•   Palliative Care and Care in the Final Stages of Life VÅV22KV05-3007 07.01.2025-07.02.2025  2 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student:
    - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
    - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
    - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
    - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
    - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
    - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
    - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.
    Prerequisites
    VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
    VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
    VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
    Content of the study unit
    The basics of palliative care
    Pain and symptom treatment
    Holistic support for patients and relatives
    Interaction and encounters
    Care in the final stages of life
    Care of the deceased
    Ethics and law
    Interprofessional teamwork
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Marica Hinders

    Learning material

    Recommended literature in Moodle

    Learning methods

    Introduction lecture - compulsory
    Work shop -Escape Game- Compulsory

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Återkoppling på uppgifterna erhålls genom bedömningskriterier, mer detaljerad motivering erhålls vid kontakt med kursens lärare.

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    07.01.2025 - 07.02.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

    Group(s)
    • UBM23D-V
    • UHV23D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Individual case study
    Online Exam

    Timing and attendance

    Spring 2024 7.1-7.2

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 c =27h
    2 c =54

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject
    Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.