Studieguide

Studieperiodens (kursens) lärandemål

The Student:
- can assess and prioritize patients’ care needs based on clinical judgment and evidence-based practice
- utilizes patient-centered guidance methods to support health promotion, self-care, and treatment adherence
- effectively applies a range of digital tools to support nursing assessments and patient education
- demonstrates an understanding of the opportunities and challenges associated with welfare technology solutions in healthcare settings
- engages in ethical reflection on the use of welfare technology, considering both the patient’s and the caregiver’s perspectives
- is capable of planning and documenting nursing care using the Finnish Care Classification (FinCC) system following national guidelines

Studieperiodens (kursens) innehåll

Digital Learning
Digital nursing care: Assessment, counseling, and patient guidance.
Nursing assessment: According to the Finnish classification system.
ABCDE evaluation: A systematic approach to patient assessment.
Healthcare technology innovations: Future and current welfare technology solutions in the healthcare sector.
Use of Terveysportti: Utilizing the Terveysportti platform for healthcare information and resources.

Förkunskapskrav

Evidence Based Nursing and Interaction
Fundamentals of Nursing Care
Human Anatomy and Physiology
Microbiology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases
Medication Management 1
Health Promotion
Medication Management 2
Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
Clinical Nursing and Acute Nursing Care
Perioperative Nursing Care and Radiation Protection

Bedömningskriterier, tillräcklig (1)

Criteria for Evaluation of the Exam
The student demonstrates only a superficial understanding of the subject.

Assessment Criteria for Written Work
The student follows the instructions but shows inadequate familiarity with other students' work. Their knowledge of the subject is limited, though they may grasp some essential aspects.

Despite following the instructions for the written work, the student demonstrates insufficient knowledge of both the subject matter and other students' work, with only a minimal understanding of key concepts.

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Evaluation Criteria for the Exam
The student demonstrates the ability to reference relevant literature, critically reflect, and justify their viewpoints effectively.

Assessment Criteria for Written Work
The student follows the given instructions for the written assignment but shows limited engagement with the work of other students. While the student demonstrates an understanding of their subject matter, the ability to apply knowledge in a broader context is limited.

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Criteria for Evaluation of the Exam
The student demonstrates in-depth knowledge and a level of maturity that goes beyond traditional expectations.

Criteria for Evaluation of Written Work (Individually or in Groups)
The student follows the instructions for the written work and demonstrates a strong command of the subject matter. They have engaged with other participants' work, can ask relevant questions, and actively contribute to discussions during seminars.

Exceptional written work and participation in opposition may be characterized by outstanding technical execution, a compelling oral presentation, insightful reflections, and an independent approach to the assignment.