Hoppa till innehåll

Research- and Development MethodologyPoäng (5 sp)

Kod: NU26DN02

Poäng

5 op

Studieperiodens (kursens) lärandemål

The Student:
- knows the basic concepts of research methodology
- can describe the research and development process and apply its various phases
- understands and can analyze scientific articles
- can apply and evaluate research ethics in research and development activities
- knows different research and development models in nursing research and their application
- can apply the central data collection and analysis methods within their own scientific and professional field
- can write and argue scientifically
- is prepared to, under supervision and gradually more independently, carry out a thesis at the bachelor's level (YH)

Studieperiodens (kursens) innehåll

Research and development process
Research and development models
Principles of research ethics
Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods in nursing research
Scientific writing and reasoning

Förkunskapskrav

Evidence Based Nursing and Interaction
Fundamentals of Nursing Care
Human Anatomy and Physiology
Microbiology, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases
Medication Management 1
Health Promotion
Medication Management 2
Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2

Bedömningskriterier, tillräcklig (1)

Criteria for Evaluation of the Exam
The student demonstrates only a superficial understanding of the subject.

Assessment Criteria for Written Work
The student follows the instructions but shows inadequate familiarity with other students' work. Their knowledge of the subject is limited, though they may grasp some essential aspects.

Despite following the instructions for the written work, the student demonstrates insufficient knowledge of both the subject matter and other students' work, with only a minimal understanding of key concepts.

Bedömningskriterier, goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Evaluation Criteria for the Exam
The student demonstrates the ability to reference relevant literature, critically reflect, and justify their viewpoints effectively.

Assessment Criteria for Written Work
The student follows the given instructions for the written assignment but shows limited engagement with the work of other students. While the student demonstrates an understanding of their subject matter, the ability to apply knowledge in a broader context is limited.

Bedömningskriterier, berömliga (5)

Criteria for Evaluation of the Exam
The student demonstrates in-depth knowledge and a level of maturity that goes beyond traditional expectations.

Criteria for Evaluation of Written Work (Individually or in Groups)
The student follows the instructions for the written work and demonstrates a strong command of the subject matter. They have engaged with other participants' work, can ask relevant questions, and actively contribute to discussions during seminars.

Exceptional written work and participation in opposition may be characterized by outstanding technical execution, a compelling oral presentation, insightful reflections, and an independent approach to the assignment.