Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- has knowledge of the nursing care for the most common cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urological, and nephrological diseases
- can assess nursing care needs and plan, implement, and evaluate care based on evidence-based knowledge
- masters central evidence-based nursing care methods, clinical examinations, and functional assessments
- can perform nursing care planning and documentation according to the Finnish classification system
- can integrate health-promoting and preventive care within internal medical and surgical nursing care
- can guide and support patients in their care and rehabilitation

Content

Nursing care for cardiovascular health issues
Nursing carefor respiratory health issues
Nursing care for gastrointestinal health issues
Nursing care for urological and nephrological health issues
Assessment of care needs, planning, implementation, and evaluation of care
Clinical examinations and functional assessments
Evidence-based nursing care methods and clinical practice, as well as critical thinking
Use of Terveysportti
Prevention of complications and diseases
Patient guidance and patient-centered rehabilitation methods

Qualifications

No prior requisities

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views.

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.