8, and every second Monday in July.
  
  Student can choose if they accomplish one, two or three parts/credits of the course.

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination:
  Several small assignments in Moodle
  Two possibilities to do retake exams on general exams at Novia UAS

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  NA

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline for all assignments: 20th of August 2021.
  See Moodle for more information, please.

  Internationa connections

  Students from different cultures and countries will meet each other on forums and discuss different issues.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Use of time
  1 cr = 27h work by the student
  3 cr= 3 x 27h = 81h
  
  The Nordic Welfare Model, Social Services and Social Work (1 cr)
  Health Care and Midwifery (1cr)
  Trends and challenges (1 cr)

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  Fail the student does not reach the below mentioned criteria.
  Pass according to the below grades 1-5.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Satisfactory, very satisfactory 1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good, very good 3-4
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent 5
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his assignments an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he has read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion. The assignment shows something out of the ordinary (technical execution, presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).

•   Nursing Care for the Child, Adolescent and Family NU18AF09-3001 19.10.2020-06.12.2020  3 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for children, adolescents and their families
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to maternity care and can recognize normal pregnancy, birth and postpartum
  - can recognize and give immediate first aid/care in complications during pregnancy, birth and postpartum and refer patients without delay to maternity care facilities
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to neonatal care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients, with consideration to the age-specific needs of the patient
  - be able to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those needs, and document them based on the national classification system
  - understand different cultural needs and learn to treat the patient, and the family, with dignity

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for children, adolescents and their families
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to maternity care and can recognize normal pregnancy, birth and postpartum
  - can recognize and give immediate first aid/care in complications during pregnancy, birth and postpartum and refer patients without delay to maternity care facilities
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to neonatal care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients, with consideration to the age-specific needs of the patient
  - be able to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those needs, and document them based on the national classification system
  - understand different cultural needs and learn to treat the patient, and the family, with dignity

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MATERNITY CARE
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  National Institute for health and Welfare. 2017. We're having a baby a guidebook for expectant parents. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-833-3 (for written exam)
  Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of nursing. Berman A., Snyder S. Chapter 21
  
  CHILD, ADOLESCENT AND NEONATAL CARE
  Quick Reference Guide to Pediatric Care
  Deepak M. Kamat, Kelly J. Kelleher, Henry M. Adam, Rebecca A. Baum, Jatinder Bhatia, Deborah E. Campbell, Donna M. D'Alessandro, Thomas G. DeWitt, Jane Meschan Foy, and Athra Kaviani
  Neonatology at a Glance
  https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4038516
  Atlas of Procedures in Neonatology
  https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3417876
  Nursing the Neonate
  https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=707872
  Martin, G. I. & Rosenfeld, W. (2018). Common problems in the newborn nursery: An evidence and case-based guide.
  https://tritonia.finna.fi/novia/Record/tria.364332

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstration, video, group work, tutorials, online exam, home exam, individual assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5
  Maternity care exam 1,5cr
  28-30p = 5
  25-27p = 4
  22-24p = 3
  19-21p = 2
  16-18p = 1
  Child, Adolescent and neonatal care 1,5cr
  28-30p = 5
  25-27p = 4
  22-24p = 3
  19-21p = 2
  16-18p = 1)

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 06.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Maternity care 1,5 cr with Anita Wikberg
  Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care 1,5 cr with Anna-Lena Nieminen
  Retake exams: 22nd of January and 12th of February, registration is necessary.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  (Written exam in maternity care
  Individual assignments
  Home exam)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Maternity care: (Written exam last lecture online + retake 22nd of January and 12 of February 2021)
  Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care: (Deadline for individual assignments and home exam w 48, no seminar)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr 3cr=81h
  Maternity care 1,5 cr: lectures 12h, tutorials 26,5h, (written exam 2h) = 40,5
  Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care 1,5 cr: lectures 6h + tutorials, (including written assignments and home exam 34,5h)=40,5h

•   Nursing Finnish NU18IA05-3002 28.09.2020-20.12.2020  3 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - can produce simple instructions and nursing documentation
  - can orally discuss patient care, nursing procedures, medical conditions
  - knows common vocabulary used in nursing
  - can cope in simple conversations with patients

  Prerequisites

  Knowledge about nursing and Finnish for Beginners.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  The material is on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Homework
  Reading texts
  Exercises in class
  Dicsussions
  Presentations

  Teaching language

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 04.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Activity during the lessons
  Approved exercises
  Oral and written exam

•   Nutrition, Diets and Health Education NU15HS04-3002 28.09.2020-15.11.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to identify essential nutrients and their dietary sources
  - be able to describe normal digestion, absorption and the metabolism of vitamins, carbohydrates, proteins and lipids
  - be able to identify factors influencing nutrition
  - be able to identify nutritional variations throughout the life span
  - become familiar with eating disorders and therapies related to these
  - become familiar with diets related to illness and disease
  - be able to guide patients concerning nutritional issues
  - be able to apply evidence-based nursing care and the nursing process to nursing care related to nutritional problems

  Prerequisites

  Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
  The Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to identify essential nutrients and their dietary sources
  - be able to describe normal digestion, absorption and the metabolism of vitamins, carbohydrates, proteins and lipids
  - be able to identify factors influencing nutrition
  - be able to identify nutritional variations throughout the life span
  - become familiar with eating disorders and therapies related to these
  - become familiar with diets related to illness and disease
  - be able to guide patients concerning nutritional issues
  - be able to apply evidence-based nursing care and the nursing process to nursing care related to nutritional problems

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Sharma, S. Ed. 2016. Nutrition at a glance. Second Edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.(available as e-book)
  
  Lutz, C., Mazur, E. & Litch, N. 2015. Nutrition and Diet Therapy. 6th Ed.Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company. (available as e-book)
  
  Berman, A. Frandsen, G. & Snyder, S. 2012. Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concept, Process and Practice. 10th Ed. London: Pearson. Ch. 47. Nutrition, pp 1153-1199. (available as e-book)
  
  Insel, P., Ross, D., McMahon, & Bernstein, M. 2016. Discovering Nutrition. 5th Ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  
  LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Ch 22 Nursing Care of Patients with Nutritional Disorders pp. 563-587.
  
  + material in Moodle course

  Learning methods

  Lectures, small group works, practical exercises, individual work,seminars.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Realistic diary, suggestions and reflections, correct calculations, individual work + work in pairs evaluating another students work, (max 10 points) 20% of grade,
  Assignment about diets, diseases and nutrition (max 40 points) 80% of grade.
  total 10p+40p=50p
  
  26-30p=1
  31-35p=2
  36-40p=3
  41-45p=4
  46-50p=5
  
  Diet diary: total 10p
  Realistic diary and correct calculations 3p
  reflection and suggestion on own diary 2p
  reflection, suggestion on friends diary 2p
  health promotion method 3p
  
  Assignment: total 40p
  Description of disease/condition/problem 2p
  Aim of diet 2p
  What is the diet 4p
  What should be avoided and why 2p
  What is recommended for a person with this d/c/p 3p
  Where do the person find daily intake of energy, car/prot/fat?1p each, total 3p
  What types of fats are good in this d/c/p 1p
  Where do the person find the mayor minerals, trace elements, fat soluble vitamins ADEK, Water soluble vitamins, B, B12 and folate 1p each group, total 4p
  Health education to patient/family 2p
  Forbidden list/ strongly recommended list 2p
  Analyse the situation ‘put yourself in patient shoes’ 2p
  Discussion 3p
  Scientific references and description of new and relevant results 3p
  Presentation 2p
  Comments 2p
  Following Novia's instructions for writing 1p
  Something extra 2p

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  2 written exam possibilities instead of assignment on the two following general written exam days after seminar. 11th of December 2020 and 22nd of January 2021
  Diary is still compulsory.
  
  Written exam literature is:
  Sharma, S. Ed. 2016. Nutrition at a glance. Second Edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.(available as e-book)
  
  LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Ch 22 Nursing Care of Patients with Nutritional Disorders pp. 563-587.
  
  Deadline for food diary16th of November, evaluation of another students diary 23rd of November
  Seminar 12th of November

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written assignment (2 cr)
  Participation in seminars
  Diet diary observation and reflection and
  Evaluation of another students diet diary including MI (motivational interview) technique (1 cr)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3cr= 3x27h=81h
  Introduction and lectures = 8h
  Practical exercises, calculations and supervision 4h
  Seminar 8h
  Individual work and work in pairs 61h
  Total 81h

•   Oncological Nursing Care NU15IC07-3003 01.08.2020-28.02.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to define cancer and differentiate benign from malignant neoplasms
  - be able to describe the theories of carcinogenesis
  - be able to explain carcinogens and identify risk factors for cancer
  - be able to compare the mechanisms and characteristics of normal cells to those of malignant cells
  - be able to describe the physical and psychosocial effects of cancer
  - become familiar with patient organizations and community support for patients with cancer

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to define cancer and differentiate benign from malignant neoplasms
  - be able to describe the theories of carcinogenesis
  - be able to explain carcinogens and identify risk factors for cancer
  - be able to compare the mechanisms and characteristics of normal cells to those of malignant cells
  - be able to describe the physical and psychosocial effects of cancer
  - become familiar with patient organizations and community support for patients with cancer

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar. grupparbeten, diskussioner och rollspel via Vebex
  
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assessment scale 1-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lisen Kullas-Nyman

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Paediatrics, Maternity and Adult Nursing Care NU18CT10-3001 11.01.2021-09.05.2021  9 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - communicate with patients and colleagues in Swedish or Finnish. The supervision also gradually shifts from English to Swedish or Finnish
  - follow the general rules and routines in a working environment
  - demonstrate an understanding of health promotion working methods and implement these in his/her own practice
  - become familiar with the health centre organization, as well as the working methods at different wards and receptions
  - implement the nursing process into the care for an ill child or a pregnant woman, in both simulated and real situations, under supervision
  - apply evidence-based nursing, as well as identify and analyze the specific needs of the child, the pregnant woman and the family
  - employ safe working methods
  - perform safe drug administration for children and pregnant women
  - guide the family in health promotion and illness prevention
  - employ health promotion working methods

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 2
  Nursing Care for the Child, Adolescent and Family
  Home and Community Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in patient-centered nursing care

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 09.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Patient Safety and Quality Assurance NU15IC06-3005 01.03.2021-31.08.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the principles of safety control and know how to implement them in nursing care
  - obtain knowledge of X-ray diagnostics and its importance in patient care
  - know laws, regulations and directives concerning medical radiation
  - know the medical uses of radiation
  - obtain basic knowledge and skills regarding radiation, and will be able to minimize radiation risks
  - obtain basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
  - prepare to promote patient safety in all phases of the nursing process
  - prepare to prevent and identify quality deviations in all phases of the nursing process
  - understand the importance of confidentiality in all phases of the nursing process, and be able to act in accordance with such principles

  Prerequisites

  Medical/Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
  Patient safety in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Patient safety and Quality assurance:
  Duffy, J. R. 2013. Quality Caring in Nursing and Health Systems. Implications for Clinicians, Educators, and Leaders. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10687047
  
  Kalra, J. 2011. Medical Errors and Patient Safety. Strategies to reduce and disclose medical errors and improve patient safety. De Gruyter. U.S.A (Online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10486525
  
  Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on ebrary)
  
  Marr, H. & Giebing, H. 1994. Quality Assurance in Nursing Concepts. Methods and Case studies. Campion Press. Edinburgh.
  
  Boström, A-M., Nordström, G. & Wilde-Larsson, B. red. 2017. Kvalitetsarbete för bättre och säkrare vård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Waterson, P. 2014. Patient Safety Culture; Theory, methods and application (Online book)
  http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10989175
  
  Pauley J.A. & Pauley J.F. 2011. Establishing a Culture of Patient Safety: Improving Communication, Building Relationships, and Using Quality Tools (Online book)
  http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10929643
  
  Other material and more information about literature can be found in the Moodle course

  Learning methods

  Patient safety and Quality assurance 2cr with Anita Wikberg:
  Lectures, group work, tutorials, online test
  Radiation safety 1cr with Katarina Vironen:
  Lectures, on-line test

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Online test on 'Potilasturvaportaali' P/F P= Pass F= Fail
  Written assignment in Patient safety and quality assurance grade 0-5
  Criteria for evaluation of written assignment:
  Max 40 points
  Detailed description of the nature of the ward or practice 3p
  Description of background method/model for quality development and reference to source 3p
  List of what could be changed or developed 2p
  Choice of relevant object to develop/ improve 2p
  Relevant background literature (minimum 2) on the topic which will be developed or improved 2p
  Detailed description of the process of developing and evaluating applying the chosen method/model 10p
  Reflection on how the work promotes patient safety and quality assurance and sustainable development 3+3p
  Has used Novia's instruction for writing thesis e.g. references 2p
  6 pages texti two students, 9 pages if three students etc. 2p
  Extra literature or something extra which was not demanded 2p
  PP, Prezi, film or other material 2p
  Presentation on seminar 2p
  Active participation or good comments on Moodle 2p
  1= 21-24
  2=25-28
  3=29-32
  4=33-36
  5= 37-40
  
  Radiation safety: Online test and activity

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.03.2021 - 31.08.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.02.2021 - 28.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Seats

  15 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Compulsory presence in Patient safety and quality assurance
  Test on the Finnish 'patient quality portal' (Potilasturvaportti) on patientsafety and Quality assurance:
  Online test:
  Log in to:
  https://portal.potilasturvaportti.fi/sv/Account/Open?oo=GUWZHbk999!2f7M71ZAm6Q5YYqkQ4Ma9nCFDccz0QWj2lJNqwkgDJ79U7sWK!2bHEULq
  Click Ny användare (=new user)
  Choose language
  Fill the form and register as a new user
  Create a username and key
  Choose unit: YH Novia and department: write the name of your group
  Click education
  Choose the course: Patient safety through skill

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Patient safety and Quality assurance:
  Online test on 'Potilasturvaportti'
  All the course is online
  written assignment in small groups
  Online test in Radiation safety

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Patient safety and quality assurance:
  Seminars either 13th of april or 15 of April in patient safety and quality assurance
  Deadline for online test is 15th of May.
  Retake exam are the 28th of May and 27th of August 2021.
  Exam literature:
  Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses: Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on ebrary)
  + Moodle material
  
  Radiation safety: dates for retake exam agreed when the course starts

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr 3cr = 81h
  Patient safety and Quality Assurance: 4h introduction+ 4h lectures, online test 5h, tutorials and cooperation in a small group 37h, seminar 4h = 54h
  Radiation safety: 8h lectures, 14 h individual/groupwork, 32h preparation and on-line test =54h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Perioperative Nursing Care NU15IC02-3002 19.10.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know various types of surgery according to the purpose, degree of urgency and degree of risk
  - know how to apply the nursing process to surgical nursing care
  - know the different phases of the perioperative period
  - be able to identify the nursing responsibilities related to planning perioperative nursing care and preparing the patient for surgery
  - obtain knowledge about different types of anaesthesia
  - know the essential nursing assessments and interventions during the immediate postoperative phase
  - become familiar with complications related to surgery

  Prerequisites

  Basic Nursing Skills 1
  Basic Nursing Skills 2
  Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know various types of surgery according to the purpose, degree of urgency and degree of risk
  - know how to apply the nursing process to surgical nursing care
  - know the different phases of the perioperative period
  - be able to identify the nursing responsibilities related to planning perioperative nursing care and preparing the patient for surgery
  - obtain knowledge about different types of anaesthesia
  - know the essential nursing assessments and interventions during the immediate postoperative phase
  - become familiar with complications related to surgery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Berman, A. & Snyder, S. 2012. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts. process and Practice. Unit 8, Chapter 37.
  
  LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, P. (2015). Medical-Surgical Nursing – Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 6 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey. Unit 2, Chapter 4: Nursing care of patients having surgery.
  
  Timby, B. 2013. Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 th Ed. Wolters Kluvert Health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. USA.
  
  Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis
  
  Iivanainen, A., & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirja. SanomaPro oy. Helsinki.
  
  E-book Ebrary: Stone, Julian & Fawcett, W. (2013). At a Glance : Anaesthesia at a Glance (1). Wiley-Blackwell.
  
  Terveysportti
  
  + other recommended literature (not translated)

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Presentation of Thesis and Maturity Exam NU15TH03-3003 17.02.2021-31.12.2021  6 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - present, discuss and defend the approved thesis at a seminar
  - critically examine another thesis presented at the seminar
  - carry out an approved maturity exam

  Prerequisites

  Intermediary Thesis Seminar

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - present, discuss and defend the approved thesis at a seminar
  - critically examine another thesis presented at the seminar
  - carry out an approved maturity exam

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  See courses on methodology RM02, RM03, RM04 and ethical documents in Moodle course for thesis

  Learning methods

  Students independent work and presentation of thesis with the help of supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The evaluation will be slightly updated in the beginning of 2021

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  17.02.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 02.05.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  See practical guide for thesis writing.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  6 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation of thesis and maturity exam in May or November
  Opposition of another students work

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Cooperation with the field if the thesis is projects are ordered from different health care organizations or projects.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  week 18
  Presentation on Tuesday 4th of May 2021 and maturity exam on Friday 7th of May 9-11 the same week
  Registration on Moodle 2 weeks earlier is compulsory!
  Presentation in autumn is w 47

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  Students independently plan their work and include time for supervision, using/following the practical guide for thesis writing.

  Assessment criteria

  Grade 0
  FRAUD AND IRREGULARITIES ALWAYS GENERATE A FAILED GRADE REGARDLESS OF GREAT ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE THESIS
  
  THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
  The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the study are irrelevant and source criticism is missing.
  
  SCIENTIFIC WRITING
  The work is not systematic and the language is commonplace and inexact.
  The understanding of the text is at stake due to language and grammatical mistakes.
  The text is neither clear nor logical, and is not credible, for example, in the result.
  
  METHOD
  The choice of methodology is not described or is poorly described and irrelevant.
  The correlation between the method description and the realisation of the thesis is very poor.
  The ethical discussion is irrelevant or missing.
  The thesis is not comprehensive enough according to standards for a thesis.
  The conclusions are illogical and are not drawn on an analysis of the data material.
  
  RESULTS
  The presentation of the results is insufficient/ incorrect/ not based on the analysis of the data material.
  There is no logical structure and the analysis/ reflective discussion is uncritical and shallow.
  
  THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
  The summary of the thesis is poorly written (abstract).
  The introduction is not linked to the content of the thesis, the aim is not clear and the research questions are not in accordance with the aim.
  Unstructured layout and incorrect reference list.
  The presentation is unstructured, unprepared and irrelevant.
  The opposition of the thesis is irrelevant and based on personal opinions.
  Immature and dependent work process.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
  grade 1
  The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis are based on few sources and the description is general or brief.
  Sources are referred to in an unreflective way.
  Some source criticism can be found in the text.
  
  grade 2
  The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis are based on mainly relevant literature but remain very general or briefly described.
  The sources are few, only partially relevant and form a weak theoretical background for the thesis.
  The ability to present an overview of relevant research is weak.
  The source criticism is inadequate.
  
  SCIENTIFIC WRITING
  grade1
  The language is commonplace, throughout the work and the terminology is unclear or inexact.
  Popular science sources are frequently used and it is not possible to know if the difference between scientific sources and popular science is understood.
  The source paths are not clear.
  
  grade 2
  The use of language is uneven.
  There is commonplace text which influence the accuracy, especially in the background (use of sources and understanding of scientific literature), while the presentation of the results shows a basic ability to use scientific language.
  
  METHOD
  grade1
  The description of method is rudimentary and incomplete.
  The discussion on results and method including a critical review of the study is irrelevant or very superficially described.
  The conclusions are shallow and trivial.
  
  grade 2
  The description of the method is general and part of the description of method, discussion of methods or the ethical discussion are poor.
  The discussion of results and method/the critical review are very superficial. The conclusions are trivial.
  
  RESULTS
  grade 1
  The presentation of results is very brief and insignificant.
  The process is very superficially described and it is difficult to follow the logic in the presentation.
  The discussion of the results is referring or incomplete in relation to what is relevant for the aim of the thesis.
  The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is very poor.
  
  grade 2
  The data material is poor and the presentation of the results are short, the work process is superficially and shortly described.
  The discussion of the result is mainly referring and some central aspects to the aim of the work are neglected or incomplete.
  The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is poor.
  
  THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
  grade1
  The summary of the thesis is inadequate (abstract).
  The introduction is short, insignificant and does not introduce the reader to the topic.
  The aim is unclear/irrelevant and the research questions do not relate to the aim or are incorrect.
  There are errors in the reference list and in the in-text citation.
  The presentation is weak and incoherent. The opposition shows the inability to critically review a text.
  Partially immature and dependent work process.
  
  grade 2
  The summary of the thesis is partly inadequate.
  The introduction shows a partly misleading or unclear picture of the topic.
  The aim is unclearly described or inappropriate for a thesis.
  The logical connection between the research questions and the aim of the thesis is very poor.
  There are some errors in the reference list and in the in-text citation.
  The presentation is unprepared and the time schedule is not kept.
  The opposition is referring only.
  The work process has been characterized by certain problems and a dependent working method.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
  grade 3
  There is a basic ability to synthesize and the theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis form a functioning theoretical whole for the thesis.
  The literature is relevant regarding the topic, and the theoretical framework is relevant.
  Good source criticism.
  
  grade 4
  The study has a good theoretical foundation based on extensive and relevant literature and a clear and adequate theoretical framework.
  Very good source criticism.
  
  SCIENTIFIC WRITING
  grade 3
  The use of language is mainly correct and shows a basic understanding of writing scientific text.
  Some shortcomings related to use of terminology and construction of sentences occur (for example, writing about yourself in third-person singular).
  The search paths for used sources are clear and the referencing is correct.
  
  grade 4
  Correct use of language shows understanding of search paths and use of scientific text, even if some small mistakes occur. Can clearly distinguish between popular science and scientific text and use of different types of sources.
  The text is credible and exact.
  
  METHOD
  grade 3
  The method description gives a good picture of the realisation of the study, however missing in-depth discussion on different choices of methods.
  The study is corresponding to the scope of a thesis and is carried out well.
  The ethical discussion is short but declare relevant ethical issues.
  The critical review is extensive but not reflective.
  The conclusions are legitimate and reflect the aim, but the ability for argumentation is missing.
  
  grade 4
  The description of method gives a comprehensive picture of the realisation of the study and shows awareness of advantages and disadvantages concerning the choice of methods.
  The ethical discussion is extensive and complete regarding relevant ethical issues.
  The conclusions are comprehensive and well founded.
  
  RESULTS
  grade 3
  The data material is big enough for analysis and the presentation of the results is systematic and follows the described process, but the reasoning is tentative and mainly referring.
  The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear, but brief and undeveloped, the refection is missing.
  
  grade 4
  The data material is rich and the analysis follows the description and is well implemented.
  The presentation of results is correct and shows the ability for independent reasoning.
  The presentation of results follows the described process, which renders transparent results.
  The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear and extensive and demonstrates strengths and weaknesses in the realisation.
  
  THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
  grade 3
  The summary of the study is well written.
  The introduction gives the reader a good enough picture to understand the topic and aim of the study.
  The aim and the research questions are logically connected.
  Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
  The presentation and the opposition according to the instructions.
  The work process has been smooth and mainly independent.
  
  grade 4
  The summary of the study is very well written.
  The introduction gives a clear background to how the work relates to previous research and thus the aim of the thesis. The aim and the research questions are logically interconnected.
  Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
  The presentation is systematic and an ability to develop and clarify the topic is present.
  The opposition is critical and constructive and show the ability to familiarise with the opposed work.
  The work process is mature and mainly independent.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
  The background and the starting point are very well founded and well described and show an ability to understand the topic from different perspectives.
  A reflecting approach to the topic is present in the work. The theoretical framework is well chosen and there is an ability to evaluate its merits and limitations.
  The sources are comprehensive and relevant, and show an excellent ability for source criticism.
  
  SCIENTIFIC WRITING
  Scientific language is used throughout the thesis and the text is clear and distinct and gives an impression of accuracy and credibility.
  The text is easy to read.
  The use of references is correct.
  
  METHOD
  The description of method gives a comprehensive picture of the realisation of the study and shows the awareness of advantages and disadvantages concerning the choice of methods, and the ability to consider different alternatives.
  The ethical discussion is extensive and complete regarding relevant ethical issues.
  The conclusions are comprehensive and well founded and there is an ability of critical evaluation. An ability to show new perspectives and questions for further research.
  
  RESULTS
  The data material is rich and the analysis is transparent and excellently done.
  The presentation of results is well-structured, innovative, original, and shows an ability for independent reasoning.
  The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear and comprehensive.
  Strengths and weaknesses in the realisation of the study are discussed.
  The work finishes with an attractive ending, well-founded synthesis and possibilities for development.
  
  THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
  The summary of the study is outstanding.
  The introduction problematises previous research and knowledge of the topic and thus place the aim in a scientifically interesting context
  The aim and the research questions are logically interconnected.
  Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
  The presentation is systematic and an ability to develop and clarify the topic is present.
  The opposition is critical and constructive and show an excellent ability to problematise and reflect critically on the topic.
  The work process is flexible, mature and independent.
  The work goes the extra mile that shows luminescence.

•   Professional Finnish NU19IA07-3003 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student has oral and written skills in Finnish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Arranges in regular care speech situations and can write simple
  coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Finnish NU19IA07-3004 29.03.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student has oral and written skills in Finnish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Arranges in regular care speech situations and can write simple
  coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  The material is available on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  Self-study course.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Oral and written exam.
  
  European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used for the assessment of knowledge of Finnish and other national languages. Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate
  satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicate good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (the grade
  1) the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sv/utbildning-och-examina/nivaskalan-sprakkunskap-och-sprakutveckling#48ac3886

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  29.03.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 28.03.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On September 28th
  On 23 November

  Student's schedule and workload

  54 houers

•   Professional Finnish - oral skills NU19IA07-O-3002 01.08.2020-31.12.2020 +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has oral skills in Finnish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisite

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Arranges in regular care speech situations even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Finnish - oral skills NU19IA07-O-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has oral skills in Finnish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisite

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Arranges in regular care speech situations even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Finnish - writing skills NU19IA07-W-3002 01.08.2020-31.12.2020 +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has written skills in Finnish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Can write simple coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Finnish - writing skills NU19IA07-W-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has written skills in Finnish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Can write simple coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Swedish NU19IA06-3003 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student has oral and written skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Arranges in regular care speech situations and can write simple
  coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Swedish NU19IA06-3004 29.03.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student has oral and written skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Arranges in regular care speech situations and can write simple
  coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  The material is available on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  Self-study course.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Oral and written exam.
  
  European Framework of Reference for Languages ​​(CEFR) is used for the assessment of knowledge of Finnish and other national languages. Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate
  satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicate good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (the grade
  1) the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sv/utbildning-och-examina/nivaskalan-sprakkunskap-och-sprakutveckling#48ac3886
  Students hav to demonstrate the knowledg required för level B.1

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  29.03.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 28.03.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on September 28th
  on 23 November

  Student's schedule and workload

  54 hours of self-study.

•   Professional Swedish - oral skills NU19IA06-O-3002 01.08.2020-31.12.2020 +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has oral skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisite

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Arranges in regular care speech situations even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Swedish - oral skills NU19IA06-O-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has oral skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisite

  Content of the study unit

  Understands longer speech sequences and the central content of many healthcare situations if the subject is familiar and spoken normally. Arranges in regular care speech situations even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Swedish - writing skills NU19IA06-W-3002 01.08.2020-31.12.2020 +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has written skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Can write simple coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Swedish - writing skills NU19IA06-W-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  (NU18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student is has written skills in Swedish for nurses. The student has reached the same level as is in the Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Understands plain texts in healthcare, but demanding texts on subjects that are foreign can cause
  difficulties. Can write simple coherent texts on common phenomena, even if grammar and
  vocabulary can sometimes cause understanding problems.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  Group(s)

  • NU18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Qualitative Research Designs NU15RM03-3003 22.02.2021-11.04.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - define qualitative research
  - describe sampling techniques in qualitative research
  - understand ethics in nursing research
  - discuss the major sources of qualitative data
  - explain analysis and interpretation methods with qualitative data
  - describe techniques used to evaluate research
  - understand how to use qualitative research findings in evidence based nursing care

  Prerequisites

  Integral Aspects of Nursing Research

  Content of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - define qualitative research
  - describe sampling techniques in qualitative research
  - understand ethics in nursing research
  - discuss the major sources of qualitative data
  - explain analysis and interpretation methods with qualitative data
  - describe techniques used to evaluate research
  - understand how to use qualitative research findings in evidence based nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
  
  Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book)
  
  Finnish national board on research integrity (Tenk). 2012. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Available at: https://www.tenk.fi/en
  
  O'Leary, Z. 2009. The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, group work, interview

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  -

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  22.02.2021 - 11.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 21.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The literature review and thesis reading can be used for the thesis

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to general instructions for validation in Novia
  3 smaller assignments during the course (see Moodle)
  1) literature search, review
  2) read in depth 1 thesis write a summary, reflect,
  3) data collection, interview, will be used in RM04 as a data material, deadline 21st of March

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Interview with an immigrant

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments presented on seminar 7th and 8th of April,
  Retakes on the two following general written exam days after the seminar

  Internationa connections

  Interview with an immigrant

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr / 27 h
  3 cr = 81 h
  Lectures 12 h, seminar 8 h AW
  2 h literature search
  61 h tutorials literature search, reading preparing for assignments

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Quantitative Research Designs and Thesis Writing NU15RM04-3003 15.03.2021-31.05.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with the most common methods of quantitative data collection and analysis
  - be able to carry out simple statistical calculations and tests
  - become familiar with the research process and master the different phases of the process
  - prepare to carry out the thesis independently and under supervision

  Prerequisites

  Integral Aspects of Nursing Research

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with the most common methods of quantitative data collection and analysis
  - be able to carry out simple statistical calculations and tests
  - become familiar with the research process and master the different phases of the process
  - prepare to carry out the thesis independently and under supervision

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Quantitative methods: the following literature is recommended: Denise F. Polit & Cheryl Tatano Beck. 2008. Nursing Research. Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluver., as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
  
  Qualitative methods: the following literature is recommended:
  Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
  
  Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing. 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book)
  
  Finnish national board on research integrity (Tenk). 2012. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Available at: https://www.tenk.fi/en
  
  O'Leary, Z. 2009. The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

  Learning methods

  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
  Qualitative methods: lectures, exercises, independent work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  15.03.2021 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Quantitative methods 2cr Ralf Lillbacka
  Qualitative methods 1 cr Anita Wikberg
  
  The courses RM02, RM03, RM04 and TH01 are connected and are the foundation for the thesis work.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
  Qualitative methods: theory and practice on data analysis, groupwork, graded 0-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted before the final course date.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1cr = 27h
  3cr = 81h
  Qualitative method: (1 cr) : 8 h lectures+ exersises + 4 h seminar + 15 h students own work in groups

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  Not pass
  Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Satisfactory, very satisfactory
  Quantitative and qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good and very good
  Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent
  Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Rehabilitation and Habilitation NU15HS03-3003 08.02.2021-04.04.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the concept of habilitation and rehabilitation from a social, physical and psychological perspective
  - become familiar with rehabilitation and habilitation at different ages
  - understand the organization and management of rehabilitation and habilitation in nursing, both nationally and internationally, and be able to apply it to patient guidance and nursing care
  - recognize different patient organizations acting in the field of rehabilitation and habilitation

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - understand the concept of habilitation and rehabilitation from a social, physical and psychological perspective
  - become familiar with rehabilitation and habilitation at different ages
  - understand the organization and management of rehabilitation and habilitation in nursing, both nationally and internationally, and be able to apply it to patient guidance and nursing care
  - recognize different patient organizations acting in the field of rehabilitation and habilitation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment
  National and international recommendations on Moodle
  PP presentations
  Movies

  Learning methods

  Lecture
  Guest lectures
  Group work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 04.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Additional information

  Absence at seminar is compensated with a summary and a reflektion of all other assignments

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam and seminar
  Seminar is compulsary

  Student's schedule and workload

  71 h

•   Responses to Addictive Behaviour NU15AF07-3003 12.04.2021-11.06.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and be prepared to apply, legislation and social control on to substance abuse
  - be able to identify the impactof substance abuse and addiction on society
  - be prepared to implement preventive working methods
  - be able to describe the specific features of different groups of substance abusers
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with addiction and substance abuse disorders
  - be able to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those needs and document them based on the national classification system
  - will be able to apply the specific features of addiction and substance abuse to all nursing contexts

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology 1
  The Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and be prepared to apply, legislation and social control on to substance abuse
  - be able to identify the impactof substance abuse and addiction on society
  - be prepared to implement preventive working methods
  - be able to describe the specific features of different groups of substance abusers
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with addiction and substance abuse disorders
  - be able to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those needs and document them based on the national classification system
  - will be able to apply the specific features of addiction and substance abuse to all nursing contexts

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Videbeck, S.2014. Psychiatric mental health nursing
  https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4625052
  Katona C, Cooper, C & Robertson, M.2015. Psychiatry at a glance
  https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4094470
  Rassool, G.H.2010. Addiction for nurses
  O'Brien, P.G., Kennedy, W.Z. & Ballard, K.A. 2008. Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing
  Smith, G. 2014. Mental health Nursing at a Glance

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Seminars
  Selfstudies

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  12.04.2021 - 11.06.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 11.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Groupwork
  Selfstudies

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Responses to Altered Endocrine and Sexual-Reproductive Function NU18AF03-3002 31.08.2020-04.10.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - identify health problems involving the endocrine system, the reproductive system and breasts
  - identify abnormal findings that may indicate an impairment of the endocrine system
  - use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with an endocrine or sexual-reproductive dysfunction
  - prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national classification system
  - identify the risk factors and symptoms of the various types of diabetes
  - prepare for guiding the patient in health promotion and prevention of complications
  - identify the risk factors and complications related to STI
  - apply insights into altered endocrine and sexual-reproductive functions to all nursing contexts
  - can care for patients with gynecological infections, tumors, bleeding disturbances, early pregnancy complications
  - know and can give advice about family planning
  - have awareness of sexual aspects including infertility in the human being
  - treat the patient with respect and dignity

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology 1
  The Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - identify health problems involving the endocrine system, the reproductive system and breasts
  - identify abnormal findings that may indicate an impairment of the endocrine system
  - use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with an endocrine or sexual-reproductive dysfunction
  - prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national classification system
  - identify the risk factors and symptoms of the various types of diabetes
  - prepare for guiding the patient in health promotion and prevention of complications
  - identify the risk factors and complications related to STI
  - apply insights into altered endocrine and sexual-reproductive functions to all nursing contexts
  - can care for patients with gynecological infections, tumors, bleeding disturbances, early pregnancy complications
  - know and can give advice about family planning
  - have awareness of sexual aspects including infertility in the human being
  - treat the patient with respect and dignity

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  For Endocrine
  LeMone, P., Burke, M., Bauldoff,G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. pp. 461-527
  https://www.skhole.fi/best-healthcare-education-in-the-world.html
  -
  Reproductive and sexual functions:
  LeMone, P., Burke, M., Bauldoff,G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. pp. ch 47: 1542-1554, ch 49, 50
  Menstrual cycle, the most important gynecological surgeries, family planning
  Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, chapter 40. Available as e-book
  https://www.skhole.fi/best-healthcare-education-in-the-world.html
  gynecology

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussions, tutorials, group work, written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Altered Endocrine function 1 cr = 33%
  Sexual-Reproductive Function 2 cr = 67%
  Common written exam for both parts.
  Written exam grades 0-5
  Maximum 90p (30p for Endocrine part and 60p for Gynecology part)
  82-90p=5
  73-81p=4
  64-71p=3
  55-63p=2
  46-54p=1
  <45,5=0
  Sexuality assignment on Moodle Pass/Fail, not included in exam.
  Other group works are not compulsory but will be included in the exam

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 04.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Seats

  15 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Content of the course will be written in the Moodle course.
  The sexuality part will not be included in the exam.
  Group works are not compulsory, and will be done mainly during lectures,
  however the content of them will be included in the exam

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam on the last lecture of the course 29th of September 2020
  Retake exam 1 and 2 on general exam days 23rd of October and 27th of November 2020
  Dates will be written in the Moodle course.
  Deadline for sexuality assignment on Moodle 1st of October or when the retakes are taken.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr=81h
  Gynecology and sexuality 2 cr:
  3x4h=12h lectures in gynecology + 4h work on sexuality assignment + 36 tutorial = reading of book and other material + 2h written exam = 54h
  Endocrinology 1 cr:
  2x4h lectures on endocrinology, the last lecture concern practice of physical examination with obligatory participation + 2h exam + 17 tutorial = reading of book and other material = 27 h
  The exam include both part of the course

•   Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal Function and Urinary Elimination NU15AF04-3003 26.10.2020-20.12.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - identify health problems related to gastrointestinal or urinary elimination disorders
  - identify abnormal findings that may indicate alterations in the gastrointestinal system and urinary elimination system
  - identify risk factors and complications of disorders related to the gastrointestinal- or urinary elimination system
  - assess the patient’s need for nursing care through adequate clinical and physiological assessments
  - prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them, based on the national classification system
  - use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients with gastrointestinal- or urinary eliminationdisorders
  - apply insights into altered gastrointestinal function and urinary elimination to all nursing contexts

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology 1
  The Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - identify health problems related to gastrointestinal or urinary elimination disorders
  - identify abnormal findings that may indicate alterations in the gastrointestinal system and urinary elimination system
  - identify risk factors and complications of disorders related to the gastrointestinal- or urinary elimination system
  - assess the patient’s need for nursing care through adequate clinical and physiological assessments
  - prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them, based on the national classification system
  - use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients with gastrointestinal- or urinary eliminationdisorders
  - apply insights into altered gastrointestinal function and urinary elimination to all nursing contexts

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal Functions:
  LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 21,23-25; 537 - 545, 588 - 730.
  Responses to Altered Urinary Eliminations:
  LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 26-28; 731 - 823 and Chapter 48: p 1657-1672 (from testicular torsion - prostate cancer)

  Learning methods

  lectures and case studies
  physical assessment practice ( mandatory )

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Writen test evaluated 0-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  26.10.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 15.12.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written examination :
  Re-take 1:
  Re-take 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h= 1 cr
  81 h= 3 cr

•   Responses to Altered Haematological, Cardiovascular and Vascular Function NU15AF01-3002 12.10.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to describe normal variations in cardiovascular assessment findings
  - be able to identify health problems related tocardiovascular, lymphatic, vascular or haematologic disorders
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients with cardiovascular, haematological and vascular disorders
  - know how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines andclassification system
  - be able to explain nursing implications for medication and other treatments prescribed for haematologic disorders
  - be able to apply insights into altered haematological, cardiovascular and vascular functions onto all nursing contexts

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology 1
  The Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to describe normal variations in cardiovascular assessment findings
  - be able to identify health problems related to cardiovascular, lymphatic, vascular or hematologic disorders
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients with cardiovascular, haematological and vascular disorders
  - know how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines andclassification system
  - be able to explain nursing implications for medication and other treatments prescribed for haematologic disorders
  - be able to apply insights into altered haematological, cardiovascular and vascular functions onto all nursing contexts

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  CVD references
  Alexander, MF., Fawcett, JN., Runciman, PJ. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. 2012: pp. 7-72.
  LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. 2011: 867-1014.
  Thaler, MS- The Only EKG Book You’ll Ever Need. The 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015 (you can use the previous additions as well)
  Hematology:
  LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2011. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 33; 1068 - 1117.
  Alexander, M., Fawcett, J. & Runciman, P. 2012. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. Ch 11, 479 - 523.
  Skhole videos.

  Learning methods

  lectures, case studies
  physical assessment practice (Mandatory)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written test 0-5
  Responses to Altered Haematological, 30%
  Cardiovascular and Vascular Function 70%

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  12.10.2020 - 29.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 18.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  written test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written test :
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  3 cr = 81h

•   Responses to Altered Mental Health NU15AF06-3003 08.03.2021-31.05.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of the organization and management of mental health care on a national level, including the specific legislation concerning mental health care
  - be able to identify common mental health disorders
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with mental health disorders, and apply the specific features of mental health to all nursing contexts
  - be able to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, correctly act on these, and document them, based on the national classification system
  - become familiar with medication used in mental health care
  - be able to apply insights into altered mental health to all nursing contexts

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology 1
  The Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of the organization and management of mental health care on a national level, including the specific legislation concerning mental health care
  - be able to identify common mental health disorders
  - be able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with mental health disorders, and apply the specific features of mental health to all nursing contexts
  - be able to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, correctly act on these, and document them, based on the national classification system
  - become familiar with medication used in mental health care
  - be able to apply insights into altered mental health to all nursing contexts

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Videbeck, S.2014. Psychiatric mental health nursing
  https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4625052
  Katona C, Cooper, C & Robertson, M.2015. Psychiatry at a glance
  https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4094470
  Wrycraft, N.2009. An Introduction to Mental Health Nursing
  O'Brien, P.G., Kennedy, W.Z. & Ballard, K.A. 2008. Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing
  Smith, G. 2014. Mental health Nursing at a Glance
  https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1829439

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Seminars
  Selfstudies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Criteria on moodle

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Test on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal and Respiratory Function NU15AF05-3003 01.10.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - identify health problems involving the musculoskeletal system and respiratory function
  - identify manifestations of impairment of the musculoskeletal system
  - use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients with musculoskeletal and respiratory disorders
  - prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing, act correctly on those, and document them, based on the national classification system
  - identify risk factors and complications of disorders related to the musculoskeletal system and respiratory function
  - apply insights into altered musculoskeletal- and respiratory function to all nursing contexts

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology 1
  The Nursing Process

  Content of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - identify health problems involving the musculoskeletal system and respiratory function
  - identify manifestations of impairment of the musculoskeletal system
  - use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients with musculoskeletal and respiratory disorders
  - prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing, act correctly on those, and document them, based on the national classification system
  - identify risk factors and complications of disorders related to the musculoskeletal system and respiratory function
  - apply insights into altered musculoskeletal- and respiratory function to all nursing contexts

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Irén Vikström, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) NU20VAL1-3002 17.05.2021-31.07.2022  3 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students will be able to:
  - To enhance the knowledge and understanding on the science of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2 including the infection period, the clinical presentation as well as the evidence on transmission and effective public health care intervention.
  - To increase awareness on safety practices of caring personal for patients with SARS-CoV-2
  - To discuss ethical dilemmas and moral resilience

  Prerequisites

  No prior requisite

  Content of the study unit

  The nature and history of the development of SARS, MERS and SARS-CoV-2
  Diagnostic methods of SARS-CoV-2
  Risk factors and sever disease
  The transition and the infection period and
  Pulmonary infection
  Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilation resources
  Epidemiological investigation and tracking
  Effective communication via reporting
  Ethical considerations on tracking, isolation and quarantine emphasizing privacy, confidentiality and autonomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Aleta, A., & Moreno, Y. (2020). Evaluation of the potential incidence of COVID-19 and effectiveness of containment measures in Spain: a data-driven approach. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01619-5
  Anderson, L. (2020). Providing nutritional support for the patient with COVID-19. British Journal of Nursing, 29(8), 458–459. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.8.458
  Braš, M., Đorđević, V., Pjevač, N., & Đurić, I. (2020). Healthy communication in the promotion of healthy aging during COVID-19 pandemic. Croatian Medical Journal, 61(2), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2020.61.177
  Campbell, C., & Gunia, A. (2020). Crisis Mode. (Cover story). TIME Magazine, 195(6), 28–37.
  COVID-19 TEST UPDATES: Current test options offer first wave of virus detection. (2020). MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer, 52(5), 34–36.
  Finch, J. (2020). Legal aspects of COVID-19 pandemic management for community nurses. British Journal of Community Nursing, 25(4), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.4.196
  FUNK, A., ORLANDO, A., SIMA, R., SCHMIDT, M., MOCK, J., SVOBODA, E., GOLEMBIEWSKI, K., & BETZ, E. (2020). COVID-19. Discover, 41(5), 12–15.
  Hofmann, G., Haan, L., & Anderson, J. (2016). Esophageal Pressure Measurements in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Critical Care Nurse, 36(5), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2016917
  HOW HAVE ORDINARY PEOPLE RESPONDED IN TIMES OF CRISIS? Four historians consider what the past might tell us about everyday responses to the Covid-19 pandemic. (2020). History Today, 70(5), 8–10.
  Kimball, A., Hatfield, K. M., Arons, M., James, A., Taylor, J., Spicer, K., Bardossy, A. C., Oakley, L. P., Tanwar, S., Chisty, Z., Bell, J. M., Methner, M., Harney, J., Jacobs, J. R., Carlson, C. M., McLaughlin, H. P., Stone, N., Clark, S., Brostrom-Smith, C., & Page, L. C. (2020). Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Residents of a Long-Term Care Skilled Nursing Facility -- King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 69(13), 377–381.
  New coronavirus. (2020). Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.010220
  Niedzwiedz, C. L., O’Donnell, C. A., Jani, B. D., Demou, E., Ho, F. K., Celis-Morales, C., Nicholl, B. I., Mair, F. S., Welsh, P., Sattar, N., Pell, J. P., & Katikireddi, S. V. (2020). Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01640-8
  Norman, I. D., Aikins, M., & Binka, F. N. (2011). The Medico-Legal Prerequisite for Initiating Quarantine and Isolation Practices in Public Health Emergency Management in Hospitals in Ghana. Ghana Medical Journal, 45(4), 167–173.
  Mathur, R. (2020). Ethics preparedness for infectious disease outbreaks research in India: A case for novel coronavirus disease 2019. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 151(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_463_20
  Park, A. (2020). How Remdesivir Became the First and Biggest Hope for Treating COVID-19. TIME Magazine, 195(20/21), 58–65.
  Robinson, P. (2020). Long-term conditions and severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). British Journal of Community Nursing, 25(5), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.5.247
  Selgelid, M. J. (2005). Ethics and Infectious Disease. Bioethics, 19(3), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00441.x
  Taylor, M. (2005). ARDS Diagnosis and Management. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 24(5), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003465-200509000-00001
  Yuan, M., Yin, W., Tao, Z., Tan, W., & Hu, Y. (2020). Association of radiologic findings with mortality of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. PLoS ONE, 15(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230548

  Learning methods

  lectures, students independents work and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  17.05.2021 - 31.07.2022

  Enrollment date range

  17.04.2021 - 16.05.2021

  • 3 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  See Moodle

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar on the 14.06.21 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS=27 hours (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  The nature and history of the development of SARS, MERS and SARS-CoV-2
  Diagnostic methods of SARS-CoV-2
  Risk factors and sever disease
  The transition and the infection period and
  Pulmonary infection
  Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilation resources
  Epidemiological investigation and tracking
  Effective communication via reporting
  Ethical considerations on tracking, isolation and quarantine emphasizing privacy, confidentiality and autonomy

•   SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) NU20VAL1-3001 28.09.2020-16.11.2020  3 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students will be able to:
  - To enhance the knowledge and understanding on the science of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2 including the infection period, the clinical presentation as well as the evidence on transmission and effective public health care intervention.
  - To increase awareness on safety practices of caring personal for patients with SARS-CoV-2
  - To discuss ethical dilemmas and moral resilience

  Prerequisites

  No prior requisite

  Content of the study unit

  The nature and history of the development of SARS, MERS and SARS-CoV-2
  Diagnostic methods of SARS-CoV-2
  Risk factors and sever disease
  The transition and the infection period and
  Pulmonary infection
  Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilation resources
  Epidemiological investigation and tracking
  Effective communication via reporting
  Ethical considerations on tracking, isolation and quarantine emphasizing privacy, confidentiality and autonomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 16.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  29.05.2020 - 30.06.2020

  • 3 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Specialized Nursing Skills 1 NU15CT03-3002 28.09.2020-22.11.2020  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrate skills in, perioperative nursing, (preoperative assessment and evaluation, and postoperative and surgical nursing skills)
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrate skills in managing the fluid balance, focusing on intravenous and blood infusions, drainage and catheters
  - understand the importance of diagnostic investigations, x-rays, laboratory tests and ECG and be able to assist with these procedures
  - will be able to independently carry out a simple laboratory test when needed

  Prerequisites

  Basic Nursing Skills 1
  Basic Nursing Skills 2
  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrate skills in, perioperative nursing, (preoperative assessment and evaluation, and postoperative and surgical nursing skills)
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrate skills in managing the fluid balance, focusing on intravenous and blood infusions, drainage and catheters
  - understand the importance of diagnostic investigations, x-rays, laboratory tests and ECG and be able to assist with these procedures
  - will be able to independently carry out a simple laboratory test when needed

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Clinical laboratory work
  Pendergraph, G E & Pender graph, C B. Latest edition. Handbook of Phlebotomy and Patient Service Techniques
  Miller, M. Latest edition. Specimen Managemant in Clinical Microbiology
  Provan, D.(Edit). Latest edition or 2010. Oxford Handbook of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation.
  Fischbach, F. Latest edition. A manual of Laboratory & Diagnostic Tests.Pendergraph, G E & Pender graph, C B. Latest edition. Handbook of Phlebotomy and Patient Service Techniques
  Miller, M. Latest edition. Specimen Managemant in Clinical Microbiology
  
  
  LeMone, P., Burke, K. & Bauldoff, G. (2011). Medical-Surgical Nursing – Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 5 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey.
  
  Berman. A. & Snyder. S. (2012). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. 9th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
  Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis
  
  Iivanainen, A., & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirja. SanomaPro oy. Helsinki.
  
  Meeker, M.H. & Rothrock, J.C (1999). Alexander´s Care of the Patient in Surgery. 11th Ed. Mosby, Inc.
  
  Terveysportti
  Lextueres notes and articles in Moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Blended learning
  Group work
  Individual work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Have not met the criteria for approved grades (not translated)

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 22.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Margareta Antus

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  Clinical laboratory work: 1,5 cr = 40,5 h, 12 h lectures, 12 h practical work in lab (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Have not met the criteria for approved grades

•   Specialized Nursing skills 2 NU15CT04-3003 22.03.2021-09.05.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - demonstrate skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in different clinical settings
  - demonstrate a holistic perspective of nursing care in case studies
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrate skills in intraoperative nursing

  Prerequisites

  Basic Nursing Skills 1
  Basic Nursing Skills 2
  Drug therapy 1
  Drug therapy 2
  Perioperative Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - demonstrate skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in different clinical settings
  - demonstrate a holistic perspective of nursing care in case studies
  - obtain knowledge of, and demonstrate skills in intraoperative nursing

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  LeMone, P., Burke, K. & Bauldoff, G. (2015). Medical-Surgical Nursing – Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey.
  
  Berman. A. & Snyder. S. (2012). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. 9th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
  Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis
  
  Iivanainen, A., & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirja. SanomaPro oy. Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Clinical training i class, practical exercises
  Case-studies
  Movies
  Discussions
  Compulsory attendance during clinical training in class

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  22.03.2021 - 09.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 21.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance during clinical training in class

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved movies
  Approved practice in clinical practice in class
  Compulsory attendance during clinical training in class

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 hours
  Compulsory attendance during clinical training in class

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Compulsory attendance during clinical training in class

•   Swedish for Beginners NU15IA02-3002 31.08.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at meeting specific needs
  - introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, and possessions
  - interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student
  - Has basic understanding in oral and written Swedish
  - Is familiar with the main structures of the language and has acquired a basic vocabulary
  - Can use Swedish in everyday situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation according to language

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Information on Moodle

  Learning methods

  The student
  - Has basic understanding in oral and written Swedish
  - Is familiar with the main structures of the language and has acquired a basic vocabulary
  - Can use Swedish in everyday situations
  During the course we’ll focus on:
  - Oral and written exercises
  - Swedish everyday vocabulary
  - Reading and listening comprehensions
  - Grammar/language structures
  - Exams

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 29.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Oral and written exams
  Short essay
  Individual oral assignment

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Oral and written exam at the end of the course.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Swedish for Beginners - Open Path NU20OPEN01-3001 09.09.2020-30.11.2020  3 credits  (ÖH20NULED-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at meeting specific needs
  - introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, and possessions
  - interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help-
  - Speak, understand and write Swedish language at level A.2

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student
  - Has basic understanding in oral and written Swedish
  - Is familiar with the main structures of the language and has acquired a basic vocabulary
  - Can use Swedish in everyday situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See separate framework for evaluation according to language

  Further information

  The course is for open path students 30 cu
  The course is mandatory to pass before application for the degree programme in nursing at Novia UAS through open path application

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  09.09.2020 - 30.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  09.09.2020 - 30.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Peter Björkroth, Irén Vikström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   The Nature and Ethics of Nursing NU15CC01-3002 27.09.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - develop an international perspective on nursing history
  - know central concepts of caring/nursing science
  - become familiar with nursing models, theories and traditions
  - become familiar with ethical theories, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues
  - obtain fundamental knowledge, and an understanding, of cultural differences, as well as the need for cultural sensitivity in all contact with people
  - will be able to apply cultural awareness, and respect for individual uniqueness, to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - develop an international perspective on nursing history
  - know central concepts of caring/nursing science
  - become familiar with nursing models, theories and traditions
  - become familiar with ethical theories, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues
  - obtain fundamental knowledge, and an understanding, of cultural differences, as well as the need for cultural sensitivity in all contact with people
  - will be able to apply cultural awareness, and respect for individual uniqueness, to nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, Unit 1 chapter 1-3. (available as e-book on ebook collection, Ebsco)
  Lindström, U.Å., Nyström, L. L. & Zetterlund, J.E. 2014. Katie Eriksson. Theory of caritative caring. In: Alligood, M.R. ed. Nursing Theorists and Their Work. 8th ed. Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 171–201.
  NURSING ETHICS
  Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier &Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, Unit 1 chapter 5. (available as e-book)
  Fry, S. T., Johnstone, M-J. 2008. Ethics in Nursing Practice. A Guide to Ethical Decision Making. (3ed). ICN. Blackwell Publishing. Chapter 1-3.
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Berman, A. & Snyder, S. J. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of nursing: concepts, process, and nursing. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, Culturally Responsive Nursing Care (Chapter 18). (available as e-book)
  Campinha-Bacote, J. 2002. The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: a model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13 (3), 181-184.
  Kaunonen, M & Koivula, M. 2006. Cultural health care issues in Finland. In: Irena Papadopoulos. ed. Transcultural Health and Social Care Development of Culturally Competent Practitioners, 203–219.
  Leininger, M. & McFarland, M. 2006. Culture Care Diversity and Universality. A Worldwide Nursing Theory. 2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA, 1–41.
  Newman Giger, J. & Davidhizar, R. 2002. The Giger and Davidhizar assessment model. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13 (3), 185-188.
  Purnell, L. 2002. The Purnell model for cultural competence. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13 (3), 193-196.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA, USA.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  27.09.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 09.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Seats

  15 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Retake written exam literature:
  Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 17 and 18.
  + Power point presentations in Moodle course (not history)
  
  Presence on all lectures is recommended.
  Strongly recommended presence on introduction to ethics online course.
  The assignment will be found in Moodle course.
  Grades are submitted in Peppi.
  Students present in Vaasa or close by can take part in class lectures, the other students can take part online.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on the two general exams following the seminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last lecture of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  If the assignment is not submitted, not presented or not accepted, there are two retake possibilities (written exams). Retake exam for this course is 11th of December 2020 and 22nd of January 2021. Registration is necessary in advance according to Novia instructions.
  To augment an accepted grade students have only one retake.
  Deadline for ethics online course is 30th of November 2020.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom or online 1h + 26h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle =27h.
  24h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment +
  4h seminar= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of NU15CC01 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra, morethan what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class during seminar or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

•   The Nature and Ethics of Nursing NU15CC01-3003 28.09.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (ÖH20NULED-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - develop an international perspective on nursing history
  - know central concepts of caring/nursing science
  - become familiar with nursing models, theories and traditions
  - become familiar with ethical theories, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues
  - obtain fundamental knowledge, and an understanding, of cultural differences, as well as the need for cultural sensitivity in all contact with people
  - will be able to apply cultural awareness, and respect for individual uniqueness, to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - develop an international perspective on nursing history
  - know central concepts of caring/nursing science
  - become familiar with nursing models, theories and traditions
  - become familiar with ethical theories, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues
  - obtain fundamental knowledge, and an understanding, of cultural differences, as well as the need for cultural sensitivity in all contact with people
  - will be able to apply cultural awareness, and respect for individual uniqueness, to nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, Unit 1 chapter 1-3. (available as e-book on ebook collection (Ebsco host))
  Lindström, U.Å., Nyström, L. L. & Zetterlund, J.E. 2014. Katie Eriksson. Theory of caritative caring. In: Alligood, M.R. ed. Nursing Theorists and Their Work. 8th ed. Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 171–201.
  NURSING ETHICS
  Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier &Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, Unit 1 chapter 5. (available as e-book)
  Fry, S. T., Johnstone, M-J. 2008. Ethics in Nursing Practice. A Guide to Ethical Decision Making. (3ed). ICN. Blackwell Publishing. Chapter 1-3.
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Berman, A. & Snyder, S. J. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of nursing: concepts, process, and nursing. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, Culturally Responsive Nursing Care (Chapter 18). (available as e-book)
  Campinha-Bacote, J. 2002. The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: a model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13 (3), 181-184.
  Kaunonen, M & Koivula, M. 2006. Cultural health care issues in Finland. In: Irena Papadopoulos. ed. Transcultural Health and Social Care Development of Culturally Competent Practitioners, 203–219.
  Leininger, M. & McFarland, M. 2006. Culture Care Diversity and Universality. A Worldwide Nursing Theory. 2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA, 1–41.
  Newman Giger, J. & Davidhizar, R. 2002. The Giger and Davidhizar assessment model. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13 (3), 185-188.
  Purnell, L. 2002. The Purnell model for cultural competence. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13 (3), 193-196.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Jones & Bartlett Learning: Burlington, MA, USA.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH20NULED-V

  Seats

  15 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Retake written exam literature:
  Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 17 and 18.
  + Power point presentations in Moodle course (not history)
  
  Strongly recommended presence on introduction to ethics online course.
  The assignment will be found in Moodle course.
  Grades are submitted in Peppi.
  students who live in Vaasa or close can attend classes, others attend online.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on 11th of December 2020 and/or 22nd of January 2021. Registration have to be done well in advance.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last lecture of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  If the assignment is not submitted, not presented or not accepted, there are two retake possibilities (written exams). Retake exams are11th of December 2020 and/or 22nd of January 2021. Registration have to be done well in advance.
  Registration is necessary in advance according to Novia instructions.
  To augment an accepted grade students have only one retake.
  Deadline for ethics online course is 30th of November 2020.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom 1h + 26h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle =27h.
  24h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment +
  4h seminar= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of NU15CC01 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

•   The Nursing Process NU20IC01-3001 11.01.2021-14.02.2021  3 credits  (NU20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - adopt an approach to nursing care based on critical thinking and evidence
  - understand the necessity of an evidence-based practice
  - obtain knowledge of how to assess, plan and implement nursing care based on the patient’s needs
  - know how to evaluate nursing care
  - know the procedures concerning the discharge of patient
  - know how to correctly document and report nursing care according to the national health care system
  - have basic knowledge of service design in social and health care

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - adopt an approach to nursing care based on critical thinking and evidence
  - understand the necessity of an evidence-based practice
  - obtain knowledge of how to assess, plan and implement nursing care based on the patient’s needs
  - know how to evaluate nursing care
  - know the procedures concerning the discharge of patient
  - know how to correctly document and report nursing care according to the national health care system
  - have basic knowledge of service design in social and health care
  - service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  - Health assessment
  - ISBAR

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
  Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203
  Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. Mar2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p133-143.
  Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
  Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live

  Learning methods

  Leacture, case studies, using scales and FinCC

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 14.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  The nursing process, critical thinking and evidence based practice, several assessments scales and FinCC

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam and oral presentation
  0-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:
  The dates will be published on Moodle page for this course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 Sp= 27 hours
  3 sp=81h

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Thesis Plan and Seminar NU15TH01-3003 11.02.2021-15.06.2021  3 credits  (NU19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - produce a supervised thesis plan
  - present an approved plan at a seminar

  Prerequisites

  Integral Aspects of Nursing Research

  Content of the study unit

  The student will:
  - produce a supervised thesis plan
  - present an approved plan at a seminar

  Further information

  Only for degree students

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  See courses RM02, RM03, RM04

  Learning methods

  Independent planning and writing of thesis work plan
  Presentation in individual or small group seminars

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  fail, pass
  Compulsory content:
  Thesis title page
  Table of content
  Introduction (1page)
  Background (description of subject/topic) (3-5pages)
  (introduction and background should include at least 6-8 references of which 5 are scientific)
  Aim
  Method (data collection method based on 2 references/discuss method of selection) (2-3 pages)
  Ethical considerations (based on references) (1 page)
  Time table
  Reference list
  
  Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excluding title page, table of content and reference list)
  
  See also practical guide

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  11.02.2021 - 15.06.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 09.05.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • NU19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 16

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Accepted thesis plan, indivudual or smal lgroup presentations during April-May, students book with teacher, when they are ready.
  See also practical guide.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Possible topic from the field: Vaasa hospital district or other projects or organizations

  Content scheduling

  individually planned work