Rika Levy-Malmberg
Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203
Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. Mar2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p133-143.
Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live
Leacture, case studies, using scales and FinCC
0-5
English
11.01.2021 - 14.02.2021
15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Rika Levy-Malmberg
The nursing process, critical thinking and evidence based practice, several assessments scales and FinCC
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
1.00 credits
H-5
Written exam and oral presentation
0-5
Exam 1:
Re-exam 1:
Re-exam 2:
The dates will be published on Moodle page for this course.
Novia , Campus Alere, Vaasa, Spring 2021
1 Sp= 27 hours
3 sp=81h
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.