Marlene Gädda
Gillberg, C. 2016. Neurpsykiatriska funktionshinder hos barn och ungdomar. Internetmedicin.se
Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om Barn- och ungdomspsykiatri av Engström, I.. Liber, Stockholm.
Utvalda delar ur Skhole
Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
Lectures
Case demonstrations
Troubleshooting
Group work
Individual work
Videos
Study
Experience Experts
The following points are considered:
Starting points and goal with scale 1 - 5
Theoretical basis and use of literature with the scale 1 - 5
Process control with scale 1 - 5
Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
Analysis and results report with scale 1 - 5
Presentation with scale 1 - 5
Swedish
22.01.2024 - 30.05.2024
01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024
4 - 25
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda, Viktor Matintupa, Carita Blomström
Degree Programme in Nursing
0.00 credits
2.00 credits
H-5
Tutorial task
The project: The family
In connection with the project, students can have contact with various care institutions, organizations and private persons with experience of the problems in the Project family
Intermediate seminar week
Intermediate seminar week
Final seminar Intermediate seminar week
Deadline for tutorials
Novia Vasa, Alere
Spring 2024
Contact teaching week 4 - 6 and 13 - 22
27h/cr
The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)