•   Pediatric Care VÅV22KV11-3006 10.03.2025-20.04.2025  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student:
    - can in their care work apply their knowledge of the most central diseases in children and young people
    - has knowledge of and understands the importance of child and family-centered care
    - can apply knowledge in pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
    - can identify, evaluate and care for children and young people's pain
    - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and young people
    - can in the care of people with disabilities or handicaps apply their knowledge of the most central disabilities or handicaps
    Prerequisites
    VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
    VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
    VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
    VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
    Content of the study unit
    Central diseases in children and adolescents
    Central disabilities and handicaps
    Child and family-centered care
    Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
    Pain
    Simulation exercises
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Criteria for evaluation of the examination
    The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Anita Ståhl-Levón

    Learning material

    Selected parts from:
    Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
    Kristensson Hallström, I & Derwig, M. 2023. (red.)Tredje upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
    Patriksson, K. & Wigert, H. (red.) 2024. Omvårdnad för barn och unga - på avancerad nivå. Studentlitteratur, Lund
    Renko, M., Niinikoski, S., & Palmu, S. (toim.) 2023.7., 7 uudistettu painos. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
    Evidensbaserade vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv
    Åhörarkopior

    Learning methods

    Lectures, individual assignments, group work
    Care planning
    Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
    Current DVD movies
    DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Graduscale 0 - 5
    Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    10.03.2025 - 20.04.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025

    Group(s)
    • USS23F-V
    Seats

    10 - 45

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Small group(s)
    • Grupp 1 (Size: 20.
    • Grupp 2 (Size: 20.
    Teachers and responsibilities

    Anita Ståhl-Levón

    Additional information

    In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform

    The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform



    Children's health care 1.5 cr

    Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr

    Children's medicine account 0.5 credits

    Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 cr

    Functional variations in children 0,5 cr

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    1.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Children's healthcare 1,5 credits - exam
    Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
    Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
    Functional variations in children 0,5 cr
    Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Examination spring 2025
    Reexamination 1
    Reexamination 2

    Timing and attendance

    Vasa, Alere autumn 2025

    Student's schedule and workload

    27 h/cr

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Criteria for evaluation of the examination
    The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    Criteria for evaluation of the examination
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    Criteria for evaluation of the examination
    The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    Criteria for evaluation of the examination
    The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho