Study Guide

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Materials

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 19.02 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Materials

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Murphy, Srivastava, and Deans. Clinical Biochemistry. Elsevier
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 26.03.2025
Re-examination 09.05.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

The students
- have skills in the process of laboratory tests and biochemical methodology
- can perform laboratory tests using different methods
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field.
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Biochemical tests using laboratory apparatus
Near patient tests

Location and time

Autumn 2024 - Spring 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).

Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).

EKGs / ECGs, BarCharts, Inc. (2012).

Green, Jacqueline M., and Anthony J. Chiaramida. 12-Lead EKG Confidence : A Step-By-Step Guide (2014).
_______________________________________________________________________
FIN:
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021), Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)

Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)

SWE:
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014), Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.

Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (2014). Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U.

Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.

Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class / laboratory work, demonstrations, individual work, groupwork

Completion alternatives

Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam or movie making
Approved assignments

Content scheduling

Autumn 2024 ~3 sp (27h x3 = 81h)
 EKG
 Urine and microscopy: Urilux-S & Clinitec Advantus
 POC-tests
 Specimens within cytology & histology
+ assignments and laboration reports


Spring 2025 2sp (27h x2 = 54h)
 Indico, Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
 Spirometry
 PEF
 Bloodgas test
 ACL, Coagulation analyzer
+ assignments and laboration reports

Further information

Mandatory attendance at Campus.

Prerequisites: Introduction to Bioanalysis & The Basics of Bioanalysis 2, the student manages to collect capillary- and venous blood samples independently.


This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Clinical Chemistry and Urine laboratory.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have basic insights into biomedical laboratory science and its relation to other sciences.
- have basic insights into professional and legal ethics.
- develop an ethical approach and works for a sustainable professional activity
- have basic insights into quality improvement in the biomedical laboratory

Content

Essential components of Biomedical laboratory science
Ethical aspects and visions for the future
Quality management within the professional field
Sustainable aspects of the work

Location and time

Spring and autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures online

Further information

The purpose of the course is to provide an insight into ethics linked to laboratory operations.
The course also aims to provide knowledge about activities close to the patient, pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases as well as sampling methodology with an emphasis on hygiene and the spread of infection.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Further information

The language of the course, examination and the literature is English

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
- are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
- are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
- consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

Content

Molecular biological methods
Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Location and time

Laboratory work in electrophoresis Spring 2025, according to schedule
Laboratory work in molecular biology Spring 2026, according to schedule

Materials

Laboratory instructions and accompanying theoretical material

Teaching methods

Laboratory work with documentation, and accompanying theory

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Completion alternatives

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Student workload

Laboratory work in electrophoresis and documentation (54 h)
Laboratory work in molecular biology and documentation (54 h)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The grade passed require presence during all laboratory work and documentation of the lab work

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Mandatory presence and documentation of the lab work

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Content

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Location and time

Fall 2024

Materials

Peate, I. 2015. Medical-Surgical at a Glance.
Dutton, H. & Finch, J. 2018. Acute and Critical Nursing at a Glance.

Teaching methods

Blended learning
Group work
Individual work
Seminars

Exam schedules

Week 48

Completion alternatives

Written assignments
Virtual exam

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Basic nursing care

Objective

The students
- have skills in communication on basic level in Swedish or/and Finnish with patients
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

Content

Clinical work practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Location and time

Spring 2025
Weeks 14-22

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Fimlab https://fimlab.fi/
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti

Moodle

Teaching methods

Clinical laboratory practice

Completion alternatives

Approved practice.
Mandatory participation in practice seminar at the end of practice.
Approved practice assignments.
Approved documentation in Moodle.

Content scheduling

8 week of clinical practice (37,5 h / week work at the practice organisation + 2,5 h / week selfstudies).
The practice is carried out during weeks 14-22 spring 2025.

Add up 8 weeks from the following:
3 weeks hematology (1 week coagulation, 1 week blood count analyser, 1 week microscopy)
1 week blood bank
5 weeks chemistry
3 weeks microbiology
2 weeks pathology/histology
2 weeks physiology
2 weeks sample collection (i.e. at a health care center)
1 week EKG

Further information

Course requirements:
Finnish
Swedish
Human Physiology and Anatomy 1 & 2
Organic Chemistry
Cell biology
Biomethodology
Hematological Methodology 1 & 2
Biochemical Methodology
Laboratory Methodology 1 & 2
Microbiological Methodology
Clinical Practice: The Basics of Bioanalysis

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Assessment methods and criteria

Mandatory attendance 100%
Approved practice assignments.
Documentation: Work certificate and signed working list.
Mandatory attendance at practice seminar.
Approved practice from clinical supervisor and teacher.

Qualifications

Clinical Laboratory Methodology
Basic Swedish
Basic Finnish

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying blood cells
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Location and time

Autumn 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

More litterature in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class and individual tasks

Exam schedules

Practical exam (microscopy) 2./3.10.2024

Completion alternatives

1 sp Theory + individual task
2 sp Workshops; microscopy of blood cells
- Performing blood smear and microscopic examination
- Manual cell count in blood and body fluids - leukocytes, erythrocytes, thrombocytes, reticulocytes, eosinphils
- Flow cytometry and haematology analyser (B-PVK/-TVK)
- The ESR

Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam
Approved assignments

Content scheduling

1. Major hematology parameters and basic techniques
- Introduction; blood smear; the full blood count and reference ranges.

Microscopic examination:
2. Peripheral blood cells in health and disease
- RBC morphology (normal); an introduction to disease of the RBC
3. White blood cells in health and disease
- Granulocytes; Monocytes; Lymphocytes; Plasma cells
4. Case studies in hematology

Further information

Course requirements:
Hematology 1
Biomethodology 1 - Microscopy



This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Clinical Hematology laboratory.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Location and time

Autumn 2023
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Snyder, L. Michael. Wallach's Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests 2020.
Practical Transfusion Medicine, edited by Michael F. Murphy, et al. 2017.
McCullough, Jeffrey. Transfusion Medicine 2016.

Teaching methods

Clinical practice in class (mandatory attendance), individual tasks, practical exam.

Student workload

2 credits = 54h

Further information

Requirement for attendance:
Hematology 2


This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Blood Bank.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical practice (attendance 100%) in class: pass / fail

Approved assignment and exam

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
- understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

Content

Hemostaseology
Immunhematology

Location and time

Virtual (Moodle) course.
Course is open in september - october 2024.
Exam at Campus, Alere (mandatory attendance).

Materials

Murphy, M. F. et al., Practical Transfusion Medicine, 2017.

McCullough, J. Transfusion Medicine, 2016.

Reid, M. E., et al. The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 2012.


Finnish red cross, Blood Service: https://www.veripalvelu.fi/en/

SWE:
Gahrton & Juliusson 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
Finlands röda kors blodtjänst. Blod- och plasmaprodukter. Senaste upplaga på FRKB:s hemsida. Helsingfors
Handbok för blodprodukter 2021 (Blodtjänsten)
SPR Blodtjänsten: https://www.blodtjanst.fi/

FIN:
Porkka, Lassila, Remes m fl. 2015. Veritaudit. Duodecim. Helsinki

Teaching methods

Virtual (Moodle) course.
Exam at Campus, Alere.

Exam schedules

Exam at Campus, Alere 21.10. kl. 12-15.

Re-exams:

Friday 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Friday 13.12.2024 kl. 12-16

Student workload

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis

Further information

Content:

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis


The purpose of the course is for students to:

- Gain insights into the hemostasis mechanism/coagulation process.
- Acquire fundamental knowledge in blood group serology and transfusion medicine.
- Develop basic understanding of clinical laboratory investigations related to these topics.
- Familiarize themselves with the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment approaches for the most common diseases within the focus areas of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Students:

- Have insights into the coagulation process and blood transfusion theory.
- Possess fundamental knowledge of clinical laboratory investigations and the investigative process related to these.
- Are familiar with the terminology in hemostasis and immunohematology.
- Know central sources of information within this field.
- Understand the significance of hemostasis and immunohematology in clinical laboratory analysis

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
- understand the principles of the immunological methods.
- command advanced terminology of immunology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

Location and time

Campus Alere.
Spring 2025 according to the schedule.

Materials

Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Martin, Burton and Roitt. Available as ebook.
and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.

Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination on Thursday 13.3.2025 at 09.00 - 11.00am.
Re-examination on Friday 4.4.2025 at 12am-4pm and Friday 25.4.2025 at 12am-4pm.

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr, based on a quiz (pass/fail)
Immunological techniques, 3 cr, exam (graded 0-5)
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr, individual assignment (pass/fail)

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Immunology

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Downie, G. 2008. Pharmacology and Medicines Management for Nurses. (4th Ed) London Churchill Livingstone
Berman, A.& Snyder, S. 2016. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. (9th ed) Boston: Pearson. Chapter 35 Medications.
Lapham, R. & Agar, H. 2009. Drug calculations for Nurses. A step-by-step Approach.
Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito. Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. 2009. Safe Pharmacotherapy. National Guide for Pharmacotherapy in Social and Health Care.
http://www.stm.Fi/en/social_andhealth_services/pharmacotherapy
Articles and new research

Teaching methods

Workshops on campus and online
selfstudies and supervised lectures

Exam schedules

Online examination i theory and drug calcuation ( supervised)

Student workload

1 cr = 27 h work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
- are able to collect specimens for microbiology
- are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
- have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Microbiological methodology
Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

Location and time

9.1.-4.2.2025
Vaasa Central Hospital, B2 Microbiology (Fimlab)

Mandatory attendance on every session.

Materials

Lesson material provided at the laboratory.

Teaching methods

Laborations at Fimlab, B2 microbiology
Online

Course assignment.

Employer connections

Fimlab personnel as lecturers and the course is done at Fimlab laboratory.

Completion alternatives

No optional examination form

Student workload

1 credit = 27h
5 credits = 135h of work

Content scheduling

9.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Basic microbiological testing and sample collection. Classification of bacteria Gram staining overview

13.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

14.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

16.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: - Gram−negative rods - Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

20.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods - Urine culture, sample collection and analysis Remember to bring a urine sample with you!

21.1 kl. 16.-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

27.1 kl. 16–18.30 Lecture: Gram−positive cocci

28.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification of Gram−positive cocci - Throat culture: sample collection and culture

29.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

30.1. kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Gram positive rods, anaerobic bacteria, yeasts, Moraxella, Neisseria and Haemophilus

3.2. kl. 16-18.30 Identification of unknown bacterial strains

4.2. Kl. 16-18.30 Analysis of results and summary

Further information

Mandatory attendance on every session.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

For Approved course:
- 100% attendance at sessions.
- Passed laborations at the laboratory.
- Approved course assignment.

Qualifications

Clinical Microbiology, immunology, pathology 1 and 2

Objective

The students
- are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
- understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
- master basic genetic calculations
- master terminology of molecular biology
- have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
- understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

Content

Genes, gene expression and genetics
Terminology of molecular biology
Methods in molecular biology

Materials

Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures and tasks. Self studies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 11.2.2025.
Re-examination 7.3.2025 and 4.4.2025

Student workload

3 cr equals 81 hours of work for the student
lectures and examination 21 h
independent studies and digital educationtools 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
- know the basic principles of radiation safety
- know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Use of gamma camera
The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
Nuclear medical pathology
Radiation safety
Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

- has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
- can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in the professional field
- can evaluate the quality of care and be aware of good sustainable choices in the work
- can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
- understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
- is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
- knows the uses of medical radiation
- has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
- has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

Content

Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
Quality development
Patient safety

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, and instructions for assignments
References:
Jones, K. P., Cachaper, G. A., Danley, K., Morgan, M. K., Maduro, R. S., McGee, G. W., Danley, S. C., & Zimbro, K. S. (2023). Equitable Nurse Assignments Within the Context of Census-Driven Staffing Models. MEDSURG Nursing, 32(2), 101–117.

Riaz, T., Akram, M., Rashid, A., Ansari, R., Laila, U., Bankole, M. M., Kayode, A. A. A., Ozdemir, F. A., Sołowski, G., Alinia-Ahandani, E., Altable, M., Adetuyi, B. O., Akhter, N., Akhtar, N., Ghauri, A. O., Egbuna, C., Sfera, A., & Parmar, P. (2023). Creating culture of safety: Risk management in healthcare and nursing. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 10(8), 15–21.

Brown, C., & Brown, M. (2023). Blood and blood products transfusion errors: what can we do to improve patient safety? British Journal of Nursing, 32(7), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.7.326

LENBURG, C. B., KLEIN, C., ABDUR-RAHMAN, V., SPENCER, T., & BOYER, S. (2009). THE COPA MODEL: A Comprehensive Framework Designed to Promote Quality Care and Competence for Patient Safety. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 30(5), 312–317.

Yilmaztürk, N., Kose, İ., & Cece, S. (2023). The effect of digitalization of nursing forms in ICUs on time and cost. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01333-6

Tuppal, C. P., Vega, P. D., & Tuppal, S. M. P. (2022). Towards a theory of communion‐in‐caring. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(2), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13049

Vasilica, C., Wynn, M., Davis, D., Charnley, K., & Garwood-Cross, L. (2023). The digital future of nursing: making sense of taxonomies and key concepts. British Journal of Nursing, 32(9), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.9.442

Raja, M., Kymre, I. G., Bjerkan, J., Galvin, K. T., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2023). National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults’ dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops and seminar

Completion alternatives

Seminar
Radiation safety: on-line examination

Student workload

1sp= 27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Did not achieve any of the criteria

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Radiation safety exam:
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Radiation safety exam:
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

Radiation safety exam:
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Objective

the student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Materials

Course literature;
Pharmacology and medicines management for nurses, Downie, George ; Mackenzie, Jean ; Williams, Arthur ; Hind, Caroline, 2008
Pharmacology : a 2-in-1 reference for nurses. E-bok
Priff, Nancy ; Harold, Catherine ; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Rang&Dael´s Pharmacology. Dale, M. Maureen ; Rang, H. P. ; Dale, M. M.

Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies

Completion alternatives

Group assignment (0-5)
Examination (0-5)

Student workload

1 c=27 h

Further information

The content is found in Moodle.
Introductions to all parts of the course and to seminars are compulsory, during all other lectures presence is highly recommended.
Use Novia instructions for writing in all assignments.
If the work is not submitted is not presented or not accepted 2 retakes can be taken on general written exam dates.
Registration in time according to Novia instructions is required
Retakes are always at kl 12.00-16.00.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views can give an independent account of the literature understands most of the topic presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject can analyze and interpret subject facts master the subject versatile has a broad grasp of the subject presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

0-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

Location and time

Autumn 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Material on Moodle


SWE & FIN:

Henriksson, O., & Rasmusson, M. (2018). Fysiologi med relevant anatomi (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Sovijärvi, A., Hartiala, J., Knuuti, J., Laitinen, T., Malmberg, P., & Haapalahti, P. (2018). Kliinisen fysiologian ja isotooppilääketieteen perusteet (Nyaste upplagan). Duodecim.

Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U. (2014). Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Teaching methods

Lessons in classrooms
Practical exercises
Assignments on Moodle
Exam

Course responsible teacher: Petra Lithén

Exam schedules

Examination 17.10. kl. 15:30-18:30

Re-take exam:
Fri 25.10.2024 kl. 12-16
Fri 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Student workload

3 sp = 81h

Further information

Mandatory attendance week 40.

In the course we review the common physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods.

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Performed assignments and the course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam.

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

The students
- have basic insights into biomedical laboratory science and its relation to other sciences.
- have basic insights into professional and legal ethics.
- develop an ethical approach and works for a sustainable professional activity
- have basic insights into quality improvement in the biomedical laboratory

Content

Essential components of Biomedical laboratory science
Ethical aspects and visions for the future
Quality management within the professional field
Sustainable aspects of the work

Location and time

Spring and autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures online

Further information

The purpose of the course is to provide an insight into ethics linked to laboratory operations.
The course also aims to provide knowledge about activities close to the patient, pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phases as well as sampling methodology with an emphasis on hygiene and the spread of infection.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Further information

The language of the course, examination and the literature is English

Objective

The students
- have skills in communication on basic level in Swedish or/and Finnish with patients
- have skills in the phases of the laboratory examination process from the preanalytical to the postanalytical, when carrying out laboratory examinations, both in specimen collection and near patient examination.
- are able to meet the need of the patient in the specimen collection process
- are able to establish co-operative and harmonious working relationships with other health professionals
- have the ability to independently evaluate and manage new situations that belong to the area.
- have insights into quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety as well as sustainable development in the laboratory.
- have insights into ethical issues and base their work on work ethical values.

Content

Clinical work practice in specimen collection, clinical biochemistry, clinical hematology, clinical microbiology, clinical physiology and neurophysiology, nuclear medicine, histopathology and cytology, transfusion medicine

Location and time

Spring 2025
Weeks 14-22

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Fimlab https://fimlab.fi/
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti

Moodle

Teaching methods

Clinical laboratory practice

Completion alternatives

Approved practice.
Mandatory participation in practice seminar at the end of practice.
Approved practice assignments.
Approved documentation in Moodle.

Content scheduling

8 week of clinical practice (37,5 h / week work at the practice organisation + 2,5 h / week selfstudies).
The practice is carried out during weeks 14-22 spring 2025.

Add up 8 weeks from the following:
3 weeks hematology (1 week coagulation, 1 week blood count analyser, 1 week microscopy)
1 week blood bank
5 weeks chemistry
3 weeks microbiology
2 weeks pathology/histology
2 weeks physiology
2 weeks sample collection (i.e. at a health care center)
1 week EKG

Further information

Course requirements:
Finnish
Swedish
Human Physiology and Anatomy 1 & 2
Organic Chemistry
Cell biology
Biomethodology
Hematological Methodology 1 & 2
Biochemical Methodology
Laboratory Methodology 1 & 2
Microbiological Methodology
Clinical Practice: The Basics of Bioanalysis

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Follows the time schedule
Has basic knowledge
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team
Is aware of the ethical stand points and guidelines

Assessment methods and criteria

Mandatory attendance 100%
Approved practice assignments.
Documentation: Work certificate and signed working list.
Mandatory attendance at practice seminar.
Approved practice from clinical supervisor and teacher.

Qualifications

Clinical Laboratory Methodology
Basic Swedish
Basic Finnish

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge and skills in molecular biological methods and electrophoresis
- are able to carry out molecular biological laborations according to method descriptions
- are able to carry out agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis based on method descriptions
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications with regard to electrophoretic methods
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and quality improvement
- consider occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work

Content

Molecular biological methods
Agarose and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Location and time

Laboratory work in electrophoresis Spring 2025, according to schedule
Laboratory work in molecular biology Spring 2026, according to schedule

Materials

Laboratory instructions and accompanying theoretical material

Teaching methods

Laboratory work with documentation, and accompanying theory

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Completion alternatives

Mandatory presence at laboratory work
Mandatory documentation of laboratory work

Student workload

Laboratory work in electrophoresis and documentation (54 h)
Laboratory work in molecular biology and documentation (54 h)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The grade passed require presence during all laboratory work and documentation of the lab work

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Mandatory presence and documentation of the lab work

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical metods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Materials

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Murphy, Srivastava, and Deans. Clinical Biochemistry. Elsevier
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 26.03.2025
Re-examination 09.05.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

The students
- have profound knowledge about lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods that are used within clinical diagnostics.
- understand the principles of the immunological methods.
- command advanced terminology of immunology.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the field.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Lymphocytes, antibodies and immunological methods

Location and time

Campus Alere.
Spring 2025 according to the schedule.

Materials

Roitt´s Essential Immunology by Delves, Martin, Burton and Roitt. Available as ebook.
and chapter 10 (pp 155-170) in Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry by Burtis and Bruns, 7th edition published 2015.

Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination on Thursday 13.3.2025 at 09.00 - 11.00am.
Re-examination on Friday 4.4.2025 at 12am-4pm and Friday 25.4.2025 at 12am-4pm.

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

5 cr equals 135 hours of work for the student

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Basic Immunology, 1,5 cr, based on a quiz (pass/fail)
Immunological techniques, 3 cr, exam (graded 0-5)
Immunological techniques in clinical diagnostics, 0,5 cr, individual assignment (pass/fail)

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Immunology

Objective

- has knowledge of and can apply legislation regarding patient safety
- can apply central concepts and methods in quality assurance in the professional field
- can evaluate the quality of care and be aware of good sustainable choices in the work
- can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care
- understands and has insights into the importance of X-ray examinations in patient care
- is familiar with laws and regulations and directives on medical radiation
- knows the uses of medical radiation
- has basic insights and skills regarding radiation and radiation protection and can minimize radiation risks and be responsible for radiation protection aspects in his own work
- has provided the basic training in radiation protection for health professionals as ST Directive 1.7 (Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)

Content

Basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7(Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa)
Quality development
Patient safety

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, and instructions for assignments
References:
Jones, K. P., Cachaper, G. A., Danley, K., Morgan, M. K., Maduro, R. S., McGee, G. W., Danley, S. C., & Zimbro, K. S. (2023). Equitable Nurse Assignments Within the Context of Census-Driven Staffing Models. MEDSURG Nursing, 32(2), 101–117.

Riaz, T., Akram, M., Rashid, A., Ansari, R., Laila, U., Bankole, M. M., Kayode, A. A. A., Ozdemir, F. A., Sołowski, G., Alinia-Ahandani, E., Altable, M., Adetuyi, B. O., Akhter, N., Akhtar, N., Ghauri, A. O., Egbuna, C., Sfera, A., & Parmar, P. (2023). Creating culture of safety: Risk management in healthcare and nursing. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 10(8), 15–21.

Brown, C., & Brown, M. (2023). Blood and blood products transfusion errors: what can we do to improve patient safety? British Journal of Nursing, 32(7), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.7.326

LENBURG, C. B., KLEIN, C., ABDUR-RAHMAN, V., SPENCER, T., & BOYER, S. (2009). THE COPA MODEL: A Comprehensive Framework Designed to Promote Quality Care and Competence for Patient Safety. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 30(5), 312–317.

Yilmaztürk, N., Kose, İ., & Cece, S. (2023). The effect of digitalization of nursing forms in ICUs on time and cost. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01333-6

Tuppal, C. P., Vega, P. D., & Tuppal, S. M. P. (2022). Towards a theory of communion‐in‐caring. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(2), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13049

Vasilica, C., Wynn, M., Davis, D., Charnley, K., & Garwood-Cross, L. (2023). The digital future of nursing: making sense of taxonomies and key concepts. British Journal of Nursing, 32(9), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.9.442

Raja, M., Kymre, I. G., Bjerkan, J., Galvin, K. T., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2023). National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults’ dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops and seminar

Completion alternatives

Seminar
Radiation safety: on-line examination

Student workload

1sp= 27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Did not achieve any of the criteria

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Radiation safety exam:
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Radiation safety exam:
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

Radiation safety exam:
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Objective

The students
- have fundamental knowledge about the analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs, such as the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas and the thyroid, as well as digestive-, reproductive-, and circulatory organs
- are familiar with common metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
- are familiar with preanalytical factors within bioanalysis
- have knowledge of different analytical methods within biochemical bioanalysis
- understand the meaning of laboratory results within biochemical bioanalysis
- master fundamental terminology of clinical biochemistry
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research related to biochemical bioanalysis
- are prepared to improve the quality of and consider sustainable development for bioanalysis

Content

Analysis of biomolecules in connection to diseases in different organs
Metabolic, secretory and hormonal disorders
Terminology

Location and time

Spring 2025 according to the schedule

Materials

Burtis, Ashwood & Burns. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. Saunders
Scientific articles
Lecture material

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 19.02 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2025, 23.05.2025 and 12.09.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written, individual examination and mandatory task
The course is graded 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

Biochemistry

Objective

The students
- have basic knowledge and skills in microbiological methodology and understand its role in the patient's care.
- are able to collect specimens for microbiology
- are able to handle specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods within clinical microbiology.
- have the ability to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are connected to the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent assurance of quality and quality improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety in the laboratory.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Microbiological methodology
Microbiological specimens, specimen culturing, coloring, identification and determination of resistance

Location and time

9.1.-4.2.2025
Vaasa Central Hospital, B2 Microbiology (Fimlab)

Mandatory attendance on every session.

Materials

Lesson material provided at the laboratory.

Teaching methods

Laborations at Fimlab, B2 microbiology
Online

Course assignment.

Employer connections

Fimlab personnel as lecturers and the course is done at Fimlab laboratory.

Completion alternatives

No optional examination form

Student workload

1 credit = 27h
5 credits = 135h of work

Content scheduling

9.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Basic microbiological testing and sample collection. Classification of bacteria Gram staining overview

13.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

14.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: Introduction to the laboratory, lab safety and confidentiality agreement. Gram staining practical (technique and analysis). Handout urine sample collection material and instructions.

16.1 kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: - Gram−negative rods - Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

20.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods - Urine culture, sample collection and analysis Remember to bring a urine sample with you!

21.1 kl. 16.-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

27.1 kl. 16–18.30 Lecture: Gram−positive cocci

28.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Identification of Gram−positive cocci - Throat culture: sample collection and culture

29.1 kl. 16-18.30 Practical class: - Analysis of results and summary

30.1. kl. 15–17.30 Lecture: Gram positive rods, anaerobic bacteria, yeasts, Moraxella, Neisseria and Haemophilus

3.2. kl. 16-18.30 Identification of unknown bacterial strains

4.2. Kl. 16-18.30 Analysis of results and summary

Further information

Mandatory attendance on every session.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

For Approved course:
- 100% attendance at sessions.
- Passed laborations at the laboratory.
- Approved course assignment.

Qualifications

Clinical Microbiology, immunology, pathology 1 and 2

Objective

The students
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- are familiar with nuclear medical pathology.
- know the basic principles of radiation safety
- know the basic principles of using radioactive substances and radiopharmaca.
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Use of gamma camera
The imaging methods in nuclear medicine
Nuclear medical pathology
Radiation safety
Use of radioactive substances and radiopharmaca

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

The students
- have skills in the process of laboratory tests and biochemical methodology
- can perform laboratory tests using different methods
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part of the field.
- have fundamental insights in the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety, as well as sustainable development in the work.
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Biochemical tests using laboratory apparatus
Near patient tests

Location and time

Autumn 2024 - Spring 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

An Introduction to Biomedical Science in Professional and Clinical Practice by Sarah J. Pitt and Jim Cunningham (2009).

Biomedical Sciences: Essential Laboratory Medicine by Raymond Iles , and Suzanne Docherty (2012).

EKGs / ECGs, BarCharts, Inc. (2012).

Green, Jacqueline M., and Anthony J. Chiaramida. 12-Lead EKG Confidence : A Step-By-Step Guide (2014).
_______________________________________________________________________
FIN:
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021), Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)

Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)

SWE:
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014), Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.

Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (2014). Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U.

Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.

Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class / laboratory work, demonstrations, individual work, groupwork

Completion alternatives

Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam or movie making
Approved assignments

Content scheduling

Autumn 2024 ~3 sp (27h x3 = 81h)
 EKG
 Urine and microscopy: Urilux-S & Clinitec Advantus
 POC-tests
 Specimens within cytology & histology
+ assignments and laboration reports


Spring 2025 2sp (27h x2 = 54h)
 Indico, Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
 Spirometry
 PEF
 Bloodgas test
 ACL, Coagulation analyzer
+ assignments and laboration reports

Further information

Mandatory attendance at Campus.

Prerequisites: Introduction to Bioanalysis & The Basics of Bioanalysis 2, the student manages to collect capillary- and venous blood samples independently.


This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Clinical Chemistry and Urine laboratory.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- are familiar with genes, gene expression and genetics
- understand the role of genes in protein synthesis
- master basic genetic calculations
- master terminology of molecular biology
- have knowledge of fundamental methods in molecular biology
- are familiar with the main sources of information related to molecular biology
- understand the importance of molecular biology within bioanalysis

Content

Genes, gene expression and genetics
Terminology of molecular biology
Methods in molecular biology

Materials

Brändén H. Molekylär biologi, 4:e upplagan. Studentlitteratur 2010.
Lordish, Berk, Zipursky, Matsudaira, Baltimore, Darnell. Molecular cell biology. Freeman.
Kristoffersson U. Medicinsk genetik, en introduktion. Studentlitteratur 2014.
Ehinger M. och Ekenstierna L. Bioteknik - från DNA till protein. Studentlitteratur 2008.
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures and tasks. Self studies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 11.2.2025.
Re-examination 7.3.2025 and 4.4.2025

Student workload

3 cr equals 81 hours of work for the student
lectures and examination 21 h
independent studies and digital educationtools 60 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written examination and mandatory task
Course grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of molecular biology and genetics

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Content

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Location and time

Fall 2024

Materials

Peate, I. 2015. Medical-Surgical at a Glance.
Dutton, H. & Finch, J. 2018. Acute and Critical Nursing at a Glance.

Teaching methods

Blended learning
Group work
Individual work
Seminars

Exam schedules

Week 48

Completion alternatives

Written assignments
Virtual exam

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Basic nursing care

Objective

the student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Materials

Course literature;
Pharmacology and medicines management for nurses, Downie, George ; Mackenzie, Jean ; Williams, Arthur ; Hind, Caroline, 2008
Pharmacology : a 2-in-1 reference for nurses. E-bok
Priff, Nancy ; Harold, Catherine ; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Rang&Dael´s Pharmacology. Dale, M. Maureen ; Rang, H. P. ; Dale, M. M.

Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies

Completion alternatives

Group assignment (0-5)
Examination (0-5)

Student workload

1 c=27 h

Further information

The content is found in Moodle.
Introductions to all parts of the course and to seminars are compulsory, during all other lectures presence is highly recommended.
Use Novia instructions for writing in all assignments.
If the work is not submitted is not presented or not accepted 2 retakes can be taken on general written exam dates.
Registration in time according to Novia instructions is required
Retakes are always at kl 12.00-16.00.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views can give an independent account of the literature understands most of the topic presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject can analyze and interpret subject facts master the subject versatile has a broad grasp of the subject presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

0-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying the number of blood cells and their morphology
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Location and time

Autumn 2023
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Snyder, L. Michael. Wallach's Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests 2020.
Practical Transfusion Medicine, edited by Michael F. Murphy, et al. 2017.
McCullough, Jeffrey. Transfusion Medicine 2016.

Teaching methods

Clinical practice in class (mandatory attendance), individual tasks, practical exam.

Student workload

2 credits = 54h

Further information

Requirement for attendance:
Hematology 2


This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Blood Bank.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical practice (attendance 100%) in class: pass / fail

Approved assignment and exam

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Downie, G. 2008. Pharmacology and Medicines Management for Nurses. (4th Ed) London Churchill Livingstone
Berman, A.& Snyder, S. 2016. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. (9th ed) Boston: Pearson. Chapter 35 Medications.
Lapham, R. & Agar, H. 2009. Drug calculations for Nurses. A step-by-step Approach.
Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito. Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. 2009. Safe Pharmacotherapy. National Guide for Pharmacotherapy in Social and Health Care.
http://www.stm.Fi/en/social_andhealth_services/pharmacotherapy
Articles and new research

Teaching methods

Workshops on campus and online
selfstudies and supervised lectures

Exam schedules

Online examination i theory and drug calcuation ( supervised)

Student workload

1 cr = 27 h work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods

Location and time

Autumn 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

Material on Moodle


SWE & FIN:

Henriksson, O., & Rasmusson, M. (2018). Fysiologi med relevant anatomi (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Sovijärvi, A., Hartiala, J., Knuuti, J., Laitinen, T., Malmberg, P., & Haapalahti, P. (2018). Kliinisen fysiologian ja isotooppilääketieteen perusteet (Nyaste upplagan). Duodecim.

Bjuväng, A., Kjellberg, M., Rehle, H., & Åkesson, U. (2014). Klinisk kemi och klinisk fysiologi: Analyser och undersökningar (Nyaste upplagan). Studentlitteratur AB.

Teaching methods

Lessons in classrooms
Practical exercises
Assignments on Moodle
Exam

Course responsible teacher: Petra Lithén

Exam schedules

Examination 17.10. kl. 15:30-18:30

Re-take exam:
Fri 25.10.2024 kl. 12-16
Fri 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Student workload

3 sp = 81h

Further information

Mandatory attendance week 40.

In the course we review the common physiological and neurophysiological examinations and methods.

The students
- have fundamental insights into the laboratory examination process at physiological examinations of the body's organs and organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, the gastrointestinal channel, etc.
- have fundamental insights into neurophysiologcal examinations of nerves, muscles, spinal cord and brain
- have fundamental insights into patient care.
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods, reference ranges, illness diagnostics and current research within the area.
- are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Performed assignments and the course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam.

Qualifications

Anatomy and Physiology

Objective

The students
- have skills in the laboratory testing process and hematological methods in studying blood cells
- are able to use central sources of information and scientific publications concerning methods in clinical hematology.
- are able to examine, analyze and document laboratory results.
- have the ability to independently manage new situations that are part the field.
- have fundamental insights into the adherent quality assurance and improvement.
- consider security and occupational safety
- be aware of how to make sustainable choices in laboratory work

Content

Hematological methods to study blood cells
Other hematological tests

Location and time

Autumn 2024
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Mandatory attendance.

Materials

Moore, G., Knight, G. & Blann, A. Haematology. 3rd Edition 2021.

Lichtman MA, Shafer MS, Felgar RE, Wang N. 2016. Lichtman's Atlas of Hematology.

Rodak, B. F, Carr, J. H. 2013 Clinical Hematology Atlas. Elsevier Sauders.

Hoffbrand A. V., Moss P. A. H. . 2012 Essential haematology.

Theml H., Diem H., & Haferlach T. 2004. Color Atlas of Hematology - Practical Microscopic and Clinical Diagnosis (https://www.chospab.es/biblioteca/DOCUMENTOS/Color_Atlas_of_Hematology_Practical_and_Clinical_Diagnosis_2004_Thieme.pdf)

O'Connor, B, H. 1984. A Color Atlas and Instruction Manual of Peripheral Blood Cell Morphology. Williams & Wilkins.

More litterature in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical practice in class and individual tasks

Exam schedules

Practical exam (microscopy) 2./3.10.2024

Completion alternatives

1 sp Theory + individual task
2 sp Workshops; microscopy of blood cells
- Performing blood smear and microscopic examination
- Manual cell count in blood and body fluids - leukocytes, erythrocytes, thrombocytes, reticulocytes, eosinphils
- Flow cytometry and haematology analyser (B-PVK/-TVK)
- The ESR

Practice in class: pass or fail
Practical exam
Approved assignments

Content scheduling

1. Major hematology parameters and basic techniques
- Introduction; blood smear; the full blood count and reference ranges.

Microscopic examination:
2. Peripheral blood cells in health and disease
- RBC morphology (normal); an introduction to disease of the RBC
3. White blood cells in health and disease
- Granulocytes; Monocytes; Lymphocytes; Plasma cells
4. Case studies in hematology

Further information

Course requirements:
Hematology 1
Biomethodology 1 - Microscopy



This course is a pre-requisite for attending practice at Clinical Hematology laboratory.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Receives feedback and performs practical tasks under supervision
Follows instructions, considers safety and takes responsibility for her/his own task
Asks questions relevant for the own learning process
Can communicate and work with others people in the team

Qualifications

The Basics of Bioanalysis

Objective

The students
- have insights in the coagulation process and blood transfusion.
- have fundamental insights in laboratory tests work and the working process connected to it.
- are familiar with the main sources of information within the field
- understand the importance of hemostaseology and immunhematology within bioanalysis.

Content

Hemostaseology
Immunhematology

Location and time

Virtual (Moodle) course.
Course is open in september - october 2024.
Exam at Campus, Alere (mandatory attendance).

Materials

Murphy, M. F. et al., Practical Transfusion Medicine, 2017.

McCullough, J. Transfusion Medicine, 2016.

Reid, M. E., et al. The Blood Group Antigen FactsBook, 2012.


Finnish red cross, Blood Service: https://www.veripalvelu.fi/en/

SWE:
Gahrton & Juliusson 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
Finlands röda kors blodtjänst. Blod- och plasmaprodukter. Senaste upplaga på FRKB:s hemsida. Helsingfors
Handbok för blodprodukter 2021 (Blodtjänsten)
SPR Blodtjänsten: https://www.blodtjanst.fi/

FIN:
Porkka, Lassila, Remes m fl. 2015. Veritaudit. Duodecim. Helsinki

Teaching methods

Virtual (Moodle) course.
Exam at Campus, Alere.

Exam schedules

Exam at Campus, Alere 21.10. kl. 12-15.

Re-exams:

Friday 22.11.2024 kl. 12-16

Friday 13.12.2024 kl. 12-16

Student workload

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis

Further information

Content:

2,5 sp (67,5 hours): Blood groups, blood transfusion control, and laboratory investigations related to these topics.
0,5 sp (13,5 hours): Hemostasis


The purpose of the course is for students to:

- Gain insights into the hemostasis mechanism/coagulation process.
- Acquire fundamental knowledge in blood group serology and transfusion medicine.
- Develop basic understanding of clinical laboratory investigations related to these topics.
- Familiarize themselves with the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment approaches for the most common diseases within the focus areas of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Students:

- Have insights into the coagulation process and blood transfusion theory.
- Possess fundamental knowledge of clinical laboratory investigations and the investigative process related to these.
- Are familiar with the terminology in hemostasis and immunohematology.
- Know central sources of information within this field.
- Understand the significance of hemostasis and immunohematology in clinical laboratory analysis

Qualifications

None