•   Developmental Project in Public Health Nursing HVV14FU04-3008 02.09.2024-31.07.2025  5 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student
    -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in public health care work
    Prerequisites
    Research methodology
    Research methods and nursing theory
    Degree thesis
    Content of the study unit
    Developmental project
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Anita Wikberg

    Learning material

    According to the chosen theme

    Learning methods

    Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    The development work is evaluated 1-5
    Criteria for evaluation
    Starting point for and goal of the development work
    The theoretical foundation of development work
    Area of ​​use for the development work
    Critical review of development work, process and product

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    02.09.2024 - 31.07.2025

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

    Group(s)
    • UHV21D-V
    Seats

    10 - 20

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell, Marlene Gädda, Terese Österberg

    Additional information

    The lectures and seminars are compulsory

    Novia instructions for writing thesis has to be used

    AI is not allowed to use

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

    RDI share

    5.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    1.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    -

    Practical training and working life co-operation

    The work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Presentation of development work week 47 year 2024 or in May 2025

    Timing and attendance

    Alere
    Autumn 2024, spring 2025

    Internationa connections

    -

    Student's schedule and workload

    3 h lecture
    6 h seminars
    126 h individual work, with supervision

    Content scheduling

    -

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
    The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
    Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
    Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
    The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
    The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
    The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    he motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
    The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
    The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
    The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
    Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.

    The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
    The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
    The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
    The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
    The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
    The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
    The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
    The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation