Anita Ståhl-Levón
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2011. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
Handouts
According to the lecturer´s instruction
Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Videos
Study
Experience Experts
The following points are considered in the Group work:
Theoretical basis and use of literature with scale 1 - 5
Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
Cooperation with scale 1-5
Presentation with scale 1 - 5
The following points are considered on the Project day:
Preparation for the presentation with scale 1-5
Get the students interested in the subject, get them to cooperate and discuss with scale 1-5
Can summarize the discussion on the subject with scale 1-5
Swedish
01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021
29.11.2021 - 07.02.2021
10 - 35
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda
Degree Programme in Nursing
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
Group work
Project together with UsÖ
Lecturers spring 2021:
Lectures and study autumn 2021
In connection with the project the students have a drug prevention day for secondary school students
Group work:
Seminar autumn 2021
Project day:
Hösten 2021
Novia Vasa, Alere
Spring 2021 and autumn 2021
Local education in spring, look at schedule
Contact teaching week 35-38 in autumn
27h/cr
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)