Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- has knowledge of the basic concepts of research methodology
- can describe the research- and development process and apply its various phases
- understands and can analyze scientific articles
- can apply and evaluate research ethics in research- and development activities
- has knowledge of different research and development models in nursing research and their application
- can apply the central data collection and analysis methods within their own scientific and professional field
- can write and argue scientifically
- is prepared to, under supervision and gradually more independently, carry out a thesis at the bachelor's level (YH)

Content

Research- and development process
Research- and development models
Principles of research ethics
Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods in nursing research
Scientific writing and reasoning

Qualifications

VÅ26IN01 Introduction to Higher Education Studies and the Profession

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views.

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional.

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods).

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.