Skip to main content

Environmental Impact AssessmentLaajuus (3 cr)

Code: CM22ME01

Credits

3 op

Objective

The student:
- understands the importance of assessing the long term environmental consequences of planning and construction
- knows the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process
- is familiar with different methods of assessing environmental impacts

Content

- the EIA process (Screening, Scoping, Impact analysis, mitigation, report writing, monitoring)
- impact assessment methods
- case studies

Qualifications

No previous knowledge requirements

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments were completed and the student obtained a basic understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments were completed without major remarks and the student obtained a good understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assignments were completed without remarks and the the student obtained an excellent understanding of the course content

Materials

Study material is provided on the moodle course page

Enrollment

15.11.2024 - 09.03.2025

Timing

10.03.2025 - 02.05.2025

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Faculty of Bioeconomy

Teaching languages
  • English
Teachers
  • Stefan Heinänen
  • Anna-Karin Almén
Groups
  • CM24D-E
    Sustainable Coastal Management, full-time studies, 2024

Objective

The student:
- understands the importance of assessing the long term environmental consequences of planning and construction
- knows the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process
- is familiar with different methods of assessing environmental impacts

Content

- the EIA process (Screening, Scoping, Impact analysis, mitigation, report writing, monitoring)
- impact assessment methods
- case studies

Location and time

Period 3, Campus Raseborg

Materials

Provided on moodle during the course

Teaching methods

Lectures and assignments

Exam schedules

During the course

Completion alternatives

assignments and presentations

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments were completed and the student obtained a basic understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments were completed without major remarks and the student obtained a good understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assignments were completed without remarks and the the student obtained an excellent understanding of the course content

Assessment methods and criteria

Graded 1-5 based on the assignments

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

<50% of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

50-59% (=1) or 60-69% (=2) of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments respectively

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

70-79% (=3) or 80-89% (=4) of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments respectively

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

90-100% (=5) of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments respectively

Qualifications

No previous knowledge requirements

Enrollment

15.11.2023 - 08.01.2024

Timing

02.01.2024 - 23.02.2024

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Teaching languages
  • English
Teachers
  • Stefan Heinänen
  • Anna-Karin Almén
Groups
  • CM23D-E
    Sustainable Coastal Management, full-time studies, 2023

Objective

The student:
- understands the importance of assessing the long term environmental consequences of planning and construction
- knows the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process
- is familiar with different methods of assessing environmental impacts

Content

- the EIA process (Screening, Scoping, Impact analysis, mitigation, report writing, monitoring)
- impact assessment methods
- case studies

Location and time

Period 3, Campus Raseborg

Materials

Provided on moodle during the course

Teaching methods

Lectures and assignments

Exam schedules

During the course

Completion alternatives

assignments and presentations

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments were completed and the student obtained a basic understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments were completed without major remarks and the student obtained a good understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assignments were completed without remarks and the the student obtained an excellent understanding of the course content

Assessment methods and criteria

Graded 1-5 based on the assignments

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

<50% of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

50-59% (=1) or 60-69% (=2) of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments respectively

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

70-79% (=3) or 80-89% (=4) of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments respectively

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

90-100% (=5) of the maximum number of credits earned in the assignments respectively

Qualifications

No previous knowledge requirements

Enrollment

01.12.2022 - 08.01.2023

Timing

02.01.2023 - 03.03.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Mode of delivery

Contact teaching

Unit

Faculty of Bioeconomy

Campus

Ekenäs, Raseborgsvägen 9

Teaching languages
  • English
Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Sustainable Coastal Management
Teachers
  • Stefan Heinänen
  • Anna-Karin Almén
Teacher in charge

Stefan Heinänen

Groups
  • CM22D-E
    Sustainable Coastal Management, full-time studies, 2022

Objective

The student:
- understands the importance of assessing the long term environmental consequences of planning and construction
- knows the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process
- is familiar with different methods of assessing environmental impacts

Content

- the EIA process (Screening, Scoping, Impact analysis, mitigation, report writing, monitoring)
- impact assessment methods
- case studies

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The assignments were completed and the student obtained a basic understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The assignments were completed without major remarks and the student obtained a good understanding of the course content

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assignments were completed without remarks and the the student obtained an excellent understanding of the course content

Qualifications

No previous knowledge requirements