•   Nursing Assessment in Primary Care VÅV22PV01-3001 07.01.2025-02.02.2025  3 credits  (USS22F-V, ...) +-
    Competence objectives of the study unit
    Student
    - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
    - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate primary care for patients of different ages
    - is prepared to care for patients of different ages in acute primary care
    - has the ability to make decisions and based on them prioritize the patient's care
    - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
    - can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in primary and home care
    Prerequisites
    Education for nurse:
    Basic Care
    Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
    VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
    VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
    VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
    VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

    For DP in Nursing:
    NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
    NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care
    Content of the study unit
    Nursing assessment
    Physical assessment
    ABCD, ISBAR
    Care planning, documentation
    Supervise patients in primary care
    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)
    The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1
    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

    The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.
    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

    Assessment criteria for written work
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)
    Criteria for evaluation of the exam
    The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

    The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.
    Further information
    The language of education is Swedish
    Examination tasks can be written in English
    Only for degree students
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Marica Hinders

    Learning material

    Se Moodle och kursens förverkligande

    Learning methods

    Case studies
    Group work

    Objects, timing and methods of assessment

    Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

    Teaching language

    Swedish

    Timing

    07.01.2025 - 02.02.2025

    Enrollment date range

    02.12.2024 - 06.01.2025

    Group(s)
    • USS22F-V
    • USS22D-V
    Seats

    10 - 25

    Responsible unit

    Faculty of Health and Welfare

    Teachers and responsibilities

    Sirkku Säätelä, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders

    Additional information

    The course is partly online

    Degree Programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Nursing

    RDI share

    0.00 credits

    Share of online studies

    0.50 credits

    Assessment scale

    H-5

    Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

    Compulsory introduction
    Compulsory workshops
    Case studies
    Group work

    Timing and attendance

    Spring 2025
    7.1-2.2

    Student's schedule and workload

    1 cr = 27h
    3cr= 81h

    26h in class
    55h self sudies

    Assessment criteria
    Failed (0)

    The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1

    Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

    The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject. Assessment criteria for assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions but her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate.

    Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

    The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

    Assessment criteria for written assignment:
    The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows sufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

    Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

    The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

    Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
    The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.