•   Clinical assessment and nursing care SHV14AK03-3005 01.09.2022-31.07.2023  10 credits  (SHV21HD-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    Has awareness to handle patients/clients' health and disease conditions, through adequate medical history, status assessment and treatment
    Can perform structured health history and critically analyse and evaluate the same
    Can perform a structured examination of the patient/client and critically analyse and evaluate her/his own intervention
    Master the key skills required for diagnostics and clinical decisions
    Can apply decision models to make differential diagnoses and then provide subsequent evidence-based care and critically analyse and evaluate the same
    Can take responsibility for the patient's/client's health and illness conditions
    Have ability to teach and supervise patients/clients
    Prerequisites
    SHV14AK02 Anatomy and pathophysiology
    Content of the study unit
    Physical assessment
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    < 49%
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Rika Levy-Malmberg

    Learning material

    For the subjects critical thinking and clinical judgment please attach the following reading materials:
    Clinical judgment- an essential tool in the nursing process
    http://www.infiressources.ca/fer/Depotdocument_anglais/Clinical_Judgement%E2%80%93An_Essential_Tool_in_the_Nursing_Profession.pdf
    What critical thinking, critical reasoning, and clinical judgment are?
    https://www.elsevier.com/books/critical-thinking-clinical-reasoning-and-clinical-judgment/alfaro-lefevre/978-0-323-35890-3
    Clinical reasoning instructor resourceshttp://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&hid=113&sid=1d415f7a-433b-4674-a0a0-d28e4ee49a53%40sessionmgr115
    For the subject of critical thinking and EBP please find the following material
    Kitson, AL., Athlin, ÅM., Conroy, T Anything but Basic: Nursing’s Challenge in Meeting Patients’Fundamental Care Needs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(5), 2012. Pp 331-339
    Long, B.C& Phipps, W.J. & Cassmever, V. L. (1995). Adult Nursing A Nursing Process Approach, London U.K pp: 4-13
    Lunney, M. Use of Critical Thinking in the Diagnostic Process. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification.21 (2), 2010.pp82-88.
    Lynda, F., Snyder, CH.. Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: Par three: Critical appraisal process. Journal of the Academy of Nurse Practitioner. 24, 2012. Pp704-715
    Robert, RR. Petersen S. Critical Thinking at the Bedside: Providing Safe Passage to Patients. MEDSURG Nursing.22 (2), 2013.pp 85-118.
    Smith, SA Nurse Competence: A Concept Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 23(3), 2012 pp. 172-182.
    Herdman, TH., ed NANDA International Nursing Diagnosis> Definitions & Classification 2012-2014. 2012 Wiley-Blackwell (this book can be found in Swedish)
    For the subject of history thanking physical assessment
    Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML., Bickley, LS. Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 2012. Philadelphia, 11th ed. Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott
    Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott.
    Fagerstrom, L.M.( 2019), (red) Avanserat Klinisk Sykepleie. Oslo. Gylendal.

    Learning methods

    Lectures
    Clinical examination, decision making and implementation of nursing care

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)
    The OSCE Examination Form was developed in England in the late 1970s, and is used today in medicine and health education in several countries. OSCE assesses the student's clinical competence (knowledge and skills), problem-solving ability and interactivity. The arrangement means that there are different stations with patient cases (case)

    Students are assessed on the basis of an assessment form (checklist of criteria), the content of which varies depending on the patient case.
    All criteria are evaluated as follows:
    • 0 = Fail (asks/acts not)
    • 1 = Sufficiently approved (asks/acts but not correct / direct according to directive)
    • 2 = Competent (asks/acts correctly)

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    01.09.2022 - 31.07.2023

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2022 - 31.08.2022

    Group(s)
    • SHV21HD-V
    • SHV21HD-Å
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Rika Levy-Malmberg, Ann-Louise Glasberg, Daniel Nenonen

    Additional information

    Each student is assessed on the basis of two clinical patient cases (case / station) at a time.

    Time is limited to 30 minutes per student per station.

    Students have 25 minutes to complete the three sections below.

    Then the observer / examiner has 5 minutes to discuss the performance.

    Students receive a brief description of the patient, as well as the instructions below.

    • This is your first time meeting the patient.

    • You have 25 minutes to go. Keep track of time! The observer then announces that it is 2 minutes left.

    When the time is up, you must finish even if all parts are not completed.

    • Information is provided by the "patient" or the observer during the examination, if asked / asked.

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    OSCE spring 2021

    Timing and attendance

    Attendance days' courses and times are available on Moodle

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 cu = 27 hours

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    < 49%

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    50-69%

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    70-89%

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    > 90%

    Approved / Failed

    Students are assessed on the basis of an assessment form (checklist of criteria), the content of which varies depending on the patient case.
    All criteria are evaluated as follows:
    • 0 = Fail (asks/acts not)
    • 1 = Sufficiently approved (asks/acts but not correct / direct according to directive)
    • 2 = Competent (asks/acts correctly)