•   Patient Safety and Service Design in Social and Health Care NU22BC03-3006 02.09.2024-20.10.2024  3 credits  (NU24D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - obtain knowledge of health care- and social welfare structures and services, both nationally and internationally
    - become familiar with the treatment- and service chains and design of social- and health care
    - understand the principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice.
    - be able to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing care in order to guide the patient in matters concerning rights to health care and social services.
    - understand the importance of confidentiality and sustainability in all phases of the nursing process, and be able to act in accordance with such principles
    - prepare to promote patient safety in all phases of the nursing process
    - knows and understand how to work according to the data security and data protection
    Prerequisites
    No prior prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Health care- and social welfare structures and organization by the public, private and third sector in Finland
    Treatment and service chains and design of social- and health care
    Principles of service profession
    Basic principles of health legislation in Finland
    Normative, resource and information guidance governing health care services
    Autonomy and right to self determination
    Electronic services as a part of the service system
    Wellbeing at work as a nurse
    EU´s General Data Protection Regulations and Directive
    Data Protection Act
    Information Security and data protection in different nursing contexts
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Carina Gädda

    Learning material

    Presented on the moodle page

    Learning methods

    Lectures, Group assignment, individual online exam

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    02.09.2024 - 20.10.2024

    Enrollment date range

    02.07.2024 - 06.09.2024

    Group(s)
    • NU24D-V
    Responsible unit

    Vaasa

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Maria Berg, Carina Gädda

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Written assignments
    Online test

    Timing and attendance

    2.9.2024 - 20.10.2024
    Campus Alere

    Student's schedule and workload

    1c=27h
    3c=81h


    Lectures (9h), at Campus. First lecture is mandatory
    Individual studies (67h) Individiual studies and group work.
    Seminar (6h). at Campus

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
    The literature is referenced
    Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
    The technical design is satisfactory.
    Refers concepts and basic principle
    Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The questions are answered.
    The methodological literature is applied.
    The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
    The technical design is good
    Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
    The literature is analyzed and applied.
    The reflection is scientifically analytical.
    The technical design is commendable.
    Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
    Makes versatile use of literature
    Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically