•   Internal Medicine and Surgical Care 3 VÅV22KV03-3014 31.03.2025-04.05.2025  5 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student:
    - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
    - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
    - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
    - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
    - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
    - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
    - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
    - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
    Prerequisites
    VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
    Content of the study unit
    Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
    Care of the patient with neurological disorders
    Care of the patient with hematological disorders
    Care of the patient with sensory disorders
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Written exam: points < 50%
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Jannica Andtfolk

    Learning material

    MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
    Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
    Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
    Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
    Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
    Föreläsningar på Moodle

    NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
    Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
    Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
    Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
    Föreläsningar på Moodle

    HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
    Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
    Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
    Material på Moodle.

    SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
    Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.

    Övrigt:
    Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.

    Referenslitteratur:
    Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
    Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
    Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.

    Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

    Learning methods

    Lectures
    Self-studies
    Workshops (case & practice)

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
    Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
    MSK: Tent bedöms 0-5
    Neuro: Quiz x 2 bedöms 0-5
    Sinnesorganen: Quiz bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    31.03.2025 - 04.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 24.03.2025

    Group(s)
    • USS24F-V
    Seats

    10 - 50

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Small group(s)
    • Grupp 1 (Size: 20.
    • Grupp 2 (Size: 20.
    Teachers and responsibilities

    Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

    Additional information

    Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture

    Mandatory attendance at workshops.

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    3.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Validation according to Novia instructions.

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:

    Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (0-5)
    Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
    Korsord (reuma och atros) (0-5)
    Stroke (kort tent före med workshop) (0-5)
    Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
    Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
    Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

    Timing and attendance

    Novia Vaasa, Alere
    Spring 2025

    Student's schedule and workload

    27 h/sp = 135 h
    Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
    - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
    - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
    - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
    - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp

    4+2+2 h online

    Neuro:
    5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro.
    5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro.

    MSK:
    4 h Workshop, MSK-bedömning & case

    Sinnesorganen:
    4 h Workshop. Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro.
    4 h Workshop. Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro.

    Hematologi:
    Självstudier (not translated)

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Written exam: points < 50%

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Written exam: points 70%-89%

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%