•   Public health nursing with children and their families VÅV21HA04-3001 02.09.2024-11.10.2024  4 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student
    - masters methods to support and monitor the child’s growth and development
    - recognizes and can intervene at an early stage in situations that may pose a risk to the child’s health and development
    - has knowledge of relationships, parenting and early interaction
    - is prepared to provide guidance and counselling to the family on issues regarding upbringing and health habits
    - can respect the cultural affiliation of the child and its family
    - can work within various networks and teams to support the child and its family
    - masters the vaccination program offered at the child welfare clinic
    Prerequisites
    Introduction to public health nursing
    Content of the study unit
    Couple relationship, parenting, early interaction
    Methods to support and monitor the child's growth and development
    Recurrent and comprehensive health examinations, screenings
    Early intervention and recognition of situations that may pose a risk to the child's health and development including child protection
    Supervision and counseling for the family in education issues and issues related to health habits
    Multi-professional and multicultural health care work
    Vaccination activities in child health clinics
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Failed exam
    Not participated in simulations
    Not participated in expert lecture
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
    Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Marie Hjortell

    Learning material

    För study material : see also Moodle
    Kurslitteratur:
    NEUKO databas - lastenneuvola via THL/terveysportti, 2022
    Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen och inom skolhälsovården - Metodhandbok 31/2018. THL ( elektronisk) Mäki P.Wikström K., Hakulinen-Viitanen T., Laatikainen T
    Institutet för hälsa och välfärd. www.thl.fi Webbsidan : Infektionssjukdomar och Vaccinationer
    Tillsammans kring matbordet-kostrekommendationer för barnfamiljer. THL. förnyad upplaga 2019

    Referenslitteratur ( barnhälsovård ) :
    Barnhälsovård-att främja barns hälsa . 2016. red. Magnusson, Blennow, Hagelin, Sundelin. Liber:Stockholm
    Barnrådgivningen som stöd för barnfamiljer. Handbok för personalen.
    Handböcker 2005:12. Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
    Bramhagen, A-C. och Carlsson, A. (red.) Hälsofrämjande arbete för barn och ungdomar. 2013. Studentlitteratur
    Ensi- ja turvakotien liitto. Tunnista vauvan hätä! Vauvan kaltoinkohtelun tunnistaminen ja siihen puuttuminen
    Hakulinen-Viitanen, Hietanen-Peltola, Hastrup, Wallin ja Pelkonen
    Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 2008:24. Isien ja isyyden tukeminen äitiys- ja lastenneuvoloissa.
    Halme, N. 2009. Isän ja leikki-ikäisen lapsen yhdessäolo. THL.
    Kirjaamisopas: Lastenneuvola ja kouluterveydenhuolto. THL.2022
    Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY
    Laaja terveystarkastus. Ohjeistus äitiys- ja lastenneuvolatoimintaan sekä kouluterveydenhuoltoon. Opas 22/2012. THL
    Mothander-Risholm P; Broberg;A. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar I vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.
    MLL. Hur växer och utvecklas barn.
    Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
    Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2010:7. Älä lyö lasta! Kansallinen lapsiin kohdistuvan kuritusväkivallan vähentämisen toimintaohjelma 2010-2015
    Salpa, P. 2007. Lapsen liikkumisen kehitys, ensimmäinen ikävuosi. Tammi.
    Silven, M. (toim.Ahonen, L. 2017. Haastavat kasvatustilanteet. Lämpimän vuorovaikutuksen käsikirja. Juva: PS-Kustannus.

    Learning methods

    Lectures, demonstrations, simulations,
    Own work in base groups

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Approved exam, grade 1-5
    Approved participation in simulations
    Deltagit i expertföreläsning

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    02.09.2024 - 11.10.2024

    Enrollment date range

    15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

    Group(s)
    • UHV21D-V
    Seats

    10 - 18

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Marie Hjortell, Vasa - timlärare Vård

    Additional information

    Mandatory attendance at the start of the course, demonstrations, simulations and expert lectures

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Exam 11.10
    Reexam 1 22.11.2024
    Reexam 2 17.1.2025

    Timing and attendance

    Autumn 2024 week 36-41

    Student's schedule and workload

    Students' work effort is expected to correspond to 27 hours per credit

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Failed exam
    Not participated in simulations
    Not participated in expert lecture

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
    Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
    Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)