Pia Nygårdas
Health Promotion
Snelling A. 2014 Introduction to Health Promotion.John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated (E-Book)
Wills, J & Leach , R. Fundamentals of Health Promotion for Nurses (E-Book)
Bergmann, K .E & Bergmann, R. 2003. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in the Family. (E-Book)
Up-to -date articles
Nursing Theorists:
Alligood, M.R 2018. Nursing Theorists and their work, Ninth Edition. U.S.A Elsevier.
Pender, Nola.J, Murdaugh, C & Parsons A.2011. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson cop. 2011.
Epidemiology:
Gordis, L. 2014. Epidemiology. Fifth Edition. Elsevier.
Porta, M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, sixth edition.2014.Oxford University Press, Incorporated (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Nutrition:
Sharma, S ,Barasi M , Sheehy T & Kolahdooz F. Nutrition at a Glance.2016 .John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (E-Book)
Up-to date articles
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.www.stm.fi
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. www.thl.fi
Online
Introduction lecture, Web based studies - Online
Self studies/tutorials.
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
30-35= 1
36-41= 2
42-48= 3
49-54=4
55-60= 5
Individual Assignments (20 points) and Home examination (40 points)
English
02.10.2023 - 10.12.2023
15.06.2023 - 10.07.2023
0 - 50
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Irén Vikström-Dahl, Pia Nygårdas
The content of the course will be published on Moodle.
Degree Programme in Nursing
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
Autumn 2023
Web based learning
27 h/cr , 4 cr =108 h
108 hours individual work to do, several self studies and several written assignment during the course.
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the examination
The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)