•   Starting Points for The Public Health Nurse´s Work at Individual, Group and Community Level HVV22HA01-3002 03.03.2025-04.04.2025  2 credits  (UHV22D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - has knowledge of the legislation, the strategies and the health policy programmes that form the basic principles for public health nurses
    - is well acquainted with the core values and ethical principles in public health nursing
    - knows about the developmental stages of public health nursing
    - understands the significance of social analysis as a main principle in health promotion work
    - has the skills to support health promotion in a multicultural and changing society based on the needs of various population groups
    - can work for sustainable development in public health care work
    Prerequisites
    Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
    Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
    Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
    Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
    Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved
    Content of the study unit
    Starting points for the public health nurse´s work at individual, group and community level
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Ej slutfört examinationsuppgifter och inte deltagit i seminariet (not translated)
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and

    Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Marie Hjortell

    Learning material

    Se närmare Moodle och kursansvarigs anvisningar.
    Artiklar, databaser och aktuella styrdokument. (not translated)

    Learning methods

    Föreläsningar
    Diskussion
    Självstudier och basgruppsarbete
    Examination (not translated)

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Uppgift : styrdokument GK/UK
    Examination bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    03.03.2025 - 04.04.2025

    Enrollment date range

    03.12.2024 - 28.02.2025

    Group(s)
    • UHV22D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Marie Hjortell, Frida Gädda

    Additional information

    Obligatoriskt deltagande vid kursintroduktion och examinationstillfälle. (not translated)

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Examination i form av basgruppsarbete vars utformning planeras i samråd med studerandegruppen (not translated)

    Timing and attendance

    Våren 2025
    Närstudier vid Alere
    Självstudier i basgrupper (not translated)

    Student's schedule and workload

    Studerandes arbetsinsats förväntas motvara 27h/sp (not translated)

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Ej slutfört examinationsuppgifter och inte deltagit i seminariet (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
    Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.

    Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
    Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
    Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och

    Kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)