Anita Ståhl-Levón
Children- and Adolescent psychiatry
Alfvén, G. 2017. Barn och psykosomatik i teori och klinik. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
Gillberg, C. 2016. Neurpsykiatriska funktionshinder hos barn och ungdomar. Internetmedicin.se
Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om Barn- och ungdomspsykiatri av Engström, I.. Liber, Stockholm.
Utvalda delar ur Skhole
Barn och ungdoms psykiatrin
Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2011. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
Åhörarkopior
Vuxenpsykiatri
Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Åhörarkopior
According to lecturer´s instructions
Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Individual work
Videos
Study
Experience Experts
Seminars
Participation i Project
Word scale for Project family:
The following points are considered:
Starting points and goal with scale 1 - 5
Theoretical basis and use of literature with the scale 1 - 5
Process control with scale 1 - 5
Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
Analysis and results report with scale 1 - 5
Presentation with scale 1 - 5
Swedish
01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021
15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021
10 - 20
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda
Degree Programme in Social Services
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
2.00 credits
H-5
Virtual exam
Home exam
Group Work
Individual tasks
Project Family
Project day with UsÖ
Study visits to various healthcare facilities and organizations
Guest lecturer spring 2021 and autumn 2021:
In connection with the Family Project the students can have contact with various care institutions, organizations and private persons with experience of the problems
In connection with the project together with UsÖ the students have a drug prevention day for secondary school students
Intermediate seminar in the project family Marlene and Anita participates
Final seminar in the project family Anita and Marlene participate
Deadline for self-study assignments
Seminar on methods in addiction care
The project day around abuse on
Self-study deadline?
Vaasa Novia, Alere spring 2021 Thursday 22.4 and Monday 24.5 (subject to possible changes)
Vasa Novia, Alere autumn 2021 weeks 36 -
27 h/cr
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)