Jannica Andtfolk
Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, seminar, online course
Swedish
10.01.2022 - 13.03.2022
15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022
Administration
Jannica Andtfolk
The content of the course will be in Moodle.
On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
Validetion according to Novia general directives
Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 0,5cr.
The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group.
Seminar and presentation the last time of the course.
Autumn 2021 w 41-45
Novia Vasa, Alere
and online.
27h/cr
2cr 2x27h=54h
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)