Anita Wikberg
Quantitative methods: the following literature is recommended: Denise F. Polit & Cheryl Tatano Beck. 2008. Nursing Research. Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluver., as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
Qualitative methods: the following literature is recommended:
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing. 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book)
Finnish national board on research integrity (Tenk). 2012. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Available at: https://www.tenk.fi/en
O'Leary, Z. 2009. The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
Qualitative methods: lectures, exercises, independent work
Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.
English
15.03.2021 - 31.05.2021
15.11.2020 - 14.03.2021
10 - 16
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anita Wikberg, Ralf Lillbacka
Quantitative methods 2cr Ralf Lillbacka
Qualitative methods 1 cr Anita Wikberg
The courses RM02, RM03, RM04 and TH01 are connected and are the foundation for the thesis work.
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
1.00 credits
3.00 credits
H-5
Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
Qualitative methods: theory and practice on data analysis, groupwork, graded 0-5
-
Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted before the final course date.
Novia, Alere
Spring 2021
w. 12-14
-
1cr = 27h
3cr = 81h
Qualitative method: (1 cr) : 8 h lectures+ exersises + 4 h seminar + 15 h students own work in groups
-
Not pass
Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.
Satisfactory, very satisfactory
Quantitative and qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.
Good and very good
Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.
Excellent
Quantitative and qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.