Marie Hjortell
Neonatal care: Selected parts from:
Fellman, V., Luukainen, P. & Asikainen, T. 2019. Vastasyntyneiden tehohoito. Oppaan uusin kirjaversio, 3 uudistettu painos. Duodecim, Helsinki. (This book is also available in its entirety at Terveysportti.)
Iivanainen, A & Syväoja, P. 2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki. Pages 146 - 151
Lagercrantz, H., Hellström-Westas, L. & Norman, M. (Eds.) 2015. Neonatology, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Lundqvist, P. (Eds.). 2013. Nursing of the newborn child. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
Handout
Breastfeeding councelling: see Moodle course
Lectures
Duties
Demonstrations
Case
Videos
Laborations
Score Scale 0 - 5
Swedish
20.03.2024 - 28.04.2024
01.12.2023 - 30.03.2024
10 - 18
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marie Hjortell
Kurshelheten 3 sp består av kursdelarna:
Neonatal vård 1,5 sp med Anita Ståhl-Levon
Amningshandledning 1.5 sp med lektor Marie Hjortell
Obligatorisk närvaro vid samtliga närstudietillfällen i amningshandledning för att få amningshandledarintyg (not translated)
Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
Exam through Moodle in neonatal care
completed web training with passed knowledge test: https://neohlrutbildning.se/index.php
Mandatory attendance 16 hours in the breastfeeding tutorial section 1.5 credits to obtain the breastfeeding supervisor certificate
Examination in neonatal care
Re-examination 1
Re-examination 2
Written work in the course part breastfeeding guidance is presented during the course at various times during week 16-17 concerning the chosen theme for the written work/presentation.
Vasa Novia, Alere spring 2024 weeks 14-17
27 h/ cr
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essentials
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional