Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- can explain the evidence-based information that guides planning, implementation and evaluation of clinical and screening mammography
- can explain the principles of mammography and fluoroscopy examinations and procedures
- has basic knowledge of fluoroscopy techniques and the most common fluoroscopy examinations
- understands the importance of patient guidance in clinical radiographers' work
- can explain the principles of radiation exposure optimization in mammography and fluoroscopy examinations and procedures
- can explain the factors affecting image quality in mammography examinations
- can explain the operating principles of a mammography device based on radiation physics.
- can apply his/her knowledge of quality assurance
- knows the reference doses for mammography

Content

Mammography
Fluoroscopy examinations
Guidance and care

Qualifications

Conventional Radiography and Ultrasound

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)