Studieguide

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Innehåll

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Tid och plats

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Course examination 19.02 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Underkänd (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Förkunskapskrav

Biochemistry

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Innehåll

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Tid och plats

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Murphy, Srivastava, and Deans. Clinical Biochemistry. Elsevier
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Course examination 26.03.2025
Re-examination 09.05.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Underkänd (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Förkunskapskrav

Biochemistry

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in the process of laboratory tests and biochemical methodology
- can perform laboratory tests using different methods
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field.
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Biochemical tests using laboratory apparatus
Near patient tests

Tid och plats

Autumn 2024 - Spring 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).

Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).

EKGs / ECGs, BarCharts, Inc. (2012).

Green, Jacqueline M., and Anthony J. Chiaramida. 12-Lead EKG Confidence : A Step-By-Step Guide (2014).
_______________________________________________________________________
FIN:
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021), Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)

Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)

SWE:
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014), Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.

Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (2014). Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U.

Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.

Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

Undervisningsmetoder

Laborationer, föreläsning, demonstrationer, individuellt arbete, grupparbete.

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Övningar i laboration: GK / UK
Praktiska tenter eller filmskapande
Godkända uppgifter: Lab-rapporter, arbetsblad, övningsuppgifter

Periodisering av innehållet

Autumn 2024 ~3 sp (27h x3 = 81h)
 EKG
 Urine and microscopy: Urilux-S & Clinitec Advantus
 POC-tests
 Specimens within cytology & histology
+ assignments and laboration reports


Spring 2025 2sp (27h x2 = 54h)
 Indico, Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
 Spirometry
 PEF
 Bloodgas test
 ACL, Coagulation analyzer
+ assignments and laboration reports

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Mandatory attendance at Campus.

Förkunskapskrav: Grunder i bioanalytik & Bioanalytikens grunder 2, studeranden ska ha kunskapen att självständigt utföra kapillär- och venprovtagning.

Denna kurs är en förutsättning till praktiken vid klinisk kemi och sekret laboratorium.

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Förkunskapskrav

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Lärandemål

The students
- have basic insights into biomedical laboratory science and its relation to other sciences.
- have basic insights into professional and legal ethics.
- develop an ethical approach and works for a sustainable professional activity
- have basic insights into quality improvement in the biomedical laboratory

Innehåll

Essential components of Biomedical laboratory science
Ethical aspects and visions for the future
Quality management within the professional field
Sustainable aspects of the work

Tid och plats

Våren och hösten 2025

Undervisningsmetoder

Föreläsningar online

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Kursens syfte är att ge en inblick i etik kopplat till laboratorieverksamheten.
Kursen syftar även till att ge kunskap om patientnära verksamhet, preanalytiska, analytiska och postanalytiska faser samt provtagningsmetodik med betoning på hygien och smittspridning.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

No prerequisites

Tilläggsuppgifter

The language of the course, examination and the literature is English

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
- are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
- are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
- consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

Innehåll

Molecular biological methods
Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Tid och plats

Laboratory work in electrophoresis Spring 2025, according to schedule
Laboratory work in molecular biology Spring 2026, according to schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Laboratory instructions and accompanying theoretical material

Undervisningsmetoder

Laboratory work with documentation, and accompanying theory

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

Laboratory work in electrophoresis and documentation (54 h)
Laboratory work in molecular biology and documentation (54 h)

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

The grade passed require presence during all laboratory work and documentation of the lab work

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Mandatory presence and documentation of the lab work

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Innehåll

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Tid och plats

Fall 2024

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Peate, I. 2015. Medical-Surgical at a Glance.
Dutton, H. & Finch, J. 2018. Acute and Critical Nursing at a Glance.

Undervisningsmetoder

Blended learning
Group work
Individual work
Seminars

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

week 48

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Written assignments
Virtual exam

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

3 x 27 h = 81 h

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

Basic nursing care

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in communication on basic level in Swedish or/and Finnish with patients
- have skills in the the laboratory testing process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations/tests, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into patient safety and quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values

Innehåll

Clinical work practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Undervisningsmetoder

Klinisk laboratorie praktik

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Förkunskapskrav

Clinical Laboratory Methodology
Basic Swedish
Basic Finnish

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying blood cells
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Tid och plats

Hösten 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

Mera material på Moodle.

Undervisningsmetoder

Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, praktiska övningar, individuella uppgifter.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Praktisk tent (mikroskopiering) 2./3.10.2024

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

1 sp Undervisning + individuell uppgift
2 sp Praktiska övningar;
- Utförande och granskning av perifera blodutstryk
- Cellräkning i blod och punktionsvätskor – manuellt (leukocyter, erytrocyter, trombocyter, retikulocyter, eosinofila)
- Användning av Bürkerkammare
- Automatisk cellräknare (B-PVK / -TVK)
- SR-undersökning
- Punktionsvätskor


Praktiska övningar i klass: GK / UK
Praktisk tentamen
Godkända uppgifter

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Kurskrav:
Hematologi 1
Biometodik 1 - Mikroskopi


Kursen är en förutsättning till praktik vid klinisk hematologi laboratorium.

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Förkunskapskrav

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Förkunskapskrav

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Lärandemål

The students
- have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
- understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Hemostaseology
Immunhematology

Tid och plats

Virtuell kurs på Moodle.
Kursen öppen september - oktober 2024.
Tent vid Campus, Alere (obligatorisk närvaro).

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Murphy, M. F. et al., Practical Transfusion Medicine, 2017.

McCullough, J. Transfusion Medicine, 2016.

Reid, M. E., et al. The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 2012.


Finnish red cross, Blood Service: https://www.veripalvelu.fi/en/

SWE:
Gahrton & Juliusson 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
Finlands röda kors blodtjänst. Blod- och plasmaprodukter. Senaste upplaga på FRKB:s hemsida. Helsingfors
Handbok för blodprodukter 2021 (Blodtjänsten)
SPR Blodtjänsten: https://www.blodtjanst.fi/

FIN:
Porkka, Lassila, Remes m fl. 2015. Veritaudit. Duodecim. Helsinki

Undervisningsmetoder

Virtuell kurs (Moodle).
Tent vid Campus, Alere.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Tent på Campus, Alere 21.10. kl. 12-15.

Omtentamen:

Fre 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Fre 13.12.2024 kl. 12-16

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blodgrupper och blodtransfusionskontroll samt laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostas

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Innehåll:
2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blodgrupper och blodtransfusionskontroll samt laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostas


Syftet i kursen är att studeranden:

Har insikter i hemostasmekanismen/koagulationsprocessen.
Har grundläggande insikter i blodgruppsserologi och transfusionsmedicin.
Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
Känner till de vanligaste sjukdomarnas prevention, diagnostisering och behandlingsformer inom kursens tyngdpunktsområden.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Studerande:
Har insikter i koagulationsprocessen och blodtransfusionsläran.
Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar och i undersökningsprocessen i relation till dessa.
Är förtrogen med terminologin inom hemostas och immunhematologi.
Känner till centrala informationskällor inom området.
Förstår betydelsen av hemostas och immunhematologi inom bioanalytik.

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The students
- have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
- understand the principles of the immunological methods.
- command advanced terminology of immunology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

Tid och plats

Campus Alere.
Spring 2025 according to the schedule.

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Martin, Burton and Roitt. Available as ebook.
and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.

Scientific articles
Lecture material

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Course examination on Thursday 13.3.2025 at 09.00 - 11.00am.
Re-examination on Friday 4.4.2025 at 12am-4pm and Friday 25.4.2025 at 12am-4pm.

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr, based on a quiz (pass/fail)
Immunological techniques, 3 cr, exam (graded 0-5)
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr, individual assignment (pass/fail)

Underkänd (0)

Otillräckliga kunskaper i ämnet

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Svaga/försvarliga kunskaper i ämnet

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Goda kunskaper i ämnet

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Utmärkta kunskaper i ämnet

Förkunskapskrav

Immunology

Lärandemål

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.

Innehåll

Medication administration and different medication groups

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The students
- have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
- are able to collect specimens for microbiology
- are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
- have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Microbiological methodology
Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

Tid och plats

9.1.-4.2.2025
Vasa centralsjukhus, B2 mikrobiologi (Fimlab)

Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tillfällen.

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Material ges vi laboratoriet.

Undervisningsmetoder

Laborationer vid Fimlab, B2
Online

Kursuppgift.

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Inga alternativa prestationssätt

Periodisering av innehållet

9.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Basic microbiological testing and sample collection. Classification of bacteria Gram staining overview

13.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

14.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

16.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: - Gram−negative rods - Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

20.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods - Urine culture, sample collection and analysis Remember to bring a urine sample with you!

21.1 kl. 16.-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

27.1 kl. 16–18.30 Lecture: Gram−positive cocci

28.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification of Gram−positive cocci - Throat culture: sample collection and culture

29.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

30.1. kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Gram positive rods, anaerobic bacteria, yeasts, Moraxella, Neisseria and Haemophilus

3.2. kl. 16-18.30 Identification of unknown bacterial strains

4.2. Kl. 16-18.30 Analysis of results and summary

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tillfällen.

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

För godkänt:
- 100% deltagande i tillfällen.
- Godkända övningar på laboratoriet.
- Godkänd kursuppgift.

Förkunskapskrav

Clinical Microbiology, immunology, pathology 1 and 2

Lärandemål

The students
- are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
- understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
- master basic genetic calculations
- master terminology of molecular biology
- have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
- understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

Innehåll

Genes, gene expression and genetics
Terminology of molecular biology
Methods in molecular biology

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle

Undervisningsmetoder

Föreläsninga och övningsuppgifter. Självstudier.

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

3sp innebär 81h studier.
föreläsningar och examination 21 h
självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Mera information på kursens Moodlesidor

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Skriftlig examination och obligatorisk uppgift.
Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5

Underkänd (0)

Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Studerande har goda kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Studerande har utmärka kunskaper inom molekylärbiologi och genetik

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The students
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
- know the basic principles of radiation safety
- know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Use of gamma camera
The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
Nuclear medical pathology
Radiation safety
Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

Tid och plats

According to schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

All the materials can be find at Moodle

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, demonstration, workshop

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

The dates for examination will be find at Moodle

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

27hx3cr = 81h

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Radiationsafety, legislation and regulations: written assignment

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

Anatomy and Physiology

Lärandemål

- has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
- can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in the professional field
- can evaluate the quality of care and be aware of good sustainable choices in the work
- can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
- understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
- is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
- knows the uses of medical radiation
- has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
- has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

Innehåll

Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
Quality development
Patient safety

Tid och plats

According to schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, and instructions for assignments
References:
Jones, K. P., Cachaper, G. A., Danley, K., Morgan, M. K., Maduro, R. S., McGee, G. W., Danley, S. C., & Zimbro, K. S. (2023). Equitable Nurse Assignments Within the Context of Census-Driven Staffing Models. MEDSURG Nursing, 32(2), 101–117.

Riaz, T., Akram, M., Rashid, A., Ansari, R., Laila, U., Bankole, M. M., Kayode, A. A. A., Ozdemir, F. A., Sołowski, G., Alinia-Ahandani, E., Altable, M., Adetuyi, B. O., Akhter, N., Akhtar, N., Ghauri, A. O., Egbuna, C., Sfera, A., & Parmar, P. (2023). Creating culture of safety: Risk management in healthcare and nursing. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 10(8), 15–21.

Brown, C., & Brown, M. (2023). Blood and blood products transfusion errors: what can we do to improve patient safety? British Journal of Nursing, 32(7), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.7.326

LENBURG, C. B., KLEIN, C., ABDUR-RAHMAN, V., SPENCER, T., & BOYER, S. (2009). THE COPA MODEL: A Comprehensive Framework Designed to Promote Quality Care and Competence for Patient Safety. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 30(5), 312–317.

Yilmaztürk, N., Kose, İ., & Cece, S. (2023). The effect of digitalization of nursing forms in ICUs on time and cost. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01333-6

Tuppal, C. P., Vega, P. D., & Tuppal, S. M. P. (2022). Towards a theory of communion‐in‐caring. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(2), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13049

Vasilica, C., Wynn, M., Davis, D., Charnley, K., & Garwood-Cross, L. (2023). The digital future of nursing: making sense of taxonomies and key concepts. British Journal of Nursing, 32(9), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.9.442

Raja, M., Kymre, I. G., Bjerkan, J., Galvin, K. T., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2023). National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults’ dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, workshops and seminar

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Seminar
Radiation safety: on-line examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

1sp= 27h

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

0-5

Underkänd (0)

Did not achive any of the criteria

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.
Radiation safety exam:
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Radiation safety exam:
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

Radiation safety exam:
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Förkunskapskrav

No prerequisites

Lärandemål

the student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Innehåll

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views can give an independent account of the literature understands most of the topic presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject can analyze and interpret subject facts master the subject versatile has a broad grasp of the subject presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

Tid och plats

Hösten 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Material i Moodle


SWE & FIN:

Henriksson, O., & Rasmusson, M. (2018). Fysiologi med relevant anatomi (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Sovijärvi, A., Hartiala, J., Knuuti, J., Laitinen, T., Malmberg, P., & Haapalahti, P. (2018). Kliinisen fysiologian ja isotooppilääketieteen perusteet (Nyaste upplagan). Duodecim.

Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U. (2014). Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Undervisningsmetoder

Lektioner i klassrum
Praktiska övningar
Uppgifter på Moodle
Tentamen

Kursansvarig: Petra Lithén

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Tent 17.10. kl. 15:30-18:30

Omtentamen:
Fre 25.10.2024 kl. 12-16
Fre 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

3 sp = 81h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Obligatorisk närvaro vecka 40.

Kursen innehåller genomgång av de vanligaste fysiologiska och neurofysiologiska funktionsundersökningar och metoder som bioanalytiker utför.

Studerande
- har grundläggande insikter i laboratorieundersökningsprocessens faser vid fysiologiska funktionsundersökningar av kroppens organ och organsystem, såsom hjärta, lungor, gastrointestinalkanal, mm
- har grundläggande insikter i neurofysiologiska funktionsundersökningar av nerver, muskler, ryggmärg och hjärna.
- har grundläggande insikter i patientens helhetsvård och funktionsundersökningarnas metodik
- kan använda för yrket centrala informationskällor och vetenskapliga publikationer rörande metoder, referensvärden, sjukdomsdiagnostik och aktuell forskning inom området.
- har beredskap att utveckla kvaliteten och beakta hållbar utveckling inom bioanalytik.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Utförda uppgifter och tentamen betygsätts 0-5 baserat på resultat.

Förkunskapskrav

Anatomy and Physiology

Lärandemål

The students
- have basic insights into biomedical laboratory science and its relation to other sciences.
- have basic insights into professional and legal ethics.
- develop an ethical approach and works for a sustainable professional activity
- have basic insights into quality improvement in the biomedical laboratory

Innehåll

Essential components of Biomedical laboratory science
Ethical aspects and visions for the future
Quality management within the professional field
Sustainable aspects of the work

Tid och plats

Våren och hösten 2025

Undervisningsmetoder

Föreläsningar online

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Kursens syfte är att ge en inblick i etik kopplat till laboratorieverksamheten.
Kursen syftar även till att ge kunskap om patientnära verksamhet, preanalytiska, analytiska och postanalytiska faser samt provtagningsmetodik med betoning på hygien och smittspridning.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

No prerequisites

Tilläggsuppgifter

The language of the course, examination and the literature is English

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in communication on basic level in Swedish or/and Finnish with patients
- have skills in the the laboratory testing process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations/tests, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into patient safety and quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values

Innehåll

Clinical work practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Undervisningsmetoder

Klinisk laboratorie praktik

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Förkunskapskrav

Clinical Laboratory Methodology
Basic Swedish
Basic Finnish

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
- are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
- are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
- consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

Innehåll

Molecular biological methods
Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Tid och plats

Laboratory work in electrophoresis Spring 2025, according to schedule
Laboratory work in molecular biology Spring 2026, according to schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Laboratory instructions and accompanying theoretical material

Undervisningsmetoder

Laboratory work with documentation, and accompanying theory

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

Laboratory work in electrophoresis and documentation (54 h)
Laboratory work in molecular biology and documentation (54 h)

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

The grade passed require presence during all laboratory work and documentation of the lab work

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Mandatory presence and documentation of the lab work

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Innehåll

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Tid och plats

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Murphy, Srivastava, and Deans. Clinical Biochemistry. Elsevier
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Course examination 26.03.2025
Re-examination 09.05.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Underkänd (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Förkunskapskrav

Biochemistry

Lärandemål

The students
- have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
- understand the principles of the immunological methods.
- command advanced terminology of immunology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

Tid och plats

Campus Alere.
Spring 2025 according to the schedule.

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Martin, Burton and Roitt. Available as ebook.
and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.

Scientific articles
Lecture material

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Course examination on Thursday 13.3.2025 at 09.00 - 11.00am.
Re-examination on Friday 4.4.2025 at 12am-4pm and Friday 25.4.2025 at 12am-4pm.

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr, based on a quiz (pass/fail)
Immunological techniques, 3 cr, exam (graded 0-5)
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr, individual assignment (pass/fail)

Underkänd (0)

Otillräckliga kunskaper i ämnet

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Svaga/försvarliga kunskaper i ämnet

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Goda kunskaper i ämnet

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Utmärkta kunskaper i ämnet

Förkunskapskrav

Immunology

Lärandemål

- has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
- can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in the professional field
- can evaluate the quality of care and be aware of good sustainable choices in the work
- can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
- understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
- is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
- knows the uses of medical radiation
- has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
- has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

Innehåll

Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
Quality development
Patient safety

Tid och plats

According to schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, and instructions for assignments
References:
Jones, K. P., Cachaper, G. A., Danley, K., Morgan, M. K., Maduro, R. S., McGee, G. W., Danley, S. C., & Zimbro, K. S. (2023). Equitable Nurse Assignments Within the Context of Census-Driven Staffing Models. MEDSURG Nursing, 32(2), 101–117.

Riaz, T., Akram, M., Rashid, A., Ansari, R., Laila, U., Bankole, M. M., Kayode, A. A. A., Ozdemir, F. A., Sołowski, G., Alinia-Ahandani, E., Altable, M., Adetuyi, B. O., Akhter, N., Akhtar, N., Ghauri, A. O., Egbuna, C., Sfera, A., & Parmar, P. (2023). Creating culture of safety: Risk management in healthcare and nursing. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 10(8), 15–21.

Brown, C., & Brown, M. (2023). Blood and blood products transfusion errors: what can we do to improve patient safety? British Journal of Nursing, 32(7), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.7.326

LENBURG, C. B., KLEIN, C., ABDUR-RAHMAN, V., SPENCER, T., & BOYER, S. (2009). THE COPA MODEL: A Comprehensive Framework Designed to Promote Quality Care and Competence for Patient Safety. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 30(5), 312–317.

Yilmaztürk, N., Kose, İ., & Cece, S. (2023). The effect of digitalization of nursing forms in ICUs on time and cost. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01333-6

Tuppal, C. P., Vega, P. D., & Tuppal, S. M. P. (2022). Towards a theory of communion‐in‐caring. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(2), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13049

Vasilica, C., Wynn, M., Davis, D., Charnley, K., & Garwood-Cross, L. (2023). The digital future of nursing: making sense of taxonomies and key concepts. British Journal of Nursing, 32(9), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.9.442

Raja, M., Kymre, I. G., Bjerkan, J., Galvin, K. T., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2023). National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults’ dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, workshops and seminar

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Seminar
Radiation safety: on-line examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

1sp= 27h

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

0-5

Underkänd (0)

Did not achive any of the criteria

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.
Radiation safety exam:
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Radiation safety exam:
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

Radiation safety exam:
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Förkunskapskrav

No prerequisites

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Innehåll

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Tid och plats

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Course examination 19.02 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Examination

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Underkänd (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Förkunskapskrav

Biochemistry

Lärandemål

The students
- have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
- are able to collect specimens for microbiology
- are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
- have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Microbiological methodology
Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

Tid och plats

9.1.-4.2.2025
Vasa centralsjukhus, B2 mikrobiologi (Fimlab)

Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tillfällen.

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Material ges vi laboratoriet.

Undervisningsmetoder

Laborationer vid Fimlab, B2
Online

Kursuppgift.

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Inga alternativa prestationssätt

Periodisering av innehållet

9.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Basic microbiological testing and sample collection. Classification of bacteria Gram staining overview

13.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

14.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

16.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: - Gram−negative rods - Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

20.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods - Urine culture, sample collection and analysis Remember to bring a urine sample with you!

21.1 kl. 16.-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

27.1 kl. 16–18.30 Lecture: Gram−positive cocci

28.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification of Gram−positive cocci - Throat culture: sample collection and culture

29.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

30.1. kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Gram positive rods, anaerobic bacteria, yeasts, Moraxella, Neisseria and Haemophilus

3.2. kl. 16-18.30 Identification of unknown bacterial strains

4.2. Kl. 16-18.30 Analysis of results and summary

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tillfällen.

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

För godkänt:
- 100% deltagande i tillfällen.
- Godkända övningar på laboratoriet.
- Godkänd kursuppgift.

Förkunskapskrav

Clinical Microbiology, immunology, pathology 1 and 2

Lärandemål

The students
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
- know the basic principles of radiation safety
- know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Use of gamma camera
The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
Nuclear medical pathology
Radiation safety
Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

Tid och plats

According to schedule

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

All the materials can be find at Moodle

Undervisningsmetoder

Lectures, demonstration, workshop

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

The dates for examination will be find at Moodle

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

27hx3cr = 81h

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Radiationsafety, legislation and regulations: written assignment

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

Anatomy and Physiology

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in the process of laboratory tests and biochemical methodology
- can perform laboratory tests using different methods
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field.
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Biochemical tests using laboratory apparatus
Near patient tests

Tid och plats

Autumn 2024 - Spring 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).

Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).

EKGs / ECGs, BarCharts, Inc. (2012).

Green, Jacqueline M., and Anthony J. Chiaramida. 12-Lead EKG Confidence : A Step-By-Step Guide (2014).
_______________________________________________________________________
FIN:
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021), Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)

Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)

SWE:
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014), Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.

Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (2014). Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U.

Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.

Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

Undervisningsmetoder

Laborationer, föreläsning, demonstrationer, individuellt arbete, grupparbete.

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Övningar i laboration: GK / UK
Praktiska tenter eller filmskapande
Godkända uppgifter: Lab-rapporter, arbetsblad, övningsuppgifter

Periodisering av innehållet

Autumn 2024 ~3 sp (27h x3 = 81h)
 EKG
 Urine and microscopy: Urilux-S & Clinitec Advantus
 POC-tests
 Specimens within cytology & histology
+ assignments and laboration reports


Spring 2025 2sp (27h x2 = 54h)
 Indico, Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
 Spirometry
 PEF
 Bloodgas test
 ACL, Coagulation analyzer
+ assignments and laboration reports

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Mandatory attendance at Campus.

Förkunskapskrav: Grunder i bioanalytik & Bioanalytikens grunder 2, studeranden ska ha kunskapen att självständigt utföra kapillär- och venprovtagning.

Denna kurs är en förutsättning till praktiken vid klinisk kemi och sekret laboratorium.

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Förkunskapskrav

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Lärandemål

The students
- are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
- understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
- master basic genetic calculations
- master terminology of molecular biology
- have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
- understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

Innehåll

Genes, gene expression and genetics
Terminology of molecular biology
Methods in molecular biology

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle

Undervisningsmetoder

Föreläsninga och övningsuppgifter. Självstudier.

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

3sp innebär 81h studier.
föreläsningar och examination 21 h
självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Mera information på kursens Moodlesidor

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Skriftlig examination och obligatorisk uppgift.
Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5

Underkänd (0)

Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Studerande har goda kunskaper i molekylärbiologi och genetik

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Studerande har utmärka kunskaper inom molekylärbiologi och genetik

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Innehåll

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Tid och plats

Fall 2024

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Peate, I. 2015. Medical-Surgical at a Glance.
Dutton, H. & Finch, J. 2018. Acute and Critical Nursing at a Glance.

Undervisningsmetoder

Blended learning
Group work
Individual work
Seminars

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

week 48

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Written assignments
Virtual exam

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

3 x 27 h = 81 h

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

Basic nursing care

Lärandemål

the student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Innehåll

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views can give an independent account of the literature understands most of the topic presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject can analyze and interpret subject facts master the subject versatile has a broad grasp of the subject presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Förkunskapskrav

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Lärandemål

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.

Innehåll

Medication administration and different medication groups

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Förkunskapskrav

None

Lärandemål

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

Tid och plats

Hösten 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Material i Moodle


SWE & FIN:

Henriksson, O., & Rasmusson, M. (2018). Fysiologi med relevant anatomi (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Sovijärvi, A., Hartiala, J., Knuuti, J., Laitinen, T., Malmberg, P., & Haapalahti, P. (2018). Kliinisen fysiologian ja isotooppilääketieteen perusteet (Nyaste upplagan). Duodecim.

Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U. (2014). Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Undervisningsmetoder

Lektioner i klassrum
Praktiska övningar
Uppgifter på Moodle
Tentamen

Kursansvarig: Petra Lithén

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Tent 17.10. kl. 15:30-18:30

Omtentamen:
Fre 25.10.2024 kl. 12-16
Fre 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

3 sp = 81h

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Obligatorisk närvaro vecka 40.

Kursen innehåller genomgång av de vanligaste fysiologiska och neurofysiologiska funktionsundersökningar och metoder som bioanalytiker utför.

Studerande
- har grundläggande insikter i laboratorieundersökningsprocessens faser vid fysiologiska funktionsundersökningar av kroppens organ och organsystem, såsom hjärta, lungor, gastrointestinalkanal, mm
- har grundläggande insikter i neurofysiologiska funktionsundersökningar av nerver, muskler, ryggmärg och hjärna.
- har grundläggande insikter i patientens helhetsvård och funktionsundersökningarnas metodik
- kan använda för yrket centrala informationskällor och vetenskapliga publikationer rörande metoder, referensvärden, sjukdomsdiagnostik och aktuell forskning inom området.
- har beredskap att utveckla kvaliteten och beakta hållbar utveckling inom bioanalytik.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Utförda uppgifter och tentamen betygsätts 0-5 baserat på resultat.

Förkunskapskrav

Anatomy and Physiology

Lärandemål

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying blood cells
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Innehåll

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Tid och plats

Hösten 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

Mera material på Moodle.

Undervisningsmetoder

Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, praktiska övningar, individuella uppgifter.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Praktisk tent (mikroskopiering) 2./3.10.2024

Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

1 sp Undervisning + individuell uppgift
2 sp Praktiska övningar;
- Utförande och granskning av perifera blodutstryk
- Cellräkning i blod och punktionsvätskor – manuellt (leukocyter, erytrocyter, trombocyter, retikulocyter, eosinofila)
- Användning av Bürkerkammare
- Automatisk cellräknare (B-PVK / -TVK)
- SR-undersökning
- Punktionsvätskor


Praktiska övningar i klass: GK / UK
Praktisk tentamen
Godkända uppgifter

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Kurskrav:
Hematologi 1
Biometodik 1 - Mikroskopi


Kursen är en förutsättning till praktik vid klinisk hematologi laboratorium.

Vitsordsskala

Godkänd/Underkänd

Bedömningskriterier, godkänt/underkänt

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Förkunskapskrav

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Lärandemål

The students
- have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
- understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

Innehåll

Hemostaseology
Immunhematology

Tid och plats

Virtuell kurs på Moodle.
Kursen öppen september - oktober 2024.
Tent vid Campus, Alere (obligatorisk närvaro).

Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur

Murphy, M. F. et al., Practical Transfusion Medicine, 2017.

McCullough, J. Transfusion Medicine, 2016.

Reid, M. E., et al. The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 2012.


Finnish red cross, Blood Service: https://www.veripalvelu.fi/en/

SWE:
Gahrton & Juliusson 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
Finlands röda kors blodtjänst. Blod- och plasmaprodukter. Senaste upplaga på FRKB:s hemsida. Helsingfors
Handbok för blodprodukter 2021 (Blodtjänsten)
SPR Blodtjänsten: https://www.blodtjanst.fi/

FIN:
Porkka, Lassila, Remes m fl. 2015. Veritaudit. Duodecim. Helsinki

Undervisningsmetoder

Virtuell kurs (Moodle).
Tent vid Campus, Alere.

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Tent på Campus, Alere 21.10. kl. 12-15.

Omtentamen:

Fre 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Fre 13.12.2024 kl. 12-16

Studerandes tidsanvändning och belastning

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blodgrupper och blodtransfusionskontroll samt laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostas

Tilläggsuppgifter för studerande

Innehåll:
2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blodgrupper och blodtransfusionskontroll samt laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostas


Syftet i kursen är att studeranden:

Har insikter i hemostasmekanismen/koagulationsprocessen.
Har grundläggande insikter i blodgruppsserologi och transfusionsmedicin.
Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar i relation till dessa.
Känner till de vanligaste sjukdomarnas prevention, diagnostisering och behandlingsformer inom kursens tyngdpunktsområden.

Vitsordsskala

H-5

Bedömningskriterier, tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Arviointikriteerit, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Arviointikriteerit, berömliga (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Bedömningsmetoder (förverkligande) och -kriterier (studieperioder/kurser)

Studerande:
Har insikter i koagulationsprocessen och blodtransfusionsläran.
Har grundläggande insikter i kliniska laboratorieundersökningar och i undersökningsprocessen i relation till dessa.
Är förtrogen med terminologin inom hemostas och immunhematologi.
Känner till centrala informationskällor inom området.
Förstår betydelsen av hemostas och immunhematologi inom bioanalytik.

Förkunskapskrav

None