Anita Ståhl-Levón
Hygiene:
Suojaeristyksen toteuttaminen, tartuntaeristyksen toteuttaminen, infektioiden ehkäisyt, och infektioon liittyvä ohjaus +sidorna 307-310 from the book Hoida ja kirjaa, 2012 Iivanainen-Syväoja.
WHO.2015. Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health care
http://www.vardhandboken.se/
Films and articles according to the lecturer's instructions
Hygiene:
Lecturesand discussionss, demonstration, two group works, clinical skills training
Hygiene:
For passing the course part in Hygiene, an approved group work, approved virtual test (min 70% right answers) and active participation in clinical skills training are required.
Swedish
05.10.2020 - 31.12.2020
01.08.2020 - 11.10.2020
10 - 30
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Ulla Penttinen, Anita Ståhl-Levón
Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
1.00 credits
H-5
Hygiene:
Group work pass/must be supplemented
Virtual test 0-5
Participation in clinical skills training
Hygiene:
Group 1 A: Deadline for groupwork
Virtual test open Re-take
Group 1 B: Deadline for group work
Virtual test open Re-take
Autumn 2020, weeks 36-40
27 hours/cr
Clinical microbiology 54 h: Scheduled teaching 14 h, Literature studies 40 h
Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)