Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- is familiar with their university of applied sciences, its teaching methods, use of various platforms, and digital tools
- can conduct basic literature searches using various databases and information retrieval systems
- reflects on the nature of higher education and understands the importance of the personal learning process concerning continuous learning and professional development
- is familiar with their chosen field of study and understands the competence requirements of their future profession
- can communicate effectively both orally and in writing in a clear, structured, and purposeful manner
- understands the principles of academic writing and can apply them in their studies
- can use appropriate referencing systems and follow Novia's academic writing guidelines when reporting and citing sources
- can search for information using various methods and tools and assess the credibility and relevance of sources critically
- is aware of the principles of sustainable development and understands how they apply both within higher education and their professional field
- has a basic understanding of sustainability, including global and systemic perspectives, as well as the difference between linear and circular systems
- can apply sustainability principles within their field and is familiar with how the University of Applied Sciences Novia works with sustainability

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in a higher education context
Social media, data protection, and data security
Use of AI
The importance of the profession
The work areas of nurses, public health nurses, and midwives
Sustainability within the university of applied sciences and the profession
Recipient-friendly writing that follows language guidelines and demonstrates linguistic accuracy
Use of reliable source material and application of source criticism
Evaluation of the credibility, purpose, and relevance of sources, including their timeliness
Development of oral communication and presentation skills in academic and professional contexts
Application of Novia’s writing guidelines for academic assignments and reporting

Qualifications

No prior requisites

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for Evaluation of the Exam
The student demonstrates only a superficial understanding of the subject.

Assessment Criteria for Written Work
The student follows the instructions but shows inadequate familiarity with other students' work. Their knowledge of the subject is limited, though they may grasp some essential aspects.

Despite following the instructions for the written work, the student demonstrates insufficient knowledge of both the subject matter and other students' work, with only a minimal understanding of key concepts.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Evaluation Criteria for the Exam
The student demonstrates the ability to reference relevant literature, critically reflect, and justify their viewpoints effectively.

Assessment Criteria for Written Work
The student follows the given instructions for the written assignment but shows limited engagement with the work of other students. While the student demonstrates an understanding of their own subject matter, the ability to apply knowledge in a broader context is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for Evaluation of the Exam
The student demonstrates in-depth knowledge and a level of maturity that goes beyond traditional expectations.

Criteria for Evaluation of Written Work (Individually or in Groups)
The student follows the instructions for the written work and demonstrates a strong command of the subject matter. They have engaged with other participants' work, can ask relevant questions, and actively contribute to discussions during seminars.

Exceptional written work and participation in opposition may be characterized by outstanding technical execution, a compelling oral presentation, insightful reflections, and an independent approach to the assignment.