Anna-Lena Nieminen
Paediatric Care
Selected parts from:
Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
Handout
Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
Literature:
Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
Lectures, individual work, group work
Care planning
Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
Current DVD movies
Demonstrations
Examination
Grade scale 0 - 5
33 - 36 point = 5
29 - 32 point = 4
25 - 28 point = 3
21 - 24 point = 2
18 - 20 point = 1
Swedish
04.04.2022 - 08.05.2022
15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022
10 - 40
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón
The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.
Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery
Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31
0.00 credits
1.00 credits
H-5
Examination
Examination spring 2022
Reexamination 1:
Reexamination 2:
Vasa Novia, Alere spring 2022
27 h/cr
Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)