Reija Anckar
Buehring, J. & Bishop, P.C. 2020. Foresight and Design: New Support for Strategic DecisionMaking. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation. Volume 6, Issue 3, Autumn2020, pp 408 – 432. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872620300423
Kehusmaa, K. 2010. Strategiatyö – Organisaation voimanlähde. https://kauppakamaritieto-fi.ezproxy.turkuamk.fi/ammattikirjasto/teos/strategiatyo2010#kohta:Strategiaty((f6)((20)((2013)((20)organisaation((20)voimanl((e4)hde
Kerestegian, S. 2019. Life-centred Design.
https://creativeregion.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Stiven-Kerestegian-on-Life-Centred-Design.pdf
Lucidchart. 2021. Top Frameworks for Strategic Planning.https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/strategic-planning-frameworks
Mager, B. 2020. The Future of Service Design.https://www.academia.edu/44459133/The_Future_of_Service_Design
Owens, J. 2019. 10 Principles of Life-centered Design. How we May Begin to Design for a Futureof Inclusivity.
https://medium.com/the-sentient-files/10-principles-of-life-centered-design-3c5f543414f3
Salmela, K. 2020. Strateginen palvelumuotoilu - kohti vaikuttavampaa palvelukehitystä. LaureaUAS. Master’s thesis.
https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/353899/Salmela_Kim.pdf?sequence=2
Stroh, P. J. 2014. Business strategy: Plan, execute, win!https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/turkuamk-ebooks/reader.action?docID=1651191
Suri, J.F. 2019. The Future is Life-centered. Podcast. https://www.mixed-methods.org/episodes/2019/7/24/the-future-is-symbiotic-jane-fulton-suri-ideo
Trischler, J., & Charles, M. 2019. The application of a service ecosystems lens to public policyanalysis and design: exploring the frontiers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. Vol. 38(1), 19-35. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0743915618818566
Trollbäck & Company. The New Division. (n.d.) The Global Goals Design.
https://www.thenewdivision.world/globalgoals
Wataya, H. 2020. Designing for Change through Life Centered Approach.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/designing-change-through-life-centered-approach-helena-wataya?articleId=6666080714812866560
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
https://kestavakehitys.fi/en/agenda2030
Additional links to tools will be published on the learning platform.
Lectures and group work.
Strategic service design project work for a commissioner as a group work
Presentations.
Peer feedback.
All the assignments returned in time.
Active participation and interaction in the group work
Report of the process and results including service concepts and strategy, and a video presentation for the commissioner.
Assessment criteria of project work:
Analytical approach
Usage of appropriate methods and tools for development
Contents of service concepts and strategy
Informativeness of documentation
Lecturers’, self and peer evaluation
Scale 1 – 5
English
13.09.2024 - 31.12.2024
15.06.2024 - 12.09.2024
Faculty of Business
Reija Anckar, Eva Holmberg
Degree Programme in Service Design
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
According to the principles for credit transfer.
The course and the project are a continuation of the previous course Service Design and Future Challenges, possibly with the same commissioner.
The purpose of the study project is to develop strategies and services for the commissioner.
You will work in groups of 3 – 4 persons. Your goal during the course is to create a strategy (vision, mission, values and culture) with service concepts, and finally design a road map for cooperation and engagement of stakeholders concerning the strategy.
The deadline for the final assignment (process portfolio and video/oral presentation) will be published later.
Deadline for overdue assignments will be published later.
Friday 1.11.2024 8.30-16.15 Strategic Service Design Approach TUAS ICT City
Thursday 28.11.2024 8.30-16.15 Strategic Service Design Approach TUAS ICT City
Workload approximately 135 h:
- Contact sessions ca 16 h
- Distance studies ca 119 h
Pre-assignment 4 h
Research and service design project 80 h
Report, and video/oral presentation for the commissioner 35 h
- Quantity: the work is not completed and or;
- Quality: the minimum content requirements are not met
Sufficient 1
Theory and methodology are poorly understood and implemented in real life project.
Research, service design, communication and documentation are hardly acceptable.
Active participation.
Satisfactory 2
Appear to grasp theory and have made a start in showing its applicability in real life project.
Research, service design, communication and documentation are acceptable.
Active participation.
Good 3
Understanding of theory and applicability of methods in real life project, but work could bestronger.
Research, service design, communication and documentation are good.
Active participation.
Very Good 4
General understanding of theory and methods, very good implementation in real life project.
Reliable research, innovative service design and communication and documentation on goodlevel.
Very active participation.
Excellent 5
Mastery of theory and methods, proficiency of implementation of them in real-life project.
Outstanding research, innovative service design and excellent communication anddocumentation.
Very active participation.