•   Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology 2 BAA23BS04-3001 08.01.2024-28.02.2024  2 credits  (BL23F-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The students
    - have knowledge of microbiology, immunology and pathology to be able to use relevant sources of information and scientific literature and to communicate with colleagues
    - acts appropriately in care situations
    - understands the principles of methodology, diagnostics and bioanalytics
    Prerequisites
    None
    Content of the study unit
    Clinical microbiology
    Immunology
    Pathology
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Camilla Ribacka

    Learning material

    Murray, Rosenthal & Pfaller. Medical Microbiology. 8th edition.
    https://www.elsevier.com/books/medical-microbiology/murray/978-0-323-29956-5

    Online http://www.microbiologybook.org/book/bact-sta.htm
    Roitt’s Essential Immunology 13th Edition Peter J. Delves, Seamus J. Martin, Dennis R. Burton, Ivan M. Roitt

    Websites & magazines
    https://www.asm.org/
    http://jcm.asm.org/
    https://www.thl.fi/ttr/gen/rpt/statistiker.html (THL, register över smittsamma sjukdomar)
    https://thl.fi/web/infektiotaudit-ja-rokotukset/seurantajarjestelmat-ja-rekisterit/tartuntatautirekisteri/tartuntatautien-esiintyvyystilastot

    Learning methods

    Advanced Study in Clinical Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology

    Lectures
    Self-studies
    Discussions
    Current Scientific Articles

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    The course is graded 0-5 based on result in the exam

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    08.01.2024 - 28.02.2024

    Enrollment date range

    01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

    Group(s)
    • BL23F-V
    Seats

    8 - 35

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Camilla Ribacka

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Science

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    1.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Exam

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Course examination 22.02.2024
    Re-examination 05.04.2024, 19.04.2024 and 03.05.2024

    Timing and attendance

    Spring 2024

    Student's schedule and workload

    2 ECT= 54 hours of studies and lectures

    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Exam
    answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
    has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


    Written assignment
    The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Exam
    can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
    can give an independent account of the literature
    understands most of the topic
    presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
    can motivate some of their claims and positions
    can give some own examples

    Written assignment
    The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Exam
    has in-depth knowledge of the subject
    can analyze and interpret subject facts
    master the subject versatile
    has a broad grasp of the subject
    presents original and apposite examples

    Written assignment
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)