•   Organisational Theory and Strategic Leadership SHV22UL01-3002 12.11.2024-31.12.2024  5 credits  (SHV23HD-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student:
    - is able to analyse social and health care organisations and consider social development
    - is able to explain and investigate the main principles of organisational activities and leadership
    - is able to analyse and interpret the organisation from a stakeholder perspective
    - is able to critically examine the relationship between ethics, values ​​and leadership at different levels in the organisation
    - is able to apply and analyse current, interdisciplinary research within the leadership area
    Prerequisites
    No prerequisites
    Content of the study unit
    Organisational theories and their development related to social development
    Modern organisational theories in today's social and health care
    Strategic management and strategic thinking in the organisation
    Creative organisations
    LEAN
    Organisational culture
    Ethics and values ​​in organisations
    Current interdisciplinary research in the field
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Camilla Strandell-Laine

    Learning material

    Material on Moodle.

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    The basis for the course's examination consists of:
    - A written individual submission, graded according to 0-5
    - A group work, graded 0-5

    Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    12.11.2024 - 31.12.2024

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 13.11.2024

    Group(s)
    • SHV23HD-V
    • SHV23HD-Å
    • SHV24H-Å
    • SHV24H-V
    Seats

    0 - 50

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Camilla Strandell-Laine, Jussi Reijonen

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Social Services and Health Care

    Campus

    Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    5.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Information in Moodle

    Timing and attendance

    Autumn 2024
    Online course in Teams
    Lectures; 12.11, 26.11, 10.12 (12.00-14.45)
    Compulsory seminar

    Student's schedule and workload

    In total 5 ECTS, 135 hours
    Lectures 9h
    Selfstudies 126 h

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
    The methodological literature is not used.
    Reflections are not performed.
    The technical design is lacking.
    Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
    The literature is referenced
    Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
    The technical design is satisfactory.
    Refers concepts and basic principle
    Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The questions are answered.
    The methodological literature is applied.
    The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
    The technical design is good
    Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
    The literature is analyzed and applied.
    The reflection is scientifically analytical.
    The technical design is commendable.
    Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
    Makes versatile use of literature
    Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically