Lena Sandén-Eriksson
Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar
Lectures
Groupwork
Groupexamination
Obligatory lectur: Filip koskinen and teologist
If not present: task in moodle
Tentamen vitsord 0-5
Uppgifter Gk/kompletteras/Uk (not translated)
Swedish
04.01.2021 - 31.03.2021
15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021
10 - 45
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders
Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
2.00 credits
H-5
Online examination
enligt schema (not translated)
27h/ cr
For the exam
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)