Please select the curriculum by the start year of studies and competence track.
Rika Levy-Malmberg
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
Alligood, M.R. ed. 2018. Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (2014 version is available as e-book)
Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book) chapters 1-3,7-9,12,13, 25 ,28, 30, 34, 38.
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
eller
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2018. Essentials of nursing research. appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.) . Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Lectures, discussions, seminars
Methods and basis for evaluation:
Nursing theory 1 cr
Written exam 2cr
Criteria for the theory evaluation:
Motivation of choice 1 point
Background of theorist 2 p
Where did the theorist find inspiration 1 p
How was the theory created/generated 1 p
Description of the theory 10 p
Concepts/phenomena 4 p
Relations within the theory 1 p
Assumptions, hypothesis, premises 1 p
Level of theory 1 p
How is the theory used 2 p
Criteria for evaluation of the theory 2 p
Conclusions what did you learn from the theory, how could you use this theory in practice and in your thesis 2 p
PP layout 1 p
Other material: pictures, books, instruments etc 2 p
Presentation, prepared 2 p
Comments 2 p
References 2 p
max 10 slides 1 p
Handed in on time 1 p
Followed instructions 1 p
Total points 40
Written exam 50%= grade 1
English
01.12.2021 - 13.02.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
20 - 35
Rika Levy-Malmberg
The theory chosen in the assignment can be used in the thesis.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Validation according to general instructions on validation in Novia
-
Time table for examination:
Typer of axamination is given during introduction lecture
Possibility to two retakes on two later dates
Presentation on seminar
-
6x2h= 12 lectures, individual presentation,
seminars 4h per student in two groups (8h all together)
2h online exam
63 h own work, reading, doing assignment, preparing for seminar and online exam
1 cr=27h, 3cr= 81h work for students
-
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning
Price, A., Smith, S. & Challiner, A. 2016. Ward-based Critical Care. A Guide for Health Professionals. 2nd Edition.
Holbery, N & Newcombe, P. 2016. Emergency Nursing at a Glance.
WHO, Emergency & Trauma Care Training Course. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s16382e.pdf
lectures, (online lectures are not taped)
case studies
discussions,
group-work
Grade 0 - 5
English
01.11.2021 - 22.05.2022
11.06.2021 - 14.11.2021
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Written exam
Re-take 1
Re-take 2
Cooperation with Vaasa Central hospital
Written exam 2021
3 x 27 h
Nina Vestö
67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning
Price, A., Smith, S. & Challiner, A. 2016. Ward-based Critical Care. A Guide for Health Professionals. 2nd Edition.
Holbery, N & Newcombe, P. 2016. Emergency Nursing at a Glance.
WHO, Emergency & Trauma Care Training Course. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s16382e.pdf
Practice in class, simulation exercise
Pass /fail
English
01.12.2021 - 29.05.2022
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Practical examination, pass/fail
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Distance learning
Course books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
Additional recommended books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Lecture material and exercises on Moodle
On-line study material and tasks.
Selfstudies.
The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the on-line exam and virtual tests
English
30.08.2021 - 23.11.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Camilla Ribacka
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
4 credits
H-5
Course examination via the Moodle platform 23rd of November
Re-take is possible two times.
Self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h.
Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Irén Vikström-Dahl
50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning
Course books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology : For Nursing and Healthcare Students
Additional recommended books:
Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell.
Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons. Asia
Lecture material and exercises on Moodle
Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.
The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam and virtual tests
English
30.08.2021 - 23.11.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Camilla Ribacka
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Course examination is scheduled in Peppi the 23rd of November
Re-examination of the course is possible 21.01.2022 and 11.02.2022
Lectures and examination 25 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 83 h.
Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Face-to-face
Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Medicine Management Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Moodle: Teachers notes
Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA
Close- education at Novia. Practical training in class, demonstration
English
13.09.2021 - 10.10.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Practical test
Face-to-face
Berman, A. & Snyder, S. 2012. (9nd ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Hess, C. 2013. Clinical guide to Skin & Wound Care. 7th Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins.
Clinical practice in class + independent training
Demonstration
Making of movies
English
11.10.2021 - 14.11.2021
11.06.2021 - 10.10.2021
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Practice in class: pass or fail
Movies: pass or fail
Moodle test: pass or fail
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Practice in clinical settings
Practice seminars
Clinical Practice 40h / week in six weeks.
Mandatory attendance 100%
mandatory attendance at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments
See separate framework for evaluation
14.03.2022 - 31.12.2022
15.11.2021 - 13.03.2022
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Only for Degree students in Nursing
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Approved internships or work as a practical nurse
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Work as a practical nurse for a minimum of 6 weeks
40 working hours/week
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
It is possible to do clinical training abroad. The student can do it through NordPlus or Erasmus networks or to find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
Work as a practical nurse for a minimum of 6 weeks
40 working hours/week
See separate framework for evaluation
See separate framework for evaluation
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars
Clinical Practice 40h / week in six weeks.
Mandatory attendance 100%
mandatory attendace at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments
English
01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars week 47
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or tto find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
Read instructions in Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
40 h/week during clinical training
6 weeks of practice
See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.
The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
Can be responsible for safe drug handling
Can use HaiPro
Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
patients and relatives
Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
cultural affiliation
Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
nursing context
Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
professional secrecy
https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.pdf
Anita Wikberg
67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning
Literature to be found online on databases
See Moodle course.
Lectures in class, possible online
Group work
Self studies
External lectures
Seminars
See below, please
English
02.05.2022 - 05.06.2022
15.11.2021 - 01.05.2022
10 - 30
Anita Wikberg
-
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Three smaller assignments:
Poster on tropical diseases
Assignment on different concepts
Reflective diary about cultural competence
Discussion and group work
2 retakes are possible if needed on general exam days in August and September.
Registration is needed well in advace
Students from many different cultures
1 cr= 27h work
3cr = 81h
22h lectures
2h external lecturer lecture
8h seminars
49h students individual and group work
-
0 = no participation or submission
1 = participation and submission in time, limited knowledge of the topic
2 = participating in discussion and assignment with satisfactory knowledge of the topic
3= show good knowledge of the topic
4= show interest and maturity in the topics
5= show an excellent insight in the topic
Camilla Mattjus
Face-to-face
All recommended literature will be found on Moodle at the start of the course.
Lectures, demonstrations, videos, assignments, written exam
The course is graded 0-5
The drug calculations part has to be 100% correct in order to pass.
English
10.01.2022 - 06.03.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Camilla Mattjus
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
The course examination will be scheduled in Peppi
Re-examination x.x.2022 and x.x.2022
Lectures and examination 21h, Self-studies and digital teaching methods 60h
Distance learning
Flipped learning, virtual pedagogics
Workshops online, assignnets and tests online
test grades 0-5
assignment passed/failed
calculation test 100% correct answers according to national instructions for drug calculation
English
13.09.2021 - 15.01.2022
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
0 - 20
Sirkku Säätelä
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
3 credits
H-5
Exam i drug calculation online /webex after 4 workshops
online test and assignets according to deadlines i moodle
Sirkku Säätelä
Distance learning
E-book; Gersch, C., Heimgartner, N., Rebar, C. & Willis, L. 2016. Pharmacology Made incredibly Easy.
Downie, G. 2008. Pharmacology and Medicines Managements for Nurses. (4 th Ed). London: Churchill Livingstone
Articles and material according to teachers advice
lectures and seminars online according to teachers information
Online test 0-5 ( 60% correct for approved)
Assigment: Pass/complete/ not pass
English
31.01.2022 - 20.03.2022
15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022
Sirkku Säätelä
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
3 credits
H-5
Virtual examination, grade 0 - 5 ( 75% for passing)
Seminars
written assigments
Online test on moodle
Re-take 1:
Re-take 2 :
3 x 27 h = 81 h
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
English
02.05.2022 - 29.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 17.04.2022
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Jannica Andtfolk
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars
Clinical Practice 40h / week in six weeks.
Mandatory attendance 100%
mandatory attendance at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments
See separate framework for evaluation
English
01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Nina Vestö
It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or tto find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.
Read instructions in Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars week 47
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
40 h/week during clinical training
See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.
The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
Can be responsible for safe drug handling
Can use HaiPro
Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
patients and relatives
Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
cultural affiliation
Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
nursing context
Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
professional secrecy
https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.pdf
Irén Vikström-Dahl
60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning
Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
Boström, A.-M., Rudman, A., Ehrenberg, A., Gustavsson, J. P., & Wallin, L. (2013). Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–12.
Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203.
Gonzol, K., & Newby, C. (2013). Facilitating Clinical Reasoning in the Skills Laboratory: Reasoning Model Versus Nursing Process-Based Skills Checklist. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 34(4), 265–267.
Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2012). The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.26 Issue( 1), 133-143.
Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live
Parvan, K., Hosseini, F. A., Jasemi, M., & Thomson, B. (2021). Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 21(1), 1–12.
Online lectures, group discussion, group assignments
English
20.09.2021 - 28.11.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Exam in the form of written exam.
Time for the exam is set by teacher. The request must be submitted three weeks before the start of the course
Obligatory seminar and written test
0-5
1 ECTS= 27 h
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
Boström, A.-M., Rudman, A., Ehrenberg, A., Gustavsson, J. P., & Wallin, L. (2013). Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–12.
Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203.
Gonzol, K., & Newby, C. (2013). Facilitating Clinical Reasoning in the Skills Laboratory: Reasoning Model Versus Nursing Process-Based Skills Checklist. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 34(4), 265–267.
Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2012). The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.26 Issue( 1), 133-143.
Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live
Parvan, K., Hosseini, F. A., Jasemi, M., & Thomson, B. (2021). Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 21(1), 1–12.
Online lectures, group discussion, group assignments
English
20.09.2021 - 28.11.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Exam in the form of written exam.
Time for the exam is set by teacher. The request must be submitted three weeks before the start of the course
Obligatory seminar and written test
0-5
1 ECTS= 27 h
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
Iris Nurmi
Face-to-face
Study materials are provided by the teacher.
Recommended book: Suomen mestari 1/ Hoidetaan suomeksi
Online lectures, oral and written exercises and assignments, individual work and work in pairs.
The grade is based on work in class, homework and exams.
English
10.01.2022 - 10.04.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Iris Nurmi, Vasa Finska 1
More information about the course will be provided in Moodle and during the first lesson.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
- assignments and exams
- homework
- active participation during lessons
- attendance at least 80 %
Assignments and exams during the course.
3 credits = 81 h
32 h online lessons
49 h individual studies
- failed exam or assignments
- too much absence from lessons
- the student has unsatisfactory knowledge in the basics of Finnish.
The student has satisfactory knowledge in the basics of Finnish both orally and in writing.
The student knows the basics of Finnish well both orally and in writing.
The student is often able to apply skills learned during the course in simple every day situations.
The student knows the basics of Finnish very well both orally and in writing.
The student knows how to apply skills learned during the course in simple every day situations.
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Austin, M., Crawford, R., Klaassen, B. & Armstrong, V. J. (2016). First aid manual: The authorised manual of St John Ambulance, St Andrew's First Aid and the British Red Cross (Revised 10th edition.). Dorling Kindersley.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.
Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2016. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Medicine Management Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Moodle: Teachers notes
Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA
Contact-teaching at Novia. Lectures. Practical training in class, demonstration, workshops
FIrst Aid 1, compulsory attendance
English
10.01.2022 - 20.02.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Practical test, virtual test
Face-to-face
Austin, M., Crawford, R., Klaassen, B. & Armstrong, V. J. (2016). First aid manual: The authorised manual of St John Ambulance, St Andrew's First Aid and the British Red Cross (Revised 10th edition.). Dorling Kindersley.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.
http//www.siviilikriisihallinta.org/from_conflicts_to development.pdf
Sellnow, T. L. & Seeger, M. W. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
E-books;
Ishikawa, Akira, & Tsujimoto, Atsushi . Risk and crisis management 101 cases. Singapore ; Hackensack, NJ : World Scientific 2009.
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1681179
Pursiainen, C. The Crisis Management Cycle
Burton, J. Crisis Communication and Crisis Management
Lectures, demonstrations, practical training, assignments
seminars
Short theoretical test Pass/fail
Practical test Pass/fail
Resuscitation 90 % correct
Written assignment Pass/fail
English
13.09.2021 - 24.10.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Nina Vestö
Compulsory attendance at all lessons
After approved course you have the possibility to bye an electronic First Aid cards from Röda Korset.
The First Aid 1 card costs 10,89 euro and the First Aid 2 card costs 10,89 euro.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Approved theoretical and practical test
Approved resuscitation test (90 % correct)
Approved assignment in Crisis management
100 % attendance at every lessons
Short theoretical test and practical tests during lessons
Written assignment in Crisis management
3 x 27 h = 81 h
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 21,23-25; 537 - 545, 588 - 730.
Responses to Altered Urinary Eliminations:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 26-28; 731 - 823 and Chapter 48: p 1657-1672 (from testicular torsion - prostate cancer)
Responses to altered Endocrine Function
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff,G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Chapter 18, 19, 20
Contact teaching at Novia: lectures, case studies, workshops and physical assessment practice ( mandatory )
English
17.01.2022 - 03.04.2022
15.11.2021 - 16.01.2022
Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Written exam
5 credits= 135 h
Irén Vikström-Dahl
40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning
National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
Tabloski, P. 2014. Gerontological nursing
Craig, L. 2019, The role of the registered nurse in supporting frailty in care homes. British Journal of Nursing 7/11. 2019
Ferraro, K., Janet M. Wilmoth, J. 2013 Gerontology : Perspectives and Issues, Fourth Edition
Sugar, J.A 2019. Introduction to aging. A positive interdisciplinary approach
Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment
National and international recommendations on Moodle
Powerpoint presentations
Movies
Lectures online and in class
Groupwork
Group work geriatrics: pass/fail
On line exam: grade 1-5
Written assignment rehabilitation: grade 1-5
Not participating in seminar: the student writes a summary and gives comment on the other groups presentation
English
08.11.2021 - 19.12.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Camilla Mattjus, Lena Sandén-Eriksson
Information about the course will be given the first lecture. At the same time also information about literature and search strategy i library and on database..
Students are divided into smaller groups by the teacher and students work in the same group throughout the course
Deadlines are to be followed
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
3 credits
H-5
NU21AF14 - 3002, is realized completely online week 45-50
Open path students
Written assignments and group report submitted (Rehabilitation and geriatrics)
Online exam (Geriatrics)
Seminar obligatory (Rehabilitation)
Retake: dates on Moodle
5 x 27 h = 135 h
The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Distance learning
National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
Tabloski, P. 2014. Gerontological nursing
Craig, L. 2019, The role of the registered nurse in supporting frailty in care homes. British Journal of Nursing 7/11. 2019
Ferraro, K., Janet M. Wilmoth, J. 2013 Gerontology : Perspectives and Issues, Fourth Edition
Sugar, J.A 2019. Introduction to aging. A positive interdisciplinary approach
Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment
National and international recommendations on Moodle
Powerpoint presentations
Movies
Lectures online
Group work
The course is realized online
Group work geriatrics: pass/fail
On line exam: grade 1-5
Written assignment rehabilitation: grade 1-5
Not participating in seminar: the student writes a summary and gives comment on the other groups presentation
English
08.11.2021 - 19.12.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Camilla Mattjus, Lena Sandén-Eriksson
Information about the course will be given the first lecture. At the same time information about literature and search strategy i library and on database will be given. No individual introduction.
Students are divided into smaller groups by the teacher and students work in the same group throughout the course
Deadlines are to be followed
Updated information on Moodle
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
5 credits
5 credits
H-5
Written assignments and group report submitted (Geriatrics and rehabilitation)
Online exam (Geriatrics)
Seminar, obligatory (Rehabilitation)
Retake: dates on Moodle
5 x 27 h = 135 h
The student has not achieved criteria for grade 1
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Distance learning
Health Promotion
Snelling A. 2014 Introduction to Health Promotion.John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated (E-Book)
Wills, J & Leach , R. Fundamentals of Health Promotion for Nurses (E-Book)
Bergmann, K .E & Bergmann, R. 2003. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in the Family. (E-Book)
Up-to -date articles
Nursing Theorists:
Alligood, M.R 2018. Nursing Theorists and their work, Ninth Edition. U.S.A Elsevier.
Pender, Nola.J, Murdaugh, C & Parsons A.2011. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson cop. 2011.
Epidemiology:
Gordis, L. 2014. Epidemiology. Fifth Edition. Elsevier.
Porta, M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, sixth edition.2014.Oxford University Press, Incorporated (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Nutrition:
Sharma, S ,Barasi M , Sheehy T & Kolahdooz F. Nutrition at a Glance.2016 .John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
www.stm.fi
www.thl.fi
Lectures, discussion, group work, self studies / Web based studies - On line
English
27.09.2021 - 12.12.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Lectures are going to be on the time scheduled and
the content of the course will be published on Moodle.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
4 credits
H-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Written assignments (max 20 p) + a group work (max 40 p) = 60 p in total
30-35= 1
36-41= 2
42-48= 3
49-54=4
55-60= 5
Seminars (on line) on the last lecture of the course. Approved assignments during the course .
Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams 26.11.21 and 10.12.21
27 h/cr , 4 cr =108 h
108 hours individual work to do, several self studies, to read relevant literature and to cooperate with other students in group work, written assignment during the course. Seminars last day of the course.
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Distance learning
Health Promotion
Snelling A. 2014 Introduction to Health Promotion.John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated (E-Book)
Wills, J & Leach , R. Fundamentals of Health Promotion for Nurses (E-Book)
Bergmann, K .E & Bergmann, R. 2003. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in the Family. (E-Book)
Up-to -date articles
Nursing Theorists:
Alligood, M.R 2018. Nursing Theorists and their work, Ninth Edition. U.S.A Elsevier.
Pender, Nola.J, Murdaugh, C & Parsons A.2011. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson cop. 2011.
Epidemiology:
Gordis, L. 2014. Epidemiology. Fifth Edition. Elsevier.
Porta, M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, sixth edition.2014.Oxford University Press, Incorporated (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Nutrition:
Sharma, S ,Barasi M , Sheehy T & Kolahdooz F. Nutrition at a Glance.2016 .John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
www.stm.fi
www.thl.fi
Web based studies - On line
Self studies/tutorials, group work and discussions.
English
27.09.2021 - 12.12.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
4 credits
H-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Written assignments (max 20 p) + examination at the end of the course (max 40 p) = 60 p in total
30-35= 1
36-41= 2
42-48= 3
49-54=4
55-60= 5
Examination on the" last lecture" of the course
Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams 26.11.21 and 10.12.21
27 h/cr , 4 cr =108 h
108 hours individual work to do, several self studies, to read relevant literature and to do several written assignments and examination at the end of the course.
Distance learning
Berman A. & Snyder S. (2016). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing, Global Edition. Pearsons. Unit 2. Chapter 7-8.
LeMone P. et al. (2015) Medical-Surgical Nursing: clinical reasoning in patient care. Pearsons. Boston. Unit 1. Chapter 3.
Health Care Comes Home: The Human Factors (2011): National Academies Press.
Mulley G., Bowman C. & Boyd M. (2014). The Care Home Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Sines d. et al (Ed.) (2013). Community and Public Health Nursing John Wileys & Sons, Incorporated.
Tuner K.J. (2012) Advances in Home Care Technologies: Results of the MATCH Project. IOS Press.
Articles.
Group work, self-directed studies, presentations, seminar and discussions. Web based studies - Blended learning
English
01.11.2021 - 05.12.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Lectures are going to be on the time scheduled and
the content of the course will be published on Moodle
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
3 credits
H-5
Seminars on the last lecture of the course w.47
Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams x and x
27 h/cr , 3 cr =81 h
4,4,6 = 12 hours lectures
67 hours individual work to do self studies, to read relevant literature and to cooperate with other students in group work and written assignment.
Distance learning
See courses:
NU15TH01,
NU15RM02 -RM03 -RM04
Increasingly independent work, with the help of a supervisor
- collect and describe background information for the study
- desribe a theoretical framework for the study
- describe methods of data analysis
- collect data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
- present the methodological part of the thesis and show examples of the results at an intermediary seminar
Lecture and seminars
Pass/Fail
See practical guide to thesis writing
The manuscript for Intermediary seminar shall include following chapters:
Introduction
Background of the study
Theoretical framework
Aim, purpose
Method
Sampling/material
Data collection
Data analysis
Ethical issues
Examples of the result
English
09.09.2021 - 31.12.2021
11.06.2021 - 28.11.2021
15 - 30
Anita Wikberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
6 credits
6 credits
H-5
Approved manuscript for intermediary seminar, attendance at intermediary seminar
Presentation at intermediary seminar in October (NU18) or December (NU19)
6cr= 6x27h= 162h
4h presentation and get together lecture, information + 8h seminar in December, 150h is independent work with the help of the supervisor.
See practical guide for thesis writing for grades 0-5 for final thesis.
Anita Wikberg
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
Depending on choice of theme/topic
See literature on writing and publishing in Moodle course
Themes/Topics to write about
1. The Social and/or Cultural Determinants of Health
2. The Equality of Health - a Global Challenge
3. Micro- and Macro-perspective in Health Care
4. To work as Nurse in Disaster/Vulnerable Areas
5. The Challenges of working in a Multicultural Team
6. Intercultural nursing care
7. To study nursing in a foreign culture
8. Braindrain of health care personnell from developing countries
9. Structural racism in health care
10. Equality and equity among patients with a different cultural background
See below
English
23.05.2022 - 06.11.2022
15.11.2021 - 22.05.2022
10 - 20
Anita Wikberg
Note that there might be smaller updates or changes before the course starts.
The assignment is individual.
Supervision is given from teacher on demand 2 times + final evaluation. Please start early!
Evaluation can be booked before 10th of June or after 18th of August.
Deadline of all texts is 15th of October 2022.
The seminar will be on XX.
To be able to publish you need to have a grade 3 or above.
Use references correctly.
Do not write about your thesis topic or the same topics as you have written in CC02!
You will take part in the peer review process of two other students.
Do spelling and grammar checkup in Word before you send to peer review and your supervisor.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Alternative 1. Write a short article (min 2000 words abstract with max 150 words excluded) about one of the topics above
Content: Introduction, Headings 1 - 3 and Conclusion
Alternative 2. Create a blog and update it on a regular base (minimum 4 times and minimum 500 words each time) during May- October 2021 where you write about one of the topics above
Alternative 3. Write a short debate article for a daily newspaper (following the guidelines for debate article) about one of the topics above
Use instructions for written assignments when writing an article (you can also use Vancouver or Harvard system). The aim is to publish your article in Novialia or a non-scientific nursing journal.
When publishing you need to have a second author, your supervisor. It will be Anita Wikberg. The second writer (AW) gives supervision, corrects manuscript and influences this way on the manuscript).
When writing a blog, the forum and manuscripts must be approved by the supervisor (AW) before publication. Use the given instructions for the forum where you publish your blog. The blog is published at Novia blogs. The supervisor's name will be mentioned in the blog.
When writing a short debate article, the manuscript must be approved by the supervisor and include the supervisors name before publishing.
The final manuscript must be sent to your supervisor through Urkund/ Ouriginal for all three alternatives
-
October
-
1cr =27h
3cr = 3x27h= 81h
2h introduction, 2h supervision, 2h peer review, 4-8h presentation
67-71h is independent work.
-
Grade one is not reached
Grade 1
The aim with the article is unclear and the literature is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient. The article is incohesive and reflects a flawed understanding of the scientific working procedure, as well as the inability to structure an article in a purposeful and accessible manner. However, the article has achieved the minor criteria for academic writing concerning text and references but cannot be published without major revisions
The aim for the blog is unclear and the literature is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient and the text mainly reflects the authors opinion rather than factual knowledge. The text has reached the minor criteria for approval but cannot be published without major revisions.
The aim with the debate article is poorly motivated, missing or insufficient. The text mainly reflects the authors own opinion rather than factual knowledge. The text has reached the minor criteria for approval but cannot be published without major revisions
Grade 2
The aim for the article remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge. The relevance of the study is described, but in a superficial way. Some of the sources are not relevant to the study. The ability for source criticism is weak. The study lacks systematicity and a logical structure. The article is somewhat incohesive and inconsistent and cannot be published unless major revisions are done.
The aim for the blog remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to factual knowledge. The relevance for publishing the text is described but in a superficial way. Some of the topics described are not relevant. The ability for source criticism is weak. The blog text does not rise attention and the text is somewhat incohesive and inconsistent and cannot be published unless major revisions.
The aim for the debate article remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to factual knowledge. It cannot be published unless major revisions.
Grade 3
The motivation for writing the article is independently described but remain general. The framework for the article is well-constructed and motivated. Central concepts are clearly introduced, but their mutual relationship remains unclear. The chosen literature and research is relevant but is used in an uncritical manner. The article can be published with minor revisions.
The blog is well motivated, independently described, but remain general. The blog text reflects actual and factual knowledge. The chosen literature is relevant. The text can be published with minor revisions.
The debate article is interesting, well-motivated but lack a clear and stringent aim that catches the readers interest. The text is not fluent. The text can be published with minor revisions
Grade 4
The aim with the article is clearly described, it is actual and interesting. The literature used is relevant and the student s ability for source criticism is good. The article is written in an academic style. With minor editing the article is ready for publication
The aim with the blog is clearly described, the text reflects factual and actual knowledge described in an interesting way. Relevant literature is used in a good way. The text is ready for publishing with minor revision.
The aim with the debate article is clear, it is independently described and rises interest. The factual and actual knowledge is reflected in the text and it is ready for publication with minor revisions.
Grade 5
The article is interesting, actual and well-motivated and the text is fluent. The references are actual and reflect the topic. The source criticism is good. The article sows the students ability to synthetizing text forming a new understanding. The article is ready for publication.
The aim with the blog is clearly described, the text rises the interest and is fluently written. It reflects actual and factual knowledge. The debate article is ready for publication
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
intra.novia.fi
Degree regulations in Novia UAS
Peppi
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)
Information
On-line assignments
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.
Passed/failed for information part
Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.
English
30.08.2021 - 10.10.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Irén Vikström-Dahl
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Compulsory attendance
-oral presentation (video recorded)
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)
Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.
3 x 27 h = 81 hours
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
intra.novia.fi
Degree regulations in Novia UAS
Peppi
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)
Information
On-line assignments
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.
Passed/failed for information part
Grades 1-5 and in some assignments pass/fail.
English
30.08.2021 - 10.10.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Hanna Kuusisto, Irén Vikström-Dahl
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Compulsory attendance
-oral presentation (video recorded)
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)
Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.
3 x 27 h = 81 hours
Face-to-face
Beauvise, A.M. (eds) (2018) Leadership and Management Competence in Nursing Practice: Competencies, Skills, Decision-Making. Springer Publishing Company, ebook.
O'Riordan, A. & Elton, J. (2016) Healthcare Disrupted - Next Generation Business Models and Strategies. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, ebook.
+ Literature to be found online on databases
See Moodle course.
Lectures, group work, case studies and self study
Case study for the part of occupational safety 1 cr. evaluated 0-5 ( 30% of the course)
Home test for the part of leading, managing and delegating in nursing care 2 cr. evaluated 0-5 ( 70% of the course).
English
08.08.2021 - 31.12.2021
15.11.2020 - 03.10.2021
Marica Hinders
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Case study and home exam
1 cr = 27 h
3 cr = 81 h
Face-to-face
Jobiili, www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Central sjukhus, www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi
Terveysportti
Moodle - Practice documents from Curricula 2015
Supervised Clinical practice
Seminars 5.10.2021 Testing of National competences
Pass /fail
English
16.08.2021 - 03.10.2021
15.11.2020 - 31.07.2021
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Nina Vestö, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Approved language interview at Vaasa Central Hospital before starting of practice
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Approved practice
Approved test at seminars
Mini Love test on moodle
Compulsory attendance at seminars
Approved evaluation from clinical supervisors and supervising teacher
40 h/ weeks during clinical training
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars
Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher
English
10.01.2022 - 24.04.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments
See Moodle - Practice Documents from Curriculae 2015
Marlene Gädda
Face-to-face
English
10.01.2022 - 15.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Jannica Andtfolk
Face-to-face
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 38-40; 1219 - 1329.
Responses to Altered Respiratory Function:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 34-37; 1066 - 1217.
Responses to Altered Neurological Function
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 41, 42, 44
Responses to Altered Integumentary System
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 15, 16
Responses to Altered Sensory Function
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 45, 46
Lectures, demonstration, workshops, assignments
Compulsory attendance at workshops at Campus
English
21.02.2022 - 01.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 20.02.2022
Jannica Andtfolk, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Written examination, assignments
Spring 2022
5 x 27 h = 135 h
Distance learning
Aspalter, C. 2019. Welfare regime analysis: 30 years in the making. International Social Work, 62:1, 76–88.
Kangas, O. & Kvist, J. 2018. Nordic Welfare states. Chapter 12. In: Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State.
Kettunen, P. 2010. The Nordic Welfare State in Finland, Scandinavian Journal of History, 26:3, 225-247.
Nordic Council of Ministers.2020. State of the Nordic region. https://www.norden.org/en/nordicregion2020
Pedersen, W. & Kuhnle S. 2017. The Nordic welfare state model.In: Knutsen, O.P. (ed.). The Nordic Models in Politica lScience: Challenged, Challenged but still Viable? Bergen: Fagbokforlaget
Save the children. 2015. State of the World's Mothers 2015: The Urban Disadvantage. Fairfield; Save the Children.
https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/node/9052/pdf/sowm_2015.pdf
+ See list of more literature in Moodle
Methods of teaching:
The course is online, the course platform is Moodle.
You will take part in online lectures (recorded), occasional group tasks, practice on interactive exercises and read or watch study materials such as videos, presentations, articles and other literature.
Part 1 (1 cr) The Nordic Welfare Model, Social Services and Social Work: Assignment in Moodle.
Part 2 (1cr) Health Care and Midwifery: Assignments in Moodle
Part 3 (1 cr) Trends and challenges: Assignment in Moodle.
English
01.06.2022 - 04.09.2022
01.04.2022 - 30.04.2022
10 - 80
Annika Wentjärvi, Johanna Wikgren-Roelofs, Anita Wikberg
Information for students:
Deadline for all assignments is 4th of September 2022
Contact person: Johanna Wikgren-Roelofs, johanna.wikgren-roelofs@novia.fi
In Moodle there is a forum for questions and answers about the course, the forum will be read every Monday 30.5-30.6 and 8.8-4.9, and every second Monday in July.
Students can choose if they accomplish one, two or three parts/credits of the course.
Degree Programme in Nursing
3 credits
H-5
Examination:
Several small assignments in Moodle
Two possibilities to do retake exams on general exams at Novia UAS
NA
Deadline for all assignments: 4th of September 2022.
See Moodle for more information, please.
Students from different cultures and countries will meet each other on forums and discuss different issues.
Use of time
1 cr = 27h work by the student
3 cr= 3 x 27h = 81h
The Nordic Welfare Model, Social Services and Social Work (1 cr)
Health Care and Midwifery (1cr)
Trends and challenges (1 cr)
-
Fail: The student does not reach the below mentioned criteria.
Pass: According to the below grades 1-5.
Satisfactory, very satisfactory 1-2
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Good, very good 3-4
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited.
Excellent 5
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his assignments an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he has read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion. The assignment shows something out of the ordinary (technical execution, presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
MATERNITY CARE
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
National Institute for health and Welfare. 2017. We're having a baby a guidebook for expectant parents. Available at: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-833-3 (for written exam)
Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of nursing. Berman A., Snyder S. Chapter 21
CHILD, ADOLESCENT AND NEONATAL CARE
Quick Reference Guide to Pediatric Care
Deepak M. Kamat, Kelly J. Kelleher, Henry M. Adam, Rebecca A. Baum, Jatinder Bhatia, Deborah E. Campbell, Donna M. D'Alessandro, Thomas G. DeWitt, Jane Meschan Foy, and Athra Kaviani
Neonatology at a Glance
https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4038516
Atlas of Procedures in Neonatology
https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3417876
Nursing the Neonate
https://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=707872
Martin, G. I. & Rosenfeld, W. (2018). Common problems in the newborn nursery: An evidence and case-based guide.
https://tritonia.finna.fi/novia/Record/tria.364332
Lectures, demonstration, video, tutorials, written exam, individual assignments
Grades 0-5
Maternity care exam 1,5cr + Child, Adolescent and neonatal care 1,5 cr
28-30p = 5
25-27p = 4
22-24p = 3
19-21p = 2
16-18p = 1
English
27.09.2021 - 22.01.2022
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
10 - 30
Camilla Mattjus, Anita Wikberg
Maternity care 1,5 cr with Anita Wikberg
Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care 1,5 cr with Camilla Mattjus
Retake exams: the two general exams after the course is finished, registration is necessary.
Retakes on 10th of December 2021 and 21th of January 2022
Students that has passed one of the parts before writes only the other part of the exam,
and the points will be half and divided accoring to grades:
8p =1
9-10p= 2
11-12p = 3
13-14p= 4
15p = 5
The average of the grades in the two parts will give the final grade
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
(Written exam, Individual assignments)
-
Maternity care, Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care:
Written exam last lecture in school w. 46 + retake on two gereral retakes
Retakes on 10th of December 2021 and 21th of January 2022
Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care: There will be small tasks and independent reading to do.
-
27h/cr 3cr=81h
Maternity care 1,5 cr: lectures 12h, tutorials 26,5h, written exam 2h = 40,5
Care for the Child, Adolescent + neonatal care 1,5 cr: lectures + simulations 12h , (including small web based tasks and written exam exam 22,5h) =40,5h
-
Face-to-face
The material is on Moodle.
Homework
Helthcare text
Exercises in class
Diskussions
Presentations
01.09.2021 - 31.12.2021
11.06.2021 - 12.09.2021
Anita Kvist
Preparing the texts at home.
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Oral and written exam in the end of the course.
3 credits or 81 hours
Face-to-face
English
30.08.2021 - 03.10.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Nygårdas
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Face-to-face
Oncology:
Abraham, J., Gulley, J. 2019. The Bethesda Handbook of Clinical Oncology. Volters Cluwer.
Dark,G. 2013. Oncology at a Glance. Wiley-Blackwell.
Duodecim. 2019. Käypä hoito-suositus. Palliatiivinen hoito ja saattohoito.
Kinzbrunner, B. & Policzer, J. 2011. End - of - Life care. Practical Guide. New York: Medical
The National Advisory Board on Health Care Ethics (ETENE). 2003. End-of-life care
ETENE 2012. Human dignity, hospice care and euthanasia
Lectures, discussions, self study
Grade 0 - 5
English
08.04.2022 - 31.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 31.03.2022
Lena Sandén-Eriksson
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
H-5
Palliative care: online web course
Oncology: individual exam
27h/credit
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Face-to-face
English
10.01.2022 - 24.04.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Anna-Lena Nieminen
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Nina Vestö
80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning
Berman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen, G. 2016. (10nd ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.
Hess, C. 2013. Clinical guide to Skin & Wound Care. 7th Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins.
Lectures
Clinical practice in class + independent training
Demonstration
Seminars
English
21.02.2022 - 15.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 20.02.2022
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam
Approved assignment
Distance learning
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Duffy, J. R. 2013. Quality Caring in Nursing and Health Systems. Implications for Clinicians, Educators, and Leaders. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10687047
Kalra, J. 2011. Medical Errors and Patient Safety. Strategies to reduce and disclose medical errors and improve patient safety. De Gruyter. U.S.A (Online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10486525
Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook central)
Marr, H. & Giebing, H. 1994. Quality Assurance in Nursing Concepts. Methods and Case studies. Campion Press. Edinburgh.
Boström, A-M., Nordström, G. & Wilde-Larsson, B. red. 2017. Kvalitetsarbete för bättre och säkrare vård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Waterson, P. 2014. Patient Safety Culture; Theory, methods and application (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10989175
Pauley J.A. & Pauley J.F. 2011. Establishing a Culture of Patient Safety: Improving Communication, Building Relationships, and Using Quality Tools (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10929643
Other material and more information about literature can be found in the Moodle course
Patient safety and Quality assurance 2cr with Anita Wikberg:
Lectures, group work, tutorials, online test
Radiation safety 1cr with Katarina Vironen:
Lectures, group work, on-line test
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportaali' P/F P= Pass F= Fail
Written assignment in Patient safety and quality assurance grade 0-5
Criteria for evaluation of written assignment:
Max 40 points
Detailed description of the nature of the ward or practice 3p
Description of background method/model for quality development and reference to source 3p
List of what could be changed or developed 2p
Choice of relevant object to develop/ improve 2p
Relevant background literature (minimum 2) on the topic which will be developed or improved 2p
Detailed description of the process of developing and evaluating applying the chosen method/model 10p
Reflection on how the work promotes patient safety and quality assurance and sustainable development 3+3p
Has used Novia's instruction for writing thesis e.g. references 2p
6 pages texti two students, 9 pages if three students etc. 2p
Extra literature or something extra which was not demanded 2p
PP, Prezi, film or other material 2p
Presentation on seminar 2p
Active participation or good comments on Moodle 2p
1= 21-24
2=25-28
3=29-32
4=33-36
5= 37-40
Radiation safety: Online test and participating activity
English
25.10.2021 - 31.01.2022
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Katarina Vironen, Anita Wikberg
Compulsory presence in Patient safety and quality assurance
Test on the Finnish 'patient quality portal' (Potilasturvaportti) on patientsafety and Quality assurance:
Online test:
Log in to:
https://portal.potilasturvaportti.fi/sv/Account/Open?oo=GUWZHbk999!2f7M71ZAm6Q5YYqkQ4Ma9nCFDccz0QWj2lJNqwkgDJ79U7sWK!2bHEULq
Click Ny användare (=new user)
Choose language
Fill the form and register as a new user
Create a username and key
Choose unit: YH Novia and department: write the name of your group
Click education
Choose the course: Patient safety through skill
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
3 credits
H-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportti'
All the course is online
written assignment in a small group
Online test in Radiation safety
Two retakes on genreal exam days, registration is compulsory
Retake exams are 21th of January and 11th of February 2022 in school
for patient safety and quality assurance:
Exam literature isKelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook Central)
+ Moodle material
Radiation safety: dates for retake exam agreed when the course starts
27h/cr 3cr = 81h
Patient safety and Quality Assurance: 4h introduction+ 4h lectures, online test 5h, tutorials and cooperation in a small group 37h, seminar 4h = 54h
Radiation safety: 8h lectures, 14 h individual/groupwork, 32h preparation and on-line test =54h
Irén Vikström-Dahl
25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning
Kela, the social institution of Finland. Available at: http://www.kela.fi/documents/10180/578772/Kela_Yleisesite_EN_WEB.pdf/60019393-183a-40ff-9325-e4cdabb54790
Säkkinen, S. (2010). Fact about social welfare and health care in Finland 2010. Available at: http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79913/facts2010.pdf?sequence=1
The ministry of social affairs and health care, Finland: http://stm.fi/en/publications
National Institute of Health and Welfare, Finland https://www.thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en
Information and literature at Moodle
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Duffy, J. R. 2013. Quality Caring in Nursing and Health Systems. Implications for Clinicians, Educators, and Leaders. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10687047
Kalra, J. 2011. Medical Errors and Patient Safety. Strategies to reduce and disclose medical errors and improve patient safety. De Gruyter. U.S.A (Online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10486525
Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook Central)
Marr, H. & Giebing, H. 1994. Quality Assurance in Nursing Concepts. Methods and Case studies. Campion Press. Edinburgh.
Boström, A-M., Nordström, G. & Wilde-Larsson, B. red. 2017. Kvalitetsarbete för bättre och säkrare vård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Waterson, P. 2014. Patient Safety Culture; Theory, methods and application (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10989175
Pauley J.A. & Pauley J.F. 2011. Establishing a Culture of Patient Safety: Improving Communication, Building Relationships, and Using Quality Tools (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10929643
Other material and more information about literature can be found in the Moodle course
Lectures, Group assignment, poster exhibition
Patient safety and Quality assurance 2cr with Anita Wikberg:
Lectures, group work, tutorials, online test, seminar
Service Design in Social and Health Care 2cr with Marica Hinders
Lectures, group work, tutorials.
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportaali' P/F P= Pass F= Fail
Written assignment in Patient safety and quality assurance grade 0-5
Criteria for evaluation of written assignment in patietn safety and quality assurance:
Max 40 points
Detailed description of the nature of the ward or practice 3p
Description of background method/model for quality development and reference to source 3p
List of what could be changed or developed 2p
Choice of relevant object to develop/ improve 2p
Relevant background literature (minimum 2) on the topic which will be developed or improved 2p
Detailed description of the process of developing and evaluating applying the chosen method/model 10p
Reflection on how the work promotes patient safety and quality assurance and sustainable development 3+3p
Has used Novia's instruction for writing thesis e.g. references 2p
6 pages texti two students, 9 pages if three students etc. 2p
Extra literature or something extra which was not demanded 2p
PP, Prezi, film or other material 2p
Presentation on seminar 2p
Active participation or good comments on Moodle 2p
1= 21-24
2=25-28
3=29-32
4=33-36
5= 37-40
English
01.11.2021 - 31.12.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
20 - 40
Marica Hinders, Anita Wikberg
Compulsory presence in Patient safety and quality assurance
Test on the Finnish 'patient quality portal' (Potilasturvaportti) on patient safety and quality assurance:
Online test:
Log in to:
https://portal.potilasturvaportti.fi/sv/Account/Open?oo=GUWZHbk999!2f7M71ZAm6Q5YYqkQ4Ma9nCFDccz0QWj2lJNqwkgDJ79U7sWK!2bHEULq
Click Ny användare (=new user)
Choose language
Fill the form and register as a new user
Create a username and key
Choose unit: YH Novia and department: write the name of your group
Click education
Choose the course: Patient safety through skill online
Service Design in Social and Health Care is held in collaboration with VAMK.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
3 credits
H-5
Poster exhibition and oral presentation
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportti'
All the course is available online
Written assignment in a small groups in patiensafety and quality assurance
Service Design in Social and Health Care:
Lectures, group work with cases and seminars.
-
Seminar and poster exibition
Seminars in patient safety and quality assurance
Two retakes on genreal exam days, registration is compulsory
Retake exams are 21th of January and 11th of February 2022 in school
for patient safety and quality assurance:
Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook central)
+ Moodle material
-
27h/cr
Patient safety and Quality Assurance: 4h introduction + 4h lectures, online test 5h, tutorials and cooperation in a small group 37h, seminar 4h = 54h
Service Design in Social and Health Care: 8h lectures, tutorial and case studies in small groups 42h, seminar 4h =54h
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Distance learning
Kela, the social institution of Finland. Available at: http://www.kela.fi/documents/10180/578772/Kela_Yleisesite_EN_WEB.pdf/60019393-183a-40ff-9325-e4cdabb54790
Säkkinen, S. (2010). Fact about social welfare and health care in Finland 2010. Available at: http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79913/facts2010.pdf?sequence=1
The ministry of social affairs and health care, Finland: http://stm.fi/en/publications
National Institute of Health and Welfare, Finland https://www.thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en
Information and literature at Moodle
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Duffy, J. R. 2013. Quality Caring in Nursing and Health Systems. Implications for Clinicians, Educators, and Leaders. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10687047
Kalra, J. 2011. Medical Errors and Patient Safety. Strategies to reduce and disclose medical errors and improve patient safety. De Gruyter. U.S.A (Online book) http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10486525
Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook Central)
Marr, H. & Giebing, H. 1994. Quality Assurance in Nursing Concepts. Methods and Case studies. Campion Press. Edinburgh.
Boström, A-M., Nordström, G. & Wilde-Larsson, B. red. 2017. Kvalitetsarbete för bättre och säkrare vård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Waterson, P. 2014. Patient Safety Culture; Theory, methods and application (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10989175
Pauley J.A. & Pauley J.F. 2011. Establishing a Culture of Patient Safety: Improving Communication, Building Relationships, and Using Quality Tools (Online book)
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10929643
Other material and more information about literature can be found in the Moodle course
Lectures, Group assignment, poster exhibition
Patient safety and Quality assurance 2cr with Anita Wikberg:
Lectures, group work, tutorials, online test, seminars
Service Design in Social and Health Care 2cr with Marica Hinders
Online: lectures, group work, tutorials.
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportaali' P/F P= Pass F= Fail
Written assignment in Patient safety and quality assurance grade 0-5
Criteria for evaluation of written assignment in patient safety:
Max 40 points
Detailed description of the nature of the ward or practice 3p
Description of background method/model for quality development and reference to source 3p
List of what could be changed or developed 2p
Choice of relevant object to develop/ improve 2p
Relevant background literature (minimum 2) on the topic which will be developed or improved 2p
Detailed description of the process of developing and evaluating applying the chosen method/model 10p
Reflection on how the work promotes patient safety and quality assurance and sustainable development 3+3p
Has used Novia's instruction for writing thesis e.g. references 2p
6 pages texti two students, 9 pages if three students etc. 2p
Extra literature or something extra which was not demanded 2p
PP, Prezi, film or other material 2p
Presentation on seminar 2p
Active participation or good comments on Moodle 2p
1= 21-24
2=25-28
3=29-32
4=33-36
5= 37-40
English
01.11.2021 - 31.01.2022
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
20 - 40
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Marica Hinders, Anita Wikberg
Compulsory presence in Patient safety and quality assurance
Test on the Finnish 'patient quality portal' (Potilasturvaportti) on patientsafety and Quality assurance:
Online test:
Log in to:
https://portal.potilasturvaportti.fi/sv/Account/Open?oo=GUWZHbk999!2f7M71ZAm6Q5YYqkQ4Ma9nCFDccz0QWj2lJNqwkgDJ79U7sWK!2bHEULq
Click Ny användare (=new user)
Choose language
Fill the form and register as a new user
Create a username and key
Choose unit: YH Novia and department: write the name of your group
Click education
Choose the course: Patient safety through skill
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
4 credits
H-5
Poster exhibition and oral presentation
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Patient safety and Quality assurance:
Online test on 'Potilasturvaportti'
All the course is online
written assignment in a small group
Service Design in Social and Health Care:
Online lectures and written assignments
-
Seminar and poster exibition
Seminars in patient safety and quality assurance
Two retakes on genreal exam days, registration is compulsory
Retake exam are 21st of january and 11th of February 2022 will be arranged online if necessary.
Kelly, P., Vottero, B.A. & Christie-McAuliffe C.A. (Eds.) 2014 Introduction to Quality and Safety Education for Nurses : Core Competencies. New York: Springer Publishing Company. (available on Ebook Central)
+
Moodle material
-
27h/cr
Patient safety and Quality Assurance: 4h introduction+ 4h lectures, online test 5h, tutorials and cooperation in a small group 37h, seminar 4h = 54h
Service Design in Social and Health Care: 8h lectures, tutorial and case studies in small groups 42h, seminar 4h =54h
-
The exam and assignment do not fullfill the criteria below 1-5
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
Face-to-face
Berman, A. & Snyder, S. 2012. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts. process and Practice. Unit 8, Chapter 37.
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, P. (2015). Medical-Surgical Nursing Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 6 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey. Unit 2, Chapter 4: Nursing care of patients having surgery.
Timby, B. 2013. Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 th Ed. Wolters Kluvert Health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. USA.
Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis
Iivanainen, A., & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirja. SanomaPro oy. Helsinki.
E-book Ebrary: Stone, Julian & Fawcett, W. (2013). At a Glance : Anaesthesia at a Glance (1). Wiley-Blackwell.
Terveysportti
+ other recommended literature
Close- education at Novia: lectures
English
08.11.2021 - 19.12.2021
11.06.2021 - 07.11.2021
Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Written exam
Anita Wikberg
84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning
See courses on methodology RM02, RM03, RM04 and ethical documents in Moodle course for thesis.
Also see Moodle course TH03 for NU19
Students independent work and presentation of thesis with the help of supervision
The evaluation has been slightly updated in the beginning of 2021
See practical guide.
English
04.01.2022 - 18.12.2022
15.11.2021 - 03.01.2022
10 - 20
Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Anita Wikberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg, Marica Hinders, Irén Vikström-Dahl, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland, Maj-Helen Nyback, Marlene Gädda, Marie Hjortell
See practical guide for thesis writing.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
1 credits
H-5
Presentation of thesis and maturity exam in May or November
Opposition of another student's work
Cooperation with the field if the thesis is a project ordered from a health care organization.
week X
Presentation on xx of May 2022 and maturity exam on XX Friday at 9-11 the same week
Registration on Moodle 2 weeks earlier is compulsory!
Presentation in autumn is w 47
presentation 23 rd of November 8.15-14.00 and maturity test 25th of November 9-11
-
Students independently plan their work and include time for supervision, using/following the practical guide for thesis writing.
Grade 0
FRAUD AND IRREGULARITIES ALWAYS GENERATE A FAILED GRADE REGARDLESS OF GREAT ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE THESIS
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the study are irrelevant and source criticism is missing.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
The work is not systematic and the language is commonplace and inexact.
The understanding of the text is at stake due to language and grammatical mistakes.
The text is neither clear nor logical, and is not credible, for example, in the result.
METHOD
The choice of methodology is not described or is poorly described and irrelevant.
The correlation between the method description and the realisation of the thesis is very poor.
The ethical discussion is irrelevant or missing.
The thesis is not comprehensive enough according to standards for a thesis.
The conclusions are illogical and are not drawn on an analysis of the data material.
RESULTS
The presentation of the results is insufficient/ incorrect/ not based on the analysis of the data material.
There is no logical structure and the analysis/ reflective discussion is uncritical and shallow.
THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
The summary of the thesis is poorly written (abstract).
The introduction is not linked to the content of the thesis, the aim is not clear and the research questions are not in accordance with the aim.
Unstructured layout and incorrect reference list.
The presentation is unstructured, unprepared and irrelevant.
The opposition of the thesis is irrelevant and based on personal opinions.
Immature and dependent work process.
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
grade 1
The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis are based on few sources and the description is general or brief.
Sources are referred to in an unreflective way.
Some source criticism can be found in the text.
grade 2
The theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis are based on mainly relevant literature but remain very general or briefly described.
The sources are few, only partially relevant and form a weak theoretical background for the thesis.
The ability to present an overview of relevant research is weak.
The source criticism is inadequate.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
grade1
The language is commonplace, throughout the work and the terminology is unclear or inexact.
Popular science sources are frequently used and it is not possible to know if the difference between scientific sources and popular science is understood.
The source paths are not clear.
grade 2
The use of language is uneven.
There is commonplace text which influence the accuracy, especially in the background (use of sources and understanding of scientific literature), while the presentation of the results shows a basic ability to use scientific language.
METHOD
grade1
The description of method is rudimentary and incomplete.
The discussion on results and method including a critical review of the study is irrelevant or very superficially described.
The conclusions are shallow and trivial.
grade 2
The description of the method is general and part of the description of method, discussion of methods or the ethical discussion are poor.
The discussion of results and method/the critical review are very superficial. The conclusions are trivial.
RESULTS
grade 1
The presentation of results is very brief and insignificant.
The process is very superficially described and it is difficult to follow the logic in the presentation.
The discussion of the results is referring or incomplete in relation to what is relevant for the aim of the thesis.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is very poor.
grade 2
The data material is poor and the presentation of the results are short, the work process is superficially and shortly described.
The discussion of the result is mainly referring and some central aspects to the aim of the work are neglected or incomplete.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is poor.
THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
grade1
The summary of the thesis is inadequate (abstract).
The introduction is short, insignificant and does not introduce the reader to the topic.
The aim is unclear/irrelevant and the research questions do not relate to the aim or are incorrect.
There are errors in the reference list and in the in-text citation.
The presentation is weak and incoherent. The opposition shows the inability to critically review a text.
Partially immature and dependent work process.
grade 2
The summary of the thesis is partly inadequate.
The introduction shows a partly misleading or unclear picture of the topic.
The aim is unclearly described or inappropriate for a thesis.
The logical connection between the research questions and the aim of the thesis is very poor.
There are some errors in the reference list and in the in-text citation.
The presentation is unprepared and the time schedule is not kept.
The opposition is referring only.
The work process has been characterized by certain problems and a dependent working method.
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
grade 3
There is a basic ability to synthesize and the theoretical background and the theoretical framework of the thesis form a functioning theoretical whole for the thesis.
The literature is relevant regarding the topic, and the theoretical framework is relevant.
Good source criticism.
grade 4
The study has a good theoretical foundation based on extensive and relevant literature and a clear and adequate theoretical framework.
Very good source criticism.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
grade 3
The use of language is mainly correct and shows a basic understanding of writing scientific text.
Some shortcomings related to use of terminology and construction of sentences occur (for example, writing about yourself in third-person singular).
The search paths for used sources are clear and the referencing is correct.
grade 4
Correct use of language shows understanding of search paths and use of scientific text, even if some small mistakes occur. Can clearly distinguish between popular science and scientific text and use of different types of sources.
The text is credible and exact.
METHOD
grade 3
The method description gives a good picture of the realisation of the study, however missing in-depth discussion on different choices of methods.
The study is corresponding to the scope of a thesis and is carried out well.
The ethical discussion is short but declare relevant ethical issues.
The critical review is extensive but not reflective.
The conclusions are legitimate and reflect the aim, but the ability for argumentation is missing.
grade 4
The description of method gives a comprehensive picture of the realisation of the study and shows awareness of advantages and disadvantages concerning the choice of methods.
The ethical discussion is extensive and complete regarding relevant ethical issues.
The conclusions are comprehensive and well founded.
RESULTS
grade 3
The data material is big enough for analysis and the presentation of the results is systematic and follows the described process, but the reasoning is tentative and mainly referring.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear, but brief and undeveloped, the refection is missing.
grade 4
The data material is rich and the analysis follows the description and is well implemented.
The presentation of results is correct and shows the ability for independent reasoning.
The presentation of results follows the described process, which renders transparent results.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear and extensive and demonstrates strengths and weaknesses in the realisation.
THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
grade 3
The summary of the study is well written.
The introduction gives the reader a good enough picture to understand the topic and aim of the study.
The aim and the research questions are logically connected.
Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
The presentation and the opposition according to the instructions.
The work process has been smooth and mainly independent.
grade 4
The summary of the study is very well written.
The introduction gives a clear background to how the work relates to previous research and thus the aim of the thesis. The aim and the research questions are logically interconnected.
Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
The presentation is systematic and an ability to develop and clarify the topic is present.
The opposition is critical and constructive and show the ability to familiarise with the opposed work.
The work process is mature and mainly independent.
Grade 5
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
The background and the starting point are very well founded and well described and show an ability to understand the topic from different perspectives.
A reflecting approach to the topic is present in the work. The theoretical framework is well chosen and there is an ability to evaluate its merits and limitations.
The sources are comprehensive and relevant, and show an excellent ability for source criticism.
SCIENTIFIC WRITING
Scientific language is used throughout the thesis and the text is clear and distinct and gives an impression of accuracy and credibility.
The text is easy to read.
The use of references is correct.
METHOD
The description of method gives a comprehensive picture of the realisation of the study and shows the awareness of advantages and disadvantages concerning the choice of methods, and the ability to consider different alternatives.
The ethical discussion is extensive and complete regarding relevant ethical issues.
The conclusions are comprehensive and well founded and there is an ability of critical evaluation. An ability to show new perspectives and questions for further research.
RESULTS
The data material is rich and the analysis is transparent and excellently done.
The presentation of results is well-structured, innovative, original, and shows an ability for independent reasoning.
The coherence between the aim and the conclusions is clear and comprehensive.
Strengths and weaknesses in the realisation of the study are discussed.
The work finishes with an attractive ending, well-founded synthesis and possibilities for development.
THESIS AS A WHOLE AND PRESENTATION
The summary of the study is outstanding.
The introduction problematises previous research and knowledge of the topic and thus place the aim in a scientifically interesting context
The aim and the research questions are logically interconnected.
Layout, reference list and references follow the standard.
The presentation is systematic and an ability to develop and clarify the topic is present.
The opposition is critical and constructive and show an excellent ability to problematise and reflect critically on the topic.
The work process is flexible, mature and independent.
The work goes the extra mile that shows luminescence.
Anita Kvist
Face-to-face
The material is available on Moodle.
Self-study
Oral and written exam.
European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is used for the assessment of knowledge of Finnish and other national languages. Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate
satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicate good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (the grade
1) the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.
https://www.oph.fi/sv/utbildning-och-examina/nivaskalan-sprakkunskap-och-sprakutveckling#48ac3886
English
28.03.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.11.2021 - 27.02.2022
Anita Kvist
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Anita Kvist
Face-to-face
The material i available om Moodle.
Self-study course.
Oral and written exam.
European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is used for the assessment of knowledge of Finnish and other national languages. Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate
satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3) and level B2 or higher indicate good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (the grade
1) the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.
https://www.oph.fi/sv/utbildning-och-examina/nivaskalan-sprakkunskap-och-sprakutveckling#48ac3886
English
28.03.2022 - 27.11.2022
15.11.2021 - 27.03.2022
Anita Kvist
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Oral and written exam.
Rika Levy-Malmberg
67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book)
Finnish national board on research integrity (Tenk). 2012. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Available at: https://www.tenk.fi/en
O'Leary, Z. 2009. The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Lectures, discussions, group work, interview
-
0-5
English
31.01.2022 - 03.04.2022
15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022
Rika Levy-Malmberg
The literature review and thesis reading can be used for the thesis
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Validation according to general instructions for validation in Novia
3 smaller assignments during the course (see Moodle)
1) literature search, review
2) read in depth 1 thesis write a summary, reflect,
3) data collection, interview, will be used in RM04 as a data material, deadline 21st of March
Interview with an immigrant or students from different culture
Assignments presented on seminar
Retakes on the two following general written exam days after the seminar
Interview with an immigrant
1 cr / 27 h
3 cr = 81 h
Lectures 12 h, seminar 8 h AW
2 h literature search
61 h tutorials literature search, reading preparing for assignments
-
-
-
-
-
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Face-to-face
Quantitative methods: the following literature is recommended: Denise F. Polit & Cheryl Tatano Beck. 2008. Nursing Research. Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluver., as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
Qualitative methods: the following literature is recommended:
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing. 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book)
Finnish national board on research integrity (Tenk). 2012. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Available at: https://www.tenk.fi/en
O'Leary, Z. 2009. The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
Qualitative methods: lectures, exercises, independent work
Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.
English
14.03.2022 - 29.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 13.03.2022
Ralf Lillbacka, Rika Levy-Malmberg
Quantitative methods 2cr Ralf Lillbacka
Qualitative methods 1 cr Rika Levy-Malmberg
The courses RM02, RM03, RM04 and TH01 are connected and are the foundation for the thesis work.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
Qualitative methods: theory and practice on data analysis, groupwork, graded 0-5
-
Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted before the final course date.
-
1cr = 27h
3cr = 81h
Qualitative method: (1 cr) : 8 h lectures+ exersises + 4 h seminar + 15 h students own work in groups
-
Not pass
Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.
Satisfactory, very satisfactory
Quantitative and qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.
Good and very good
Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.
Excellent
Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.
Marlene Gädda
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
Videbeck, S.2014. Psychiatric mental health nursing
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4625052
Katona C, Cooper, C & Robertson, M.2015. Psychiatry at a glance
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4094470
Rassool, G.H.2010. Addiction for nurses
O'Brien, P.G., Kennedy, W.Z. & Ballard, K.A. 2008. Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing
Smith, G. 2014. Mental health Nursing at a Glance
Lectures
Groupwork
Seminars
Selfstudies
English
11.04.2022 - 22.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 13.04.2022
Marlene Gädda
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Groupwork
Selfstudies
27h/cr
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
Sexual and reproductive functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, M., Bauldoff,G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. pp. ch 47: 1542-1554, ch 49, 50
Menstrual cycle, the most important gynecological surgeries, family planning
Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2016. Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J. : Pearson, cop, chapter 40. Available as e-book
https://www.skhole.fi/best-healthcare-education-in-the-world.html
Gynecologic nursing care except pregnancy complications (abortions etc.)
Lectures, group discussions, tutorials, group work, written exam
Sexual-Reproductive Function 1,25 cr
Sexuality assignment on Moodle Pass/Fail, not included in exam.
Common written exam for both parts.
Written exam grades 0-5
Other group works are not compulsory but will be included in the exam
English
30.08.2021 - 12.12.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
15 - 30
Anita Wikberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg
Content of the course will be written in the Moodle course.
The sexuality part will not be included in the exam.
Group works are not compulsory, and will be done mainly during lectures,
However the content of them will be included in the exam
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Written exam
-
Written exam on the last lecture of the course 26 of October
Retake exam 1 and 2 on general exam days 26th of November and 10th of December
Deadline for sexuality assignment on Moodle
-
27h/cr
3cr=81h
Sexual and reproductive functions 1,25 cr:
2x4h=8h lectures in gynecology + 4h work on sexuality assignment + tutorial = 20h reading of material + 2h written exam = 34h
Face-to-face
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 21,23-25; 537 - 545, 588 - 730.
Responses to Altered Urinary Eliminations:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 26-28; 731 - 823 and Chapter 48: p 1657-1672 (from testicular torsion - prostate cancer)
Close- education at Novia: lectures and case studies
physical assessment practice ( mandatory )
Writen test evaluated 0-5
English
08.11.2021 - 16.01.2022
11.06.2021 - 07.11.2021
Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
written exam
Written examination :
Re-take 1:
Re-take 2:
27 h= 1 cr
81 h= 3 cr
67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning
CVD references
Alexander, MF., Fawcett, JN., Runciman, PJ. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. 2012: pp. 7-72.
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. 2011: 867-1014.
Thaler, MS- The Only EKG Book You’ll Ever Need. The 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015 (you can use the previous additions as well)
Hematology:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2011. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 33; 1068 - 1117.
Alexander, M., Fawcett, J. & Runciman, P. 2012. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. Ch 11, 479 - 523.
Skhole videos.
lectures, case studies (lectures are not taped)
Self-education
physical assessment practice (Mandatory)
Written test 0-5
Responses to Altered Haematological, 30%
Cardiovascular and Vascular Function 70%
English
27.09.2021 - 31.10.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Margareta Antus, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
written test
Written test : 27.10.2021
Re exam 1:
Re exam 2:
1 cr = 27 h
3 cr = 81h
67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning
Medical-Surgical Nursing: Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care (2015)
https://tritonia.finna.fi/novia/Record/tria.349466
Unit 4: Responses to Altered Integumentary Structure and Function
Unit 11: Responses to Altered Neurologic Function
Unit 12: Responses to Altered Sensory Function
Fundamentals of Medical-Surgical Nursing : A Systems Approach (2014)
by Brady, Anne-Marie; McCabe, Catherine; McCann, Margaret
Ebook: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2226/lib/novia/detail.action?docID=10822336
Medical-surgical nursing at a glance (2016) in Ebscos e-boks collection.
http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1103657&site=ehost-live
Limited User Access (3 Copies Available)
Moodle
Terveysportti
Lectures and practice
Written exam 0-5
ENT obligatory practice
English
25.10.2021 - 28.11.2021
11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Ann-Louise Glasberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1 credits
H-5
Written exam
See schedule in Peppi
ENT- OBLIGATORY PRACTICE (virtual)
Neuro - practice at Alere (not virtual)
1 Sp= 27 h
3 sp= 81h
< 50%
50-69%
70-89%
>90%
Marlene Gädda
34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning
Videbeck, S.2014. Psychiatric mental health nursing
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4625052
Katona C, Cooper, C & Robertson, M.2015. Psychiatry at a glance
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4094470
Wrycraft, N.2009. An Introduction to Mental Health Nursing
O'Brien, P.G., Kennedy, W.Z. & Ballard, K.A. 2008. Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing
Smith, G. 2014. Mental health Nursing at a Glance
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1829439
Lectures
Groupwork
Seminars
Selfstudies
Criteria on moodle
English
28.02.2022 - 10.04.2022
15.11.2021 - 27.02.2022
Marlene Gädda
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
2 credits
H-5
Assignments on moodle
27h/cr
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For the exam:
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
For the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
Nina Vestö
Face-to-face
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2015. Medical Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 38-40; 1219 - 1329.
Responses to Altered Respiratory Function:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2015. Medical Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 5th ed. Pearson. Chapter 34-37; 1066 - 1217.
Moodle
lectures, case studies, demonstrations, exersises
Both part 1 and part 2 will be graded 0 - 5.
English
10.01.2022 - 20.02.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Nina Vestö
If you fail in the first case-study exam, you can´t take part in case-study exam 2. Re-take will be an written examination of both part 1 and part 2 on a general re-take.
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Case-study exams (2 exams; part 1 and part 2), dates see schedule
Case-study exam 1
Case-study exam 2
Re-take 1.
Re-take 2.
3 x 27 h
Åsa Lågland
Face-to-face
Clinical laboratory work
Pendergraph, G E & Pender graph, C B. Latest edition. Handbook of Phlebotomy and Patient Service Techniques
Miller, M. Latest edition. Specimen Managemant in Clinical Microbiology
Provan, D.(Edit). Latest edition or 2010. Oxford Handbook of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation.
Fischbach, F. Latest edition. A manual of Laboratory & Diagnostic Tests.Pendergraph, G E & Pender graph, C B. Latest edition. Handbook of Phlebotomy and Patient Service Techniques
Miller, M. Latest edition. Specimen Managemant in Clinical Microbiology
LeMone, P., Burke, K. & Bauldoff, G. (2011). Medical-Surgical Nursing Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 5 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey.
Berman. A. & Snyder. S. (2012). Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. 9th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis
Iivanainen, A., & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirja. SanomaPro oy. Helsinki.
Meeker, M.H. & Rothrock, J.C (1999). Alexander´s Care of the Patient in Surgery. 11th Ed. Mosby, Inc.
Terveysportti
Lextueres notes and articles in Moodle (not translated)
Blended learning
Group work
Individual work
Have not met the criteria for approved grades (not translated)
English
11.02.2022 - 03.04.2022
15.11.2021 - 10.02.2022
Margareta Antus, Åsa Lågland
Compulsory attendance (not translated)
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Clinical laboratory work: 1,5 cr = 40,5 h, 12 h lectures, 12 h practical work in lab (not translated)
Have not met the criteria for approved grades
Åsa Lågland
Face-to-face
English
04.04.2022 - 16.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022
Åsa Lågland
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
Information on Moodle
The student
- Has basic understanding in oral and written Swedish
- Is familiar with the main structures of the language and has acquired a basic vocabulary
- Can use Swedish in everyday situations
During the course well focus on:
- Oral and written exercises
- Swedish everyday vocabulary
- Reading and listening comprehensions
- Grammar/language structures
- Exams
Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).
English
30.08.2021 - 24.10.2021
01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
-
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Oral and written exams
Short essay
Individual oral assignment
-
Oral and written exam at the end of the course.
-
3 x 27 h = 81 hours
-
Irén Vikström-Dahl
Face-to-face
English
30.08.2021 - 24.10.2021
02.12.2021 - 31.12.2021
Terese Herrgård-Backlund
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
H-5
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Face-to-face
See courses RM02, RM03, RM04
Independent planning and writing of thesis work plan
Presentation in individual or small group seminars
fail, pass
Compulsory content:
Thesis title page
Table of content
Introduction (1page)
Background (description of subject/topic) (3-5pages)
(introduction and background should include at least 6-8 references of which 5 are scientific)
Aim
Method (data collection method based on 2 references/discuss method of selection) (2-3 pages)
Ethical considerations (based on references) (1 page)
Time table
Reference list
Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excluding title page, table of content and reference list)
See also practical guide
English
28.03.2022 - 29.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 27.03.2022
Rika Levy-Malmberg
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
Approved/Rejected
Accepted thesis plan, indivudual or smal lgroup presentations during April-May, students book with teacher, when they are ready.
See also practical guide.
Possible topic from the field: Vaasa hospital district or other projects or organizations
individually planned work
There is no implementations attached to this degree programme.