•   Care Assessment and Health Technology VÅV22KV14-3004 21.04.2025-23.05.2025  3 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student:
    - can work in different business environments within healthcare
    - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
    - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
    - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
    - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
    - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective
    Prerequisites
    VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
    Content of the study unit
    Care assessment
    ABCDE evaluation
    Telephone counseling
    Digital consulting
    Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
    Ethics
    Sustainable Development
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    Did not achieve any of the criteria
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Jannica Andtfolk

    Learning material

    Care Assessment:
    Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432

    Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630

    Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974

    Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255

    Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3

    Health technology:

    Nordens välfärdscenter
    https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/

    Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
    https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/

    Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
    https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-

    Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
    https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324

    Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658

    A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z

    Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
    https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

    Learning methods

    lectures, group discussion and seminar

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    1-5

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    21.04.2025 - 23.05.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

    Group(s)
    • UBM23D-V
    • UHV23D-V
    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Rika Levy-Malmberg, Jannica Andtfolk

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.00 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Seminar and assignment
    instruction will be given in Moodle

    Exam dates and retake possibilities

    Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

    Timing and attendance

    Autumn 2024 , Vaasa

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 ECTS= 27 hours

    Content scheduling

    Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
    Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    Did not achieve any of the criteria

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

    In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

    To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.