Camilla Ribacka
Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Marin, Burton and Roit, 13th edition, published by Wiley Blackwell, 2017 and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.
Hybrid teaching methods
Group or individual assignment
Presentation
Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail.
Swedish
08.01.2024 - 30.04.2024
01.12.2023 - 26.01.2024
8 - 15
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Camilla Ribacka
Additional information, tasks and quizzes is found in Moodle
Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist
0.00 credits
3.00 credits
H-5
Examination
Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr is evaluated by quiz exam on Moodle. The exam in Basic Immunology is graded passed or failed. In order to get a passed grade 70 % of the answers in the exam need to be correct.
Immunological techniques, 3 cr is evaluated by a written exam, which is graded 0-5, where 0 is a failed grade and 5 is the highest possible grade. Exam 22.03.2024. Re-examination 24.05 or 13.09.2024
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr is evaluated by an assignment, which is graded passed or fail. A failed grade means that the assignment was inadequat
Spring 2024
5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student
Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples
Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples
Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)