Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- understands the basics of microbiology and immunology
- has knowledge of preventive care and the care of the most common national and global infectious diseases
- is familiar with the epidemiology of infectious diseases
- has knowledge of various transmission routes to assess and prevent infection risks, as well as isolation
- can guide and support individuals regarding risks and procedures in case of suspected global epidemics and pandemics

Content

Laws and regulations on communicable diseases
The different microbial groups and the most common pathogenic microbes
Microbiota and the immune system in health and disease
Development and consequences of resistant bacteria
Immunization
Own role in antibiotic stewardship
Acute inflammatory response
Current global and national infectious diseases
Transmission routes and infection risks
Isolation, quarantine, and asepsis
Patient guidance

Qualifications

None

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)