Marlene Gädda
Alfvén, G. 2017. Barn och psykosomatik i teori och klinik. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Handout
Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Individual work
Videos
Demonstrations
Study visits
Experience expert
Grade scale
92 - 100 % = 5
84 - 91 % = 4
76 - 83 % = 3
68 - 75 % = 2
60 - 67 % = 1
Swedish
22.01.2024 - 28.05.2024
01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024
4 - 25
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda
Degree Programme in Nursing
0.00 credits
0.00 credits
H-5
Virtual test at Moodle
Self-study tasks
Experience expert from various areas of psychiatry and care for drug abuse
Virtual examination deadline
Novia Vasa, Alere
Spring 2024
27 h/cr
For the exam
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
For written work
For the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
For the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)