Marlene Gädda
Medibas handboken
Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
Lagstiftning
Aktuell forskning
...according to the teacher's instructions
Lectures
Self studies, individually and in pairs
Study visits
criteria on moodle
Swedish
15.02.2021 - 31.05.2021
15.11.2020 - 14.02.2021
10 - 35
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Marlene Gädda
Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
2.00 credits
H-5
Moodletest
Assignments; selfstudy/in pairs
Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital
Moodletest
Re exam on general re exam days spring 2021
Novia Vasa, Alere
27h/cr
For the exam:
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot the essential
For written work:
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
For the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)