Academic year 2021 - 2022

•   Biochemical Bioanalysis 1 BA18BI01-3004 03.01.2022-20.02.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
  - are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  - are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
  - have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
  - understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
  - master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
  - are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

  Prerequisites

  Biochemistry

  Content of the study unit

  Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
  Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
  Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
  Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
  Vetenskapliga artiklar
  Föreläsningsmaterial (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, övningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Skriftlig examination och obligatoriska uppgifter
  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 20.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 14.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kurstentamen 16.02.2022
  Omtentamen på allmän omtentamen fredagen den 11.03.2022 och 06.05.2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar och examination 21 h, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärka kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

•   Biochemical Bioanalysis 2 BA16BI02-3003 21.02.2022-03.04.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
  - are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  - are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
  - have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
  - understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
  - master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
  - are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

  Prerequisites

  Biochemistry

  Content of the study unit

  Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
  Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nilsson-Ehle (red). Laurells Klinisk Kemi i praktisk medicin. Studentlitteratur
  Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
  Simonsen. Analysteknik. Studentlitteratur.
  Vetenskapliga artiklar
  Föreläsningsmaterial (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, övningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Skriftlig examination och obligatoriska uppgifter
  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.02.2022 - 03.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 20.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kurstentamen 16.03.2022
  Omtentamen på allmän omtentamen fredagen den 06.052022 och 26.08.2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar och examination 21 h, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärka kunskaper inom området. (not translated)

•   Biomedical Laboratory Science and Quality Development BA20LV02-3001 01.05.2022-31.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic insights into biomedical laboratory science and its relation to other sciences.
  - have basic insights into professional and legal ethics.
  - are able to carry out comprehensive quality improvement in the biomedical laboratory

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Essential components of Biomedical laboratory science
  Ethical aspects
  Quality management within the profession

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.05.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.04.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Hälsa och välfärd 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Biomethodology 1 BA18KM01-3002 07.02.2022-11.02.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic knowledge and skills in microscopy and cell biological, immunological and histological methods.
  - command the basic settings of the microscope.
  - are able to carry out cell biological, immunological and histological laborations according to method descriptions.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in biosciences.
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory work.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the work.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Microscopy
  Cell biological, immunological and histological methods.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Anvisningar för mikroskopering
  Anvisningar för histologiska metoder
  Litteratur om infektionsserologi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hösten 2020: Laborationer i mikroskopi
  Våren 2021: Laborationer i histoteknik
  Våren 2022: Laborationer i immunologisk metodik (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.02.2022 - 11.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 06.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 14

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktiska prov och tentamen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Läsår 2020-2021
  1 sp är 27 h arbete (laborationer och eget arbete)
  2 sp är 54 h arbete
  
  
  Våren 2022 planeras i ett senare skede (not translated)

•   Biomethodology 2 BA18KM02-3002 24.01.2022-28.02.2023  4 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
  - are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
  - are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
  - have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
  - consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Molecular biological methods
  Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Laborationsanvisningar, samt annat tillhörande material (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Laborationer med tillhörande dokumentation, samt behövlig teori (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 28.02.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.01.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle-sida (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Närvaro vid laborationer är obligatorisk.
  Dokumentering av utförda laborationer är obligatorisk. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  32 h laborationer i elektrofores, samt 22 h dokumentation
  32 h laborationer i molekylärbiologi, samt 22 h dokumentation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  För godkänt vitsord krävs närvaro vid samtliga laborationer, samt dokumentation över utförda laborationer (not translated)

•   English RB20EN01-3001 10.01.2022-01.04.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a work context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication
  Fundamental terminology of the profession
  Scientific and professional formulation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 01.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   Hematological Methodology 2 BA14KM07-3002 11.09.2021-18.11.2021  2 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
  - have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.

  Prerequisites

  The Basics of Bioanalysis

  Content of the study unit

  Hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2021 - 18.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Histopathological and Cytological Bioanalysis BA18BI09-3001 01.08.2021-30.06.2022  3 credits  (UBA18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have insights into the analysis of cells and tissues in relation to different organ diseases.
  - have fundamental insights into cytology and histopathology
  - command the clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within cytological and histopathological bioanalysis.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Cell biology
  Histology

  Content of the study unit

  Cytological and histopathological bioanalysis
  Clinical terminology of histopathology and cytology biology.

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kliininen sytologia. Koivuniemi. Kandidaattikustannus
  Cytology. Edmund Cibas Barbara Ducatman. Elsevier
  Histology. Ross & Pawlina. Lippincott
  Bancroft's Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. Suvarna, Layton, Bancroft.Elsevier
  https://bethesda.soc.wisc.edu/index.htm
  https://www.eurocytology.eu/en/home
  https://sksy.yhdistysavain.fi/linkit/
  https://www.suomenhistotekniikanyhdistys.fi/
  https://www.omicsonline.org/histology/best-open-access-journals-in-histology.php
  https://www.journals.elsevier.com/pathology/open-access-articles
  https://www.nsh.org/about/overview
  https://uia.org/s/or/en/1100063824
  http://www.ihcworld.com/weblinks.htm (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning
  Litteraturstudier
  Skriftliga arbeten (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 30.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 01.08.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA18D-V

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp är 3 x 27 h (not translated)

•   Immunological Methodology BA14BI06-3002 03.01.2022-03.04.2022  5 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
  - understand the principles of the immunological methods.
  - command advanced terminology of immunology.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Immunology

  Content of the study unit

  Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning
  Digikursmaterial (BioDigi) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 03.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 15

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Immunology and pathology RB20BV04-3001 30.08.2021-20.12.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the function of lymphocytes in human immune defence
  - knows the process of immunisation
  - command immunological and pathological terminology.
  - are familiar with the acute inflammation, and changes in cells and tissues in disease
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within immunology and pathology
  - understand the importance of immunology within health care professions

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Immunology and pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Penttinen, Ulla. Immunologi och patologi. Kurskompendium på moodle
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur (Toppenbra bok!)
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021 (om sars-cov-2 och immunförsvaret)
  Truedsson. Klinisk immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur.
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Kapitel 2, sid 27-109 handlar om immunologi.
  Brehmer-Andersson. Allmän patologi. Studentlitteratur 2011
  Seidal. Klinisk patologi. Studentlitteratur 2006
  Mäkinen et al. Patologia. Duodecim 2012 finns på Terveysportti
  Karttunen, Soini, Vuopala. Tautioppi. Edita 2005.
  Agger, Andersen, Leslie, Aasted. Immunologi. Studentlitteratur.2007. ISBN: 9789144034355
  Erlanson-Albertsson. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
  Immunologibok på internet http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27123/
  
  Immune responses to viruses:
  https://www.immunology.org/public-information/bitesized-immunology/pathogens-and-disease/immune-responses-viruses
  
  The Immune System
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784777 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Skriftligt arbete (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 20.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tentamen på Alere ca 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarnas slut
  Omtentamen i december 2021 och januari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp innebär 3 x 27 h arbete för studerande, 81 h arbete (not translated)

•   Laboratory Methodology BA16ME01-3003 14.03.2022-24.04.2022  5 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - master fundamental skills of laboratory work; laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
  - are able to use basic laboratory equipment
  - are able to work in the laboratory carefully and systematically based on method descriptions and safety regulations
  - have fundamental insights into qualitative and quantitative analyses
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
  - are able to calculate contents and manufacture solutions
  - have fundamental insights into organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography
  - consider occupational safety as well as sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
  The use of basic laboratory equipment
  Organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Laborationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända laborationer och rapporter (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.03.2022 - 24.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2020 - 25.02.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Laborationer, praktiska prov och rapporter utförs och inlämnas inom utsatt tid (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp betyder 27 h arbete för studerande (not translated)

•   Medical Treatment RB20BV05-3001 13.09.2021-30.11.2021  5 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
  - are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
  - are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
  - command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
  - are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
  - are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Medication administration and different medication groups
  Pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
  SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  
  Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
  Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
  Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar
  armacology distributed by the teacher

  Learning methods

  Online lectures and seminars
  tasks and tests online

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Task passed not approved
  test 0-5 scale

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Microbiological Methodology BA14KM05-3003 10.01.2022-06.02.2022  5 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
  - are able to collect specimens for microbiology
  - are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
  - have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
  - have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
  - have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Microbiology

  Content of the study unit

  Microbiological methodology
  Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Bakteriologi: (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 06.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Molecular Biology BA20BV11-3001 07.01.2022-01.04.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
  - understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
  - master basic genetic calculations
  - master terminology of molecular biology
  - have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
  - are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
  - understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Genes, gene expression and genetics
  Terminology of molecular biology
  Methods in molecular biology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
  Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
  Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
  Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Skriftlig examination och obligatorisk inlämingsuppgift
  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2022 - 01.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig examination (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursexamination 16.03.2022
  Omtentamen 22.04.2022 och 25.05.2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar och examination 21 h, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik (not translated)

•   Molecular biological Bioanalysis BA18BI08-3001 01.08.2021-30.06.2022  3 credits  (UBA18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with genetic disease, and the Finnish disease heritage
  - have insights into the analysis of genes and cells in relation to different organ diseases.
  - have profound knowledge about molecular biological methods
  - command the clinical terminology of molecular biology.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within molecular biological bioanalysis.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Cell biology
  Molecular Biology

  Content of the study unit

  Genetic disease
  The Finnish disease heritage
  Molecular biological methods
  Clinical terminology of molecular biology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Molekylärbiologisk bioanalytik. Kurskompendium. U Penttinen (tillgänglig på moodle)
  Genetiska sjukdomar. Magnus Nordenskjöld. Liber
  Perinnöllisyyslääketiede. Aula, Kääriäinen, Palotie. Duodecim
  Fundamentals of molecular diagnostics. David E. Bruns, Edward R. Ashwood, Carl A. Burtis
  Molekylärbiologi. Bränden. Studentlitteratur
  Human Genetics and Genomics. Taneri et al. Wiley-vch
  
  Open access books and articles:
  Genomes. Brown https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21128/
  Gene reviews https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1116/
  https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/8/2895
  https://www.hilarispublisher.com/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Skriftliga arbeten (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 30.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.07.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA18D-V

  Seats

  0 - 16

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp innebär 3 x 27 h arbete för studerande (not translated)

•   Nuclear Medical Bioanalysis and Radiation Safety BA14BI07-3002 30.08.2021-10.10.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
  - are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
  - know the basic principles of radiation safety
  - know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
  - have fundamental insights into patient care.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology

  Content of the study unit

  Use of gamma camera
  The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
  Nuclear medical pathology
  Radiation safety
  Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 10.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Patient Safety BA20VG06-3002 03.01.2022-30.04.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
  - has knowledge of and can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in patient care
  - can integrate patient safety and quality assurance in healthcare
  - can evaluate the quality of care
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
  - understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
  - is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
  - knows the uses of medical radiation
  - has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
  - has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
  Patient safety

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Radiation safety:
  According to lecturer

  Learning methods

  Radiation safety:
  Lectures
  On-line examination

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Radiation safety:
  Max 100p, 60% for approved result, grade scale 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 30.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Radiation safety: On-line examination, march 2022

  Student's schedule and workload

  Radiation safety: 27h

•   Physiological and neurophysiological Bioanalysis BA14BI04-3002 25.10.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
  - have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
  - have fundamental insights into patient care.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
  - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and Physiology

  Content of the study unit

  Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   The theoretical and ethical basics in nursing care RB20VG05-3001 20.09.2021-30.11.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the ethics of care and can apply them to healthcare
  - has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Fundamental components of caring science
  Ethical aspects

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Thesis and maturity test BA18EX03-3001 01.08.2021-31.12.2021  6 credits  (UBA18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

  Prerequisites

  Theoretical studies
  Basic practice courses

  Content of the study unit

  Presentation of Thesis
  Opponentship
  Maturity test based on the thesis work and written expression

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 10.10.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Anita Kvist, Ulla Penttinen, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 1 BA18KL01-3002 29.03.2022-29.05.2022  10 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
  - are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
  - are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Laboratory Methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.03.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

Academic year 2022 - 2023

•   Basic nursing care RBA22VG02-3002 19.09.2022-04.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
  - are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
  - are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing methods
  Ergonomics in the work
  Aseptic manners
  Nursing process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Anttila K, Kaila-Mattila T, Kan S, Puska E-L & Vihunen R. 2004. Vård och välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen. Tammerfors
  
  Iivanainen A & Syväoja, P 2012. ,Hoida ja Kirjaa. SanomaPro (valda delar)
  
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  ww.vardhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning
  Individuella arbeten
  Kliniska övningar på KTC ( obligatorisk närvaro)
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 04.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

•   Biomethodology 1 BAA22KM01-3001 28.11.2022-18.12.2022  4 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic knowledge and skills in microscopy and cell biological, immunological and histological methods.
  - command the basic settings of the microscope.
  - are able to carry out cell biological, immunological and histological laborations according to method descriptions.
  - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in biosciences.
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory work.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the work.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Microscopy
  Cell biological, immunological and histological methods.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.11.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Cell biology BAA22BV08-3001 10.10.2022-04.11.2022  2 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the structure and function of the cells.
  - are familiar with the function of the cell organelles.
  - are able to identify the cell organelles.
  - are familiar with cell splitting and cell death.
  - are familiar with human cells and embryology.
  - command terminology of cell biology.
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within cell biology.
  - understand the importance of cell biology within bioanalysis.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Cells and cell organelles, structure and function
  Terminology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.10.2022 - 04.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology 1 BAA22BV03-3002 01.08.2022-19.11.2022  4 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 19.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Human physiology and anatomy 1 RBA22BV01-3003 26.09.2022-13.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology
  Cells, tissues, integumentary system
  Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
  Support- and movement organs

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  27.08.2022 - 25.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination
  Re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 22 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 59 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication RBA22IN01-3002 29.08.2022-30.10.2022  4 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Swedish 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbeten.
  Material på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kommunikation:
  - Föreläsningar om vetenskapligt skrivande
  - Föreläsningar om muntlig framställning
  - Grupparbete i vetenskapligt skrivande
  - Övningar i muntlig presentation
  - Muntliga presentationer som videobandas och analyseras (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kommunikation
  
  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat.
  Förkunskapskrav
  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 30.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1, Katarina Vironen, Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kommunikation: Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:Underkänd
  Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
  Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kommunikation:
  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
  • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
  • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
  • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)

•   Laboratory Methodology BAA22ME01-3001 24.10.2022-26.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - master fundamental skills of laboratory work; laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
  - are able to use basic laboratory equipment
  - are able to work in the laboratory carefully and systematically based on method descriptions and safety regulations
  - have fundamental insights into qualitative and quantitative analyses
  - are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
  - are able to calculate contents and manufacture solutions
  - have fundamental insights into organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography
  - consider occupational safety
  - be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Laboratory equipment, safety and methodology
  The use of basic laboratory equipment
  Organic synthesis, spectrometry, potentiometry and chromatography

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.10.2022 - 26.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Research Methodology RB20FU01-3001 19.09.2022-09.10.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
  - can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Science theory and evidence-based knowledge
  Research approaches
  Research process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures group discussion and assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group assignment and home test, the test on Moothe

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Based on the test on Moodle and group assignment graded as 0-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 3 cr. 1 cr=27 hours; 3 cr= 81 hours,

  Assessment criteria

  The students does not understand and can not apply the methods of qualitative research

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Notable weakness are found in students understanding and application on the research aims and questions or the data collection stage

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding and can apply qualitative concepts into the different research phases

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The students demonstrates a complete understanding for qualitative concepts of research and make only insignificant errors when applying and planing research

•   Research Methods RB20FU02-3001 19.09.2022-09.10.2022  4 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students
  - can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
  - can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
  - can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
  - can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
  - can make simple statistical calculations and tests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work

  Prerequisites

  Research methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Qualitative and quantitative research methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
  Qualitative methods:
  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
  qualitative methods: lectures and group discussion and assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.
  
  qualitative method: based on a home exam, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental concepts and understanding the research process and analysis approaches, is evaluated

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
  qualitative methods: written assignment and presentation (graded according to the scale 1-5)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Quantitative method: the assignment has to be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course
  
  qualitative method: group written assignment and presentation within a seminar

  Student's schedule and workload

  Quantitative research methodology is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours work of which 12 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.
  qualitative methods is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply the research process and analysis methods.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.
  
  qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of analysis methods and is not adequately preform content analysis

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply concepts analysis , and only minor errors are found in the analysis process.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding and makes only insignificant errors when applying the methods.

•   The Basics of Bioanalysis BAA22VB01-3001 29.08.2022-24.09.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills about bioanalytics and laboratory work
  - have fundamental skills about the role of laboratory examinations in the patient care.
  - have fundamental skills in the laboratory testing process
  - have basic knowledge in cell biology, microbiology, immunology, biochemistry, and molecule biology, and the impact of this knowledge on clinical laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Basic knowledge about bioanalytics, laboratory work and lab tests
  Brief history
  Total testing process
  Meaning of lab tests in patient care
  Cell biology in the clinical laboratory
  Microbiology in the clinical laboratory
  Immunology in the clinical laboratory
  Biochemistry in the clinical laboratory
  Molecule biology in the clinical laboratory

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Aktuellt material meddelas via kursmoodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, egna uppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd/Underkänd (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 24.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftliga egna arbeten och presentationer (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp motsvarar 27 h arbete
  3 sp motsvarar 81 h arbete (not translated)

•   The Basics of Bioanalysis 1 BAA22LV01-3001 29.08.2022-31.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - have skills in the clinical laboratory examination process, especially the preanalytical phase (preparations, equipment, the process of examination and the specimen collection)
  - are familiar with quality development and management
  -realize the importance of good co-operation between the different units in the caring community as a prerequisite for the good quality of laboratory examinations.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - see its role and responsibility as a professional to work for global sustainable social development

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Health care and social welfare in Finland
  Different organizations
  Different aspects of sustainable development
  Basic knowledge about the clinical laboratory work and lab tests (brief history, working process, meaning of lab tests' resultat in patient care, etc)
  Reference range, type of specimen
  Patient preparation for lab-tests and preanalytical issues
  Occupational safety, legislation
  Laboratory equipment
  Specimen collection procedures
  Performing capillary puncture
  Microbiological, cytological specimens,
  Venipuncture
  Near patient testing: EKG, CRP, INR-TT, HBG, etc.
  Specimen handling and storage

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 2 BA18KL02-3002 01.08.2022-31.12.2022  10 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
  - are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
  - are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Laboratory Methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Work Practice in Clinical Laboratory 3 BA18KL03-3002 01.08.2022-31.12.2022  8 credits  (UBA20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
  - are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
  - are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
  - have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
  - have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
  - consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
  - have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical Laboratory Methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Work Practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5