•   English VÅV22EN01-3012 28.04.2025-30.05.2025  3 credits  (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    The student:
    -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
    -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
    literature
    -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
    -is aware of cultural differences in communication
    Prerequisites
    No prior knowledge required
    Content of the study unit
    Working life related documents
    Professional communication in working life
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
    The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
    The student has not participated during the course.
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Åsa Fagerudd

    Learning material

    The teacher's material

    Learning methods

    On campus

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Passed exam, approved assignments and oral presentation, participation in class

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    28.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 27.04.2025

    Group(s)
    • UBM24D-V
    • UHV24D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Miranda Ekholm

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Final exam

    Student's schedule and workload

    27h/sp = 81 h

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
    The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
    The student has not participated during the course.

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a basic understanding of the course material.
    The contents of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
    The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The student demonstrates a good understanding of the course material and is able to draw on the literature.
    The student can reflect on and motivate their point of view.
    The student has almost or completely fulfilled the instructions of the assignments.
    The contents of submitted assignments are good.
    The student has participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment towards the course contents and course assignments.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the course material.
    The contents of submitted assignments are excellent and the assignments have been executed exceptionally well.
    The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment towards and interest in the course contents and course assignments.
    The student has a deep understanding of the course contents and is able to use that knowledge in their future profession.