Studieguide

Student
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and societal governance in substance abuse care
- can identify the consequences of abuse and dependence on the welfare society
- can apply preventive care work and describe the care chain in the abusive care system
- can describe specific features of different drug groups
- can evaluate different care and treatment efforts in different contexts

Biomedical sciences
Health promotion in nursing care
Clinical nursing care
Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

Nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Marlene Gädda

Barn och ungdoms psykiatrin
Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2011. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
Åhörarkopior
Enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

Föreläsningar
Case med problemlösning
Grupparbeten
Videor
Erfarenhetsexpert?
Deltagande i Miepämessut

The following points are considered in the Group work:
Theoretical basis and use of literature with scale 1 - 5
Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
Cooperation with scale 1-5
Presentation with scale 1 - 5
The following points are considered on the Project day:
Preparation for the presentation with scale 1-5
Get the students interested in the subject, get them to cooperate and discuss with scale 1-5
Can summarize the discussion on the subject with scale 1-5

Swedish

26.08.2024 - 17.11.2024

15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

USS21F-V
USS21D-V

4 - 25

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda

Degree Programme in Nursing

0.00 credits

1.50 credits

H-5

Grupparbete
Individuella uppgifter

Erfarenhetsexpert
Deltagande i miepämessut

Presentas för studerande vid första närstudietillfället

Alere, Hösten 2024

27h/cr

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)