•   Methods of Development and Evaluation HCS22EB03-3006 01.08.2024-08.11.2024  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - is able to define structure, service and outcome quality and meaning of quality assurance from the different perspectives
    - is able to identify and apply prevailing quality assessment methods and quality standards within social and health care
    - is able to describe the most central quality management systems within social- and health care
    - is able to integrate quality assurance and quality improvement to her/his professional duties
    - is able to plan and implement evaluation of one’s work field/activity/operation
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Perspective on quality management, quality policy, quality system
    Quality standards within social and health care organization
    Quality assurance, quality improvement and control as well as methods for constant quality improvement
    Central quality management systems in Finland within social and health care
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and his/hers knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for assignment. She/he have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the possible seminar. The assignment and the possible role as an opponent show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the possible seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Camilla Strandell-Laine

    Learning material

    ntroduced in the course moodle page

    Learning methods

    Lectures, individual studies and group work.

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    01.08.2024 - 08.11.2024

    Enrollment date range

    02.08.2024 - 24.10.2024

    Group(s)
    • SHV23HD-V
    • SHV23HD-Å
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Camilla Strandell-Laine

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Campus

    Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Timing and attendance

    Online and introduction on Campus
    6.9 at 8.15-11.30 Introduction and lecture on Campus
    26.9 at 12.30-15.45 Online
    31.10a at 12.30-15.45 Online

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 ECTS credit = 27h
    5 ECTS credits = 135h

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
    The literature is referenced
    Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
    The technical design is satisfactory.
    Refers concepts and basic principle
    Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The questions are answered.
    The methodological literature is applied.
    The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
    The technical design is good
    Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
    The literature is analyzed and applied.
    The reflection is scientifically analytical.
    The technical design is commendable.
    Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
    Makes versatile use of literature
    Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically