Skip to main content

Nursing Assessment in Specialized HealthcareLaajuus (3 cr)

Code: VÅV22SV01

Credits

3 op

Objective

Student
- can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the specialized healthcare for patients of different ages
- has evidence-based knowledge of the specialized healthcare and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to patients and to their relatives
- is prepared to care for patients of different ages in acute specialized healthcare in the event of various traumas and disasters
- has the ability to make decisions and, based on them, prioritize the patient's specialized healthcare
- can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
- can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in the specialized healthcare
- can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
- can, taking into account the patient's age, perform basic clinical assessment of the patient's vital functions

Content

Nursing assessment
Physical assessment
ABCD, ISBAR
Care planning, documentation
Supervise patients in specialized healthcare

Qualifications

Education for nurse:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Materials

See Moodle and realization plan

Further information

The language of education is Swedish
Examination tasks can be written in English
Only for degree students

Enrollment

02.12.2024 - 06.01.2025

Timing

07.01.2025 - 02.02.2025

Number of ECTS credits allocated

3 op

Virtual portion

1 op

Mode of delivery

67 % Contact teaching, 33 % Distance learning

Unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Teaching languages
  • Svenska
Seats

10 - 40

Degree programmes
  • Degree Programme in Nursing
Teachers
  • Anita Ståhl-Levón
  • Marica Hinders
  • Marice Nedergård
Teacher in charge

Marica Hinders

Scheduling groups
  • Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open UAS: 0.)
Groups
  • USS22F-V
    Sjukskötare (YH), h22, flerform, Vasa
  • USS22D-V
    Sjukskötare (YH), h22, dagstudier, Vasa
Small groups
  • Grupp 1
  • Grupp 2

Objective

Student
- can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the specialized healthcare for patients of different ages
- has evidence-based knowledge of the specialized healthcare and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to patients and to their relatives
- is prepared to care for patients of different ages in acute specialized healthcare in the event of various traumas and disasters
- has the ability to make decisions and, based on them, prioritize the patient's specialized healthcare
- can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
- can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in the specialized healthcare
- can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
- can, taking into account the patient's age, perform basic clinical assessment of the patient's vital functions

Content

Nursing assessment
Physical assessment
ABCD, ISBAR
Care planning, documentation
Supervise patients in specialized healthcare

Location and time

Spring 2025
7.1-2.2

Materials

See Moodle and realization plan

Teaching methods

Case studies
Group work
Simulation

Completion alternatives

Compulsory introduction
Compulsory workshops
Case studies and simulation
Group work

Student workload

1 sp = 27h
3sp= 81h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject. Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions but her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows sufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.

Qualifications

Education for nurse:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Further information

The language of education is Swedish
Examination tasks can be written in English
Only for degree students