Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- is familiar with the history of radiography and radiotherapy
- has a knowledge about different modalities in diagnostic and therapeutic radiography and about radiograhers profession.
- has a knowledge about basic words and concepts
- is familiar with the research field in clinical radiography
- can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
- has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
- has basic skills in interprofessional work
- understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
- understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
- is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health
- has knowledge about AI

Content

General information on different types of radiation
Imaging modalities in X-ray department, radiotherapy and nuclear medicine
Radiographer training
Radiographer's professional competence and fields of work
Clinical radiography as a research field
Health care in Finland
Administrative structures, different service environments and service systems
General laws in social and health care
Interprofessional work
The position and rights of the client/patient
Ethical guidelines and codes
Professional behaviour
Sustainability of the profession
AI

Qualifications

None

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.