First aid (2 cr)
Code: RBA22VG01-3001
General information
Enrollment
01.12.2022 - 16.01.2023
Timing
16.01.2023 - 19.02.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
2 op
Virtual portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
50 % Contact teaching, 50 % Distance learning
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy
- Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist
Teachers
- Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Teacher in charge
Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn
Groups
-
UBA22D-VBioanalytiker (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa
-
URS22D-VRöntgenskötare (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
The students
- are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
- are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.
Content
First aid
Health care in case of emergency
Materials
Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Teaching methods
Lessons, demonstration, practice
Completion alternatives
Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time
Further information
Compulsory attendance at all lessons
You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples
Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples
Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
Assessment methods and criteria
Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct
Qualifications
None