•   Nuclear Medical Bioanalysis and Radiation Safety BAA23BI07-3001 18.11.2024-16.03.2025  3 credits  (BL23F-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The students
    - has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
    - are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
    - know the basic principles of radiation safety
    - know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
    - have fundamental insights into patient care.
    - are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
    - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.
    Prerequisites
    Anatomy and Physiology
    Content of the study unit
    Use of gamma camera
    The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
    Nuclear medical pathology
    Radiation safety
    Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Katarina Vironen

    Learning material

    All the materials can be find at Moodle (not translated)

    Learning methods

    Lectures, demonstration, workshop (not translated)

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Radiationsafety, legislation and regulations: written assignment (not translated)

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    18.11.2024 - 16.03.2025

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 26.01.2025

    Group(s)
    • BL23F-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Katarina Vironen, Bioanalytik 1

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Science

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    The dates for examination will be find at Moodle (not translated)

    Timing and attendance

    According to schedule (not translated)

    Student's schedule and workload

    27hx3cr = 81h (not translated)

    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance. (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods) (not translated)