Jannica Andtfolk
Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012.
Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (2004).Tionde upplagan 2021. Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
http://vardhandboken.se
http://www.terveysportti.fi
Moodle lectures
Lectures,
discussions,
group-work,
demonstration, practice
The examination is assessed 0-5
Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
Knows the values and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
Can collaborate with others in the student group
Swedish
02.01.2023 - 26.02.2023
01.12.2022 - 01.01.2023
10 - 20
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Marice Nedergård, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk
Practical exercises mandatory!
Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
1.00 credits
H-5
Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes
Approved objective structured clinical examination
Please see schedule
See peppi for re-examination
Spring 2023
1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h
20 h (5 x 4h) Theory lessons in class
20 h (5 x 4h) Practical exercises 3 times in common with VAMK, 2 times only Novia ALL TIMES MANDATORY
119 h Individual assignments, group work, exam reading
3 h exam
Theory
Lesson 1
The care process
Ethics in healthcare
ISBAR
FinCC
Arrival interview
Lesson 2
Ergonomics
Patient hygiene
Carer's hygiene
Lesson 3
Vital functions and diabetes
Lesson 4
Nutrition (food and nasal stomach probe) and Elimination (catheterization and ostomy)
Lesson 5
Wound care
Criteria for evaluating the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.
Criteria for evaluating the exam
The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.
Criteria for evaluating the exam
In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.