•   Community Nursing NU22CC13-3001 09.09.2024-13.12.2024  4 credits  (NU22-1, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    - is familiar with the organization of home care in Finland, and be able to define home care in different settings
    - is aware of patient- and staff safety during home visits
    - can take care of the patient in a home environment while considering professionalism, confidentiality and courtesy.
    - can apply evidence-based nursing care, and the nursing process, in home- and community nursing care
    - can work in different settings in community nursing care
    - is able to evaluate, prioritize and guide the patient in community nursing care
    - knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
    - applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
    - applies ethical, sustainable and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context
    Prerequisites
    Clinical Nursing 1
    Basic Nursing Care 1
    Content of the study unit
    Organization of home care in Finland, and be able to define home care in different settings
    Patient safety in home and community care
    Use different guidance methods: oral and written guidance, using telephone and digital tools
    Health technology in community care
    Home care, home hospitals, community nursing care
    Information and service guidance

    "
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Marica Hinders

    Learning material

    information about recommended literature is available on moodle

    Learning methods

    Lectures
    Group work
    Exam
    Practical Workshops

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    09.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024

    Group(s)
    • NU22-1
    • NU22D-V
    Seats

    0 - 25

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Timing and attendance

    Fall semester 9.9..2024 - 13.12.2024

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 credit 27h
    4 credits 108h

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
    The literature is referenced
    Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
    The technical design is satisfactory.
    Refers concepts and basic principle
    Students have justifiable knowledge

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The questions are answered.
    The methodological literature is applied.
    The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
    The technical design is good
    Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
    The literature is analyzed and applied.
    The reflection is scientifically analytical.
    The technical design is commendable.
    Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
    Makes versatile use of literature
    Students have excellent knowledge